Keyboard shortcuts are available for common actions and site navigation.
According to multiple sources, the #Erdogan Gov will be sending Jihadi forces operating under its control in N. #Syria, to fight the Libya National Army in Tripoli. It is unknown how #NATO command will react to one of its members transporting #Jihadists across the #Mediterranean.
![Dick Anderson](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Since I was asked about sources regarding Ankara's decision to send Jihadists (called rebels as well) to Libya, here is at least one well established public source.https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/turkey-send-syrian-rebel-fighters-fight-haftar-libya…
NATO gave the original green light to the same Turkey to send the same Jihadists across the same Mediterranean in 2011 ... but it was from Libya to train your lovely “free Syrian army”. You always think you can limited-use jihadists ... then expect them to somehow disappear?pic.twitter.com/YaFPjFxwZk
NATO didn’t do anything when the flow of fighters and weapons was the opposite direction, from Libya to Syria via Erdogan’s Turkey. NATO’s anchor the U.S. actually facilitated it under Obama, and the jihadists were called rebels. Reverse flow has already begun, with no reaction.
NATO is training, arming, financing Islamist terrorists as well. NATO use islamists in Kosova, Syria, Chechnya and Xincan Uyghur.
It is clear that NATO will NOT react to this (except for some statements of condemnation here and there )
If Turkey’s actions generate war, it will be fully supported by NATO. This is how they can sale weapons and phosphorus. Peace and stability has no financial gain for NATO.
What interest does turkey have in Libya? This seems like such a weird move
Oil & Gas
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="73" height="73"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
