Fantastic blog on his new paper, Servaas Storm takes down the (in)famous paper by Besley and Burgess with replication test that demonstrates the opposite of what they argued. Must read. @CriticalDev @Jayati1609
The Bogus Paper that Gutted Workers’ Rightshttps://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/the-bogus-paper-that-gutted-workers-rights…
-
Show this thread
-
"The paper of Besley and Burgess (2004) thus suffers from fatal errors of omission and commission. The paper, written by two 'useful economists,’ exhibits a gratuitous empiricism in which priors trump evidence…"
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
"The fundamental flimsiness of approach and findings of this body of work stands in stark relief to its more than sweeping, and socially costly, public policy recommendations to abolish pro-worker labor regulation."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
"As the example of Besley and Burgess (2004) illustrates, the social and economic damage caused by wrong-headed policy advice to millions of manufacturing workers can be substantial.”
@sanjaygreddy@mattberkley@andypsumner1 reply 2 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
"what I want to emphasize here is that this high-profile paper is by no means the only one to fail the replication test and/or break down after closer scrutiny. The problem is endemic in economics..."
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
To UK MPs' committee chair, 2003: "economists claim/gains/to poor people without/the price of food...All of the World Bank’s major research conclusions (“Assessing Aid”; “Growth is Good...”; “Globalisation, Growth and Poverty”; and...income inequality) suffer from these flaws."