Weirdly, as the example of the Zong demonstrates, insuring slaves wasn't actually lucrative for these companies. The assholes who took out such policies also tended to be the type of assholes who killed their own slaves. To make things worse, it's not like great records existed of which slave was which, so policyholders often cashed in when any of their slaves died, whether or not they were the specific person on the insurance form. But the practice still continued right up until the Civil War, with even longstanding insurance companies offering policies until as late as 1856. In 2002, a lawsuit was filed against Aetna, along with other companies, claiming they should pay reparations for their part in slavery. It was dismissed two years later.
97 Comments
jbreeding91
January 25th, 2020 • 25/01/20 • 5:43 am
Any of you guys notice how the main picture is a secret service dude? That was one of the entries, but I guess it got cut in editing.
Now, I have to assume that’s a picture of Margaret Sanger.
Redd
January 25th, 2020 • 25/01/20 • 5:02 am
#1) Environmental laws are still regularly used by racists against minority groups. Laws about environmental noise are used to prevent Muslims from building mosques and sounding the call to prayer.
Laws regulating hazardous waste disposal often just direct it to poor/minority communities or lead to it being exported to the developing world. These communities often lack the money, political connections, etc. needed to prevent hazardous waste sites from being built near them. Developing countries often have weak environmental laws (or regulators who are ineffective or easily bribed) and so large corporations will relocate manufacturing to them so that they can avoid the expense of properly disposing of their toxic waste.
ButtLiquor
January 25th, 2020 • 25/01/20 • 4:59 am
I only know what a "sambo" is from that song from Hair, which is now stuck in my head.