Welp.
According to ARTBA, structurally deficient bridges account for 178 million crossings per day. These bridges are everywhere, and include notable ones like the Arlington Memorial Bridge (Virginia), the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge (California), the Brooklyn Bridge (New York City), the Pensacola Bay Bridge (Florida), the Robert S. Maestri Bridge (Louisiana), and the Lacey V. Murrow Memorial Bridge (Washington).
By the way, if you live in Ohio or Pennsylvania, congratulations! Those states account for 18% of the country's least-eligible bridges. Have you considered moving to West Virginia? There's literally an entire song about how their roads will get you home.
This situation is compounded by the fact that at the current rate at which we're working on our literally crumbling infrastructure, it's going to take more than 80 years to repair or replace all 47,000 bridges that need it. Fun fact! The average age of a structurally deficient bridge is 62 years. So unless we get off our asses, the bridges we need to repair now will be the only working bridges in the country by the time we've finished.

87 Comments
Sleepmonger
January 13th, 2020 • 13/01/20 • 3:30 am
"school districts that used buses retrofitted with clean air technologies were found to have, on average, higher standardized test scores than districts without."
Unless this study and the one about absenteeism corrected for income, it doesn't show that test scores are related to school buses. It seems likely that districts that can afford to retrofit or replace their buses can also afford to pay more and better teachers in better facilities with better supplies. To make that claim, the study should have been looking at scores before and after the upgrades to each district's buses. That seems so obvious I have to wonder if Cracked misrepresented the study. Likewise, absenteeism is higher in lower income districts for a lot of reasons related to poverty.
1) doesn't only affect workers. Buses and light rail shut down early here, so forget late shopping or seeing a movie that's not a matinee. You can get there if you go at night, but you can't get home unless you leave early.
shmortez
January 13th, 2020 • 13/01/20 • 3:21 am
Imagine the "roads and bridges" we could have if all the spending proposed for "roads and bridges" actually went to "roads and bridges".
SKK
January 13th, 2020 • 13/01/20 • 6:22 am
Gonna come right out and say it:
The freight IS far more important than the riders, when it comes to US supply logistics. If you want us to 'put the people first, not the freight' then we're going to be taking that freight off the rail cars and putting it onto trucks barreling down the interstate.
This is
a) less safe
b) more expensive
c) less efficient
d) more harmful to the environment
Taking all these into account, and the relative number of people traveling by train vs private car or bus on our federally-managed interstate highway system, then passengers are indeed a DISTANT second compared to freight.