Which Syrians? Very few supporters of either Assad or the PYD would relish rule by the warlords now in control of much of northern Syria, which is what this policy amounts to. Comparisons between Syria & Libya are almost meaningless in any case: the faultlines are so differenthttps://twitter.com/shadihamid/status/1216779646173425664…
-
-
Libya scenario in the sense of having direct US military action against Assad. By Libya scenario, I'm referring to the intervention but also the aftermath of intervention, as I lay out here in more detail:https://www.vox.com/2016/4/5/11363288/libya-intervention-success…
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
I’ve read it- at the time as well- and disagree with your argument for multiple reasons
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
well, that's fine. we don't need to agree :) but that's what I mean by Libya scenario
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Who would you have replaced Assad with in this scenario? How would you have prevented the ethnic & sectarian divisions which Syria possesses but Libya does not spiralling into a post-intervention conflict which the US would now own?
14 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Likely someone he hadn't yet killed?
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Very obviously, the question means "what government imposed by US force of arms would be sufficiently regarded as legitimate by opponents of the rebels (not solely supporters of the regime) to avoid continued conflict the US would be obliged to quell?"
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
None of us, to my knowledge, advocated "a government imposed by US force of arms"
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Then what was the example you take from Libya in the first place? If you mean a NFZ would have been a good thing, that may well be the case, but Libya far outstripped that.
-
-
Replying to @arisroussinos @RashaAlAqeedi
Again, I feel like many of us wrote quite a lot about this in 2012-2015, including in some of the pieces I sent you earlier
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
-
-
-
NFZ ? What ?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-