Huw EdwardsVerified account

Nevertheless, it seems that someone HAS edited that footage.

Yes, the BBC acknowledged that it was edited, for the very simple reason of brevity.

Its not X on Y though, is it Huw? Each time they say its an accident, and each time it happens again. Derisive laughter edited out & replaced with applause, a dither edited out to sound assured, scruffy BoJo replaced with combed BoJo. How many times? & why only in one direction?

Amazing that someone who is paid the GDP of a small country to read an autocue should stick up for the people who pay him amid their blatant facilitating of the Johnson revolution.

One editing gaff can be explained away but two is a conspiracy. You are supposed to be the professionals

“Mr Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: ‘Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action’.”

And yet it has happened twice in the past couple of weeks. It's actually 'crackers' that you're using the 'it couldn't happen here' defence to defend something that is demonstrably true. Someone in BBC is editing footage. Your line of attack here would suggest passive complicity