Talk:Hounds of Love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Genre?[edit]

Can we all agree that the genre needs to be modified? Simply calling this album 'pop' is insufficient. The cited article uses the term 'progressive pop' (which I think fits better) and art-rock should be added (to describe the second side specifically). 99.229.213.1 (talk) 07:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

No. The AllMusic source says the following:
  • "But Hounds of Love was more carefully crafted as a pop record..."
  • "...and it abounded in memorable melodies and arrangements, the latter re/flecting idioms ranging from orchestrated progressive pop to high-wattage traditional folk..."
  • "Bush never lets the material get too far from its pop trappings and purpose."
  • "...this record [is] wonderfully overpowering as a piece of pop music."
It's clear that when "progressive pop" and "traditional folk" are mentioned, the reviewer is talking about the various song arrangements that can be found on the album. At least one of the songs has a progressive pop arrangement, and at least one of the songs has a traditional folk arrangement. The reviewer is not talking about an overall album genre here. Instead, it's as clear as day that he is enthused about the album being the epitome of pop, the brightest and most brilliant example of pop. Binksternet (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't mean to offend anybody here, but I've never understood the importance to some people of the "correct" music genre to place in the infobox – I'd much rather concentrate on improving the article itself. Over recent months I've added reviews to the reception section and in my sandbox I'm currently working on the track-by-track composition: I really think that this article could (and should) be a GA at some point. Richard3120 (talk) 18:02, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
We have New York Times article. [1] The following:
  • "...she builds upon a long tradition of primarily British (but see also the Canadian Miss Mitchell and the American Captain Beefheart and Frank Zappa for North American variants) tradition of folk-based, elaborate and ornate art-rock."
  • "She also shows a winning sureness in her deployment of minimalist rock textures." -- 115.164.218.81 (talk) 04:58, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I think the NYT source is very clear about its assessment as art rock. That leaves us editors to the task of deciding what is more important, art rock from NYT or pop music from AllMusic. Which one is first? Binksternet (talk) 06:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the art rock genre tag, as the album doesn't contain many elements of rock. Instead, I've replaced it with art pop, something Kate Bush's music is often cited as an example of, and something that better describes the sound of the album. Morfph (talk) 23:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hounds of Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hounds of Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

☑Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

 Done Richard3120 (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Hounds of Love - Language: English[edit]

Don't undo this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hounds_of_Love&type=revision&diff=933920430&oldid=932153983. Hounds of Love is an English language album. 99% of the lyrics are in English, but 1% are in German and Latin; see https://www.metrolyrics.com/hello-earth-lyrics-kate-bush.html and https://www.metrolyrics.com/waking-the-witch-lyrics-kate-bush.html --User123o987name (talk) 19:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)