Keyboard shortcuts are available for common actions and site navigation.
I welcome this improvement but cannot replicate it. See how on this test photo, the top photo is on Twitter web, bottom is the original. Twitter web version continues to wash away color and sharpness. Am I doing something wrong, or expecting too much?pic.twitter.com/UWnMPmYyPZ
Steps to check: 1) if it has orientation set to rotate the image, we will transcode 2) if it is over 4096 in any dimension, we will transcode 3) if it is over 5 MBs, we will transcode 4) if the compression is very inefficient (worse than 1 pixel per byte), we will transcode
If you post again, feel free to send me the Tweet and I can investigate
Ah yes, thank you. It's both 2 and 3. Using a D850 which produces w > 8000 and I export down to 15MB. Seems large but is already compressed coming from 60MB.
wow -- that's quite the source image! If you can drop it down to under 4096x, it should preserve quite beautifully.
Congrats and amazing job! These were actually the important details I was looking for!! So photos of roughly 12MP, and at or under 5 MB won’t have any transcoding when displayed in full? That’s huge. Is there any scenario that would trigger chroma subsampling?
If we trigger a transcode, we will apply chroma subsampling. No transcode will mean no subsampling.
I appreciate your hard work!
Great update
also thank you so much for the details!
I'll check my export settings on Photoshop right away XD
| code wrangler / doc writer | in Vegas | work 
80s movies & whisky![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="73" height="73"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
