The word “race,” denoting lineage, comes from a French translation of haras (silent “h”) into the Italian razza — which in Italian of that time applied to animals, not people. This points to current English and Italian usage being derived and adapted, respectively, from the French.
| [ad name=”Adsense160x600_orange”] | A human race is defined as a group of people with certain common inherited features that distinguish them from other groups of people. All men of whatever race are currently classified by the anthropologist or biologist as belonging to the one species, Homo sapiens.This is another way of saying that the differences between human races are not great, even though they may appear so, i.e. black vs white skin. All races of mankind in the world can interbreed because they have so much in common. All races share 99.99+% of the same genetic materials which means that division of race is largely subjective, and that the original 3-5 races were also probably just subjective descriptions as well.
The Major Divisions of the Human RaceMost anthropologists recognize 3 or 4 basic races of man in existence today. These races can be further subdivided into as many as 30 subgroups. Ethnographic division into races from Meyers Konversationslexikon of 1885-90 is listing:
|
Caucasion:
Skull: Dolicephalic(Long-Head),High forehead,Little supraobital development.
Face: Mainly Leptoproscopic( Narrow)Sometimes Meso- or even Euryproscopic, Neither Facial nor alveolar prognathism occurs except among some archaic peoples.
Nose:Long,narrow,high in both root and bridge.
Mongoloid:
Skull: High incidence of Brachycephaly(Short Round Head)
American Indians while Mongoloid are often Dolicephalic.
Foreheads slightly lower than that of the Caucasoid.
No Supraobital development.
Face: Wide and short, projecting cheek bones, Prognathism rare. Shovel shaped incisors common especialy in Asia.
Nose: Mesorine(Low and Broad in both root and bridge.
Negroid:
Skull: usually Dolicephalic, a small minority are Brachycephalic.
Forehead most often high, little supraobital development.
Face: Leproscopic (to a much lesser degree than the Caucasion), Prognathism common in most Negro populations.
Nose: Low & broad in root and bridge with characteristic depression at root.
Another popular division recognizes 4 major races
The world population can be divided into 4 major races, namely white/Caucasian, Mongoloid/Asian, Negroid/Black, and Australoid. This is based on a racial classification made by Carleton S. Coon in 1962. There is no universally accepted classification for “race”, however, and its use has been under fire over the last few decades. The United Nations, in a 1950 statement, opted to “drop the term ‘race’ altogether and speak of “ethnic groups”. In this case, there are more than 5,000 ethnic groups in the world, according to a 1998 study published in the Scientific American.
What is Race?
What is Race? When some people use the “race” they attach a biological meaning, still others use “race” as a socially constructed concept. It is clear that even though race does not have a biological meaning, it does have a social meaning which has been legally constructed.
Biological Construction
By . . .”biological race,” I mean the view of race espoused by Judge Tucker, and still popular today, that there exist natural, physical divisions among humans that are hereditary, reflected in morphology, and roughly but correctly captured by terms like Black, White, and Asian (or Negroid, Caucasoid, and Mongoloid). Under this view, one’s ancestors and epidermis ineluctably determine membership in a genetically defined racial group. The connection between human physiognomy and racial status is concrete; in Judge Tucker’s words, every individual’s race has been “stampt” by nature. . . .Despite the prevalent belief in biological races, overwhelming evidence proves that race is not biological. Biological races like Negroid and Caucasoid simply do not exist. A newly popular argument among several scholars, is that races are wholly illusory, whether as a biological or social concept. Under this thinking, if there is no natural link between faces and races, then no connection exists.
There are no genetic characteristics possessed by all Blacks but not by non- Blacks; similarly, there is no gene or cluster of genes common to all Whites but not to non-Whites. One’s race is not determined by a single gene or gene cluster, as is, for example, sickle cell anemia. Nor are races marked by important differences in gene frequencies, the rates of appearance of certain gene types. The data compiled by various scientists demonstrates, contrary to popular opinion, that intra-group differences exceed inter-group differences. That is, greater genetic variation exists within the populations typically labeled Black and White than between these populations. This finding refutes the supposition that racial divisions reflect fundamental genetic differences.
Notice this does not mean that individuals are genetically indistinguishable from each other, or even that small population groups cannot be genetically differentiated. Small populations, for example the Xhosa or the Basques, share similar gene frequencies. However, differentiation is a function of separation, usually geographic, and occurs in gradations rather than across fractures.. .. . . The notion that humankind can be divided along White, Black, and Yellow lines reveals the social rather than the scientific origin of race. The idea that there exist three races, and that these races are “Caucasoid,” “Negroid,” and “Mongoloid,” is rooted in the European imagination of the Middle Ages, which encompassed only Europe, Africa, and the Near East.. . Nevertheless, the history of science has long been the history of failed efforts to justify these social beliefs. Along the way, various minds tried to fashion practical human typologies along the following physical axes: skin color, hair texture, facial angle, jaw size, cranial capacity, brain mass, frontal lobe mass, brain surface fissures and convolutions, and even body lice. As one scholar notes, “[t]he nineteenth century was a period of exhaustive and–as it turned out–futile search for criteria to define and describe race differences.”. . . Attempts to define racial categories by physical attributes ultimately failed. By 1871, some leading intellectuals had recognized that even using the word “race” “was virtually a confession of ignorance or evil intent.” The genetic studies of the last few decades have only added more nails to the coffin of biological race. Evidence shows that those features usually coded to race, for example, stature, skin color, hair texture, and facial structure, do not correlate strongly with genetic variation. . . The rejection of race in science is now almost complete. In the end, we should embrace historian Barbara Fields’s succinct conclusion with respect to the plausibility of biological races: “Anyone who continues to believe in race as a physical attribute of individuals, despite the now commonplace disclaimers of biologists and geneticists, might as well also believe that Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy are real, and that the earth stands still while the sun moves.”
. . . Unfortunately, few in this society seem prepared to fully relinquish their subscription to notions of biological race.. . .[including the] Congress and the Supreme Court. Congress’ anachronistic understanding of race is exemplified by a 1988 statute that explains that “the term ‘racial group’ means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of physical characteristics or biological descent.” The Supreme Court, although purporting to sever race from biology, also seems incapable of doing so. In Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji, the Court determined that an Arab could recover damages for racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. . . Despite a seeming rejection of biological race, Justice White [stated]: “The Court of Appeals was thus quite right in holding that § 1981, ‘at a minimum,’ reaches discrimination against an individual ‘because he or she is genetically part of an ethnically and physiognomically distinctive subgrouping of homo sapiens.”‘. . . By adopting the lower court’s language of genetics and distinctive subgroupings, Justice White demonstrates the Court’s continued reliance on blood as a metonym for race. . . .In Metrobroadcasting v. FCC, Justice Scalia again reveals the Court’s understanding of race as a matter of blood. During oral argument, Scalia attacked the argument that granting minorities broadcasting licenses would enhance diversity by blasting “the policy as a matter of ‘blood,’ at one point charging that the policy reduced to a question of ‘blood . . . blood, not background and environment.”‘
Social Construction
. . . I define a “race” as a vast group of people loosely bound together by historically contingent, socially significant elements of their morphology and/or ancestry. I argue that race must be understood as a sui generis social phenomenon in which contested systems of meaning serve as the connections between physical features, races, and personal characteristics. In other words, social meanings connect our faces to our souls. Race is neither an essence nor an illusion, but rather an ongoing, contradictory, self-reinforcing process subject to the macro forces of social and political struggle and the micro effects of daily decisions. . . Referents of terms like Black, White, Asian, and Latino are social groups, not genetically distinct branches of humankind.
I seem to remember a forensic study that could tell by examining a persons hair whether they were east Asian, African, or, for lack of a better word, Caucasian. What would that difference be called? Would it be an ethnic difference, a racial difference, or something else?
Another thing, Is this statement a good fact based argument when trying to point out scientific “consensus”?
“Anyone who continues to believe in race as a physical attribute of individuals, despite the now commonplace disclaimers of biologists and geneticists, might as well also believe that Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy are real, and that the earth stands still while the sun moves”
You all are Homo S.
Why is there nothing on brown people (not black) are we just considered an invisible race?
“Black, White, Asian, and Latino are SOCIAL groups, not genetically distinct branches of humankind.”
Brown skin can occur in many societies. There is also olive skin color and reddish skin color. Even with the fairest skin colors there can be a yellow, or pick tint. Would you say they are all considered invisible just because they aren’t mentioned?
True. It seems that the author of the post does not know very much about races. In the first place there are different blood types which describe more punctually race types that belong to the hominoids who are inherently descendants from the ” mother monkey”, and of course those that belong to the A, B AB, O blood types, otherwise Caucasians, Asiatics & Negroid races which are NOT RH Negative blood types do not belong or descent from the “mother monkey”. The only RH negative blood type (which constitute 10 to 15% of the world population (centered and mostly located in Euskara (north of Spain 40% OF THE POPULATION there and other countries of Europe) belong to the RH negative blood type which by the way does not exist in the animal “hominoid kingdom” and is only found in people as mentioned before and does not mix with A, B, AB or O types.. Therefore, all other blood types except the RH negative are “hominoids” descendants from “mother monkey” and therefore common human descendants from “hominoid” sapiens.
From whom do the RH negatives descent from is still a mystery, but according to Basque legends they are descendants from the continent of Atlantis.from which they fled before the sinking and disappearance of the continent. so to explain the rest of the races which include brown skin (not tanned) to explain the rest of these type of ethnic groups are derivatives of the three basic races mentioned at the beginning descendants from “mother monkey”. The world is so currently mobile (mobility, we are in the age of Aquarius, changes and spreading) actually that new types of racial expressions are beginning to arise making our world even more beautiful. The existence of hominoids of the three basic races that have RH negative is considered an inheritance that has been accepted from the RH negative type of female mitochondrial. RH negative son from an RH negative mother will be rejected if the father is NOT RH negative, so both have to be RH negative for the son/.daughter to live. Actually, modern medicine solves these problems but sometimes it is fatal.
There are many documents, books and recent information about this on the web.
There are blue and green eyes in almost every country in the world. Blue eyes are not exclusively from the USA and Europe. Blue, white green & green eyes originate in Afghanistan, & north India, who fled to other places (north to Asia, Australia, South America by sea) during the invasion of the African cannibal many thousands of years ago when Europe did not exist so many of these ancient people fled to save themselves form become a pie.
IF THIS POST DOES NOT APPEAR ON YOUR WEB BLOG YOU ARE BLOCKING MY COMMENT ON PURPOSE.
One example of brown skinned peoples would be mestizo. This would be a mixture of Caucasian and Mongoloid. Native Americans are an Asiatic subgroup just as people from India are a Caucasian subgroup. We are all humans or Homo sapiens.
Why do we hate? We hate because we are taught to hate we hate because we are ignorant we are the product of ignorant people who have been touched ignorant thing which there are four or five races there are not four or five races there is only on race on the face of the earth and we are all part of that race that the human race but we have seperated people separate races so that some of use can see superior to the other we thought it will work i guess but it hasn’t work it has been bad for every won but it time to get over this business there no gene for racism there no gene for bigot your not born in bigot you have to lean how to be a bigot anything you lean you can unlearn it time to unlearn bigotry it time to get over this thing
Hatred, envy, are inherited conditions in our DNA caused by bad chemicals located somewhere in our system (blood) and all these types of dormant actions that emerge from our character.
How do we get rid of them? Very simple., avoid being involved in the harsh discussion activities, bad people who are “toxic”. Do you have any idea why they are called toxic? The same reason why we eat toxic foods our bloodstream gets filled with toxic substances and change our character.
So how do “we” avoid getting toxic is through blood cleansing; by fasting (diets) with water one whole day every week or two times a week, then eating just fruits two days, vegetables two days, then back to normal the diet. the rest of the week and starts again. At the end you turn yourself into a vegetarian and follow Hippocrates and feel better.
exactly what i believe, thanks very much. ? besides, every single person is different thats what makes us all the same, that what being human is about, differences should be celebrated.
There is much much more than skin color that divides the races, After millennia of breeding within their own race, a person will either have been benefited or hindered in their development / evolution. Some people are stronger, faster, have more testosterone and other hormones that affect their inclination to be aggressive to get whatever they need or to breed. Some people are more inclined to reason, to build tools to get what they need and restrict breeding based upon their ability to survive. They are also inclined to explore their habitat in order to expand their possibilities for survival. Intelligence is not equal throughout the races. Examples of this are evident in the inventiveness of a particular group, what technologies they create, the societal structure they create, their art and their sciences. There are particular diseases that affect each race and our modern medicine does not work the same for each race. We are very different in many ways. Yes we can mate and produce offspring, but, then so can ducks and we don’t see just one breed of duck. Ducks follow the rule of nature and breed within their own breed. Apparently we are not as smart as ducks. It may be that we have become so politically correct that we simply ignore nature’s rules, There are some of us that can’t seem to decide which sex we are and have trouble figuring out just who it is we’re supposed to mate with. That’s pretty sad. We have been lead down a politically correct path that can only lead to our demise. Too bad we didn’t listen to mother nature.
You missed the mark a bit there.
You pointed out that, “Intelligence is not equal throughout the races. Examples of this are evident in the inventiveness of a particular group, what technologies they create, the societal structure they create, their art and their sciences”, a statement which in and of itself is a contradiction.
All races have built empires using various sciences, arts and societal structures (pushing advancements forward as a whole), be they white, asian or black.
Suggesting that one group is intellectually superior to the other, based on what you mentioned, ignores history. Your argument is only valid in the context of the era you live in right now. Take a look at history and you’ll find the innovation you seek just about everywhere. The main reason as to why all races are not exactly the same right now is because of the political structures governing each nation, and/or continent and how those structures benefit their politicians in different ways (notice how political structures across Europe, are similar more often than not, same story with Africa, the Americas etc).
Furthermore, your argument concerning diseases is valid mainly in the context of geographical location and things like financial status. Kids in the ghetto are more likely to die of easily treatable diseases than kids in the suburbs, simply because they’re poorer: a fact which is true of people living in France, Thailand and Zimbabwe (those are 3 countries on three different continents, dominated by three different races (white, asian and black respectively)). The FDA doesn’t quarantine foreign nationals for no reason, the same ebola that wiped out millions in Peru and Uganda would’ve done the same to people in Texas had they not treated the tourist before she left the airport (ebola being a virus that appears where there are Jungles and apes).
As far as ignoring nature’s rules goes, I would’ve agreed with you but that isn’t necessarily tied to political correctness on it’s own. If anything that began with being civilized and intelligent, rather than impulsive and instinctual like animals (ducks for example). In not so many words, you’re saying that race mixing is not natural, and that there are white diseases, black diseases and yellow diseases. Telling from your other offensive implications, you sound, quite literally, racist..
Blacks have never built an empire. You are incorrect.
Egyptians and Carthagian, for example
They are not aggressive and sick like other races & ethnic derivations they are just cannibals.
Calling someone “racist” that explains all the fake science and imaginary history you are referencing, without giving examples of course, because there are none.
Truth is what leftists like you call “racist” because you refuse to accept the empirical truth that everything about life on planet earth is hierarchical, and thusly UNEQUAL. Just because Marxists are pushing egalitarian lies to suit their political agenda, does not mean that is true. It is not.
Race is real, IQ’s differ, and most important BEHAVIOR is vastly different. What you are spouting is nothing but fake establishment lies.
As a matter of fact, ducks are racists and belong to the Ku Klux Klan.
The author revealed some ignorance when doubting belief in Santa Claus. Santa Claus is the evolution of the title of Saint Nicholas of Myra. I think he was Turkish and a bishop. Which his relics still remain. He did numbers of good works, said to have had miracles occurs, but is a patron saint of children. Look him up. But his spirit lives on in those who treat children at Christmas.
The Easter Bunny????? I never heard its’ origins. Yet like other things, I suspect there’s an element of truth. Maybe something like groundhog day.
Now on the various races, I’ve seen information that correlates specific diseases associated to race, where one specific disease will attact one set of people, say like lebanese. Genetics may not have all answers. Then science it seems has components with political motivations. True science is interesting. Like knowing cold attracts heat. Bernoulli law is the principle of original flight.
Social situations and other factors determined a lot, but there are some traits that seen to be specific to races. Kind of like hearing experts talk about things they say is impossible, but I’ve seen as well as others.
Getting someone honest and without motives seems to be getting harder. Which real science can carry its own validity.
But just like omitting Santa Claus is a true display of ignorance. Because what you were taught was Santa Claus was wrong, where the things for twisted up doesn’t mean Santa didn’t exist, you simply have to know more about what you’re talking about.
As like Christmas is a holiday. Christs’ mass, is a holy day as Christ was Holy as was his birth. Thanksgiving isn’t a God given holiday, but men made it a holy day, because they survived with plenty, where many who’re seldom mentioned because failure is not a meritous act, died and plenty of them. I’m ships here, or just trying to survive once they got here.
Just good for thought.
Looks like a lot of people that replied below need to go back and read the article again. Totally missed the point and still trying to categorize into certain groups.
religons are big cause of problem human live .
It’s be good not to confuse religion with people.
By saying that, religion is good. But consider, the hard headeded, the jackass, the zealot, the jackass with a motive, the son of pride, at cetera. Or the legalistic and the literalist that knows only what he’s read or been taught. This only scrapes the surface. As there’s people in high places in religions that are infected with these diseases as well as the influence that wield over people or they suck up to who benefits them, where they never overcame the grievious sins that cause conflict. They’re all diseases, the very disease that sent an innocent man who was well liked and loved by many to die.
The zealot, the fascist and every other disease. Empty souls. It’s worse in society, much worse, but I’m religion, there’s the conflict of interest in these things.
Where’s there’s all the do’s and don’ts, but how many have you ever heard preach on the verse of Moses saying, be circumspect in all that I command you! You’re about as likely to hear that as you are about collecting alms for those that need, where there’s those who always try to find a way to avoid their obligation to others. Which too many really need a role reversal in life, where they need meds with side effects, pain, and other things, where with these things they need kindness. The church isn’t to take care of thecworld, but to take care of those within first. But, too often someone is pushed to the side or are not picked to death, where the Government is more Godly than churches. Yet the Government is infected with these diseases as well. So many with self serving motives and agendas.
Lol, look at the military coming back from overseas, I’m not talking about servicemen in safe zones and essentially safe, I’m talking about those that engaged in regular combat. Then instead of reward, they come back and others try to figure out how to use them.
So many call themselves of God and they fail to see that they’re taking Gods’ name upon themselves in vain.
I don’t agree with everything about Mr. Trump, but like he mentioned us sending and using our troops while Europe traps the benefit from our people. As well as Israel and other nations. Let them pay with the blood of their people. Granted we have military that like combat, it’s what they want to do. So let them. But, everything is laid on the U.S., where like Israel, let Israel get some practice in where they have blood hungry soldiers that want to. Let them have at it. Israel is very well established. Where their industry spreads on down into Africa.
Eeeee, I can beat off Tracy easily.
But as said, religion properly understood and put in its’ proper position, it’s good. But man corrupts it. I promise you, it’s man that corrupts religion. Which I suspect is the cause of atheistic professions. Some are from unawareness and immaturity of the professor, as well as poor communication, but man tainting religion is a big influence.
Buddha didn’t tell any lies I know of, where I don’t really more Buddhism as a religion as I haven’t seen any connection to spirits or divinity.
Where it’s probably better to have a homestead in a region with a climate preferable to ones’ self, then surround ones’ self with others that shares values, interests and are loving, kind people and from there one can grow.
Again, Christians are supposed to be God like, it’s called theosis in the Orthodox. Where you want to see God, look at Galatians 5:24. Just look it up and you’ll see it’s all good.
Never forget, be circumspect in all commands.
Which prophecy states that religion would be corrupted with those of empty souls, but there’s still truth of one looks for it.
Y’all have a good one!
Oh, consider medical issues that can cause a person to violate institutional doctrines whether it’s digestive issues, urinary/genital issues or otherwise. Christ would heal such people, Satan desires to damn their souls. Which the infidel also tried to play unawareness against the faithful, where even not acknowledging his master, his master is Satan.
Religion is a problem because it makes people gullible and reduces their ability to think logically. One cannot expect a believer to see this because their capabilities are already lost. Logic has been replaced by faith, which by definition is belief in that which cannot be proved.
I understand the article but the writer totally mischaracterized hamites as being Caucasian. Hamites are black. And even Caucasians are a mixture of Anglo Saxtons (whites) from the Caucus Mountains region who mixed with Asians. This is why they are called Cauc-Asians. But I do agree that we are all one race. Be blessed
It is not Caucus Mountains … It is Caucasus. And thats why they are called Caucasians!
And they are not a mixture. Anglo-Saxons are just one of the kinds that belong to a big category containing all whites – the Caucasians. You will also find the mediterranean whites in there like Greeks, Italians and Spanish.
You couldn’t be more wrong. “Caucasian” is not a combination of “Caucus” and “Asian”. The region referred to is that of the Caucusus mountains. “Caucasian” is the normal adjective derived from it. It has nothing to do with Asian.
As for the Hamites being black, that derives from a misreading of the Hebrew genealogies of the three sons of Noah after the Flood: Shem, Ham and Japheth. They do not correspond to the modern descriptions of the Semitic and Hamitic languages (not races). There is no ‘Japhetic’ language. The Hebrew language, which was the same as that of the Canaanites including the Phoenicians, is classified as Semitic, not Hamitic, although the Biblical genealogies make Canaan a son of Mitzraim, a son of Ham. The Semitic and Hamitic languages are now regarded as two branches of the same language family, called Afroasiatic because it straddles Africa and Asia.
But your real error is in supposing that the Biblical genealogies relate to colour or race. They did not. They related to the geo-political relations of peoples in the region and beyond, not their colour or race. Canaan (the whole of the Levant between Egypt and Asia Minor) was generally under Egyptian control and that is why Canaan was assigned to Ham. The Canaanites were not black, though neither for that matter were the Egyptians, if by ‘black’ you mean akin to sub-Saharan Africans. They were not exactly white, either, which only goes to show how useless those categories are. For the record, those who formulated the three-fold division of humans into Caucusoid, Mongoloid and Negroid, included Levantines and Egyptians among Caucusoids, so even they did not use colour as the basis of their classification.
The purely American use of ‘Caucusoid’ to mean White European is not only fallacious. It is racist.
We are all equal humans, but we cannot say that we don’t have different colors. Any color is the best or the worst, we are all equal and have the same rights. But humans have different ethnics.
I agree. We all should celebrate whatever color or race we are. Political correctness is a numbing agent for great communication between all people.
Some nations, (not races) have not earned a great respect through ancient and current times.
Communication could help them to bring all up to human standards.
There is no scientific point . Science does not support the term race. Race is more of a social product brought on by the need of humans to feel different from and or superior to on another . If one has the need to know who they physically are ; region or area of the earth where their ancestors came from would be a better measuring stick.
On my fathers side ; my grandfather was Irish / Mexican. My grandmother was Native American. On my mothers side;; grandfather and grandmother were from Mexico.
So what does that say about me ? I am a U.S.AMERICAN . Who served America during Vietnam. Who’s father and uncles served during WWII / Korea / Vietnam.
We are ALL human beings and all supposedly related (science – Lucy theory).
there is more genetic difference between the races of humans than there are in entire species of animals… like the Lion and Tiger or dog breeds… you are projecting your desire to destroy every race on Earth. Thats extremely racist.
How about Indians, Arabs, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Middle East? Are they belong to Caucasians? or Semi Mongoloid/Caucasians?
I think that they would go under Caucasian race as it further divides into Hamite and Semite ethnic groups to which most of the Arab and Middle Eastern people belong.
All races are same just difference is due to geographical conditions
Genetically, Dravidians and Sinhalese are closer to Caucasoids than to any of the other races.
https://jaymans.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/global-genetic-distances-map.jpg
The Aryans are closer to the caucasoid, Dravidians are closer to australoids and monogoloids.
I think we should just categorize each other as human.
On some survey I was asked what race I was, I replied “Human”. The interview (it was a human) didn’t like that because it didn’t fit on his form, but that’s the answer I like to give.
I agree with
Race” means separation
You can ignore reality if you choose. However, there are distinct races. The differences can be summed up with this example. If a black patient is give a certain class of drugs, their RBCs will be destroyed, killing them without emergent treatment. The very same class of drugs given to a Caucasian will treat their condition without any deleterious effects.
That isn’t race….you assume all people with caucasian appearing skin and all people appearing with black as you called it (which shows me you didn’t even read the article) require different drugs for the same treatments. I bring to the table ASPIRIN! If race truly determined your genetic abilities, aspirin would kill 4 out of 5 people that took it. You’re not very…..let me dumb it down: sciency.
Blacks in Africa, very dark have the cranial morphology: Mongolian, Caucasian and Negroid. Blue eyes are related to genetic mutation, anyone can have.
Maybe if you want to divide populations, it should be black: normal, natural populations. White: Albinos, highest concentration in Europe and USA. Albino Derivatives: Chinese, Japanese and most of the “white race,” which mixed with the blacks, gained some pigmentation in the hair, skin and eyes.
I have a question plz answer me ?Are Turk people and azerbayjanis mongolian or caucasian????
Someone answer me plzzzz
They are most definetly caucasian and they come from a group called indo-iranians
Go to Amazon.com Search for book: THE NEW ANGRY AMERICAN WOMAN.
CHAPTER VI, WHITE ANGLO-SAXON MALE.
Regardless of classification of three races or 5000 groups this Chapter
will tell you all you need to know about race, etc.
E-mail, Instagram,etc ,to everyone you know and bombard
your Senator & House Member with the following:
The Soc. Sec. System is the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY MONEY IN THE SOC.SEC. SYSTEM!
You don’t believe me? Read Section 200 b of the Act.
Your Congress person will tell you that there is THREE TRILLION DOLLARS
in the account. There isn’t. What there are is Treasury notes on the books, which
means the Government owes THREE TRILLION DOLLARS to the fund and that
amount must be payed back by the AMERICAN TAXPAYERS!
COMPLETE DETAILS are in the book available on Amazon entitled:
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS RUN BY IDIOTS II!
Also is explained how you can retire on $40,000 or more at age 52
when the Government properly invests your current FICA taxes.
CORRECT JIM,
THE GOVERNMENT ARE THE MAIN CROOKS ON EARTH AS I SPEAK. THEY HAVE BORROWED MONIES FROM SOC. SEC. & NEVER PAY IT BACK. THE BLOOD WILL FLOW TO THE HORSES BRIDLE!!!. RECOMPENSE MUST BE PAID!!!
Albino is a birth defect nothing to do with race or ethnicity
I’ve just decided to post this here bcos most of our argument I see as bias…..If according to d bell curve, the Jews and the east Asians are the most intelligent race on earth, why is it then that the ruling parties have always been the Caucasians? Who determine what intelligence is in d first place? if all Africans(negroid) were dumb, why is it then that civilization began from Egypt? If d ancient homo sapiens were originally Africans where then do the Mongoloid and Caucasian from ? and why are they smarter than the negroids, or why are they fairer? someone said bcos they moved to colder regions and do not really need pigmentation, so why are the Arabians not black as they have a very hot climate? and then again how are we sure any of this scientific bullshit are true? who determine what is true or good? the blacks have been tagged with violence yet the white almost wiped out nations…Diversity is d beauty of humans. I don’t believe any race is superior we all just chess piece in d hand of the master, even scientists knows this.
They’re the most intelligent for one reason only, they’re obsessed with education & they have parental task masters. Ask any Jew or East Asian what it was like growing up, & they’ll tell you exactly that.
Remember, Jews are Caucasoid themselves, it’s just that their culture & religion (to which they’re very attached) has an intense focus on education & money. Making them stand out. Israel, an ethnic Jewish state, isn’t exactly superior though, they have a lot of problems & a lower national IQ than most Western nations. So it would seem that Jews particularly thrive in stable Western nations.
Intelligence is not stagnant, the brain is like a muscle. What we could name as ‘Western whites’ are clearly the most well rounded, & are the only sub-race or ethnicity that displays genuine altruism (to their own detriment unfortunately).
Jews are also the Caucasoid group most recently subjected to ‘survival of the fittest.’ It is a characteriestic of human populations that the most intelligent stay out of trouble,and migrants of any group leaving squalor or genocide or poverty will be the most intelligent of that group. If those are the only survivors, then that group will have had their less intelligent ‘weeded’ out, a reasonable conclusion with the Jews you mention. Also, natives of the subcontinent of India have an average IQ of only 80 or so, yet they are Caucasoid. Ironically, they have a reputation for high intelligence in the Americas because the Indian migrants moving there were the most intelligent of that native population, in search of opportunity. Ironically, such migrations are detrimental to the native populations, and open borders accelerate the problem while reducing the chances of recovery of third world countries; there is not enough brain power left to redefine the cultural and national boxes. The third law of genetics is that gene frequency in a population remains constant while gene occurence in individuals is random. When the high intelligence members of a culture are removed, the IQ level is inarguably lowered in those remaining populations.
No Indians are not Caucasoids, their upper caste Hindus are Caucasians from the Indo Aryan race family while some have Scythian ancestry. 17% of Indian males are R1a but just 10% of Indian women have genes from outsiders. 90% Indian women have haplogroups that are indigenous to their land. Even with 10%, thats still a lot Indian women with with genes from the outside. With 17% Indian males also, thats still number wise a lot of Indian men with with Aryan genes.
Genes, you are highly misinformed . Indians are considered caucasians because they have caucasian phenotypes. Indians are a racially diverse people and are mixed with three of the major races. caucasoid, mongoloid and australoid but the main ingredient in indian race is the ARYAN race. The aryan race is a different race from mongoloid, australoid, caucasoid and negroid. Aryan were a very ancient people with a mysterious origin. Read the ancient hindu books like Mahabaratas, ramayan etc and you would be completely amazed about how much we don’t know. ARYANS DO , HOWEVER HAVE THE SAME PHENOTYPE AS THE CAUCASIAN race but they are not the same. Aryans migrated out of india after the drying up of the GREAT SARASWATIE RIVER and intermixed with ancient caucasoid. They became the INDO ARYANS , thats why the mother tongue of all european languages is SANSKRIT an ancient indian language and language of the ARYANS. The caucasian race are descendants of ADAM and they are not white european exclusively. THEY ARE THE HAMITES, SEMITES AND JAPHETITHS. tHE negroid , mongoloid and australoid races are all pre adamic races. All the races have intermingled and intermixed hence the reason for some with exotic appearances. Yes so indians are caucasoids. Elam the son of SHEM a SEMITE is the ancestor of Dravidian indians. The extremely dark indians are indeed a mixture of australoid with larger skulls , broad noses etc.
The same with Brahmans. They believe they are superior because they are intelligent. Its not so. Its because they give so much of importance to education and discipline. They discipline their children imbibing in them a sense of superiority that they do well.. ITS THE TRAINING THAT MATTERS. For example in South India, in Tamil Nadu there is a caste called nadars, who lately became Christians , disciplined their children and made them read and memorize the Bible. Within a span of a generation these people even excelled the Brahmans of South India. If there is racism the parents or the elders are to be blamed. They inculcate such notions in their mind
I have an experience of such a thing as this. Once with a prince of a small kingdoms of pre Independent days in India we were having lunch in a fenced enclave. There was a Brahman boy of eight who was with us whose parents I know. When someone said they enjoy the lunch, the boy said before the days of colonial rule, we would all be outside the fence and he would be inside lunching with the Prince. Who taught him all this?
Western whites are the only ones to display altruism Sam?.. You mean selflessness masked only in interest? Sound like a drone.
Oh & the Egyptians who built up a successful civilization were not Negroids… In fact, they enslaved Negroids.
Not true
Egyptains were and are hemites which is caucasian. Also, they didn’t have that many slvaves as in popular movies and the slaves that they had were various races, not exclusively negroids.
Egyptians are Khemet which stands for black land.
Their origin is in the land of Punt. Today Somalia.
Their dna haplo E is African. their descandents lived survived and walked through the African continent. Egyptians are African type negroid.
“There are many links between ancient Egyptian and modern African culture, ranging from objects such as headrests to hairstyles such as the side lock, and this and other evidence support the idea that it was an African culture in addition to being geographically in Africa. For these reasons Egypt is seen by people of African descent as part of their cultural heritage and history. […] Egypt was an African country, and their artists depicted the Egyptians as Africans, with black skin and tightly curled hair.”
“If we look at the skin colour and also facial features on representations of Egyptians, many are what we would consider today to be Black African.” However, even if “we leave colour aside for a moment, we can also find out a great deal from looking at the facial features shown on Egyptian statues. Here, there can be no doubt that we are dealing with people who were African. Faces were broad with high cheekbones and the jaws are typically strong. The noses are also broad and the lips are generally full and fleshy in appearance.”
It was just discovered the pyramid Egyptian were Europeans not African . Today they are mostly sub Saharan
Whites are not connected culturally or ethnically with Egypt. Whites were only intruders and marauders to Egypt.
The people who were there left a portrait of themselves on the walls, and they are the original Blacks.
And you have, here again, whites over in Egypt , scrubbing away and re-painting in lighter skin tones all over those same walls and making up old artifacts, that they then “discover”.
. If whites were from Egypt, why would you have to keep digging and poking around your own culture ??? Nobody is digging up in Germany, Russia or Poland, because they already know about their culture there.
The pharos were from greece…research it.
Wow whykay, you are SO uneducated and ignorant.
Jews and east Asians are no more intelligent then other people’s.
Caucasians are not the “ruling parties’ .
Civilization , although they had a great and long lasting one, did not start in Egypt. There are many civilizations as old and older.
Ancient Egyptians were not Negroid .
If you don’t know why people became fairer as they moved north ??? What can I say ? Educate yourself at least a little before you show you ignorance on the net.
the ancient egyptian were a mixed race the felt superior to the negroids and the caucasians. learn your history if you look at the materials they used for there hair, it is much similar to what negroids use
Ancient Egyptians were not Negroid .
What is their dna? Any mtdna from Neanderthals? No? Why not?
What is their antropology?
Where do they come from?
Where is the Red race(Amerindians) and Brown race(Malay/Austronesian)?
Red= Mongoloid
Brown= Negroid
What about arabs they don’t fit any of the major groups?
the arab world is in asia.. so technically theyre asians
Just because they are in Asia doesn’t mean they have the physical attributions that would make them part of the Mongolian race.
arab people are caucasian. look it up
Arabs are Caucasian. They have Caucasian skull structure and DNA markers. Stop going by skin color.
Nope! Native Americans have been in the Americas Before there was even a inkling of a mongoloid race, Mongoliods are nothing but decendants of Australoids who left South East Asia, after the migration of the ancestral amerinds into the Americas. the only true races are those who have been isolated as continental breeding populations like the Australian Aborigines, The Native Americans ( North, Central, and South) , Eurasians (West, Central, East and South Asians) there is no Europeans, or a European continent, and African (North and South) . Native Americans are their own race of isolated breeding populations that are more closely related to each other (Ancient and Modern) than anyother race of continental people. and if we are going by head shape all their ancient genetic ancestors were Dolichiocephalic and Caucasoid, not Mongoloid or Flat faces with a short, low nasal bridges, but have browridges, and high prominent nasal bridges, even more than Europoids. Native Americans are not descended from mongoloid Haplogropups, but Ydna Q, nd C, and Mtdna A, B, C, D and X, whitch are only found sporatically in East Asia, but also in West Eurasia for that matter. Native Americans are descendants of a Upper Paleolithic Siberian Meta population that once inhabited West Eurasia, all the way to East Eurasia, that do not exist anymore, except in the Native American populations from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego. For a race of people like NAs who descend from a 250 genetic founders to turn into the tens of millions that populated two separate continents so fully, for them to learn to live off the lands and seas and rivers, for their first language to expand into over 1,000 separate languages as different from Swahili to German, from English to Japanese, or for their initial culture to expand into thousands of different cultures, that tells us that they are a older race of people, that were already here in the Americas, when the first mongoloid East Asian evolved a mere 10,000 years ago from the archaeological record of East Asia. Native Americans have more languages, and culture than Asians or Europeans, and even africans. The only race to tie them are the aborigines , who are also a separate race. The problem with this is that most Americans and western science cant stomach them to be older than Asia or Europe, because it conflicts with their preconcieved notions about Americas past, and the age of the Native American population in the Americas!!
They say that ‘White/Caucasian’, ‘Mongoloid/Asian’,’Negroid/black’ and ‘Australoid’ are four major races or if i use the term of UN, ‘ethnic groups’.I am from India, Here there are people with white complexion but they are not Caucasians.We have people with black or dark complexion but they are not Negroids.All Asians are not Mongoloids.Then why they say ‘Mongoloid/Asian?India is very diverse with people of different ethnic groups.But i strongly believe that no ethnic group is superior…
They never said anything about superiority in the post and those 3 main groups are when the world was in the young since then mixtures have exploded making other groups but they all originated from the 3
Robert,
You are wrong. In the past, you hear only about caucasians,Mongoloid, and Negroids because that was all that was known. Australoids were not know until much much later. Australia was not known until around the beginning of the 19th century, but Australoids were present in the World since the distant past.
I think India is a blend of all the three.
Sp Riggs. Interesting comments. I think what be an interesting study of product or culture would be why caucasians are so receptive to belligerence as evidenced by two devastating world wars, including mass genocide on an unprecedented scale, numerous proxy wars and nuclear arsenals so large that could destroy the world several time over. Now that would be a study worth having. Think of the number of lives that could save in the future including our children.
I don’t think Caucasians are any more receptive to belligerence than any other race. How many people did Mao murder in the “Cultural Revolution”, Pol Pot in Cambodia, and the Japanese in WWII?
This article feels like it has alot of liberal “spin” to it. He talks about exhaustive studies that show no differences between races or that we are 99.99% of the same genetic material, but define “genetic material”. I find it very hard to believe that different groups of people: Negroid, Mongoloid and Caucasians have very different outside appearances, but per this article there are no differences in their mental abilities, behaviors and temperaments??? We don’t see that in the animal kingdom, like dogs for example. Seems different breeds could be raised in the same household (culture), yet have very different temperaments.
I don’t think there is any scientific way to tell how much of a person’s personality is influenced by culture and how much is influenced by genetics. Is it 70/30, 60/40??? I see and hear my very young kids do things that I have never really taught them and which I feel come more from genetics than their surroundings, but again, there is no way to tell.
Ex. statistically, black people commit more crime as a percent of the population. Is that a product of their culture or is there some genetic aspect of it, i.e. lower intelligence or a temperament that is more prone to anger/violence??? I know people will gasp at that, but I don’t think it is out of the realm of possibility. Studies also show that Asians do better on standardized testing vs. blacks and whites. Could it be they are more intelligent or is it a product of their culture? Again, not outside the realm of possibility to think Asians are more intelligent and have more calm temperament. Asian populations don’t seem to have the same negative problems/issues in their country that we have in the USA (serial killers, rapists, gangs, etc.), but I don’t really have data/evidence to support any of that and I’m not an expert on Asian issues, so it’s just my perception.
Is it chicken or the egg? I do find it hard to believe that the problems in the black community are solely due to slavery (150 years ago) or the “white man” or racism. I believe that much of the poverty and issues in the black community are due to black people and their negative attitudes/behaviors. I do think a part of this is culture, but I also believe that there is a genetic factor as well. Either way, it would be great to conduct studies and figure this out, but the liberals and their idiotic liberal ideology would never allow scientists to conduct or even listen to these type studies. But, if I were suffering or my people were suffering, then I would want to know the root cause of the problem as it is the only way to properly fix it.
There is a way to measure how much of a personality or intelligence is genetic and how much is environmental. It’s called a heritability quotient (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability). There’s also plenty of info on environmental factors on IQ. For example, genetic intelligence is going down because unintelligent people tend to have more kids than intelligent people (like in the movie idiocracy), but intelligence is going up because of better education, nutrition, etc. I’m sure you could find lots of information on the IQ and personality traits of different races and cultures too.
why don’t you do a study of why Caucasians are so controlling over the whole earth and it wasn’t even here first scientist going back shows Caucasians was not here first but this is a white American let’s do cultures trying to study to see why the brain of the white man is so controlling and possessive Over Al lmankind.
why not do a study on why non Caucasians blame Caucasians for their own stupid choices? let go of the coattails of slavery 150 yrs ago… all races have equal opportunity, protection and responsibility under the law…
Latoya… let me guess what race you are.
You don’t have to guess, because your you are always the problem, Steve Chambers.
Your kind always wants to look at the so-called problems of other races, but nothing white people do harms anybody else.
So you are telling me White people were bombed, raped, caused to move from their homelands, get arrested for crimes they didn’t commit by Black people? Chinese people? Indian people? Arab people? Which one of these races did that to the entire race of white people?
White men have total domination over this earth. Really Steve? You are a shining example of how you have been perfectly indoctrinated to believe everyone else is a criminal but yourselves.
@MrsLemuria
So you’re saying that It’s white people’s fault that Africans were enslaving each other for over 1000 years BEFORE they started selling their own kind to white people?
Blacks were making slaves of blacks before they even knew white people existed.
Yes. There was plenty of slavery in Africa 1000 years before the America’s were ever discovered – at least as early as the 7th century.
And Chinese had slavery 1000 years before that.
I think you may be the one who has been indoctrinated.
Because they wrote the bible and have used it to create a slave master mentality over 3000 years.
You know Jews wrote the Bible right? And while Hebrew is not a “race” they are a subgroup of Caucasian – similar to Hispanics, or Europeans. The Jews experienced multiple periods of slavery starting with Egypt. Also, the Bible is not one book – it is 66 different books written over a 1500 year time frame, from 40 different authors, in 3 languages, and on 3 continents.
Pretty clever but Hebrews are negroid, not cuacasian. This has been proven scientifically through archaeology, dna and if you ever read the book you would see the book states that fact several times. As far as the Hebrew’s (black’s) correlation to crime and other statistics it is obvious that the mental enslavement perpetuated by media and the social injustices of living in a country that has erased all social and cultural contributions of that ethnicity has taken it’s toll
Actually
“White people” dint create slavery. Slavery as first seen in africa. The idea of slavery came from africa just like civilization.
Whites controlling? Maybe in the last 500 years of recorded history..The Ottomen Turks were pretty controlling for about 600 years..Were they considered white?..The mongols rode out of Mongolia,and conquered parts of Christian Europe for hundreds of years.Were they white and controlling? The Mughals conquered the Indian sub continent,and they weren’t Indian.Were they white and controlling?..The history of mankind is the strong rolling over the weak..Nobody owns anything if they can’t defend it..North America wasn’t some sleepy little hamlet before the Europeans sailed in..There was plenty of WAR between the many tribes here..They massacred each other before they EVER saw a white man
Perfectly said! Over the centuries EVERY SINGLE race/tribe on Earth has had their “turn” behind the slave cart AND every single race/tribe has had their “turn” cracking a whip over a back. Some race had to be the first slaves, but it pre dates written record. Some race also had to be last, and just so happened to be the Blacks. Instead of holding onto slavery, that no black person alive today ever experienced, for dear life… Knowing this you would think that Blacks would be releaved that they wernt alone and that they wernt singled out for slavery and wouldn’t feel oppressed and/or victimized after learning all the races have experienced slavery and some much worse and for way longer. If anything you would think it would forge a bond and bring Blacks closer (on a personal level) to the rest of the races in the world since slavery is a commonality that all of our ancestors share… you would think that Blacks would be thrilled knowing slavery didnt happen to them just because the color of their skin.
It wasnt because of the color. Money and wealth is always the root.
Let us not forget that the Romans took some ancient Britons as slaves. Also that the populations of some villages from the South coast of Ireland and England, disappeared overnight in the 14th and 15th Centuries due to capture of the inhabitants by Islamic Barbary Pirates. These folk were taken for sale in the slave markets of North Africa. Why is I that nobody remembers these innocent people, but only remember the Africans? There were more folk abducted into slavery from England and Ireland, than those “taken” from Africa. In reality those “taken” were sold into slavery by their own tribes, or by opposing tribes who had them as captives. I’ll have to stop now as I think I’m developing a “victim mentality”.
This goes with the old adage, “Have you ever gotten a job from a poverty stricken person?”
What would be your solution if you are right? The problem with a study like this is that it can only have a negative effect. Just like hitler, people would begin looking for the “perfect” race and see all other races as inferior. Even if certain races are more prone to certain behaviours, I don’t think it is something that can’t be fixed. Perhaps it would simply be more difficult. Regardless, environment DEFINITELY plays a role, so why not work on trying to improve that? There are also many extreme forms of racism against blacks that lasted well beyond slavery, so saying this kind of stuff ended 150 years ago is dishonest. Jim crow laws didn’t even end until ’65. Not very long ago. And so many black people are born into poverty. Regardless of the reason for so many black people being in poverty, obviously crime, education, etc. are all worse for ANYONE born into these environments regardless of race. Also, native people are often violent as well. Is this also because of race? It’s weird how they both have a similar history and they both have problems with violence. Who knows?
I just want everyone to be born as equals and race studies are not the way to do this. Even the slightest difference would be blown out of proportion to exaggerate whatever differences may exist. I doubt I can sway your opinion, so I just ask that you treat people with respect regardless of your experiences with/thoughts of people who look like them.
“I do find it hard to believe that the problems in the black community are solely due to slavery (150 years ago) or the “white man” or racism. I believe that much of the poverty and issues in the black community are due to black people and their negative attitudes/behaviors. I do think a part of this is culture, but I also believe that there is a genetic factor as well. Either way, it would be great to conduct studies and figure this out, but the liberals and their idiotic liberal ideology would never allow scientists to conduct or even listen to these type studies.”
Something tells me you would slam such studies as more liberal SJW PC propaganda bullshit unless they confirm what you want to hear.
Because believe it or not, studies have confirmed that even after ending slavery and racial segregation, the effects can still easily last for 10 generations.
Why do you find it so hard to believe that something that happened 150 years ago still affects us today? I mean it’s not THAT long ago and the whole black civil rights movement wasn’t even 100 years ago.
Fact is that as soon as slavery was abolished, differences didn’t disappear over night.
Black people, even though free, had nothing, no wealth, no land that they could pass on to their offspring whereas white people owned all the land and wealth that they made off of slave labour to leave to their children.
The only thing that changed over 150 years is that people now think racism doesn’t exist anymore and affirmative action is somehow “reverse racism”, displaying their ignorance towards what racism actually is and how it functions. For starters, racism requires an imbalance of power – which doesn’t really tend to favour people of colour in western countries.
Racism does not need an imbalance of power, that is a hyper liberal narrative conflating “racism” and “institutional racism” to protect non-white people from being identified as racists.
All racism requires is a discrimination or prejudice based on “racial characteristics” real or imagined.
Like the people in this thread claiming “white” people being controlling, aggressive, violent etc. etc. BECAUSE they are white, is racist.
This is quite hilarious and speaks toward the tendency that racist people have in “confirmation bias.” This article illustrated quite successfully that there is no “gene,” “no hereditary trait,” no categorical placement, no biological evidence AT ALL to show anything other than human beings are all from the same place, category, phylum, stratum and or whatever you put us into. But the racists on here just can’t get their head around it. See the words: “ECHO CHAMBER,” “CONFIRMATION BIAS,” “COGNITIVE DISSONANCE,” etc. etc. I’m posting this article and and response by you and the others who are so willfully abhorrent in your understanding that you were created by the same materials as every other human being on this planet. Some day, if your thinking and thoughts do not alter, you will face eternity and will have to stand and explain why you were given over to a reprobate mind because you chose to hate and treat your neighbor and brother wickedly and or indifferently. There will be no credible excuse. God help you.
I would like to say thanx for starting this topic thread. Its important to discuss because toooooo many people have unreasonable hatred for people because of their skin color.
First of all, people need to keep religion out of convo. Religion has nothing to do with subject and only stears this subject into a different direction.
Character and habits are taught.
The whole point that I saw in this article is.;
“We are all differently the same.”
I do find it fasinating tho how we humans have different color skin and attributes.
But thats the only difference between people. It would be interesting to know what causes that difference.
Ironically, all humans are also designed to be able to fast.
Um, JackFou what? those studies already exist lol the shit been happening just like plenty other stuff. Note that in your research that people of the Negroid race aren’t inherently more dumb or less able to be educated. I think A lot of people believe too much or he say she say bs. Also, people forget that throughout history on earth each one of these 3 main races stood on top for a period of time. whites weren’t always on top, they finally made it to the top. Just like white skinned people went through continents fucking shit up, people of black skinned people did as well at one point ( Moors went through killing people and fucking all their women spreading black DNA all over the place). Just as people forget Negroids traveled the American lands long ago to in which history doesn’t much speak on either. Whites are the ones who are whipping out places taking over things in present days as well as these past centuries. Just as in Africa they were doing critical mathematical bs that was introduced as if it never existed. ( a lot of things existed before some white people claimed it their find and put a name on it). Just as Mongaloid and Negroid didn’t rule forever, Caucazoid won’t rule forever either. when we’re all dead and gone Mongaloid or Negroids will take top again and history will keep repeating the vicious cycle of which race is on top now lol that’s if everyone isn’t mixed and the same skin color lmao. Some of y’all may need to research Negroid history more cause y’all will be surprised plus no one on the other continents can truly tell you Africa’s history. Africa was not always the place it is today and y’all like forgetting that too. Go look at all the major inventions/patented thing black people introduced to the world. After actually learning the important things Negroids as a whole has done for the world less educated wouldn’t be the word that comes to mind (if you’re accepting of facts and not just hateful) . SORRY, EVERYONE, THIS IS JUST TO THE GUY WHO TRIED MAKING HIS STATING ON NEGROIDS BEING LESS INTELLIGENT. HE OBVIOUSLY HAVEN’T STUDYING HISTORY THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. Just as blacks are labeled so criminal when they average 26% of total crime as well as only led in 3 crime categories, and not to mention blacks took the lead from whites in 2010 but people act like blacks always at the top of the particular crime knowing whites been on top longer. Also the fact that most people sum all of this blacks are violent animals etc. from collected data throughout American history which isn’t all true or isn’t the whole truth. If we collect history then whites still hold the title for most violent and gruesome. Americans like looking only at America to judge a whole race’s history, or just believe everything media spits out. every race has been on top and every race has been on the bottom. Racism is stupid as hell. Hate people cause of skin color? From science standpoints, if we were different species or whatever some racist people would like to call it then how the hell can we all naturally breed successfully at the rate we do??? some crazy hybrids you see be created in a lab unnaturally. A dog and a cat I’ve yet to see natural births at the level of humans. I mean Greece for instance, People forget where A lot of Greece’s culture and shit-stem from. Ethiopia, yep those Negroid the world seem to act like was always on bottom forever and isn’t intelligent at all. Those same people everyone bashes are deeply rooted into the Greece culture ( The place where they say the greatest philosophers and all came from). Scientists even brought up the fact that blacks predate whites in Greece and that yes in paintings black and white was actually depicted as far as having a noticeable difference in paintings that are out there yet when it came to painting their GODs and sculptures etc. they purposely were black skinning them. Sooooo yeah I believe one should research more before actually making those wild judgments. Yes I know some of you would love trying to show notes of what I say is a lie but remember I can show you things too that favor what I said and I say this part for the insanely racist folk, (The different people my research stem from are of different racial backgrounds, therefore, miss me with I get my research from all black people, or by some self-hating white people etc.) Personally, I believe the real issue is more so rich versus poor rather than racism. That’s my personal opinion on that part though.
what makes me think you are a person with a black or brown skin colour.
No blacks are not criminals generally speaking but gypsies they’re criminals when 85% do it.
To say that ALL white peoples fortunes were made off the backs of black slaves,or slavery is ignorant at best and an out and out lie at worst
Like when that dummy Elizabeth Warren said we didn’t build our businesses because someone else paid to have the roads built, etc! LUNACY!
The problems in the black communities are caused, in part, by the racist white Liberal. The white Liberal is, by far, the most hateful and cruel human on the planet, and has subjugated the vast majority of Negroes in this country. The white Liberal has made it so the black majority thinks very little of themselves, and their drive is stifled by endless programs and giveaways (only for blacks).
The white Liberal will give the poor black man/woman only enough to stay above ground (alive). He can have a “free phone” with 250 minutes. WOW, and some free food. But Heaven forbid he should go to work. “I better steal or sling dope or I’ll lose my food card.”
Where is the solution? Good question.
Look what the white Liberals did to South Africa. It is a disease infested, slaughterhouse, currently killing ALL white people in the country. Everything in that country is circling the drain. Even a defective brown or yellow diamond is now marketed as a rare “Yellow Diamond”. They were good only for industry when the Dutch ran the country. I never saw a yellow diamond until Mandela took over. Now that Country is finished.
The white Liberal has manufactured the most perfect “segregation” yet. The black neighborhoods are not safe for whites, (or anybody else), but the white neighborhoods are safe for everybody, and yes, even blacks.
Now, because of the white Liberal, who generated all the self hatred, the blacks own the filthy inner-city streets and the darkness because they believe that’s all they deserve. WHO WANTS TO GO THERE?? NOBODY. Who wants to open a business there? Maybe a Muslim who came from a place where life doesn’t matter. Who wants to raise their kids there? Not even the black people.
Some white people are predjuice. ..some black people are predjuice..some Asians are predjuice. And some mongolaids are predjuice.. Of all 3 or 4 basics of man in existence .because of land was taken from the indians. By blood and killing them off.ok white man did.they bought black man from their country like animals.plus they put them n slavery and had babies by black women..they hung black men and whipped them to put fear n them ok. So that they don’t try to escape or run away…you white people came from Europe on a ship willingly ok..the indians was the first ones that own land ….and they taught white Europeans how to live off the land and how to survive.thro winter time.European white man came over to USA.. Came over on a ship willingly.. they did not have anything.either… but rob and killed the indians .white man. ran the Indians off their land….that is how they got all the land…plus no one is no smarter than anyone else ok…because we are all God children he gave everyone in the world(1 )Eyes to see(2 )..Ears to hear(..3 ) (3)Mouth to taste (4)nose to smell. (5) Feel to feelings from one human being to another..we have with in ourselves as all human being on this universe to understand each other and accept each others because we are all God’s children ..color should be no barrier.people wake up no one is perfect..we all are wrong to Judge a person by their language, color of their .skin, or how smart they are..or not smart..it is stupid as can be ..no one is better than no other human being…if you are rich you got money… because money is a materialistic type of greed n the world today.money is the root of all Evil. .by the way every thing start from home where you learn to be good or bad out n the world.if you are taught to be respected to other human beings. You are on a good roll to be a good survivor. In this doggie world. If you are taught wrong at home. when you do come out in this doggie world world..and this is the way you were taught….. you..will go down the wrong path of life.because ever thy starts from home…You see God didn’t make us different he made us in his image of. He gave us breath of fresh air in our nostril . Call life….Our God is the owner of this whole universe.we as human beings do not own this universe. GOD does..God showed us love by sending his only begotten son he loves so much to die for our sins.. He paid a debt he did not owe…He died a miserable death. SO we can have eternal life. .by the blood of Jesus Christ ….Amen take notice people time is near read Revelation.God Bless Everyone n the Whole Universe.
I think the differences in “intelligence” between “races” is more of environmental and cultural factors than genetics but it would be interesting to experiment in raising 3 children from different “races” in the same household from birth, with similar opportunities and nurturing, similar physical height, similar weight and similar body types.
Excuse me, but why aren’t Pygmy and Khoisan people regarded as separate races? For all I know they are genetically very distinct and have physical traits which make them clearly different from Bantu (the mainstream Negroid).
This piece is excellently written, this answered a few questions for me. Simply the concept of different races is extremely interesting, as it goes to show how the human race as a whole has grown, flourished, and adapted throughout the ages in order to survive. It’s curious to see how genes and heredity play their roles as well. . . I wish I could be around long enough to see how we, as a species, all further develop both physically and mentally. All in all, I am thankful, on a less scientific level, for our different races as it gives a streak of diversity in this world. Great article, quite informational, you have my applause.
I totally disagree with all the liberal comments above. Nobody is born equal. Mixing up race and various genes is not a good idea for human future. We need the best seeds physically, intellectually and spiritually for the best of so called human offsprings to compete with rest of universe. As of current religiously modified society every loser, male or female gets a chance to procreate and pass on the hopeless genes to our world. Stop this madness Trump regardless of race
If you think that we need the best of the best to survive and you idiotically believe that smart couples will breed only smart children, and vice versa with less intelligent couples then you are sadly mistaken and you should kill yourself. By the way, different races mixing together is actually bringing a new and better race for the future, because it is providing the best of both (or more) of those races out. You’re also a retard for implying that different races are superior to one another. Every race has it’s strengths and weaknesses, if you looked passed you own stupidity you might actually regonize that.
LOL, calling people stupid but not understanding that intelligence is hereditary…. classic SJW bullshit
Piper: “You’re also a retard for implying that different races are superior to one another. Every race has it’s strengths and weaknesses.”
Did you notice that these two statements actually cancels each others out? If race A has strengths X and Y and weakness Z while race B has strength Y and Z but weakness X; race A is superior to B when measuring X and the opposite when measuring Z. Both races are equal when measuring Y.
And youre the one calling people stupid and retard.
Any farmer or animal breeder knows that crossbreeding is essential or we would all be inbred freaks by now hybrids are hardier and less suseptable to ailments. Besides for example, have you ever seen a black/white child that wasnt what is considered asthetecaly(sp?) hansome?
Mixed race people are more prone to disease, deformities and mental illness. Science has been proving that for years, you cannot take a negroid and just “breed” it with someone of another race and just expect it to be healthy and handsome. Most mixed people I know have terrible skin complexion, suffer from depression and drug addiction. Even Obama, I can point out a hundred odd features on that man that I would never define as handsome or attractive.. purple lips? Come on, humans aren’t cattle, we’re not being bred to be turned into someone’s dinner.
I can’t actually believe you just said that, are u actually stupid 2&)2)2)2 we have been mix breeding for thousands of years. Like that’s just not true, inbreeding causes deformities etc so that pretty much shows the closer u r genetically the worst it can be? Depression? Drugs? Wtf these r all based environment and something all humans share. Moreover “Mixed” people are generally seen as more attractive- and ur opionion on Obamas attractiveness is ur own, u can’t be so self centred as to believe everyone shares ur opinion. Ur commment is so stupid I can’t believe u exist.
Did you just say mixed breed causes deformities? I think at this point everyone knows that inbreeding exposes harmful recessive genes. And skin diseases have affected every race. Drug abuses are becauses of the environment people grow up in and dont tell white people dont abuse drugs.
Kusuma you are confusing inbreeding with inter-racial breeding. Inbreeding is having kids with you family members, IE your cousins, siblings, aunts, uncles, etc. This is rampant in Africa and the Middle East which causes the majority of deformities and the low IQ levels of these populations. We humans instinctively prefer to breed with our own kind(Race). It has NOTHING to do with racism and everything to do with preserving the species of our kind (Race). It’s science of the animal kingdom. We humans seem to forget we are just another animal on the food chain. Survival of the fittest.
So you’re basically advocating eugenics – and if you don’t see the problem in that, then I’m afraid there is no helping you.
I’m not sure where your paranoia comes from but rest assured that the Universe is so vast that competing with the rest of it won’t be a problem for the next couple of million years.
Look at “history” There have always been “SLAVES” … and not only BLACK slaves. the Romans had both black and white slaves called gladiators……… they were always big strong men who were used to “entertain”
SO NOW WE HAVE MODERN DAY gladiators…… being bought and sold and used to ENTERTAIN !!
it is in the black men’s genes to be big and strong (for battle), run fast (to survive) and a lower IQ ( so as to accept what is offered) ALL FOR ENTERTAINMENT
“Negroid” is not the appropiate term, as Caucasians originate from the Caucus Mountains and Mongolians, from Mongolia and not just the orientals someone has decided to mash together, originate from Mongolia. Nowhere on earth is there a place called Negro or Negroy. Negroid is not the scientific/technical term. We are not in Aryan biology class. There is but one race, the Human Race. Melatonin is just an indicator of health, get over it. We are one in the same, spite what is believed.
Negroid comes from the Latin which is the color black. That along with Negroid features of the nose and mouth discerns the Negroid race, and the same with the Caucasoid and the Mongoloid races. Therefore, race is a physical rather than a biological definition of different peoples. However, all are of the human race with the qualities and potential to improve or diminish the conditions on the Earth.
Nergoid is incorrect as to the respect of the orgin of the three terms used in this article. [As mentioned above by Jalissa] Adding to her statement…Congoid as from the Congolese mountains. Ignorance spreads like a disease.
You’re raising a fuss over a detail that makes no difference
Negroid and Congoid are interchangeable terms referring to the exact same thing. One is more politically correct than the other, but they are the same thing.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41857018.pdf?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negroid
From time to time people will mix up. Thre are many races yet to come up seriously haha…..
I’m from the north eastern region of India. We look like chinese and Koreans as we are Mongolians. And we are facing a lot of racial discrimination in India. They call us stupid names like chinkis, momo, etc as we don’t look like them.
Say no to racism like hitler…!!!!!!
You’re from Naga or Assam or something. And no you’re not Korean. You’re much closer to the Yellow people in Bhutan, Tibet. Just say you’re mongoloid.
I would never do that. And yes you are right say No to racial discrimination or its any other form
If discrimination of race is no longer valid then the PC crowd, aka Liberals, have painted themselves into a corner. The president elect, Donald Trump, is labeled “racist” for his position on immigrating Muslims, which is a religion. At the same time Liberals support BLM and the belief in White privilege. A prime example of spin and twist, which is spoon fed to the offspring of the elite. Race switch will be flipped when manipulation of truth is needed; in a word propaganda. Pol Pot would be proud…
I think you’re conflating believing in something with supporting it. Discrimination of race is no longer valid, which is why one race should not be privileged over another. Saying that something shouldn’t happen isn’t the same thing as saying that it doesn’t.
You do have a point about Trump’s position on Islam though. To say that it’s racism, one would need to make a case that he is using religion as an excuse for racial discrimination and that’s not been done as far as I can tell. Trump’s anti-Muslim stance is definitely unconstitutional (First Amendment) and unAmerican (see Constitution), but to say it’s racist is an unsupported accusation. It’s just lazy mud-slinging.
Trump’s position on the so called “Muslim travel ban” is neither UnAmerican OR Unconstitutional..The six nations referred to have no functioning govt to speak of..Therefore to stop a group of people from there entering this country is a power that the Constitution DOES grant to the President in Article 2….Wait until it comes before the Supreme court..It WILL be upheld,and the temporary wait
will begin..To say the extreme vetting (not banning) 100 million of 1.5 billion of the worlds Muslims is ridiculous
Fair enough point Edwin, but I’d like to clarify it’s mostly those who don’t fully grasp the difference between “race” and “religion” that define President-Elect Donald Trump as racist based off of his discrimination against Muslims. People can still call Trump “racist”, depending on their views, but simply not for his discrimination against the people following Islam. For example, one could potentially call Trump ‘racist’ for some of his comments against certain ethnic groups.
But all in all, his ideals when it comes to followers of Islam, I must agree with Roy, it is definitely a violation of the First Amendment and rather Un American.
Are you sure bro? I’m Korean and I’ve kinda lied and have claimed Yakutsk, Kazakh, Kyrgyz or even Uygher heritage.
I’ve found that if people go for the East Asian slurs it’s really because they know more about me than I “know” about myself.
I think it is simple, We are Humans. We are all mixed bloods no pure bloods exist anymore even if they ever did. How old our Planet is can’t be determined taking into consideration Crust Displacement and Continental Drift as the entire surface will be eventually recycled to melted rock. The big circle of life. If our Sun goes Nova will Race mater? Then in recent impressions I am beginning to think there is no difference between “ology” and “ism” as both have zealous religious types. I guess both have faith perhaps blind in their opinions. The Good news that we can think and have our own opinions biased or not. May God Bless you all.
Good response. And most intelligent people will agree.
However, to simply show facts and intelligence will anger many people.
They will not be able to separate beliefs and suspicions from facts.
You are assuming that everyone will listen and comprehend your very obvious statement. They will not.
Even scientists and religious leaders cannot agree on everything.
This creates the many “theories” of science and the large number of different religions.
It is my strong belief that Man will eventually come together over time. Whether it will be through religion or some other form is unknown and not provable by myself or any other.
This is why people have faith and theories.
I agree strongly with your statement and hope that you will fare well in your life.
Good day.
Art, I agree, most secure people feel the same.
Human beings are human beings. So kets not define race…
What a witless comment.
And dogs are dogs.
Yet there are labradors, poodles, corgis etc etc.
It’s not a value judgement..a poodle is better than a whippet, simply because it’s curlier.
It’s a description of what they look like.
Defining sub groups is helpful to make accommodation and understand what might be expected. from other groups. For instance, black people can generally run faster but cannot swim as well as white people.
It’s the value put on running or swimming, by society in general that determines what is ‘better’.
Let us not deceive ourselves: our talent profile is nowhere near that of, say, the Jews or the Japanese in America. The exceptional number of Nobel Prize winners who are Jews is no accident. It is also no accident that a high percentage, sometimes 50%, of faculty members in the top American universities on both the east and west coasts are Jews. And the number of high calibre Japanese academics, professionals, and business executives is out of all proportion to the percentage of Japanese in the total American population
The Search for Talent, 12 August 1982
The Bell curve is a fact of life. The blacks on average score 85 per cent on IQ and it is accurate, nothing to do with culture. The whites score on average 100. Asians score more … the Bell curve authors put it at least 10 points higher. These are realities that, if you do not accept, will lead to frustration because you will be spending money on wrong assumptions and the results cannot follow.
Lee Kuan Yew, The Man & His Ideas, 1997
I started off believing all men were equal. I now know that’s the most unlikely thing ever to have been, because millions of years have passed over evolution, people have scattered across the face of this earth, been isolated from each other, developed independently, had different intermixtures between races, peoples, climates, soils… I didn’t start off with that knowledge. But by observation, reading, watching, arguing, asking, that is the conclusion I’ve come to.
Lee Kuan Yew, The Man & His Ideas, 1997
I bet you there’s more Jews enrolled at the higher level universities for a reason too, These stats you throw around are subject to interpretation and are therefore meaningless.
In no way am I trying to be anti-Semitical but there’s also a monetary reason why so many people have opposed the Jews in modern history.
That being said, I believe everything happens for a reason and it’s all for a greater purpose.
But let’s think about who established and set up the IQ tests and where the knowledge is based. It is designed by white people, with white people’s minds in favor. Most far eastern Asian individuals worked hard to assimilate to that standard, and they surpassed western standards as a result. Africans and African Americans resisted the European education system, and so they don’t perform well on the tests. This doesn’t mean they are dumb. This means they don’t meet Europeans’ standard of education. After all, that’s a White Supremacist way of thinking. But if we look at other Mongoloid races of people, such as American indigenous groups, they mirror black people in their test-taking abilities. I would not go on a biased test to determine intelligence. A test designed by all races would determine the intelligence of the races.
But I’m probably talking to a wall. You people don’t like facts. You’ll write everything off as “liberal propaganda, and for the SJWs”.
This is so European, meaning that, this is just to keep up the confusion, so I’m going to make this as easy and simple to understand as possible. And this is fact. There are only two type of people. Easiest stated; black or white people. Negroid or Caucasoid. Which the Caucasoid derived from the Negroid. Everything else is BS meant to confuse you. The Negroid is the dominant race/people/gene, whatever you want to call it. Again these are facts that you can research. So to break it down or a simple level. Every one is from the Negroid. The dominant gene, which produces a recessive gene. That recessive gene being albino, gives off the complexion that you know as white. That recessive gene cant produce a dominant; meaning that white/Caucasoid can only produce self. NOT a melanin filled person. You can not make black from white. You can not make yellow from white either. This means that you are either have melanin or you dont. Meaning you are either black or white, Negroid or Caucasoid. No in between! If there is no difference between us, then why do Blacks have melanin at such a high level and whites DO NOT? Melanin is the single most important thing on, in, around this realm. It literally can be found everywhere. It is the vital chemical that makes life itself. Black people have this in abundance, white people have little or no melanin.
Comments from both of you demonstrate why so many people find this to be such a difficult subject to discuss seriously. Your comments have not contributed anything meaningful, only tired, old cliches.
There are clearly more than just black or white people in the world. Most white people are not albinos. Albinism can occur in people of any background, not just white. It occurs in some black people and others.
There are some differences in the appearance of modern humans which are variety within the same species.
You talk as if you are an anthropologist .
Nigerians and other bush people have similar eyes like Japanese or chines.
epicanthic fold- look it up.
The Japanese score a high IQ of 80 when they speak in Japanese. The IQ is not a method of averages. The Jews have a verbal verbosity and score 80 too. it is your language English spoken by 503 billion only (includes 2nd language) Hindi same number 497 billion Mandarin 1.2 billion.
Looks like someone cut math class during school. According to you we now have a world population of 1 trillion, lol.
You are forgetting people speak more than one language. Like i can speak both hindi and english so do a lot of people. so people who speak both english and hindi do add count in different columns when you take language speaking as a barrier but obviously speaking both hindi and english wont matter when population count is taken. I will still be considered as a single person regardless how many ever languages i speak.
And what has all that extra melanin giving blacks, besides better protection from the sun? It surely didn’t give blacks anything of importance that they can claim that has advanced human society . So what if all others evolved from Africa and negroids were the first “humans”, what does this do for blacks today? Just by your post I can see you have prejudice in you , so that is why I will sink to your level and let you know this. Boast about your superior melanin count, about how all other “races” came from blacks, BUT, what about today, in 2016? Percentage wise Blacks are last in everything, except, crime, fatherless homes, kids out of wedlock, prison population, etc, etc. So much for all that melanin, lolol. Have a nice day Einstein.
We built human society. Im
Many counties around the world. Facts. We were slaves and our riches were taken. Then we were are are oppressed. But you know this, so why talk down. You should be happy we did all that for you and you have the Privilege to walk amongst us in peace.
Kevin bro, I think ur missing a few brain cells :/// “We built human society” no Kevin u did not personally help build society. U happen to have the same skin colour as the people who might have- that’s all and I’m pretty sure u can’t say they built human society but started it. And um white people cant stay in the sun? A bit vague, I’m pretty sure they can lol.
Are you kidding? “And this is fact.” You better go back to school or get your facts from someone who actually knows facts. Caucasians are not devoid of melanin. If they were, they couldn’t stay in the sun for very long at all. Melanin is what creates a tan in Caucasians when they stay in the sun very long. Only albinos don’t have melanin; that’s the cause of the condition, which can occur in all races. Caucasians also did not evolve from Negroids. The races evolved from a common ancestor, the so-called “missing link” for whom every anthropologist is searching. The races were determined by the location and living conditions of these various people, and yes, anthropologists recognize and define at least three races, Caucasians, Negroids, and Mongoloids. Some recognize a fourth, the Australoid of Australia.
But Caucasians can’t stay in the sun at all. Sun screen, throw overs, beach hats. Then they still get sun burned. Happens in less than 30 mins. They can’t do it. Some with mixed genes, southern Italians are fine. I’ve been to Italy and seen how dark the people get in summer. So I would say that statement doesn’t work for me
People, if you read this article correctly, it stated how anthropologists, a judge, and when they thought of these social construct definitions of different races. But, if you read further, this article stated there are no genetic differences between all humans from every cultural background.
We are one race of people, biologically and genetically. So to say the human race is redundant.
Race is Human!
Racism is the process of being human!
Racist is the actions of being human!
Welcome to the Human Conditioning!
No. Racism and being racist are parts of some people. Not everyone is like that. Racism, like other kinds of baseless discrimination, is a choice by some people. It causes needless division and harm, which actually hold people back.
The human species is made up of 4 subspecies otherwise known as races. The brain sizes, the skeletons, the intelligence, the physicality, the endurance, even the diseases are all different between these races. We can all sit back and pretend that the races are exactly the same but the fact is that they simply are not. I choose to live in reality where I accept hard truths and refuse to go along for fear of being called a racist. The time of the authoritarian PC SJW has come and gone.
Interesting, but in essence very basic. In terms of definition of races and ethnical groups, etc. However, it strikes me as rather amusing how these days some sort of perverse ‘political correctness’ takes an overwhelming importance. To the point that it becomes a norm for so many people who not only have no slightest affiliation with anything scientific but dont even have capacity for judgment above 12 years old child to go out of their way (literally 🙂 ) to prove that there are no races and all people are the same. Yes, humans seems all came from the same prehistoric ape (though its not 100% proven, yet), and sure genes for say hereditary deafness are much more important and obvious differentiators than genes responsible for racial morphological differences. But saying that there are no genetic differences between races… Or that its so small that they make no real differences… Thats plain absurd. There is only one way that Caucasoid couple can produce a Negroid child 🙂 . And when it happens nobody will have any doubts just looking at this child (no gene tests would be necessary :-)) what race he/she belongs to and how he/she came about. There are quite clear morphological differences that are defined by genes, however small they are. Spending all that time trying to prove by some sophistry that there are none is hypocrisy if not worse – looks like turned around racism reminding ‘scientific proves’ the Nazis were so busily engaged into that Jews or Slavic groups are sub-species closer to animals than to people,
Pigs genome is only 2% different from humans. So I guess for some of the people there, who are spitting saliva trying to tell that everybody is the same and we are all brothers the pig is also a brother and of the same race (lol). If anything, I personally do see that animals are really very close to us and that the reason Im trying not to eat meat – if I do I feel guilty of murdering another living being that is not that different from us humans. But I also see there are some differences (not justifying a murder to fill up my stomach) and I find it absurdish to state that there are no genetic bases for defining different human races. Apparently contrary to some people who are ready to kill to prove their point that Negroid race is indeed the same as Mongoloid ’cause some science, whatever it is, proves (?) that even if there are some genetic differences they are too small to matter’. Kind of like its not that crocodiles do not fly, they do fly, just very very low 🙂
The simple and direct analysis…If they are all the same, then why are they all so different?
Darwin!
People are not “so different” from each other. What people look like is just variety in the same thing, homo sapiens/modern humans.
I like your analysis. So true.
just going in bluntly, nevermind the whole racism aspect of this whole subject.
Aren’t we forgetting, latino’s and arabs?
in which of these three catagories are they supposed to fit in?
nether white nor black nor mongolian I suppose?
Latinos are mostly mongolian (american indian above), mixed with European caucasian immigrants, and on the upper part of South America, black (negroid) slaves.
And arabs are just caucasian.
https://www.loc.gov/item/97515382/ Slave my A$$. Europeeons know that they sold our a$$’e$ up and down the ole miss as the colonized Africa before and at the same time take a look at the Second Reich. You people can not keep hiding this. Global Warming, Nah it’s judgement, and IDENTIFICATION:) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6gMGuQRZPE
I have no idea what you were trying to say. Maybe you’re trying to be the example that shows that races are indeed different.
You may also want to read some credible historical acccounts. Arabs began enslaving blacks thousands of years ago. Blacks then adopted the practice and began enslaving other tribes. The white European man didn’t get involved until about 400 years ago and ended the practice about 150 years ago.
So who is the bigger bogeyman to blacks? The white people who only enslaved you for about 250 years in much better conotions than others OR fellow Africans and Arabs who did it since the beginning of recorded history and treated their slaves worse than animals?
First of all the Arabs didn’t just enslave Blacks, they had slaves from various backgrounds, Including Europeans (mainly Slavics and to some extent Iberians) the practice was not unique to them as the Romans, the Greeks, the Persians and countless other ancient people practiced slavery it was a way of life for them and they did not care what race you were, to them it was about enslaving those they had conquered.
Secondly the practice of Slavery between Arabs and Europeans in the US was vastly different. For instance those of the same faith could not be enslaved, second even if they were not of the same faith the children they had with their masters were automatically free and were entitled to the same rights as the children borne from the legitimate marriage. (some kings and sultans are known to have had slave mothers).
Also the practice of slavery in the US dates back further then 250 years, the first slaves were brought to James town in 1619.
Although there were differences in slave practices between the two, they were both vindictive and often cruel to their slaves.
And also the person you referring to has issues with White Americans as they had enslaved his ancestors why should he care about Arabs that were raiding the other side of the continent.
your joking right? white people our literally a plague to the rest of the world. Using religion you have like a virus destroyed cultures all over the world and til this day subjugate people of color to lower standards. And AJ answered you fairly correctly about the differences in slavery
Arabs are Semites so Caucasian.
There are some of us white folks who have shunned religion and racism realizing the ignorance of these concepts!
I was also curious about this. Under the Caucasian category; Sem·ite
[ sem-ahyt or, esp. British, see-mahyt]
NOUN
1.
a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs.
2.
a Jew.
3.
a member of any of the peoples descended from Shem, the eldest son of Noah.
With Latinos, it can vary. Some Latinos are of of purely Spanish descent. Others are of purely indigenous descent, while the majority are a mixture of the two.
they aint forgetting latinos or arabs because there is no such thing. those are phases used to confuse. You are either black or white. Negroid or Caucasoid. Hope this isnt a rude awakening. You either came from the dominant or recessive gene
It must be demoralizing to have been and to be continually dominated by the ones with the recessive gene.
Ouch
There is only one race, that being the human race. People have evolved over time to their surroundings. At once there were one race in Africa (this was before continental drift, when there was just one mass of land), there were people who fought for territory and obviously people who lost, those who lost every time where forced to move farther and farther away, when the continents started drifting away, climates changed, thus Africans (black people in general) have darker skin due to the heat, less hair due to the lack of need for body hair, larger noses because it was hot and they needed to get more air into their lungs, dark eyes etc, the people who moved father away(now known as whites) became lighter skinned due to the cold, lighter eyes to cut out the glare from the snow, hairier due to the cold and so on. Over time yet again, we have evolved, as people started travelling to other countries, and slavery etc, causing other races to move into other countries, and likewise over the years people will continue to evolve to adapt to their surroundings.
What if we didn’t all evolve from the same species of ape? What if they too were a little different?
The tree has a trunk, a point of origin. This was the beginning of if all and what is now was an offshoot of that original trunk of life. Therefore, all things originated from the earliest origins of life and over time evolved to their surroundings, and abilities to survive (Survival of the Fittest).
Survival of the Fittest.
DEFINITION
1. biology
The continued existence of organisms that are best adapted to their environment, with the extinction of others, as a concept in the Darwinian theory of evolution. Compare with natural selection.
you are all wrong. History thaught at school is wrong. It does not make any sense. Lets start at something else… look at all the strange structures facing at us while scientist come with the most crappy explainations you can imagine. There might be a real fact behind all the common pre humans many cultures all over the globe are having stories about. Pre ancient hight tech civilisations more than hundred thousands years older than the ancient Sumerians. It can all solve the missing link and forget that lucy bullshit. Humanity nowadays is just a new era from humans who restarted again. We were al descendants fron a much older human race who were more advanced than we are, but in a different way than our fossil based technology. Call it scifi, I call it out of the box thinking. The chance that there was an highly very pre ancient Humanity on this earth is something we all have to take serious. There are too many gaps within our timelines and we fill it with crap. I rather believe in the Annunaki stories than bullshit like humans evolved from a common ancestor as the apes. If this is true, we had some help because there is no way earth nature is capable of these kind transitions. The truth about the human race might be too shocking for most of the sheeple anyway. Thats why they al stay with simple minded talk about white, black, asians etc.. thats not the question, the question is: Who were our creators?
These facts are sadly, distinctly, and severely inaccurate. Pangaea was the most recent supercontinent. It fractured into Gondwana and Laurasia, essentially. Those had fragmented significantly, leaving no appreciable remnant of the last supercontinent, by 150 million years ago.
Humans’ earliest ancestors didn’t separate from chimpanzees until about seven million years ago. There were no humans, nor ancestors thereof, running about and breeding and thriving nor surviving, living, or even existing on any supercontinent.
Prior to Pangaea, a series of other supercontinents existed – interspersed of course with the separations of such land masses. “Before continental drift,” there were no continents or land at all: this was around four billion years ago, because there was no time in Earth’s existence during which there was solid land that didn’t drift on top of liquid magma. Earth’s first solid land that can be verified by currently existing cratons is around 3.6 billion years old, this is the proposed supercontinent of Vaalbara. This was the first time “when there was just one mass of land,” and Vaalbara indeed drifted. Only prior to its formation was there a time “before continental drift,” and that’s only because there was no land nor continent(s) to drift whatsoever.
Did you forget to mention that everything you just stated is NOT FACTUAL, whatsoever?
You seem to have forgotten to mention that everything you mentioned is THEORETICAL and none has ever been proven. That is, unless you were there…
I will never understand why people feel the need to state other peoples THEORIES as facts. You make it sound as if you wrote them!
You know, there is more out there to study and learn from than other peoples leaps of faith that we call THEORIES, which is why many of us are here.
I have already watched all the episodes on “Our Earth” that National Geographic has to offer, so please, spare me the next lecture.
Personally, I try to look at as many angles as possible, then make a decision. To do anything less is a cop out! If you choose to do so, that is your business but please don’t make it mine! IMO, without enough different models to compare similarities, all you have is incomplete, incomparable and uncoincidable data, or “THEORIES”, not facts.
Maybe start by comparing the evidence that we do have, like the hundreds of unique cultures stories of creation which are readily available. If they were all continentaly separated, as you claim, then their stories should NOT have many similarities or coincide. If they do, You do the math, not them.
Also, if that’s the case, humans would most have likely evolved separately from neanderthals into what we are today, but that’s a whole other can of worms…
I do understand what your trying to say though; everybody else since the beginning of time is wrong, and all your separate THEORIES that hinge on each other to create the ones that you just stated are %100 correct! That’s fine, but please say what they really are ; THEORIES based on THEORETICAL EVIDENCE!
Actually lighter colored eyes evolved to take in more vitamin D from the sun, dark eyes don’t absorb as much.
No mammals existed 200 million years ago, when Pangea existed. Humans have only been around for 200 thousand years. So, no, that didn’t happen
If you can’t figure out that white makes darker colors and shades lighter in appearance, you are lying to yourself.
We are here in search of the truth, yet you already have all the answers. How do you know more than the rest of us and the scientists that have made careers of studying our species?
I’m no expert but even I know that the bananas we eat come in many different strains, and they all have their own unique characteristics. The same goes with animals and other plants.
We are different and believe it or not have different traits, some say evolution, some say intelligent design. That is your choice, but the truth is NOT!
diversity is a gift… whether you believe it from God or not. Anyone over see the “outer limits”… or maybe its
“night gallery” where everyone looks like they have a pig smeared face?
However… I do say this… When the author says there are no genetic differences… is it not genes that distinct between skin colors??? Whites do not have black genes, nor do Asians have white….and so fourth… except that by mating… they became hybrid.
There is indeed distinct diversity…. Its semantics…. to call it race … or ethnicity…. no matter… there is easily categorized diversity…. Social issues set aside.
it’s important to note that of the 0.1% of genetic variation between humans, 85 to 90% occurs within a given race. this means that a man from a completely different race form you may only have about 10-20% more variation than someone from your own race.
Context clues….Adam and Eve we’re naked and did not know it, God had not caused it to rain, so a mist was sent up from the ground to water the ground…Cain dwelt in land of Nod to the east, and got married. Reading these supposed truths in the Bible it’s concluded that at one point on earth there was no such things as seasons, or climate, but it had to be hot enough for Adam and Eve to walk around naked. Climate was tropical. Also where did this other woman come from that Cain married? It suggests they weren’t alone or for that matter first on earth other people we’re there. Also science has proved that humans have existed on this planet several million years ago, whereas the Genesis story is supposed less than 10000 years ago. After all this I conclude that race isn’t important, we argue and debate the wrong things. Instead of questioning inconsistencies we consider to be truth. Dinosaurs were here first, the original inhabitants of this earth. And God hovered over the face of the waters……the earth was dark and void….? You should have other questions other than debating who was here first, obviously we ( Humans) weren’t. Why they trying to go to Mars and the moon, and other planets? What do they know that the majority don’t? Yet we fall for the created distraction called racism/culture /ethnicity /media/ politics……. and so on. Eyes opening yet?
Agreed. Also, where did Lilith come from, Adam’s first wife? Food for thought.
This is the third iteration of human we are experiencing. Lilith was a remnant of the second iteration. One that blew itself up like the first.
I can never get anyone to show me where in the bible God says this is the only iteration.
Nothing is truly certain so I wouldn’t say I believe a ‘higher being’ created us (life in general), though definitely an option, but anyways I find it interesting how priests did not include Lilith in the bible to make sure women (at least most of the religious ones) would always be under the authority of men; for Lilith did not enjoy Adam trying to control her and soon left the garden of Eden. And if it were stated by this ‘God’ that they believe in, that women should follow the command of their husband (or simply that of men), then there should be no worries as it pertains to always keeping women at bay, ‘obedient’ and powerless.
Human kind did not come from two people named adam and eve. Only people with no common sense or a real grasp of reality could believe in such BS.
You need to accept the fact that you were brainwashed as a child and grow up and live in reality.
I may not come directly from Adam and Eve but, my father was a man and my mother was a woman { I say was because both are dead} and to me that is not BS. You need to accept that fact MR or Mrs Mix.
What’s your point? Obviously he knows your father was a man and mother was a woman. It’s the same for everyone. It’s redundant to say so. Don’t you think it’s very strange to tell him to accept that? He never said that your father being a man and your mother being a woman was BS.
His point is that based on rationalism and validated by empiricism, these two characters ‘Adam and Eve’ didn’t breed to create the 7 plus billion people walking on this Earth.
Good lord, clearly our schools are failing to teach students proper comprehension.
The THEORY of evolution The big bang THEORY. They are called theories because science cannot fully explain. Can only get a full explanation when you consider a creator….GOD
Dwayne, you completely misunderstand science, and I’m not at all surprised! Science doesn’t state something as fact, only mathematics can do that. So everything that ‘science’ states is a theory! Why don’t you already know this? All that we have in science is the best explanantion so far, given our knowledge of whatever is the subject. Science doesn’t have the temerity to say that ‘this’ is how it is, only religion does that. The Big Bang is a theory, yes, but NOTHING in science is final – it’s the very essence of science. If you don’t understand what I’ve just written, please read it again. A scientific theory is never absolutely true, nor absolutely false. It’s the best explanation we have given all that we know.
‘God’ – the concept of a creator – is illogical and irrational, given that you circle your argument, in that the god itself must have had a creator. Do you see? So it’s illogical to state that there is a creator.
Dwayne, do yourself a favour for the rest of your life; decide to think more; question what you’re told, but above all ask for evidence of what you’re being told. Religion (faith) has no evidence whatsoever, obviously, that’s why it is called faith. But if you start down this path of thinking (that you will accept something as true without any evidence) then you are duty bound to accept anything at all as true, even Father Christmas.
science does not prove everything. Do you love someone? Do you love your mother for example? Can you prove it? No , yet you know that you love her/him…..
God has left many examples of the intangible substance of our life and coming death so that we will search. I only know of one who died and rose again and follow his teaching as best I can.
—
4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away.
There are some of us white folks who have shunned religion and racism realizing the ignorance of these concepts!
Punctuated equilibrium is in keeping with the fossil evidence for humans as it does for all other life forms. However, the problem of speciation is not a small one. Australopithecines looked pretty much like Homo Habilis did. But presumably the former had 24 pairs of chromosomes like simians have & the latter had 23 pairs like humans do. While I doubt either responded to the name Adam or Eve, those first primitive humans still had to come into being within walking distance of each other & within less than a generation’s time frame. The Lord works in mysterious ways. It doesn’t have to be an either or situation. It could very well be a combination of the 2. As Hamlet said to his friend “There is more in this world than is dreamt of in your philosophies, Horatio.”
your funny man. so you just believe in burning ball of gasses and matter that popped outta nowhere. XD enjoy that shit ima go read the book about the big ass ark instead. stick to your contradicting science books if ya want.
“The natural world contains about 8.7 million species, according to a new estimate described by scientists as the most accurate ever. But the vast majority have not been identified – and cataloguing them all could take more than 1,000 years.” If that’s the case, how did one man fill his magic boat up with all of the animals?
The bible can’t be taken 100% literal. They are stories that are meant to teach lessons. Species started out few and became many. Could it be possible that he did take every kind of animal like a pig there’s many specie’s but maybe he took one kind of each animal. And from Noah’s aspect it was the whole world but is it possible that it wasn’t the entire world just his part of the world? People who doubt the bible doubt history… Truth is a lot of the bible was real weather the perspective was different or some things exaggerated, misinterpreted, misunderstood, altered, and not complete. The bible is about some people not the entire world except for the teachings are meant for everyone to say something that happened a long time ago didn’t happen is ignorance. Maybe there was a world wide flood and maybe Noah wasn’t the only one who survived but from his perspective he was. The world was so big back then to people that everything the could touch, see, travel too, or know of was the entire world they had no idea how big the world was. It was as big as they comprehended. As far as we know in his area there was only 100 different specie’s.. See if you look at things differently they become possible.. Just because some exaggerates a story, or all the facts aren’t there don’t mean it didn’t happen.. Have an open mind. Religion and science don’t have to be at war.. Ancient times people knew this the greatest scientists of the past were all religious.. Even Darwin.. People just took his theory and made it there own interpretation. He never gave up his faith he didn’t go against the bible he simply had an idea about life. God has no time. If he says one day to him that could be a million years or 5 seconds. God is something beyond comprehension, beyond possibility, and out side of our perspective. So if he would tell us everything the way he sees and does it we wouldn’t understand. Some say that makes it to easy.. Well that’s the point.. People worry so much about facts, chances, and what isn’t then focusing on life. Here now is the only thing we know 100% tomorrow’s not here the past has happened how it happened isn’t important what’s important is what’s right in front of you. God said “I am that I am” to make it simple so I leave you with it is what it is..
Yeah i find it hard to believe that a pair of emporer penquins waddled all the way from Antarctica to get on the boat…
If you can prove that Adam and Eve didn’t have belly buttons, I’ll fully believe in God (having a belly button means you were inside of a women gaining nutrients through an umbilical cord that was then removed after birth and if God really created them, they wouldn’t have had belly buttons).
Genesis 1:2 was changed because people who think in a box like you. In the original writing Genesis 1:2 said And the earth Became without form, and void. It did not say And the earth was without form, and void. what ever the earth was before it became without form in void. So between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 the earth changed Form what it was before.
The book of Enoch. Is just what the Sumerians told. Humanity was created. The bible is a metafor.. true stories but taken from much older books and stories. The story about the human race. Adam and Eve were the 2 created human experiences from our creators indeed creators not creator. The bible many times talk about Those who came from the sky. Im not religious at all, but I surely take that book serious if you are willing to keep an open mind, and not take it literally
First of all, what is “reality” and secondly, how do you know you have not been “brainwashed” yourself? Because honestly we are all taught different things and who is to say that what we are taught is what is ‘right’? Subjectivity is law and nothing is truly certain, meaning if someone wishes to believe in the certainty of a ‘God’ then so be it, if someone wants to believe in the certainty of there not being a ‘God’ then so be it. Your side, my side and the truth and what is certainly true is that we are not certain of anything being true but this statement and the ‘belief of’ (the ‘belief of’ being anything that we manifest in our thoughts because if we believe ‘it’ to be certain then to ourselves, it is certain).
Many of the comments in this post are either unsubstantiated and not understood. First, and most blatant is the comment of man’s existence on earth being of millions of years. There are no findings or even concepts that would suggest a habitation near this long. The longest educated estimation of the existence of man is about 300,000 years. The separation of “race” as refered to by most of the population is non-existent. Scientifically speaking, there is only 1 race of human. The social use of race is incorrect and is more slang than a real descriptor. These are just a couple I have seen. It’s the duty of a writer in non-fiction which respects the targeted audience to make sure what he writes can be connected with reality and not imagined in his own head.
Other human species existed for millions of years. Some of them still existed for a long time after our species, modern humans/Homo Sapiens appeared. Modern humans and other species interbred with each other.
time is of no essence to our God humans are a newer species compared to most others it says god created animals before man. he garbed us from the dirt of the earth and breathed into it, maybe a monkey was stuck and that dirt idk. idc
You might as well have quoted pages out of “The Three Little pigs.”. Otherwise why quote a book of fiction in a scientific discussion?
I guess… no before dinosaurs and such… there where microbes and bacteria first… one cell lifeforms that took millions of years to evolve…into an actual being like a dinosaur or fish or whatevvs
See that word NAKED, should ring some bells:) No Carbon/Melanin. Sure beats looking for a needle 🙂
IN = (of a person:) the beginning = (Genes-is, Birth:) Procreation go on her people, to Bring Fourth (Birth:) Genes-is 1:11 The Fruit Tree, Atom, the Only Begotten. Whose Seed (Son)S (COVENANT:) is and was in itself, the the Sons of God who foolishly went into the daughter(S) (Eve-l:) of that serpent A-dam, sinner, accuser,slave, tiller of the ground, fallen angel:)
what is the race of indian people belongs
Indians are wonderful – India decided to be a group all on their own.
Sometimes referred to as the people from the sub-continent they are not Asian and they are not African. Many Indians have caucasian features and black skin. In some countries they are referred to as Asian for reasons of geography. Look on google, it’s really interesting.
‘Various attempts have been made, under the British Raj and since, to classify the population of India according to a racial typology. After the independence, in pursuance of the government’s policy to discourage distinctions between communities based on race, the 1951 Census of India did away with racial classifications. The national Census of independent India does not recognize any racial groups in India.[1]
Some scholars of the colonial epoch attempted to find a method to classify the various groups of India according to the predominant racial theories popular at that time in Europe. This scheme of racial classification was used by the British census of India. It was often mixed with considerations about the caste system.’
People from the sub continent of India are Caucasian
Please take a look at Negroid race and inside the brackets there is word Dravidians as well as word Sinhalese, that is where the majority of the population of India come from.
Not classified under Caucasian.
Yes but a good portion Indians are not Dravidians from their Y haplogroups or from their mtDNA, neither is the bone structure black either.
The area of India is locked by mountains, so they would be cut off from the other three “races” I think they should be classified as their own race. It wasn’t until the spice trade, that they started to intermingle with the East Asians and East Africans. If you look at some of the people around the horn of Africa, you can see a little Indian blood mixed in with the people.
says mongolian
Indians are a mixture of all three mostly mongoloid secondly negroid.
What proof is there that Asian walked to the America the indigenous peoples of America didn’t come from Asia its a far fetched theory
DNA testing has connected them to Asian people. Some of those Asian people were also some of the ancestors of modern European people. DNA has also connected some native South Americans to indigenous inhabitants of Australia and Melanesia.
Jews tell us in their Torah (the same book that says Canaan is theirs because a cloud fairy said so) that a global flood took place four thousand years ago. Supposedly only eight survived. I presume they were all of the same kind, family members. In that short time, supposedly all the races today have evolved from those eight people. Any idea what “race” Noah and his clan were?
Also of all the so called 3 race, where do the Arabs belong to?
Arabs are Semites. Semites are the people who speak, or once spoke Semitic languages – includes Jew, Arabs and some other groups.
caucasian
Arabs and Indians and other sub races are mostly hybrid of some type. or just a very unique variation of the 3 master races
What race are (Asian) Indians? They appear related to Australoids, Conversely, in which of the 3 races do Australoids fit?
Thank you!
Read it again, under this classification, they are Mongoloid. Of course, since they predominately walked to the Americas from Asia, there is a basis.
I believe bob was referring to the people of India. That are not considered Mongoloid under this classification. Northern Indian peoples are considered Caucasian. Thus, although people from India are from Asia, they are thus Asian but also Caucasian. Peoples from Southern India are difficult to classify and do not fall into either of these three categories nicely.
Its all a big mess tbh…
People belonging to Southern India are thought to have originated from the Australoids, which come under Negroids
Hi everyone,
North Indians are Aryans (Caucasoid)
The term Aryan originates from the Sanskrit word ?rya meaning “honourable, respectable, noble”.
South Indians are Dravidians (Negroid)
The Sanskrit word dr?vi?a is used to denote the geographical region of South India.
P.S. I am an Indian. 🙂
IF YOU SAY ADAM AND EVE WERE JEWS ALL IN THE WORLD ARE JEWS?
Jew only reffers to the nothern two tribes judah and benjamen there are still 10 southern tribes which are hebrew but wouldnt nessisarily be called jews the story of genesis is the story of a particular blood line adam and eve were never the only two people on earth just the only two in the garden
Jews are no descendants of Abraham Isaac and Jacob, but of Esau. A Jew is not an Hebrew and an Israeli is not an Israelite. Today’s Israel (Isis) (Ra) (El) is not ancient Yisra’al.
What do you consider people from Central and South America? What is their racial make up in Columbia? Peru? El Salvador? Mexico? Argentina? Brazil?
Let’s look at the migration of mankind to region. Native Americans migration from Asian, did not stop in North America, but reaches down to South America too! An Aztec Indian, American, Eskimo and Indian (native of India) are all of the Asian race. Their culture, language and food types are similar. Remember man evolved from man!
How can race be a social construct. I think Black and White peoples difference and pretty physical if you ask me. They sound different as well. I think what they are saying is they are both Human, and there for just one race, well ok, but clearly they are two types of human.
Well I don’t ask you because you are looking for evidence of difference when genetically there is no difference. I don’t think that you should use the word ‘clearly’ as it begs the question when nothing is clear. If you insist on difference then it only shows your bias and mindset. Cultural differences are another thing and many of us like to see ourselves as being superior so we create these imagined divisions. Some cultures are more developed than others mainly due to education which makes the Brits superior to the American. (only kidding !)
There are differences, and anatomically there are differences between races. That is how a race of a skeleton is identified because of them. And that has nothing to do with, as you state “bias or mindset, these are real differences. And medically, it is very important to know these differences because of different genetic predispositions! This is not saying anyone is better than anyone else- Just saying that it is important to recognize the differences.
There are no races. Humanity is mixed, super mixed. Some black people have broad noses, but so many Irish people. I have seen both black and Asian people with kinked hair. I have seen almond shapes eyes on both Caucasian, Mongolid, and Negroids. The point is there are no clear races/ethnic groups. Humans are diverse and there different combinations of traits depending on where you go. This article is nonsense.
There are lots and lots of different races
When quality of a person is judged upon good virtues such as truthful ness humbleness honesty may be belonging to any race continent region then difference of races should not come to mind
Jews aren’t black (Negoid)–they are genetically Caucasian/Caucasoid. The science of “race” is based on genetic constructs that do NOT rely on skin color alone. It takes into account bone structure and other racial markers like hair texture, eye color, and other minor differences.
Caucasoids (“white”) are genetically dominate over Negroids, while Mongoloids (Asians) are genetically dominate over both Caucasoids and Negroids. What that means is, if you mix an Asian with a White person, those genetic markers (almond eyes for example) will generally show up in the offspring over having Non-almond shaped eyes. Also, the eyes will be brown and not blue, because the brown eye gene is stronger than the blue eye gene, which is recessive.
That being said, there is only ONE race and that is the human race. Consider the three designations listed above as “breeds” of human. For example, Collies, German Shepherds and Golden Retrievers are different breeds, but they are ALL DOGs.
A Jew is a practicer of the religion Judaism, not an ethnicity. A black man can be a Jew. A Mexican can be a Jew. A black man who practices Christianity does not classify himself as “Christian” (ethically) he classifies himself as black. Jew is not an ethnicity it’s a religion so don’t act like it is. There’s many different ethnicities such as Italian, English, Mexican, Australian, Canadian, but Jewish IS NOT one of them. Say I’m Canadian and I practice Christianity. When people ask me “what ethnicity are you?” I don’t say “oh I’m Christian” because any type of religion is simply just a religion not an ethnicity. So yes, Jews are black, and they are white, and Asian, and Hispanic. You can be half English and half Chinese, but you cannot be half Chinese and half Jewish. So saying “Jews are Caucasian” is 100% incorrect
Thank you for correctly relaying the obvious which some choose to let fly over their heads.
I’m black and your statement about “Caucasians genetically dominated over Negroids” is 100% incorrect and the history of racism backs me up on this as well as visual evidence. Hence, why do you think they created the “1 drop rule”?. Whites knew that if African people mixed with whites the end result is an African. That creates a conflict for their racist oppressive system. Our dominant features (broad noses, kinky hair, broad lips and skin color which is what the racists who colonized this country feared the most) will most likely be passed down to our offspring no matter if we mate with Caucasoid or Mongoloids. There are thousands of bi-racial celebs and historical figures to back up my claim if u disagree. Take a look at what features are most dominant in those mixed with Negroid genes. Because we are the original humans on this planet, we have the most dominant genes…..Mongoloids usually pass down their eyes from what I’ve seen
Truth and Fact, can’t believe he tried to pull that bull even more stupid is him believing as he fabricated the lies ignoring the history in the failed attempts to breed out black people because our genetic was dominant above all, stronger and faster on average, because we are the original, they still fear it till today.
And yes Mangoloids do pass on the their eye shape.
Stronger? False. Faster? Yes.
You’re also far less intelligent on average. FAR less.
No prominent civilizations. No written language. Barely any scientific contributions.
The Chinese and Russians will eventually rule the world. Hispanics will overrun America and there will be nobody to protect you and give you free money any longer.
U sound like a white supremacist and who names themselves Lucifer anyway? Anyways, look up the documentary Hidden Colors and that’ll tell u about ancient black history. Who do u think the Ancient Egyptians were? Don’t tell me u think they were white, Arab, Alien or anything but black?
Ancient Egyptians were North African.
A-A-RON you come across as a black supremacist. No better than white supremacists. Like them, you seem more concerned with repeating the dogma of racial ideology than making any serious comments based on facts.
Black supremacists and white supremacists: two sides of the same ideology.
Lol,sorry bro,am white but like to face the truth,blacks are quite stronger and way way faster than any other race,the whites in the past as always been scared of the blacks,due to the fact that,we whites or should I say the Caucasian race has a way of utilizing and discovering hidden powers in other race and using them to our own advantage,Egyptians were actually from north Africans and you can imagine how advdanced they were,we for some reason have the ability to manipulate other races,and the only race that has been smart to know this are the Asians(Chinese).and dude your comments has a lot of racism in it,just had to comment when I saw this,funny How it’s the stolen funds and Raw materials from the Asian and negroids continents that builds our economy,
What is the point of splitting hairs of race or bred. We are not all the same no mater how much some people want to say we are
Jews are members of a religion they are not a race
Thank you so so much! So I moved to a small town where people are very racist about “Asians” and they’ll be saying offending things literally 24/7 and it sucks cause I’m American (because I was born in California and grew up in the United States) and I have a normal name. I can’t go around the grocery store without getting a mean stare. Our school has a strict policy on discrimination and racism and they can be in alternative school (school for the baddest kids) but nobody ever follows it. I don’t even think some TEACHERS do. School would have been a pain in the back if I didn’t have my friends. They acted like I was just another new kid in school and didn’t care about my “race” at all. If you’re Asian, you know what stupid white people ask you all the time.
The only thing I know from your comment is that you are as racist as those you are complaining about as proven by your statement ” stupid white people”!
“Referents of terms like Black, White, Asian, and Latino are social groups, not genetically distinct branches of humankind.”
“leading intellectuals had recognized that even using the word “race” “was virtually a confession of ignorance or evil intent.”
Well, you see being born in California means that you are educated unlike the red neck attitudes that you see around. They are not all bad people but just ignorant. Keep away from them and mix with those of similar evolvement.
I am from NYC and its shocks me to read your post. I’m saddened that you have to
live in a town that is stuck in the early 1940’s . Hold your head high and try to treat these
fools as if they are invisible .
I am Ethiopian(African). I observe in my country all race analysis don’t work because, the society is wide mix of different colors, hair structure, facial structure &so on. Look at Mengistu(former president), he is black but Hailesilase( the former king) he is Asian style face…. both are originally Ethiopian. So, it is better to argue that the world is in a continuous movement of mixing different colors & culture.
I have writen on December 23 th about me. I researched my familiy tree for 200 years ( exactly from year 1807). They had all arian characterics, ( narrow noses, mostly blue or green eyes, narrow heads, pale skin, european brests) . How comes, that I have a wide face like an eskimo, a round head, african breast, green/brown eyes, only my skin pale.
You sound human to me!
LOL! The Fuhrer story regarding Blond hair & Blue eyes is a Hollywood
fantasy created post 1945! What that has to do with the core subject here is known only to Terry apparently?
Indians are dravidians. who were caucasian. The southern people are a mixture of austroloids and dravidians hence looking a bit different. But a good share of Indians are caucasians.
The Aryans today would be the Afghan/Pashtuns who are the closest to them in phenotypes and genetics. Not to mention they came from their area.
No moron Pashtuns are Eastern Iranian mixed with Turkic blood and Ghengis Khans Mongols. The true Aryans are Bengali Brahmins with R1a levels over 72%, Aryan is defined by the haplogroup R1a and the Indo Aryan language family too. Just 51% Afghan Pashtuns carry R1a.
Who can explain : My parents, grand parents and even grand grand parents belonged to arian race, but I have a wide nose and a wide round face (like an eskimo), a round head and a very fair skin. And I am not like to any of my blood relatives. And I have a prove, that my father is really my father. And I researched my family tree for 200 years.
There are four races in world :Aryans,Dravids,Mongolians,Africans.
Aryans:Indians,Europians,Americans,Percians
Dravids:Tamil,Kannad,Telgu,Kerali
Mongolians:Chinees,Japanees etc.
Africans:Nigros etc.
Indians are mixed Dravidians. The Aryans would include more of the Afghan people my hindu friend.
Afghans are part of irano-afghan subrace my afghan friend. The northwest indians such as Punjabis, Kashmiris, Rajputs are indic Aryans/Indo-Aryans phenotipicaly,linguistically and genetically.
How is it that Hamites are Caucasians and not Negroids? History books and carvings illustrate Hamites to have dark skin and thick hair.
Australoid, I can’t tell if they have their origin from Negroids but they seem to be a mix of the red Indians and the Negroids. The red Indians are a major race.
The Indians (from India) and Mexican (native Mexicans) I don’t know if they are pure races but they are really an ancient race. Also, there was a black race in the Americas before the red-indians. Its yet to be know if they were more similar to Negroids or Australoids or a totally different race Entirely.
Because Hamites and Caucasians were negroids before they departed Africa, their place of origin. At that time all Homo sapiens lived in Africa and were nearly identical in appearance. at that time, according to dna studies, all people in Africa belonged to 4 distinct tribes. For a brief period of time the Sahara desert cooled enough that one of the four tribes moved north out of Africa and into Arabia. The other three tribes would remain I sub Sahara Africa for millennia unchanged in the physical features because they were already adapted to that environment. The tribe that settled in Arabia had to adapt to different climatic conditions and also encountered Neanderthals with whom they interbred. This would obviously create a change in appearance from sub Saharan people who never encountered Neanderthals. Today, all people of the world except sub saharans have 4 to 6 percent Neanderthal Dna. After the new Arabian tribe created the worlds first civilization in Sumer, the Fertile Crescent dessertified causing many of the Arabians to move into Europe which at this point was not inhabited by modern humans. As the world was in a period f natural warming, Northern Europe had a welcoming climate and these nomads settled there, their appearance still darker skinned and akin to the Arabians from where they originated. When the ice age returned, the people in Northern Europe hunkered down and survived although the majority died from cold, starvation , and some speculate from vitamin d deficiency. In areas of high sunlight, vitamin d is abundant and too much or too little can be lethal. The humans’ natural,defense against excess vitamin d is darker skin via melanin. Africa and Middle East have lots of sunshine and the people of the regions skin remained dark. However in Northern Europe during the ice age, the darker the skin the more chance you would die of vitamin d deficiency. Through natural selection, people of lighter skin would survive. Lighter eyes were also better adapted to snowy and ice covered areas as the lighter eyes would absorb less reflected light . the term negroid is problematic because it seems to apply to anyone with black skin. A better term would be sub Saharan blacks. The people of Ethiopia , although they have black skin, were members of the one tribe who left Africa to Arabia but then moved back into northeast Africa. Although their skin is black they belong to the same tribe of people who left Africa, some of which moved to Europe and through adapting to a different environment, became Caucasians. Should also mention that when Fertile Crescent desertified, some moved to the east populating Asia and the Americas where they physically adapted to their natural environments.
Bingo! Evolution what a wonderful thing, the relative concentration of melanin affords a distinct biological advantages when matched with the proper environmental conditions. I believe mitochondrial DNA point us in the direction of a common origin in Africa. Begging the question whats the biological advantage to being either darker or lighter pigmented.
Melatonin is synthesized in the retina, GI tract and pineal gland and vital in regulating a host of biological processes vital to good health. When the amount of melanin is a bad match with your relative exposure to sunlight disease manifest.
So relative pigmentation is only a biological advantage when matched to the optimal environmental conditions for the level of pigmentation you possess. As we move from agrarian to industrialized and now the digital world we spend less time in the optimal environment for which we evolved. Hopefully we can all use our brains and knowledge for the benefit of the entirety of mankind and get past what remains our weakest link!
Its unfortunate that competition for resources brings out the worst in the animal kingdom and humans are not immune. We can be from the same country, state, town but different sides of the same river, or different religion, political affiliation, ethnicity or even different shades of the same color what ever it takes to identify the opposition competitor as being part of a different tribe .
People dnt know how to balance race. God made people different and separated them. People who lie and say race dosn’t exist are wrong. One reason is, is because history isn’t fair to all races. But if history was wrote in a non bias truthful and balanced way people would understand. Just because the west was superior than other cultures it can be attributed to luck. The west should be leading the rest of the world but instead it’s hated.
First of all who is this god person. I can find no evidence of his existence and after long searching I conclude that he does not exist.
Different tribes or subgroups have evolved at different times. The Egyptians and the Chinese had cultures far in advance at one time. The Greeks also among others. The Egyptians lasted 5000 years before their decline whereas we are now 2000 years into our so called civilisation. We will be superseded perhaps by the Chinese. It goes in cycles. As to hatred of the West, the Romans were hated but we now understand their superior evolvement at the time.
All races came from black people. Black are the first race.
what about adam and eve,where they black and if so,what language where they using?
Adam and Eve were the first Jewish people. People God had favored over the rest of mankind. After they dined he sent them to live with the rest of mankind but entrusting them with his law. Jew were the first civilized people people been here for millions of years. And we did evolve like scientist say but the bible was written to early man and science wasn’t even a concept yet. Old Testament are the basics written to help man to civilize. The Old Testament and creation story was written so early man could understand and it was teaching man how to make a week ect.
what colour was Adam?
Adam and eve lived in middle east and their skin color was tawny. They are not jew because jew comes from Ishaq(a son of the prophet ibrahim). Also the Jesus is of middle east.
Adam and Eve were black
God mixed different types of clays when he created Adam:black,white,gray and other colors so which make Adam black since black is dominate color. In fact all the prophets in the past were black and the really Jewish are black too but this will make some people mad.
So God created racism
There has been a lot of research on the colour of Adam and eve. These researches are still ongoing as description are limited and translations have changed meanings of original words. Meanwhile, a lot of conclusions have been made on the colour of Mary, mother of Jesus and Jesus. They have been concluded to be people of colour, non-caucasians contrary the picture which was used to depict Jesus as a caucasian. The picture was actually a picture of Cesare Borgia. The Hamites and Shemites have also been concluded to be of dark colour and genealogy and genetics have proven a tribe in South-Africa, some tribes in Nigeria, some in Ghana and scattered around the world to have their origin from Ham and Shem sons of Noah who were dark coloured men. Noah has been described differently in different ancient tales from different parts of the world, but one thing they all agreed in is the colour of Ham and Shem which is a dark colour. The bible further shows in luke 3:23-38 that Jesus was a descendant of Shem. If Shem had major descendants in Isreal, what have they done to all the black races of Isreal? Jacob himself was a descendant of Shem. How come the entire jews have become caucasian? Think of Egypt. The early Egyptians who built the pyramids were very dark in colour and Joseph blended with their colour and his brothers recognised him not. What colour do you think his brothers were, Think of Moses he grew up in the house of pharaoh as an Egyptian, what colour do you think he is? The same way the Jews are now people from the mountain of Caucasus is the same way was Romans are now also completely people from the same mountain and Egyptians who were fully dark skinned, are now white skinned.
This is untold History. My girlfriend is white, my children might be coloured but who knows what the third and fourth generation would be. Slowly the mountaineers are taking over the world.
Pity that all archeological evidence shows that never ever there where Jewish tribes in Egypt, nor was there the exodus from Egypt. All evidence shows that the Bible was written around the 7th century BC to strenghten a political agenda of the then rulers of Juda and skilfully mixed fact, fiction and myth..
The bible shows nothing. It is a collection of stories made up by old and perhaps wise men. We have moved on away from this god stuff and we look for evidence and not fairy stories.
and they did this research how?
Afrocentrism is still perpetrated by the American blacks.
Actually, it came from Asians really… Then the the people near the equator needed some camouflage and skin that’s tough not to burn in intense sunlight and whatnot and then the mutant creatures from Russia developed which made whites.
I believe in the theory of evolution each group of people traveled the world and after millions of years slowly developed to and adjusted to temperature weather and habitat creating the races we all know
Thank for Your education about race and I know now we all came from one parent
Evolution is the only thing that is evident to my sensibilities and since the discovery of DNA reincarnation on some level is not unthinkable and goes hand in hand with reproduction. Just my theory based on my observation and sensabilities…
Thank you for this useful information. I looked this up because my job is a research interviewer….I do polls over the phone. Everyone is asked their race, but they are first asked if they are Hispanic or Latino. Then it is asked what race are they? Many get offended by this. According to information I just read, there are three races, not five or six, which my job offers, such as Alaskan or Indian native or southern islander. Thank you for clearing this up FOR ME!
Hispanic is linguistics becouse Hispanics are a linguistic minority. Hispanics are caucasion. Most Hispanics in America are mixed of Spanish who are white and native Americans.
If Hispanics are mixed ancestry with the Caucasians from Spain and native Americans , who aren’t Caucasians but Asians who came across the Bering strait from Siberia , then how are Hispanics Caucasians ? Aren’t they Caucasian / Asian mixed? Also, in Latin American countries the Caucasian bloodlines are very little in proportion to native Americans. There are also millions of sub Saharan Africans who are members of the Latin American identity, are they Caucasian Hispanics too? The only Latin American Caucasians would be the ancestors of Europeans whose ancestors never procreated with native Americans or submsaharan Africans. Pope Francis would be an example. He is genetically 100 percent Italian.
Given that the word “race” exist, it implies physical characteristics. On the Latino question, there are White, Asian and Negro latinos so each one has to be of either race and identify as such, hence the question. If a person is deemed white, for instance, BOTH parents must be white. otherwise that offspring won’t be considered or looked white. Take the seven children John Wayne (the actor) had. If you were to Google their images, you and anybody who does so will see that each and all look and have all the physical characteristics of a white person. Wayne was married to three Latinas and had his seven children with two of them. Hence the question that requires a person who had identified him/herself as Latino/a to check which race he/she belongs to. In above example, Wayne’s wives (the mothers of his seven children) must have id’d as white because they were white. Otherwise their children would not or could not look white. This cannot be said, say, of president Obama whose father was Negroid and his mother white. Obama could never be politically correct in describing himself as white. And how about those millions of other Americans whose mothers are also Latinas and hence do not have their Latin/Spanish surname and are all (if mixed with other non-Hispanics whites) white looking because their genes (their ancestors’) spoke for them. Remember, Latin Americans are those people whose ancestors came from the five Latin countries in Europe: France, Italy, Portugal, and Rumania.
And remember that they all came from Africa originally.
Being African originally is not something to be asgamed of at all!
I also have a gard time believing wgat most others seem to think they are correct! Hthe most compelling information asnd cstring priof with
Such convincing facys of our sncoent ancestors points straight to a direct intervention from life not from this planet
HAha, its too obvious to ignore and my belief in Jesus Christ still fills my soul with complete peace and trust!
But africa was not where it is now when that happened
Hispanic/Latino is not a race. The term was first used by the U.S. Census Bureau in the 70’s to identify all Spanish speakers from Latin America living in the USA. Latinos can be White, Black, Asian or (although not a race), mixed, known as Mulattoes or Mestizos. Also, Hispanics/Latinos prefer to identify themselves by their nationality, not by their race.
As well about our cosmological make up on universal physical structure,proud heritage culture and environment.
I agree, there is only one race and that is the human kind.
Agreed! 🙂
I thought there was only one race…..”The Rat Race” we all navigate every day of our lives!! LOL
Arabs,American Indians,Negro,Chinese,Whites,Austroloid Aborigine,Indian,Polynesian.Now we all came from these races,and some of these races came from other earlier races.There would have been some crossbreeding,between races who came in contact with each other,on a more permanent basis,thru being conquered or migration or mutual cooperation,and intergration,between races.But for certain there has been changes in peoples characteristics overtime,and some races may have been just as they were in very ancient times,until the coming of the modern world,started to beat its drum.But which races are the oldest,who really knows,with human movements and changing characteristics,it must be hard to pinpoint anything about origins,and which race is related to another,is best uncovered thru scientific means,and what little historical evidence we have.A eg of migration and change is.The Papua new Guineans are the same race as the Australian aboriginal.But after the Papuans arrived in Australia they changed,in many ways.So when these people left there origins,they changed.And profoundly too.Which is Amazing.The English are the latest race,but we have european dna etc.But we speak a new language,and this has changed the way we act,and think.From how we would be if our ancestors never left there original homelands.Its a shame the ancient languages become extinct,they would have told us so much,about what was going on in our minds.This is one of my favorite subjects.The different peoples on earth and there evolution.But we can only see so far back,and that’s not fair,when there’s so much to learn but only so much on offer.
who say european was the last race if you read DNA history you will know european Exist same any race in this world
Europeans evoked in the caucas mountains. Correct term for there race is caucasion not only Europeans but northern Africans and west Asian people’s are caucasion as well. Caucasians range from white or very light fair complexion to very tan complexion. Caucasians have influence many cultures of other races including cultures of China and India. Egyptians were caucasions and so were the moors. Pensions and Jews also are caucasions. Persians call there seves Aryana. That’s who hitler talked about but was very wrong becouse arayans didn’t have blond hair and blue eyes. They most likely had brown hair and brown eyes becouse they described a Uralic group of Turks as having yellow hair and blue eyes these people came from Northern Europe and Finnish and Estonian languages came from these people. Arayans mixed with these people in Scandinavia and is the origins of the Germanic people.
Egyptians were never caucasion idiot….and all Asian people weren’t caucasion.
If you are trying to claim everyone was white you are retarded
Yes, Egyptians- both ancient and modern- are Caucasian. Terry even says that Caucasians can be of any skin tone from fair to dark. By saying “If you are trying to claim everyone was white you are retarded,” you’re misrepresenting what he was saying. Caucasian is a term referencing peoples of Europe, Western/Central Asia, and North Africa- regardless of their skin tone. Egypt is in North Africa, and therefore the people are Caucasian. This does not mean they are or ever were blonde-haired, blue-eyed Europeans (they were and are not). As evidenced from the Table of Nations plate found in the tomb of Ramses III, the Egyptians depicted themselves as distinct from both fair-skinned Libyans and black-skinned Nubians. This is still true today, as modern Egyptians (the closest relatives of Ancient Egyptians) are neither “black” or “white,” yet they still belong to racial/ethnic classification of Caucasian. Secondly, he never said all Asian people (I assume we’re talking about Eastern Asians since Western Asians are Caucasian- which doesn’t automatically mean white-skinned) were Caucasian. He said Caucasians influenced some of the cultural aspects of China and much of the culture of India. Well, he never said much of the culture of India, but Caucasians did. Caucasian mummies have been found in China wearing distinctively European styled clothing and were also found to have light hair, both blonde and red hair. That’s what he meant when he said Caucasians influenced that culture. He never said (Eastern) Asians were Caucasian. You really should learn to read before you go saying something foolish like “Egyptians were never caucasion idiot….and all Asian people weren’t caucasion.
If you are trying to claim everyone was white you are retarded.”
i think the study seems incomplete, this universe came into being billions of years ago .how are these races were counted since the first day .
”Dravidian” is a cultural group not an ethnic group (genetic analysis found no difference between the so called ‘dravidians’ and other people’s of india). Also’ Aryans migrated only in limited numbers to india (that is if any migration took place at all). The fair skin gene came through many different peoples (not just aryans) into india and came at many different times…not just at the time of aryans ( aryan invasion or migration has still no archaehalogical evidence to support it).
Look at modern day indians in south india (dravidians) and they are majority caucosoid in appearance.
The three races…causcasoid, mongoloid and negroid are classified based on skeletal features of face and body…not colour of the skin. Skin colour changes in just a few generations depending on the level of sun exposure, but skeletal features dont.
You obviously know more on this topic than the author cared to cover. This article seemed entirely shortsighted and bias. It speaks of the word “race” as if it is a purely social construct not rooted with any physical evidence. Kudos to you.
Honestly, human features are in a spectrum. For example dark dark dark brown skin (black) and really really really pale skin (white) are the extremes of color tones. Same with skull shape, lip size, nose structure, and eye shape. Even within these suppossed groups there is so much diversity. Each individual has differing features within each of these three groups. I think it is silly to try to classify people because the differences are too complex. Also, there is no agreed upon system, so why use it? Many people make skin color a big issue. There are “white” supremecists. There are people who idolize the “black” color of their skin. It’s so silly. In the big picture, does it even matter?
They are not trying to classify people they have done it. We are all different and they are real differences which is why for example we can lok at a skeleton and know which race it belonged to
South Indians from four (now five) south indian states namely Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana are Dravidians and other peoples from the states of Maharashtra, Goa, Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal and Assam are overwhelmingly Dravidian than the Aryan-Dravidian or Mongolo-Dravidian mixed race. Majority (more than 90%) of peoples from these states have dark brown to black skin color, have big noses (not long but broad), fleshy dark lips, and many other features common to Negroid race. They have features of both Caucasoid and Negroid races and can be placed on the outer periphery of Caucasian race due to their skull structure, they are more similar to Ethiopian race. Whereas most peoples from North India are mostly Caucasoid with all the caucasian features (but with a variety of skin color like nordic white, fair, wheatish, olive, tanned, light brown and brown). I’ve visited almost all the states of India and I can safely say Peoples from Kashmir region are about 90% fair, from Jammu, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh are about 80%, from Uttarakhand, Delhi and Haryana about 75% can be safely placed under fairs caucasian race, and peoples from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar Rajasthan and Gujarat are about 60-70% with fair skin. Whereas other peoples of India are mostly darker in skin color with little negro features.
all men originated from negroes, caucas…negro, mongol..negros etc… long ago they all lived like nations, and then, it was changed for color division, …..but why ?????
Well one thing is for sure, per these comments. There are those who have a strong need for ‘race’ distinction. Only they know why.
It is not a “need” to know why. It is biology. There are very distinct and measurable physiological differences amongst all races. It is not a question of whether any one race is better/worse than any other. It is a question of wanting to learn about the entirety of the human species. Saying that race between humans is an illusion is akin to saying the obvious and prominent physical differences between domesticated house cats and snow leopards is an illusion as well. Utter nonsense. Taxonomy is an important tool in better understanding the massively complex web of all organic life on earth. Why should it not be applied to humans as well, especially if it can lead to significant discoveries?
only God knows what he created
Furthermore I dislike the term ‘Caucasian’ as various populations that are distinct are being lumped together. It isnt very accurate when describing a middle eastern person or european.
Eurasian populations share alot in common but also have unique differences as well. The topic of race shouldnt draw such negative emotion. I am aware of many of those who claim race is a social construct come from America and are some influential ‘biologists’ or ‘anthropoligists’… When I look at races I do not look at the ‘New World’ i.e. America or Mexico… too complex to compare them as there are many differences within new world populations and then there are none in some cases. The populations even of European Americans for example are different and share different genetics and when they became mixed it makes it even more difficult to classify groups here. The only new world population that should be compared to other ‘races’ globally should be Aboriginal Americans who are unmixed [they share alot in common with Siberians].
In evolution the term race is used different than lets say comparing various human populations. There is validity to race in respect to mankind however our perception of it must not be political. Sadly any biologist, anthropologist, zoologist, psychologist, natural historian etc… who declares that there are differences and various races of humanity will lose his or her job sadly. That is wrong. Science has nothing to do with politics and if the far left and far right dislike that then tough shit. The only social constructs are political nut jobs.
…i agree with you 100% the developed world has become so concerned with being politically correct that they have halted the true goal of science. Science, TRUE UNBIASED SCIENCE, does not care to give you the answer you want, only the answer that is correct. Saying that human races are an illusion of society is utter nonsense when we have empirical evidence of genetic characteristics leading to a variety of physical differences amongst the races of humanity. If the “illusion” of race is true between humans, then is it any less true for any other group of organic organisms?
what race is German
Most of us learned these facts in grade school, but today school fails to teach the important stuff that would help to prevent racial hatred. Example, Mexicans consider themselves to be of a different racial group than Caucasian when in fact they are Caucasian. Sorry to bust their bubble but the news media has lead them to believe a lie. You only need to look at skin color to determine the 3 or 4 human races. In the case of Germans they are Caucasian ( or White ).
What may be of interest to some is how the races and ethnic groups were created by God. In the book of Genesis the story of Noah and his family is recorded. Using the popular method of bible study (observe, interpret, apply) one may find that after the flood God issued certain orders and conveyed certain powers to Noah’s family (Genesis 9 English Standard Version (ESV)): 9: 1, And God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth; Read Genesis 9: 2-3; and Genesis 9: 4-6. Once again God puts emphasis on filling the Earth in Genesis 9: 7. In Genesis 10 English Standard Version (ESV) God forms the Nations Descended from Noah. Rather than obey God and disperse over the Earth as they were told to do the world population migrated to a plain in a land of Shinar and settled there and began increasing in population and power. Their power was becoming such that they felt they no longer needed God
(Genesis 11: 1-4).(4 Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.”). Genesis 11: 5-32 shows how God confused the languages, dispersed the population throughout the Earth, and created the races and ethnic groups finally resulting in prejudice (“Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. 7 Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech.” 8 So the Lord dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city.)
Wonderful answer! And if God separated them; seeing as how He is all powerful; then don’t you think that He would place the ones that were similar in the same groupings? Ha, lets not forget that God has a plan and when He dispersed the folks across the earth, I’m sure He put like with like.
Steve
“Example, Mexicans consider themselves to be of a different racial group than Caucasian when in fact they are Caucasian.”
Mexican, Latinos, Hispanics, Cubans, etc. are descendants of the continent of Asia. Therefore, they are not Caucasian, but of the Mongoloid race.
Sir get your facts straight before posting lies. They are not all descendants of Mongoloids, they are indeed a mix of Caucasians and mongoloids, in some countries, blacks as well.
Why would u say that mexicans are white?that is not a fact . Mexicans speak spanish spanish is a caucasian language. The spaniards conquered most of south america an inslaved and killed alot of south americans rapped there people an forced Christianity on them.
…what?
Mexicans are a mix of Mongoloids and Caucasians. Less than 50% are Caucasian.
There are 4 human races. http://www.facebook.com/the4humanraces
There is ONE human race.
My husband is from Sri lanka. H e and his daughter are black than a MF. Idc what anyone says, technically he may be from South Asia and desperately wants to Americanized and a white person, but he’s closer to the negroid to me. Idc what genetics say. He hates that I call him black.
He says I’m more of a white person since my father is white and my mom is black- I’m both. My vietnames e nail salon lady says that South Asians are bottom of the barrel Asians and are looked down on from regular asians. This is crazy shit.
And isn’t “Aryan” a term used by Nazi’s and Neo-Nazi’s? Isn’t the correct term “European’.. Is the writer racist or something?
No, while the term “Aryan” was used by Hitler it was a corrupted term that he took. The Aryan “race” so to speak were the peoples that originated in India. Hitler stole many of his terms and symbols from other ethnicities and history. Another example of this is the swastika. Originally, and when turned the correct way, the swastika was a Hindu symbol which meant peace. Many Hindus no longer use this symbol because of the corrupted meaning and it’s new assossiation.
Thats not true theres two kinds of indians in india one are white skinned the other is brown skinned that is because the white skinned indians are caucasians ..they settled there thousands of yrs ago the word aryan is actually not a race it was a language a group of ancient caucasian spoke people.jus like the word iran comes from the word aryan iranians are caucasians they were Persians before that.
No Aryan is from Arya and the haplogroup of this race is R1a.
I’m half Melanesian and Half Dutch.. This is the first time i see that i belong to the Negroid race. I’ve always ben told by my Melanesian family that Melanesian is a race of it’s own. But apparently i’m a negro?
Polynesia was settled by the Ainu who the original poster doesn’t seem to have heard about. Denisovan Man is from the area of the Ainu who some think include Kennewick Man’ Modern genetic maps can be seen in the thread on the Ainu inside the forum.
Do you doubt we could create a Minotaur today? If you doubt Da Vinci had a Philosopher’s Stone as did many others including Nostradamus – please search their names here. “SEE”-ing the past and future might be the cause of many myths but also the motive for ancient attunement genetics using tools or technology like the caduceus staffs.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18974418
I don’t care what the “scientists” say. The major races have extreme differences, and these differences have led to war. Whatever created us used different hominids, creating different people. We are all still people, in the same way pit bulls and Labrador retrievers are dogs. This article suggested that there are no genetic predispositions…. Which is infuriating. Pit bulls have lockjaw, labs Dont. The races are extremely different, this garbage article suggests that differences doesn’t define race. But it does, and that’s why there is war. I can’t wait til the next human problem occurs… Genetic profiling, cause race issues have been pissing me off since highschool.
What are you talking about? White Europeans fought each other all the time. As did any group of the same race throughout history. Religion has been a bigger detriment than race for this war starting your talking about.
American Indians all fought each other. Today, the Arabs are all fighting Isis (which are all Arabs). Yes, religion is part of it, but they are all Arabs. Look at the Irish fighting each other within their own country over religion. And then there was the American civil war–northerners against southeners no matter the race. . However, today in America, black men are killed more often by other black men—not by whites, Asians or Hispanics or American Indians. Give us any reason and we’ll have a fight about it!.
.
in American in general same race killings out number biracial killings, don’t say it as if it’s only with black people that it’s the most.
It is funny people think Hispanic is a race and also Puerto Rican is a race. Hispanic is a ethnicity of Spanish speaking people in the America’s which can be of any race black white asian etc. Also puerto rican is a nationality not a race just like American, Canadian nationals.
Latin Americans are mutts and, by the tri-race/breed differentiation, would have us literally a mixture of all three races: Caucasion mainly from Spanish and other colonists, Negroid from Africans, and Mongoloid from the American natives. Total sato. So thorough, you can’t pretend it’s diluted into black or white or native (unless you try reeeally hard and eemagine). Also African Americans, which are actually considerably mixed with “whites”, however much people like to pretend otherwise.
Did you know African Americans can actually be white?
Yeah, I can imagine all the slave women being raped by their white owners.
Puerto Rico is not a country/nation. It is a commonwealth of the US.
The races of man are obviously social political terms imposed on people with real social, biological and political consequences. It is quite funny that people assume that because there are obvious physical differences between people from various parts of the world, they are distinct “races”. This tells me that people are presupposing there is significant meaning behind these differences. No one has ever said there are no physical differences, but it has been the racists attaching biological meaning to these differences. Funny how no one talks about “big” toe differences, feet shape, ear lobe shape, type of ear wax differences between people.
Actually, there was a recent study that documented a clear difference in ear wax types between mongoloid (asian) and caucasoid (white) people. Caucasoid wax was of the “wet” type, while mongoloids had “dry” ear wax. Gross either way!
It is useless to discuss races where we have enough trouble to boot out. Only make sure you have a place in Heaven. If a Jew sins, he loses it; if a non-Jew does the same, he gets the same result. So where is the superiority of a race in God’s agendum?
So which category do Mexicans and South Americans belong to? Most of them resemble American Indians more than they do Caucasians.
Mexicans and South Americans are primarily Caucasians. Most might be “Brown” in complexion, but are still considered Caucasians. Take the East Indians (India) for example, they range in complexion from Fair Skinned-to-Brown-to-Black, but are still considered Caucasians.
Sorry dough- do head mexicans are amerindians thus making them mongoloids and not caucasoid.
considering how most natives of the americas were wiped out and subsequently replaced with millions of caucasians, mexicans and latin-americans are closer to caucasoids and caucasians than to mongoloids.
I believe that Peruvians and Mexicans are actually the Latin-Americans proportionately higher In mongoloids . If we look at the other South America countries, they are mostly Caucasoid.
we can look back farther and see that they are all Negroid.
If you don’t believe in race then look in the mirror. Every thing about the major division of races is totally different.the say we talk look act think smell. Everything is totally different. .but being different is what existence and life are about. No one is better then anyone else.just different. Equal but but different..go to San Francisco to Oakland to San jose visit China town, Oakland silicon valley and tell me that were not different races. Right here in one state. Not just biology. Spiritual races.God bless you
I think you’re missing the point. The way you act is defined by culture. Or are you saying a black person in Holland will always act the same way as a black person in Nigeria?
The way you talk as well. Do black British people have American accents? Because they sound just like black people in America? What you’re doing is what society has done for centuries, you’re looking at cultures and saying “that’s race”. You think culture is race.
To quote Meyer’s Konversationslexicon as a scientific source strips the entire article of credibility. Meyer’s was simply a dictionary, just like Webster’s in English. Its editors were linguists, not anthropologists or geneticists. Their conclusions were antiquated when compared to the scientific classifications of those times, which were more along the lines of Rev. G. Wood’s 1870 tome “The Uncivilized Races of Men in all Countries of the World”.
Wood did not categorize human races by skin color, rather by their origin. The division of mankind by color was a creation of the English-speaking countries, because it allowed them to keep certain colors in slavery.
In the early part of the 20th century European anthropology leaned on the animal model, where a certain species (dog, horse, cat or bird) could be subdivided into many races, in which color played only a minor part or none at all. The accepted cataloging consisted of 72 races, but then the Nazis came along in Germany and screwed all of that up by by assessing values to each race, with the Scandinavians (the Nordics, one of the four Arian races at the top, and the Bushmen, the Hamites (Arabs) and the Semites (Jews) at the bottom.. They ranked some black skin races very high, such as the Massai and those of the former German Colonies (except the Hottentots). The only race the Nazis really hated (only for for what they were) were the Jews. They hated two other races, (the Romas and Sinti), but only because of their customs and their behavior, not because of what they were.
Throughout history, the separation of mankind by skin colors has been an exercise in idiocity, done primarily for the purpose of control….
sinhalese are not negros..they are decending from the north inidans.(that mean they are caucasins)
That’ is what the Mahavamsa, the fantasy story of the Sinhalese says but that is not true. The Sinhalese are negoroid and vast majority of them are black in color and they look like the close cousins of Africans.
Color is not the only fact dividing races. Caucasian, Mongolian and Negroid races depend on the skull shapes also. Although Sri Lankans have dark skin color because of near to the equivalent. So, Still Sri Lankas are Caucasian.
There are still 3 definite racial groups in terms of physical charecteristics manifest in the human phenotype. The three groups don’t look alike. They make up the human race or family. To acknowledge this is not racist. The groups are equal and all equally human. But to deny that the we look different is so stupid it would be laughable if it weren’t just another pathetic attempt to be politically correct.
Couldn’t have sAid it better
very true, i needed to distnguish between the races in the world and what you said really made it easier to think about
The deeper intellectuals debate a concept, the farther from reality it becomes, race is no exception!
In Gen 21 :1-2 God created the Jewish race,
This is why God loves the Jewish people,
So…..anyone can join the “Jewish Race”
By going to classes and converting
Not as easy to if u decide to say” I want to be Caucasian or negroid…..not a race but another religious group. Falls under ethnic. Sammy Davis Jr part of that race by birth or….???
So who create the other races ? Are we fabric ? Don’t talk nonsense. Allah created everything, all races, the earth and all universe. Allah won’t judge you for your race, Allah will judge you for your actions.
You mean he will like you if you blow people up and cut the heads of people off ?
What? Where do you see the word “Jew?” Abraham is the father of many nations, including Israel, Edom, and Arabs. Israel is not Jew. Big subject usually overlooked by both scholars and theologians.
Jews are the best racists. They have tons of paperback propaganda to prove my statement. “God’s chosen people.” would be a racist term by definition. Thanks for showing the world even more evidence of my statement. I don’t even need to create a straw-man argument toward you guys, you clearly point out how racist you are every time you type your “chosen race” mythology.
The “Jewish” or Hebrews did not exist until the covenant with Abraham. Waaaaaaaaay after the existence of man. Please quote the Bible correctly.
First of all theres no such thing as a jewish race .jewish is a religion not a race not a nationality. The jewish religion started from the tribe of judah when the hebrew people started to stray from the true religion of god .theres nothin in the old testament where u can find god describing a jewish race or religion .hebrews were semites jus like arabs they came from shem noah s son .most jews that are alive today are converts that dont have any hebrew blood and are not connected to the ancient israelites thats a fact dna was taken from so called jews in all dif
All different countrys and there dna is closer to the people they live amongst then any jew from anywhere in the world. The ashkenazi jew are turkic people called khazars who converted to judasim in the 9 th century .
Who wrote the bible? errrrrrr I know. It was the Jews. and that is why God prefers the Jews, because the Jews said so
Jews are not a race and there s no such thing as God.
This is hilarious just pure BS! How can you call a white man “Hametic”, when ham is supposedly the father of the dark races in the bible? This is just proof that all of the supposed science in the earth is very eurocentric and bias. Just because you conquered Egypt does not mean you were the first inhabitants there. Pretty soon they will say Timbuktu was made by the white race. Facts Jesus was not white! Semitic people are not white! only people that are white in the bible is Esau AKA Edom.
and I’m white
…And you need some help.
no you’re not white you’re a self-hating afrocenteric african-american : )
Bible is your basic source ? man, you´re nuts …
I have never seen a black African or African-American who looks like me: a white European. If the whole construct of race was sociological, how do you explain it? Do two white Europeans ever have children that fit the physical description of Negro? Why not?
I never felt uncomfortable with race classification as I learned it in school. and I never heard any “racism” in reference to classification.
This article makes me feel like it is the proverbial “fig leaf” of the mind.
Interesting topic. I lean mostly to one human race. Although the posibility of us being from other palnets and being abandoned here on earth as result of over population on other planets, then inter breeding and time lead to the 99.99 dna is actually still a posibility!!! If not a good movie.
If so, and after millions of years of inter breeding doesnt that process still evolves into one race?
we come from 12 different planets where the 13th racewhich is the combined racewe see today
Wow… what a bunch of tards….
The term race was coined long before our ancestors found earth…. one has to be very shallow to truly believe that a mysterious being created 2 sole individuals then later claimed that incest was wrong!!!! If that’s where we started from then we are all aunts/uncles, mother/father-daughter/son, cousins of each and every living “homo-sapien”. Then there are those that believe the evolution theory that we started out as a single cell organism. Well….. no explanation there!!!!! Then the so called “space scientists” lead us to believe that earth is the only planet that can sustain life. HAHAHA…. AGAIN I CALL BS. try this on for thought…….. our ancestors planets either were overpopulation and were forced to find another planet for their dependants to thrive. OR our ancestors that settled earth were prisoners or war and earth was their prison… and the whole race thing is that we were of different planetary origin and through many thousands of years of inter species breeding we all adapted a similar D.N.A. configuration. And the simple fact of us looking different is not only due to the difference in planetary genes but we adapted to the areas of earth we lived in involving the temperatures, direct sunlight, ectera ectera ectera………..
Just a thought of mine that sounds more logical than the beliefs of the way everyone is taught.
Who is *everyone* that you refer to? I certainly wasn’t taught that way so before you type you *tard* consider the facts, not what you PERCEIVE to be the facts.
There are races of people just like there are races of dogs, except in dogs we refer to them as breeds.
As I had stated its “MY THOUGHTS” and the term everyone refers to every living being that was taught that we evolved from a single cell organism or that we were created by a mysterious being and the world started from two people. Either myth has to many flaws to be accurate. And ” in my opinion” my theory sounds more logical. Also the scientists claim that we live on the only planet that can sustain life???? Have the studied/visited every planet in EVERY solar system/galaxy?
My advice is put some serious thought into it and think for yourself and not let others think for you.
the fact you call evryone tards proves your ignorance and in turn makes your arguement invalid.
There are almost no scientists today that think Earth is the only planet capable of supporting life.
Our “races” are acting more like “breeds” these days.
Yes, there are white, black, yellow, red people and these races have names to distinguish the differences. Nothing wrong with that.
And we all belong to he human race. I should have added this but I thought everyone understood that the umbrella is the human race and under this are the classifications
If nothing from nothing brings nothing how did we end up as something since you doubt God created you? And yes, As God said be fruitful and multiply In early days of creation Marriage among family members was common.
A world where we all look the same and speak the same, would be so boring. As long as it doesn’t lead to violence and discrimination, what is wrong with celebrating our unique differences?
I was born and live in the British Isles, but I certainly don’t class myself as British. This is despite the fact that according to my dna, I can trace my lineage in these islands back to the last ice-age.
Catergories thought up by scientists, academics and these liberal multicultural racists are completely meaningless.
Wake up people, Stop nit-picking! There is only one RACE; “The Human Race” Once we realize that in our hearts there will be peace!
If that were true there should be more peace than ever, you cannot find a country that whites call there own anymore. All white countries are being destabalized and destroyed by mass imigration.
Brian,
It is what it is… You can’t stop evolution can you?
mass immigration is an unavoidable part of life…
Ps. How do you think (you) got here?
Wake up people! These jewish and jew controlled crypto jew genetisits have brainwashed you into believing (the ‘race is a social construct’ bullshit.) They do it for a reason and many gullible people have fell for it. Equality is a social construct……
John you need to go back to school. Jesus, I thought people like you had been educated out of existence.
You are not so up to date on Neo-politics, are you?
Certain Jewish people have definitely done this, it is incontrovertible.
You can look into it yourself.
After they have done this, they have also announced that they have found the unique bits of DNA which enables them to claim themselves a race.
This is not some big secret.
I’m black.
true
In this blog, You have categorized Sinhalese(Sri lankans) as Negroids.
But we Sri Lankans are of Aryans who came to India.
I would like you to correct the point.
lol. Way to miss the entire point. of the article. Apart from that the fact is that any group can classified as anything, simply to suit whatever criteria the person doing the classifying deems pertinent. .
Hollin, he was giving an overview… not a detailed analysis of the migratory patterns of the so-called racial groupings. Furthermore, he goes on to say that racial grouping are in fact genetically illusory, meaning that there are no such things as racial groupings in a genetic sense, but that they are only to be found in a social sense. So, the point of the article was to show the futility of categorising racially as there is no difference in a genetic sense, apart from ‘random’ allocation of alleles that all ‘racial’ groupings possess.
.
Hollin you are wrong here. The original inhabitants of Sri Lanka were proto-australoids and not aryans as you claim. It is true that Sinhalese language belongs to Indo-European language family but your claim that the ethnic Sinhalese are pure Indo-Aryans is totally wrong. I can say that modern Sinhalese people are the result of mixing of indigenous proto-australoid and the aryan people.
This is so ignorant. According to your classification, I don’t even know what I am. I’m north african berber (native northafrican) and your description of africans is silly. I’ve been mistaken for being swedish, I’m blue eyed with wavey honey brown hair, long and narrow nose. And I’m native to north africa. Please explain yourself.
Ever heard of the Vandals? They were a Germanic tribe that migrated to North-africa in the 5th century
I’d say there a good chance you have in fact Swedish ancestors 🙂
What a caca their is only one race,the human race but many cultures
Not of it really matters. Bottom line, it all started in Africa.
if noenof it matters why does it matter that “it started in Africa?”
I don’t think anybody bothered to read the article, that there’s only one race and all descriptions given by society are social groups, not genetically distinct branches of humankind, if you can’t comprehend this then I feel sorry for humankind and everybody else that thinks this way.
At last! You hit the nail on the head. Most of these people don’t seem to have the the ability to concentrate to the end of the article ‘proving’ they all belong to the same race… the human race.
Too Funny and accurate. I especially love those who are getting offended by the so called category they think they have been placed in.
There are four races, Period . Clearly based on color and facial features. Caucasian ( white – Sharp features- straight hair ) Negroids ( Black – with thick lips and pug nose and short curly hair ) Mongoloid ( Yellowish skin tone – slit eyes – flat nose – straight black hair ) . Dravidians ( Brown skin , sharp features , straight black hair ) Caucasian language is Indo – European , Negroid ( African dialects ) Mongoloids ( Chinese etc similar scripts ) Dravidians ( Tamil and dialects with the devangiri script ) Dravidians originated in southern India and migrated to other parts of south Asia, like Sri. Lanka , Malaysia , Fiji etc. Dravidians are definitely a race by themselves and constitute one of the earliest known civilizations following Moanjeedaro and Harappa. There is more . will share if anyone wants to know.
Also geographical origin. Caucasian ( Europe ) Negroids (Africa ) Mongoloids ( Central Asia ) Dravidians ( south of the Indian sub continent ) . Absolutely no doubts about this.
Your description of the four races you pointed out is very ignorant and downright biologically incorrect. For example, there are many Mongoloids with skin tones that are lighter than those of Caucasians. there are many yes with “slit” eyes but there are some too without. How then do you account for those? are they no longer considered Mongoloids?
Again, your ignorant description of Negroids. “short curly hair” ? Is that a distinguishable factor in classifying a Negroid? There are many Caucasians with “short curly hair”. There are countless Negroids that do not have thick lips or a “pug nose”. For example, if you look at the Fulani tribe of sub-Saharan and North Africa. They are Negroids and they do not fit your description of “pug nose”. Therefore, your (uneducated) classification of race via the characteristics given are based on, what I suppose is a somewhat culturally and socially engrained depiction of “race” that is highly incorrect.
Wow. American Indians (North and South) are Mongoloid and they don’t all have “slit eyes” or speak Chinese. LOL
Its kind of cute though that you consider yourself a different race, I have never heard about Tamils being a seperate race, even from people who are rasist. I didn’t know Tamils were such rasists.
Did you know that Dutch people in fact are completely unrelated to Germans and Belgians? it may sound weird but its true. And the least related of all are we to the Frisians, I’m not even sure Frisians were 100% human when they usurped Friesland, Anyway we there there first. Thanks for your insight.
Bob, you’re just playing the fool aren’t you???!!!
Dravidians have flat noses not straight noses.
Interesting information. In my view, Race is an outdated term which is used to divide and control the people of the world. In time to come the devise term will disappear. Good riddance.
You are so wise Willie…I pray this happens!
Pick a race, pick a race for me, I dare ya 🙂
I am all “races” I am all colors, none over ride another.
I am one race – all races.
The oh so smart expert geneticists agree.
There is no dividing me – without killing me – unless it’s done on a DNA pie chart.
I agree, good riddance to this madness of race, It’s old and outdated.
My, and many other’s, biological body and genetic makeup is proof.
if u cannot see as far as the eagle, nor run as fast as the cheeta, neither camouflage as the chameleon. You cannot glide and howsoar as the hawk and you cannot produce electric current as some eels. if u are not as strong as a wild bull, and you cannot see light nor hear sounds which other animals can see or hear. if you cannot do any of the above Then stop pretending. you are just as helpless as every other human no matter where they are from. you are not legally protected? why do have embassies in other nations?
There are certainly more than 3 races…. Native Indians in the western hemisphere and Eastern Indians are a race amongst themselves… skin tones, distinct features in eyes, etc. Also, NORTH Africans, much different than Continental Africans in skin tone, facial features, etc. That’s 3 additional… a minimum of 6 races… Not 3.
Our design is our design. As an American Indian, I can truely say our genetic variation will continue to differ till’ time eternal ceases. My Race has been on this continent for 15,000-20,000 years now. Racial inter-mixing is no longer the fashion in this mundane era. **E.E.**
Although the human beings are genetically same but the anthropologists for their convenience to study the human beings divided it into many races based on their physical appearences and geographical regions.
PREDICTION:
In 4 or 5 hundred years human kind will have traveled and intermixed so much the notion of one particular race or another will all but have disappeared.
The truth is the races are a derivaive of the geographical ancestry due to environmental exposure of each living being animals included( south poler-dark skin- North polers White Skin ) in the middle are fair skin and there is no argument a foolish scientist will tell you about that because he is busy checking genes which has nothing with mutation of genes to suit the environment and they will never find the Race code
Oh, dear Mrico…I am going to repost the article so you can read it this time. Despite the prevalent belief in biological races, overwhelming evidence proves that race is not biological. Biological races like Negroid and Caucasoid simply do not exist. A newly popular argument among several scholars, is that races are wholly illusory, whether as a biological or social concept. Under this thinking, if there is no natural link between faces and races, then no connection exists.
There are no genetic characteristics possessed by all Blacks but not by non- Blacks; similarly, there is no gene or cluster of genes common to all Whites but not to non-Whites. One’s race is not determined by a single gene or gene cluster, as is, for example, sickle cell anemia. Nor are races marked by important differences in gene frequencies, the rates of appearance of certain gene types. The data compiled by various scientists demonstrates, contrary to popular opinion, that intra-group differences exceed inter-group differences. That is, greater genetic variation exists within the populations typically labeled Black and White than between these populations. This finding refutes the supposition that racial divisions reflect fundamental genetic differences.
Notice this does not mean that individuals are genetically indistinguishable from each other, or even that small population groups cannot be genetically differentiated. Small populations, for example the Xhosa or the Basques, share similar gene frequencies. However, differentiation is a function of separation, usually geographic, and occurs in gradations rather than across fractures.. .. . . The notion that humankind can be divided along White, Black, and Yellow lines reveals the social rather than the scientific origin of race. The idea that there exist three races, and that these races are “Caucasoid,” “Negroid,” and “Mongoloid,” is rooted in the European imagination of the Middle Ages, which encompassed only Europe, Africa, and the Near East.. . Nevertheless, the history of science has long been the history of failed efforts to justify these social beliefs. Along the way, various minds tried to fashion practical human typologies along the following physical axes: skin color, hair texture, facial angle, jaw size, cranial capacity, brain mass, frontal lobe mass, brain surface fissures and convolutions, and even body lice. As one scholar notes, “[t]he nineteenth century was a period of exhaustive and–as it turned out–futile search for criteria to define and describe race differences.”. . . Attempts to define racial categories by physical attributes ultimately failed. By 1871, some leading intellectuals had recognized that even using the word “race” “was virtually a confession of ignorance or evil intent.” The genetic studies of the last few decades have only added more nails to the coffin of biological race. Evidence shows that those features usually coded to race, for example, stature, skin color, hair texture, and facial structure, do not correlate strongly with genetic variation. . . The rejection of race in science is now almost complete. In the end, we should embrace historian Barbara Fields’s succinct conclusion with respect to the plausibility of biological races: “Anyone who continues to believe in race as a physical attribute of individuals, despite the now commonplace disclaimers of biologists and geneticists, might as well also believe that Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy are real, and that the earth stands still while the sun moves.”
. . . Unfortunately, few in this society seem prepared to fully relinquish their subscription to notions of biological race.. . .[including the] Congress and the Supreme Court. Congress’ anachronistic understanding of race is exemplified by a 1988 statute that explains that “the term ‘racial group’ means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of physical characteristics or biological descent.” The Supreme Court, although purporting to sever race from biology, also seems incapable of doing so. In Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji, the Court determined that an Arab could recover damages for racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. . . Despite a seeming rejection of biological race, Justice White [stated]: “The Court of Appeals was thus quite right in holding that § 1981, ‘at a minimum,’ reaches discrimination against an individual ‘because he or she is genetically part of an ethnically and physiognomically distinctive subgrouping of homo sapiens.”‘. . . By adopting the lower court’s language of genetics and distinctive subgroupings, Justice White demonstrates the Court’s continued reliance on blood as a metonym for race. . . .In Metrobroadcasting v. FCC, Justice Scalia again reveals the Court’s understanding of race as a matter of blood. During oral argument, Scalia attacked the argument that granting minorities broadcasting licenses would enhance diversity by blasting “the policy as a matter of ‘blood,’ at one point charging that the policy reduced to a question of ‘blood . . . blood, not background and environment.”‘
Social Construction
. . . I define a “race” as a vast group of people loosely bound together by historically contingent, socially significant elements of their morphology and/or ancestry. I argue that race must be understood as a sui generis social phenomenon in which contested systems of meaning serve as the connections between physical features, races, and personal characteristics. In other words, social meanings connect our faces to our souls. Race is neither an essence nor an illusion, but rather an ongoing, contradictory, self-reinforcing process subject to the macro forces of social and political struggle and the micro effects of daily decisions. . . Referents of terms like Black, White, Asian, and Latino are social groups, not genetically distinct branches of humankind.
this is something I have looked at my whole life and would the different races or breads be defined by their blood type A a- B b- AB ab- O o- and as a matter of how long each face has bin hear is this not the logical correct order and the 33 or so races that expand off this 4 or 8 races however you look at it or maybe not just food for thought this is not to say that any race is superior to one another rather living in a symbioses on earth with our destiny’s entwined as one new human race made of all the old races to the newest O rh negitive
Narrow all the argument on race down to the facts. First, the worlds social engineers do their damn best to convince the masses that we are all Homo sapiens which makes us one species. You know, like all dogs are dogs and all cats are cats. Well, this is true and it’s true for humans. But, to say all dogs are the same, all cats are the same and all humans are the same is lacking critical thinking. Anthropologist say humans are 99.99% genetically the same. I suppose that’s settled it. Or does it? Scientist have built a supercollider in CERN Switzerland because they have figured out there is 99.99% certainty the Big Bang theory is how our universe was created. Why? 99.99% certainty is not absolute; so they look for the God particle. So we should demand the same for Homo Sapiens origin and subgroups.
No we are not all the same. If you take a purebred dog like a German shepherd and try to train it to hunt rabbit you’d soon find out that would be fruitless. Animals have innate abilities and so do humans. Mixing of blood whether it is humans and animal has it drawback. Don’t believe it? Go to your local SPCA and get an amalgamated mutt, then go around and tell people in the know that your mutt is better than a purebred. Better yet, do the same with a horse and enter it into the horse race.
From personal experience: I worked in 4 maximum prisons and it’s a fact that the birds of the same feathers flock together. If your white and go to prison and don’t adhere to that you would soon realize that there is an absolute difference.
One more thing. I’m a Caucasian male and I can prove I’m superior to all women, black men and women, Hispanic men and women, Asians, gays and lesbians. Think about this: white men are the only legally unprotected group. Why is that?
There aren’t all that many original thoughts. Most of what we think are our ideas are actually streams of logic we were taught to adhere to. Hitler’s ideas, if seen aubjectively look very sound. The only problem is most of his ideas were based on bunk as are these ideas I just read: superior race. The only thing superior about you is you’ve had opportunities others haven’t had.
lol.
pop quiz. How old do you think the Earth is? Do you accept evolution? Do you accept Big Bang?
Your “superiority” (more like non-retardedness) is being tested here. lol
Terrance, You do know that all dogs originated from wolves so there is no such things as pure bred dogs just like there is no such thing as races. If all Humans are 99.99% alike, then you are using the color of someone’s skin, or the type of hair that they have to judge them which makes this a racial and social thing and not a biological thing.
We are not the same because of how we were raised, including our viewpoints on race. Clearly you are a racist.
I grew up in a family of all colors. All types of hair. All ideas of what is right and wrong. I was taught by my parents that everyone was the same and to treat everyone with respect. I did not even know about race until some kid, at school, whose parent was racist by the way, told me that my mother was black, because her skin was brown. Just to clarify, I was raised as being black as my race, however, in doing family research and DNA testing, I am all races or what is considered race. Most people do not know what I am upon seeing me and it is always a conversation. My mother looks like me. Her skin is not black and it is not brown. In a crowd of most white people, I cannot pick her out of the crowd just based on her skin color. Same with my Father. But because the Government has to classify people, they chose that we were black, because at the time, the law was, if you had any African blood, you were considered black.
Around 80% of the world’s population is of color. It does not matter that they are of color. It matters where they live, where they grew up. That factor determines skin color and hair type. It is how humans evolve to survive their climates.
You are not white because you are superior and you are not superior because you are white. You are white because of the climate of where your ancestors lived. It was probably cold or damp with not a lot of sunlight most of the day or even most of the year. So before you keep spreading your ignorance, please educate yourself with the facts.
We must see racial differences as subspecies variations. Of course we are all of the same species, but the division doesn’t end there. For example, there are many different sub-species of horses all over the planet. They are all horses, but display sometimes dramatic differences dependent on their sub species definition. The exact same argument can be used for cats. Lions, tigers, and cheetahs are all cats, but they are of course very different animals. We must respect those subtle differences. Are lions better than tigers, or vice versa ?
The big question is that genetically we are a very new species, and the time frame does not allow for the evolutionary differences we see in other animals. So, for the advocates of natural evolution, where does the human separation occur, or more specifically, when ? And so we return to the problematic ‘missing link’ proposed by anthropologists. As science and discovery advance, it becomes abundantly clear that there is something very strange, and hidden, about the true history of our species. A subject that even today is only whispered secretly amongst geneticists.
Black 1000 million people, Africa, South Sahara Africa
Oriental 2000 million people, Asia, East Asia
White 1000 million people, Europe, Western Europe
Desi 1500 million people, Rataka, South Asia
Arab 400 million people, Persia, West Asia
Mestizo 300 million people, Brazil, South America
Balaka 100 million people, Algeria, North Africa
Eurasian 200 million people, Siberia, North Asia
Islander 100 million people, Oceania, Eastern Australia
Hmm .. A Question to u all… what about Guinea ppapua ???? They never found in africa.. but in Asia! !! What race are they ? Regardless of there skin tone and hair which is not 100% like african blacks.. wut about them ?????
All African ethnic groups (plural) dont have the same hair texture. Guinea would be considered part of the Negroid group as would Ethiopians / Nubians, and West Africans. There are numerous ethnic groups among negroids just as with Caucasians. Russians and Irish dont look alike but they are both white. Just like Guinea, Ethiopian, West African dont look alike but both black (negroid).
What about Tibeto Burman Race where it will fall?
some of Caucasians mention above are really not Caucasians at.they are brown or mixed raced,like many south asians,some hamites,semites,some berbers, arabs,hispanics etc..
By the way the original berbers and egyptians were black and some still are,some arabs,hispanics and some south asians are black as well.heck the original south asians were black.
The hamites belong to the black group,or most of them and some Caucasians .
You do know we can trace all humans back to Africa meaning we probably were all black at tone time right?
Tell me how you get Caucasoid, and Mongoloid out of Negroid? Stop listening to bullshit that people tell you and think for YOURSELF. Take 2 black Sharpie markers and write something, then write over it again with the other black Sharpie….Did it turn white? Logic, use it.
You get it because races evolved. The human race has been shown to most likely have started in Africa. As the race spread, genetic changes took place. In Africa, a high melanin content in skin was needed to survive. As people moved North, they did not need as much melanin and their skin lightened. Talk about not using logic.
By the way, if you use a Sharpie over and over it begins to fade and instead of getting a black line you get lighter gray line. Good job using an analogy that proves the opposite of what you wanted it to.
It’s actually not that far fetched, and you only make yourself look ignorant and immature by getting angry about it. Actually, if you have dominant and recessive genes in the same race, e.g. Africa, even without evolution new races start to appear. Factor that in with people’s tendency to gather with those most like them, and you’ll have a few distinct racial categories in no time.
Race is a rather antiquated concept. Most of us are mixed race. My brother just advised me that we have Negroid and Mongoloid in our ancestry, along with Caucasian. I tend to answer Caucasian on forms, as my physical features support that “race.” We learned the races in elementary school. Why do we care? Evolution and movement of our species across the globe will continue to mix the races. We will be the stronger for the combining of genetic material.
Maybe you mean in your family you are mixed raced but if saying most humans are mixed raced,that’s not true.
Yeah, I think that’s a very valid personal perspective on your family, and I don’t think differences in race or racial identity should be focused on. It never should have been a focus. However, it’s not really an antiquated concept, because it’s not just a concept but a real aspect of life. It shouldn’t divide people, but some people have a healthy sense of cultural background in their races. While nobody should feel inferior or superior about it, the vast majority of the world is not mixed.
Humankind, is one upright, bipedal, carbon based, sentient, “SPECIES”. The major arguments presented on these pages seem many times, semantic. In the attempt to group the major form of complicated, intermixed, mammalian lifeforms on the planet into any form of classification by differences within this human, homo sapian grouping, is merely an attempt to discover origins and history, and to better understand the charcactriics, and varieties that obviously exist in the human life form. To try and deny there are some distinct morphological differences in human beings is an irrational attempt to erase the obvious. Any human being unable to simply distinguish their are color differences in skin and recognize facial and bodily similarities are color blind, and mentally deficient, ridiculous, and out of touch with reality; but of course humanity is currenly free to spout their juvenile, and misguided ideas that is white and …. This includes the educated, certificate adorned people who compile pages of useless scientific information. Make two lines of random Asians, blacks, and. whites people and ask a 5 year old to pair them together. Bet they can do it as well as a PHD, or maybe better than some of the race apologists trying to prove by their feeble arguments that all men and women are the same and equal. It has been proved that all human beings descend from one common mother ancestor. Thank heaven there are varieties and differences in people instead of a trillion twins in he world to contend with. The next argument from the “one race”, “one look”‘ people wll be that there is no difference between men and women
Couldn’t have said it better myself. Multiculturalist whackos love saying there’s no difference between the races, IF they even recognize race (well, only to call those who disagree with them “racists”), when they are apparent to their betters.
I think that there argument is that in a way there is race, but we can split people into as many as we want.
You must be from the Ozarks. Am I right?
In the genealogy of my family, I have found every race and MANY ethnicities. This is especially apparent in the last 500 years. An educated guess would be that there are no ‘pure’ bloodlines left. That said, humans are much a much stronger species as bloodlines are crossed because it eliminates the necessity of interbreeding.
Great promotion how the world got saved believe the mystery.
Emotional answers to a simple question only give subjective responses. The is but one race – The Human Race. Yes there are many ethnic groups just like there are many types of trees or fish in the seas. But a tree is still a tree a fish is still a fish a person is a person.
North Indians(Jammu Kashmir,Himachal,Punjab)basically Himalayan’s are White in Colour….and Remaining Indians are Black so What race Indians Belong to….and where from Himalayan’s came from if they are Arayans….?
Saying that we are all one human race is such a retarded thing to say. Humans are a species, not a race. There are numerous races listed in this write up that exist within our species. Whats so hard to understand about that? But I suppose cultural and racial marxism has really been the trend of the last 50 years now. It’s took a while for it to build up but boy oh boy is it a strong belief in western society now. I’m surrounded by brainwashed idiots. It’s depressing. How can biological differences in features and DNA be only a social contruct? The differences are biological and science has proved that we are different: Haplogroups demonstrate these differences.
you make great points however if you wish for people to continue reading your posts i suggest you refrain from the use of the word “retarded”.
You must not be able to read- please try to read the article before commenting. Specifically -(i will copy/paste for you)
“A human race is defined as a group of people with certain common inherited features that distinguish them from other groups of people. All men of whatever race are currently classified by the anthropologist or biologist as belonging to the one species, Homo sapiens.”
So Human is not a species and this part was in bold.
And this “The Major Divisions of the Human Race
Most anthropologists recognize 3 or 4 basic races of man in existence today. These races can be further subdivided into as many as 30 subgroups.
Ethnographic division into races from Meyers Konversationslexikon of 1885-90 is listing:
Caucasian races (Aryans, Hamites, Semites)
Mongolian races (northern Mongolian, Chinese and Indo-Chinese, Japanese and Korean, Tibetan, Malayan, Polynesian, Maori, Micronesian, Eskimo, American Indian),
Negroid races (African, Hottentots, Melanesians/Papua, “Negrito”, Australian Aborigine, Dravidians, Sinhalese)
TRY READING BEFORE POSTING MORE DIVISION AND HATE (YOU ARE ACTUALLY THE BRAINWASHED IDIOT) !
There is no biological evidence supporting the notion of race being a defining difference between individuals of the human species. Based on scientific finding, there is approximately 15% difference of genetic sequencing from one individual to another within the same racial classification. Likewise, there is approximately 15% difference of genetic sequencing from one individual to another of across racial classifications. This means that you are just as different if not more from anyone inside of your racial classification as you are from anyone outside of your racial classification. Furthermore, this means you can be more genetically similar to an individual of a different racial classification than an individual within your own racial classification. Fact is humans have not been apart from each other long enough for mutation to occur and create a separate species or “race”. Race is a social construct, created for the means of attributing power.
there is no superism in islam all humans ate da
same,
Black (African)
White (European)
Yellow (Asian)
Red (Indian)
There are 4 races.
WRONG …… The native American or ‘Red Indian’ as you choose to call them are not a separate race, they belong to the Mongoloid race and entered the American landmass via a now non existent connection between Russia and the America.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. There is only one race: Human
No, You are wrong actually. There are numerous races within one SPECIES which is human. If you deny that there are differences within our species when it’s plain and obvious to see, then you are an idiot.
READ THE ARTICLE AND TRY TO UNDERSTAND IT —HERE i WILL COPY PASTE AGAIN FOR THE IDIOTS.
All men of whatever race are currently classified by the anthropologist or biologist as belonging to the one species, Homo sapiens.
Human is a race and the division of it, divides us all, and divided WE FAIL!
Yes, but we can even see the differences between two European people (or any peoples). Some have heavy brows, some have “weak” chin, some have square jaws.
What race are the arabs?
They belong to a subgroup called Semites belonging to the Caucasian race.
what about blood type?
The president of the United States of America isn’t a white man and he’s classified as the most powerful man in the World.
Has the World ended without me noticing?
Yes it has Jemmy, and you’re in hell where all racists belong. LMFAO
The president is white, his mother was white, u idiot.
We haven’t evolved all that much, have we? All this name calling is bothersome. In the spirit of nit-picking, I shall point out that the gerund form of my knowing is correct, not me knowing, dear Jemmy. In the spirit of something lofty and loving, blessings of something transcending racial strife to you all.
White people have make themselves rich by demonizing other people for the longest time ,skin colour is the key to servive in the white man world ,how will the white man servive in a world where he cannot use skin color to live no doubt that the white man see that day as the end of the world.
I guess we’ll rely on keen grammar and spelling garnered from an education unsullied by ebonics (well, ANY illiterate manner of speech/language crafted to legitimize ignorance).
And, should our sight fail, we could utilize our powers of HEARING.
I think we’ll be OK.
Cici…excellent. I’m sure it flew right over Herb’s head.
Preach it Herb! O wait, I’m white crap. I should start feeling bad for things that other people have done, before I was born or conceived. You should treat me differently because of this, and you should if we ever meet attempt to take your revenge on me for your unfair oppression. Of course, you could just get over yourself like others have, say the Slavic people who are white and who’s name literately translates into “slave” and try to move forward..
Don’t argue, soon President O. will be turned back to the white race for a refund. Blacks always turn their backs one each other once they get what they want.
Herb sounds like your typical victimhood baww whites took over the world and I am jelly type. Funny thing is we always been in minority and still win because we are a smart capable group of people. Chances are asians will be next in line so you can be sure to whine about them in the future.
The reason why people have light skin is to survive in cloudy areas. The lighter you are, the more vitamins you collect from the sun. A person with skin as dark a our pupils (yes there are people that dark) living in a very dark place will have weak bones.
OMG! who the hell wrote this article! Examples for Negroid races : Dravidians, Sinhalese …ROFL
Lol europeans are albino black africans. No…europeans did not turn white then move to europe…they moved to europe and eventually devoloped their physical features
Nice article. I have understood the the three major races. But I would like to know some details about the Indian subcontinent. The north indians are seemingly physically different from southern ones. And people from pakistan, bangladesh and india have the faces of aryans but they are not white. what about it?
Wikipedia says that they Indo-Aryan race.
Those fair Indians are mixed-race. Long ago (1505) certain places in India were colonial states of the Portuguese Empire.
There is only one race, and it’s Human.
I would argue that there “not being any biological difference” between the races is a bunch of sensitive human nonsense. The shear fact that people look different, and are born with those differences based on their genetics would defy that logic. Just as dog breeds are different from one another. The only real distinction between these obvious differences not being inherently biological is that there is not enough isolation between humans anymore, and enough time hadn’t past to make those differences, “biological enough”, to be counted as sufficient. Because then we would have subspecies of human. But at the very least, race is to people what breed is to dog. Not a great distinction, but an obvious and observable one. So worth noting and moving on with your life.
It will always difficult to communicate detailed information to an audience of low brow uneducated racists. When you see responses that reference the bible and Noah affirms that an article of this nature is a complete waste of time.
Absolutely. Bible subscribers use it to rationalize or justify just about any ridiculous argument you may imagine. They are incapable of logical, intelligent thought because everything is pre-set or predetermined for them, based on their narrow minded interpretation of bible passages.
How extremely enlightened you are! It is fortunate for the world that Christendom was able to lay the foundation for all human civilization and scientific discipline before your advanced brand of intelligence gained ascendancy.
Christendom was and still is a bunch of brainwashed people who refuse to acknowledge scientific fact. I find it amusing that you say Christendom lay the foundation for all human civilization and perhaps it shows your ignorance. Humans have been around in the modern sense for 200,00 years while Christianity is only between 1000 and 5000 years old. Thank god religious supernatural mumbo jumbo is on the way out. (oooops old habits)
Most great civilizations arose from some type of religious belief. That you cannot deny.
I contend that when earth was under the great flood Hamm was a dark skined man on the Ark so lets not use Adam let us use Noah or forget the bible.
I believe in ONE race as God creatd one human being (Adam). There is no matter if we only differ colours as long as our inner is one. There is no Superior nor least race in the world because all of us we are sons and daughters of Adam and Eve.
what nonsense, you are obviously a deluded liberal.
Hey, how about we stop being so rude. Just because you do not believe like someone else, it is ridiculous to put them down. 🙁 You are one of 8+ billion minds, so your opinion is obviously not the best one.
You’re right, although we’re only at 7 billion. I admit I had to look just to make sure. Thankfully population isn’t growing that fast to add 1 billion in 3-4 years since I checked.
Rude? he is doing the guy a favour. Since there has never been one piece of tangible evidence that there is a God or that he created Adam. While the natural world and science is chock full of facts about how we got here and when, it would be rude not to point it out to the poor ignorant fool.
And you are certain in the non-existence of God. Really? Science has evidence in His existence. It’s just that it has been repressed or ridiculed by leading ‘academics’. Those leading ‘academics’ in the scientific community still sticks to its laws like it is dogma. They are close-minded to new theories that are as sound as the scientific laws they uphold. Look up the Natural Sciences and it’s see if it truly support the present scientific laws and disputes of a Creator.
The repression is also caused by greed as for the theories to be sound, they must be proved, so they needed to be funded. Those who fund the projects of the scientists are usually the rich or the big-time companies. These companies are needed money and fund those projects that they like to exploit for their own needs. So, they fund the scientists that can provide them with more profit, and reject those those who threaten the companies. Those that are chosen are also influenced by the rich and powers-to-be, controlling them, becoming their puppets. Medicine is one good example of this.
The science of today is practical and provides an understanding of how the universe works. However, it is just that. If you research further into the discipline, you will find out that there are provable and sound theories that are repressed.
If you’re saying that Herman is trying to do him a favor, he is actually dragging Reik down for his own gain. You have you opinion and I have mine and as Sarah said, you are one mind in over 8+ billion minds, and so am I.
Race is far more than a mere social construct, although some races are far more prone than others to some social constructs that may enhance their innate abilities, develop new unexpected ones, or destroy them so as to make them mental slaves. The black social construct in America is a man-engineered social catastrophy, but the white social construct that still prevails under a kind of omerta even the more in liberal milieux, with its fake and pre-arranged opposition between Aryan and Jewish ideals of superiority, is a great a slavery of minds and bodies as the modern African-American.
Blacks, Whites and East Asians shold be called groups rather than races. They do exist for sure far beyond mere behavioural programming, but there is one very little-discussed fact of genetics : not only the skin tone difference between African negroes and Nordic whites, but nearly all the other typical traits of negritude, such as the thick lips and skin tissues, and also some psychological ones such as a greater connection between sexuality and emotion, are dependent upon only six pair of alleles that can change at random or under some external influences throughout life as well as be inherited in the more normal mendelian fashion. Some pure-shaped and hued negroes are sometimes born in pure white families having known no African in their ancestry, and vice-versa, pure nordic-featured blonds sometimes appear in all black communities, which are not albinos. Some individuals can also pass from one group to another during their lifetime, either because of passionate identification with loved ones, or because of strange mystical phenomena. The very white central Italians of nowadays are at 95% descendents of Etruscans who used to be much more like Africans in shape and colour and also in psychology : there has been a tendency to idealize whiteness and devalue negritude under the prevalence of beauty canons in art and fashion rather than of racial theories, but other older civilizations valued the reverse.
All human types have a negro version that can be obtained through the change of only six alleles, and vice-versa all negro types have a pale version. East asian mongoloid people also have a negro version so to speak that are actually the Australids and also the Indian Dravidians and the Veddas of the Dekkan, as well as the Papus and the negritos of Philippines. The mongoloid type is also dependent, relatively to the white, to a very small number of alleles. It may be that in the near future one will be able to change racial group at will by very straightforward superficial genetic modifications as can be induced naturally : this might be the real demise of racism, when it becomes a pure esthetic choice to be discussed in beauty salons and art galleries rather than in ideological academies and political offices, although laboratories might have a greater say than ever.
The lower mean IQ of Blacks is true to some extent but can be easily explained by their superior sensibility to music and biological waves generally speaking : it is so great an interest and also a convenient mean to manipulate others when you are endowed with such a talent while very young that the temptation is great to neglect other realms of human power and also some aspect of human morality : the same can be observed among musical prodigies who quite often remain spoiled brats in other respects, and also with some white people such as the Irish who also share such an openness to sound and magic resulting in the relative neglect of architectural-like aspects of life and loss of power over economic destiny.
But in order for intellectual aptitudes to be rightfully compared you have to compare the performances of individuals who have an equal liking for the discipline on which the test is based. If you were to compare not all blacks and whites but only those whites and blacks who for instance are really interested in electricity or statistics, it turns out that the mathematical aptitude gaps are greatly reduced or just vanish. Less Blacks are interested in mathematics mostly due to the fact they are interested in more esthetic or religious actitivities first and foremost as soon as they can afford leisure, but certain small very Black communities such as the Dogon of Mali and the Ibo of Nigeria do have a mathematical inclination surpassing that of most Whites. You can make yourself the experiment of talking to many Blacks having in principle sub-standard test results, who who have both a remarkable understanding of all novel ideas with a very interesting conversation about them as can be imagined only among intellectuals among Whites, and a practical resourcefulness in many difficult situations, whereas the Whites with the same sub-standard levels will be dullards and dunces.
The present-day neo-racists are wont to make us remark that Blacks have less neoteny than Whites and Orientals, that is to say the capacity of retaining child-like traits in adulthood, which according to them is the hallmark of all evolution. They would like to consider thus that Blacks are nearer the other less evolved primates who lose those childhood traits even earlier in life. The same difference exists between wolves and wild dogs and the many, many races of domestic dogs that were evolved out of the former. But the thing is that such a process of evolution makes dogs tamer and cuddlier to humans, abler to undertand and obey human orders, not at all nearer to intelligent humanity and further from animality. Actually, the whole process of neoteny so induced in dogs is rather one of degeneracy and loss of aptitude in the direction of more slavery, less independence. Blacks are not less human, they are just more impervious to domestication for industrial purposes, nearer the ideal original savage human, which is something else. But the same difference can be observed for all African-born varieties of other animals, such as elephants and buffaloes, these African varieties of elephants cannot be domesticated but are by no means less elephant and more mammoth than the Indian type. Many so-called racial realists are wont to show Blacks to have less intellectual aptitudes or concerns due to excessively animalistic concern with sex. This argument does not hold any water, for sexual excess outside mere reproductive needs and far beyond the reproductive season of reproductive age is a human thing (albeit you may call it a vice) separating him from other animals such as chimps. Older-fashioned moralists are on the other hand wont to say that laughter is man’s own thing, and the more human ones in that respect are not especially white nor industrially performant.
Its such as you read my mind! You seem to grasp so much approximately this, such as you wrote the ebook in it or something.
I think that you just could do with a few % to pressure the message house a little bit, however other than that, that is magnificent blog. A great read. I’ll certainly be back.
So…race is a social construct?
Bullshit – that line has been put together by moon bat, left wing lunatics.
Heidi Skum is a filthy race traitor whore. She doesnt deserve to be called German after opening her legs to that burnt nigger.
Umm, who ever wrote this needs to understand that God has read that comment and I personally don’t think He enjoyed it. I know everyone is entitled to their opinion but what you wrote was just plain RACIST and I’m not sayin that cuz I’m black, I’m not. I am a mixed actually. My mom is caucasian, oriental and negro and my dad is oriental. Anyway, you can say whatever you want about my comment but you are probably not even all pure-white either so when you decide that you don’t want to go to hell you can apologize.
Rugs are Oriental. People are Asian.
my thoughts exactly.
Let’s just call it “difference in appearance” instead of race then, to ensure peace.
We are all humans indeed but we look different depending on where we came from and how we evolved: different weather conditions call for an adaptation.
That’s why people from continent a look diffrent than the ones from continent b.
Good day!x
Some one who understand the basic origins of “race”. Adaptation due to environment. For instance if one is Negroid one is more susceptible to Sickle Cell Anemia.
Of course what is interesting is we seem to have 3 basic ethnic groups and Noah had three sons.
The Bible was written in the early 300s AD, humanity has been around for 100,000 years previously… I think someone would have thought to pick out those 3 very different characteristics in that time…
Ok well first off evolution is straight up bullshit. Its impossible for mans brain to have such a leap in intelligence nd I wonder where the missing link is? There isn’t….and it sounds so crazy hearing how in this “evolution” now u have these different beasts all scattered about nd apparently we started out black but those who migrated to near the poles nd weren’t reflected by uv radiation somehow turned white. Thiss they are calling multiregional evolution. What a load of crap! Nd yes I believe we are all equal nd come from the
Ancestor but who knows mayb we did come from different ancestors cuz it says in the bible after the deluge. But anyways I hope you know there is something called melanin which is a pigment found in our skin ears eyes nd hair. In the process of malanvensis melanin producing cells called melanocytes clearly produce melanin which determines the color of our skin nd dyes nd hair. Mutations occur nd high exposure to radiation is a perfect example of how albinism occurs(mainly through genes). But your looks nd everything has to do with your genes. I definitely believe in race. Nd this is what brings ethnicity which is greasy because its good to have diversity but its not good so think of
melanin pigment nd this determines our skin hair nd eye color. In a process called malogensis
i agree with you, lol you are amazing.
Actually, there are only and I mean only 3 races—caucasoid, negroid, and mongoloid. The difference is in the width of the forehead (brachiocephalic or broad headed) and nose of a skeleton among a few other things, but that is the determining factor for race. Having majored in anthropology in college, this is the way it is determined. In those groups are sub-groups defining each ethnic group. Each group has its own certain characteristics and sub-groups but they are each a human being. Don’t get caught up in all this garbage. We are each unique and loved.
You’re gonna ignore the fact that there is no genaological difference between the “races”. Did you read the article? Race is a social construct & there are only 3 because in European history when this idea of race was developed, all that was knows was Europe, Africa & the Near East. There is no gene or cluster of genes that make someone a Caucasian, Negro, Mongolian.
Then maybe the categories are too broad, seeing as the different groups represent over 1 billion people each it is pretty hard to say that members of that group will not have certain characteristics, some people born to mixed ancestry can carry off playing as a certain ethnicity e.g. black (african) americans. Show me that a group of 1000 blonde haired blue-eyed finnish men and women have next to no difference in genes to 1000 black congolese men and women or 1000 australian aborigines and I will believe you. But until there is any consistent research that is accessible to the public to look at, I will keep my own opinion.
people with different races belong to the same planet, earth.
If one were to take that same lion on the plains of the African desert and allow it to be raised only by a zebra mother–“breast” fed–then that lion would associate itself as a “zebra” and would walk along the plains attempting to “graze” like a zebra but with tendencies to want to eat “meat”. The tendencies to want to eat “meat” would have been inbred in the lion’s genetic program of aggression towards survival. This lion would not know that it’s a lion until other lions having not been raised by zebra awaken it to the way “reality” is perceived by the majority of other lions. It would be a sad day for that particular lion, and it most likely would not survive. It is our mere perception that these areas exist, and as creatures functioning within a particular self-collapse of the electromagnetic wave function into the singularity of advanced intelligence we should move beyond the concept of “race” and think of ourselves as “one”.
When we look at the Planet we see every single problem that this Planet faces all comes from the concept of “human race”. In the “linear” sense, the “human race” has been the source of every “evil” that we have ever seen on this Planet. We can say this because in the “linear” sense we are the only creature on this planet that exists on a higher intellectual plane that have any concept of “evil” or “good”. We are not, however, the only creature on this Planet that exists with an understanding of “race”. Lower animals, lions, elephants, zebra, gazelle, etc… all exist and seem to form a mirror image of themselves without even having a mirror in front of them. A lion on the plains of the African desert cannot see itself in a mirror so as to know what it looks like comparative to those other animals in its environment. However, this same lion seems to know where to group itself. It seems to know not to group itself with zebra, for example. It does this through instinct built in from birth and its association with its mother. Its eyes see how its mother/father appears and it goes along as an adult looking for other animals that resemble them. It forms its attachments in this way. It is our mere perception that “evil”, “good”, “races”, etc … are “real” that actually creates these areas–we create these fields of energy when there is no “good” or “bad” or “race”. Everything is simply an experience that “is what it is”. We will continue this “linear” progression on the multidudinal scale, as this is has been chosen by the multitude of us before participation within the simultaneous Planet–Earth. We must move beyond arguments of “race” and other disctinctions that seem to separate “race” into varying versions of Homo Sapiens. We all belong to one “race”–Homo Sapiens.
Mitochondrial DNA does not and nor has it ever defined the “race” of an individual. If this is the case, then we could say that everyone on Earth is Black–as the history of mankind can be traced back to the mitochondrial DNA of the first woman who has been defined as a Black woman from Africa.
Cannot dispute that we are one species as we can and do interbreed.
However, the social divisions are to such an extent that they appear as separate races.
Even the Democratic Party subscribes to this. Otherwise, why ‘affirmative action’? This is evidence that they believe those of African descent are sub-standard.
By the way how do they know “LUCY” as white, black, or mongoloid as there are no genetic markers according to current thinking?
I do believe ‘diversity’ has been, and will continue to be the engine that drives our continued advancement.
It certainly works for science. Different language, and culture provide a vast array of thinking patterns. Something obvious to one may not be to another.
On the social side we seem to have entire societies with something akin to a criminal mind. Others that cannot break out of tribal cultures. And, others still, that are unable to conceive, and participate in the modern world.
With these it is suicide to be inclusive. This, regardless what the politically correct people say. I challenge anyone to prove this statement wrong. Change must come from within. If not, these societies and/or cultures must by necessity be excluded.
Obama’s voice and ability to lead people seems indicative of those Blacks that came before him–Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Barack Husein Obama seems to have been a Muslim at one point in his life, as his name suggests it. He is a Manchurian candidate, belonging to the Illuminati. The man is Black.
Man, you really are uneducated. You even misspelled ‘Hussein’. Not only do you lack the ability to spell, but also the ability to think rationally.
Man?
Any one of African descent was/is a fool to have voted for this man. He has done more to segregate the blacks than any man in history. He has continued the Democratic Parties resolve to keep the black man on the plantation where, in their view, he belongs.
I could give you chapter and verse but you are blind to it so why bother.
You might read Mr. Walter Williams columns. As he is a ‘black man’ he might get through to you.
Spoken like a true ignoramus
If you are going to discuss hyphenated-ethnicity as it is currently used Mr Obama is Kenyan-White-American. Kenyan from his father, White from his mother and American due to nationality or citizenship.
To be a Black-American he would need to have an ancestor who was a US based slave or free-Black from pre-US Civil War times. To be African American the slave/free-Black requirement is extended to the Western Hemisphere. based upon his known ancestry his father is Kenyan and his mother is generic White.
The genes that make us look like what we look like, are NOT the same as the genes we share as a species……come on…are you folks saying that lions, even though they are both cats, are the same “race”? The species, is called feline…those are the genes both cats share….what they do NOT share, is the ones that dictate body size/mass/limb to body ratio…like the one who can climb trees and the ones who can barely do so.and of course, the fur, stripes, manes on the male, etc….the time when the “ethnicity” issue comes in, is like the African elephant, and the Indian elephant comes in….or the bactrian camel vs the dromedary camel….they really ARE both elephants and camels….THEIR environments and nutrition caused the divide….I am always on the verge of shock, when I read the things people write about these issues….people bend and twist things around the amount of knowledge they have….but I have to tell you, that things cannot be learned in their entirety without a formal education, being instilled into a student who is capable of excellence….mediocraty is NOT the engine of true knowledge….
…ok. Let’s put it in terms the ignorants and racists will understand. Dog is a species. Within that specie, there are races. Each races has it’s specific features that evolved through the course of human evolution. Now, is there a superior race of dogs? One would argue that yes there are based on what they expect from a dog. However, 2 could argue all night long as to why the race of its dog is superior to the other because both would be looking at different features and character traits. Now, if you go to a pet-shop, what will you fall for? The dog who you think is the cutest or the one you’ll feel drawn to. There is no logical reasoning in that. It’s emotion and gut feelings. Why do I compare to dogs? Because, sadly, when it comes to races and our own race superiority, we act just like a bunch of dogs after the same bone. Proof that no race is superior because given the same circumstances, we’ll behave the same way and try to impose our domination which is a pretty primitive reaction in the animal world. So no. There is no superior race. Because if there was one, it would rationalize such behavior, and that is not the case. As I see in here, there are a lot of nut cases.
Holy Crap…….you sound like…well…I’m trying to be open minded here….but you have absolutely no sense being made in virtually anything you wrote.
Your dog analogy alone is so flawed that you almost have me feeling pity, and embarrassment for you. The DOG IS the race, CANINE is the species…where do you go to school? So, if what you say is true….wolves and domestic dogs are no of the same species….canine….what about lions and tigers? Are THEY 2 species, but somehow, both of the feline species?
Humans are a species, black, white, yellow (so to speak) tan (sephardic) and brown…are RACES….they are NOT ethnicities….your ethnicity, is what you CULTURAL sector is, you get that from your mother’s mitochondrial DNA….if your father is a caucasion and your mother is black….you’re black….if your mother is a caucasion and your father is black, you’re caucasion….Obama is white…his mitochondrial DNA is caucasion…..he merely has some black genes, just like a person who’s 1/2 asian and 1/2 caucasion….they look like whichever parent had the most prominent appearnce related genes….but are actually what the mother is….appearance genes, like eye color would always be what color the mother’s eyes were if genes that affect appearance were of equal status of the core genes. Additionally, the odor in which most animals can find their mother…like a seal on a beach, is generated by the gases that are produced by the mother’s bacterial decay….and that specific bacteria is the mitochondria.
Please, there are students who read these blogs…they deserve better
Obama is not White. He has no phenotypical characteristics associated with any “race” except that of the African. The bone structure of his face, the low brow and prominent wide nose, and brown eyes are all indicative of the native races of the African continent. His skin tone looks nothing like that of an “interbred” culture. My father’s mother was Native American (100% Cherokee) and his father was Black. Would that make hime 100% Native American? No, it would not. No more than it would make Obama a White man. I know people either whose father is Black and mother is White and they actually look Caucasian–either the eye color or skin color is different. Hair texture can vary. Also, the famous model Heidi Klum and Seal are great examples. Seal is of African descent and his children actually look interbred between both races. Obama doesn’t look anything but Black. He might be 1/4 White, but that’s it.
Ur race or a certain race as superior. Nd why is it that in the bible its said to have marriage only with the same people of their kind whom were the issrolites.
WOW!!! So stupid! This is hilarious!!!
Any student who has had an introductory biology class could tell you that most of what you have written in this paragraph is extremely inaccurate. People are the race that they are based on the genes that they inherit from their parents. Both parents. Equally. A woman who is half chinese and half german is racially both European and Asian, despite what her outward appearance leads one to conclude about her heritage. A persons genes contribute to their physical attributes because some genes are naturally dominant, and some exhibit pleitropy. It’s a poor example but for the sake of simplicity lets use eye color as an example: brown eyes tend to be dominant to blue eyes, so someone who is half chinese and half german will tend to have brown eyes. Depending on the exact genetic makeup of the brown eyed parent, this mixture can also result in green and hazel eyes. In either case, which parent has the brown eyes is of no consequence. The same holds for skin color, though to a lesser extent, as someone who is racially half African and half German will be far darker in skin tone than their European parent, but also far paler than their African parent (if it makes it easier, they got half of their black parents genes, therefore only half of their melanin making power, and half of their genes from their white parent who produces very little melanin in the skin, so they can’t get as dark as their black parent). This is the problem that arises when people attempt to categorize other people based on their phenotype; assumptions ignore pertinent facts.
Lastly, dog is not a race, it is a species of canid. Different types of dogs are called breeds.
-A Molecular Biologist
And if two animals (human included) can interbreed and produce fertile offspring then they are in reality the same species. Dogs and Wolves are in fact the same species to my knowledge. If a dog and wolf mate they produce offspring that is fertile and will produce offspring themselves. Just like there are close to 200 (I seem to remember reading that number somewhere) or more breeds of dogs. All of which are descendant of wolves breed by humans sometime in the past. A horse and donkey are not. If they breed they produce infertile offspring. Maybe the we should use the term “breed” instead of race to describe the general differences.
Wrong did you ever study biology?
Kingdom – Animalia , Phylum – Chordata
Class -Mammalia , Order – Primates, Family – Hominidae, Genus – Homo , Species – Homo Sapiens (sapiens)
You’re move genius
like men, some dogs are more intelligent than others. The border collie is the most intelligent.
I concur, the Border Collie is my favorite also…
To all my fellow human brothers,
One race, the human race is composed of people with different shades of colors, hair texture , eye color and shape etc..
It is such a shame to have been thought that 3 or 4 races of humans exist in the world. Scientist tell us that humans of different colors share 99.9 % of DNA contents. We even had a crazy scientist stating that 1 person in the past had blue eyes because of mutation in his genes. So every one today with blue is a direct descendant. ( nonsense)
All humans which include Caucasians, Asians, Indians are all sub species of the African blacks. The albinos ( children of black parents) were pushed on the side because they could not deal with the sun and they also had issues with their eyes and hearing. These people had to get refuge else where so they gradually migrated up north. So all Europeans are Albinos descendants and all Asians are San people descendants.
Even today Albinos in Africa are being discriminated against. We are have to learn that we are all brothers and sisters. The original humans could never have survived the extreme cold in the north.
Albinism is a lack of melanin in the skin and eyes. Albinism affects hair texture and color, skin color, eye colors etc… Some form of albinism can only affect the eyes and not the skin. People tend to form separate groups to protect themselves from harm. Humans can be very smart but can also lack common sense.
Slavery, religion, culture tend to separate people into groups for control, survival and self preservation.
Educate yourselves because black produces many colors. Even the Polar bear’s Skin is black. Do not be a ship. ( check out Albinos in Africa) ( See the different subgroup of humans even in Africa). People please wake up and be nice to your fellow humans.
We are truly all brothers and sisters.
Except that doesn’t correlate, what makes more sense is that recent African immigrants moving to mountainous and cloudy weather areas, wore clothes that blocked their skin from taking in Vitamin D. This leads to reduced chance of successful births for mothers, through this it began a sexual selection for women with lighter skin (blondes being ideal) becoming ingrained in the mental psyche as they were the most fertile in that period. Am I making sense so far? Lighter skinned women having more babies = lighter skinned babies, eventually resulting in even lighter babies while the darker skinned died off through lack of reproductive success and choice, the men lightening as a side effect but even then men still aren’t as light as women.
And of course these lighter people aren’t as well adapted to deal with high sun contact so suffer from sun burns in too hot climates hence why the closer you get to the equator the darker the human and the reverse is true except in the arctic where the high levels of UV radiation from the ice has resulted in darker skinned Inuit.
Albinism is a completely different phenomenon, with white people having albino children as well blonde/blue eyed is not albino, albino is a complete lack of melanin resulting in white haired/red eyed.
That’s a brilliant opinion.
Okay so we’re talking about how many races in the world we have. Well I’m half Indian and half black. Most of my friends are hispanic & african american. There are alot of races in the world. They all have different languages that people speak like japanese, chinese, korean, german, mexican, italian, spanish and lots more. I know at least 2 languages. They are spanish and mexicano.
one thing to keep in mind is that in the U.S they a lot of people have the idea that Hispanics like a race,when they can be considered just an ethnic group because Hispanics can be from African origin(Negroid),European/Middle East(caucasian) and native indian,and there is also lots of mixtures from these.A small group from Asian(chinese ,or Japanese).One question,which language you considered mexicano?is that one of the mexican Indian languages?
Besides Josephus, what ‘proof ‘ do you have that the only two ‘races’ are that of the Ouda and Black? Where is the lineage of Kethurah via Yaphet? or any non-Hadamic lines?
How do I find out what race and ethnic groups I am made of?
the answer is,one, the human race,allthe rest is tribal.
God is our Creator and smart enough to create a rainbow of people of different colors…you people should be ashame of yourself…specially christians…no one know if Adam was white or black…who knows…maybe Adam was white, Eve was black and God made their children a rainbow of races….WHATEVER! WE ARE ALL HUMANS! and if you said that Adam was white because you are white, or Adam was black because the last fossil the found is black you are all prejudist…we do not know, I did not know I had more white in me untill I came uto USA otherwise under the tropical sun I was cofee and milk 🙂 and science cn not proove who was first white or black….please stop it! I have a friend from Domniocan Republic that told me I did not know I was black until I came to USA….Americans Stop the fite between colors, we are all created by the same creator…we are all humans with a bit of a different cover…..God bless you all
Why are christians so ignorant? science has proven we all come from a black women about 200 thousand years ago from DNA testing on all types of races. given all of the proven science and fossil records out there, I wish they would just close their fairy tale bibles and open their eyes and read some no fiction books and wake up!!!
I agree with your statement colors complexion phenotypes and genetics differences are all environmental adaption of human due to different climate.
Well the climate would be different about 200k years ago maybe is was sunny but cold or something else.
God made man with the ability to adapt to different environments, and that people of all variations are beautiful since we are made in the same image.
Im polish and i live in canada and i found out that i was part of the slav race. And i realized that my race is close to extincton we only have 400 million people left on earth.
The slav race is not close to extinction, I hope not anyway. 400 million is pretty stable. I am greek, the worldwide estimate is between 12-14 million. So who is more at risk? Besides, more importantly the percentage of people of european descent is going to shrink from the current 12 percent to 7 percent of the world’s population by 2050.
Slav isn’t a race Its an ethnic group within a race.
which race aare you refering to ,that is on extinsion?the caucasian?since you are Polish ?
I would like to know what the “race” of the dark skinned (black) of the country India is. Also, why many seem to be ashamed to identified by the color of “black”.
North Indians were originally Aryan (Caucasian, as it says so in the article above), and South Indians were originally Dravidian (Negroid, again, says so above).
i want ask about somali people we are not arab and we are not negro so we are hamatic race you have to recognice
With comments like these from people, I will definitely be reading Frances Cress-Welsings the “Cress Theory of Color Confrontation” again, and with a renewed interest in how and why “whites” (phenotype, haplo-group, ethnicity) are as confrontational when it comes to race, even when they are espousing so-called “I’ve got mixed children, what ever”. Granted, while all groups have this same confrontational nature, when confronted with “the other”, it is the rational mind (man/woman) who understands the truth of what makes us all “different”. It all boils down to what I like to term “light-skin psychosis”. Fear that “I’m not special”. Well, you aren’t, just different. And like the author said, it’s almost negligible, especially since we are moving into the age of the so-called “super human”.
you said and I quote “This is another way of saying that the differences between human races are not great, even though they may appear so, i.e. black vs white skin.
All races of mankind in the world can interbreed because they have so much in common.
im here to let you in on a big secret…NO WE CANT! I am RH NEGATIVE..and I CANNOT successfully mate with an rh positive man..rh negatives make up only 15% of the population…including but not limited to all the royalty in the world.
if i were to try to mate with an rh positive man my body would think the child alien and kill it. go figure that one out.
i think you should do more research into the human “races” before you make such a statement that we can all interbreed, when clearly we cant.
that is untrue, if they are hr positive it doesnt mean you ‘CANNOT’ successfully mate, only that there are risks to the baby, also you can be injected with Rh immunoglobulin which enables safe pregnancies.
HAHAHA! you called yourself “Royalty” HEHEHE
I think you need to do your research on blood types and pregnancies. Anybody and everybody can interbreed!
If you ask the wrong questions it doesn’t matter what the answers are.
It may be a good thing if you reject the RHESUS MONKEY FACTOR that was shot into a large part of what was passing for the Hu-man ‘race’ even after Jenner started his Chimeric Cow Pus experiments. To be injected with yet another UNKNOWN GENETIC POISON like Rh Ig is even more insane on top of insanity. If you didn’t make the substance yourself you have NO IDEA what is in the needle regardless of what the label says. Ask the third world women given tetanus shots who got Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin ON PURPOSE TO MAKE THEM STERILE. WHO we used to be is lost in a sea of invivo genetic manipulations. It is impossible to know Who we used to be because there is no baseline established before the corruption. And what is anyone doing bringing in sacrificial stock onto Hell Planet for anyway?
Check out a blog at s2jmarketing.com on race.
No professional anthropologists recognizes “race” as anything but a social construction that is inherent with contraction.
We speak of ethnicities, populations, and haplogroups.
Maybe you should try doing research, instead of grossly generalizing about anthropology using 19th century material.
HOW DO I GET BACK THE 5 MINUTES OF MY LIFE THAT I JUST WASTED WITH THIS ARTICLE? THE OLDEST BONES TO DATE HAVE BEEN FOUND IN AFRICA…THEY HAPPEN TO HAVE BEEN THAT OF A LITTLE GIRL…LOOK INTO THE AUSTRO FAMILY. (IT’S CALLED RESEARCH- AND THEY ARE CALLED FACTS, NOT WHAT YOU THINK OR WISH). RACISM WILL NEVER DIE BECAUSE WHITE PEOPLE WONT LET IT. OKAY WE GET IT WHITE PEOPLE ARE THE BEST THINGS TO EVER HAPPEN TO THIS WORLD, WE ALL CONCEDE TO THE MIGHTY POWERFUL RACE, NOW WHAT? NOTHING! JUST AS I THOUGHT. BEING THE BEST ALSO GIFTS YOU THE TITLE AS BEING THE WORST…AGAIN ITS CALLED RESEARCH. EVERY DISASTEROUS AND MONSTROUS THING THAT HAS HAPPENED IN THIS WORLS CAN BE TRACED BACK TO WHOM? CONGRATS, GUYS WAY TO GO…YOU WIN!
The bones you’re referring to prove that man originated from Africa. This article, on the other hand, talks about racial groups. So your point is waaay off topic. And your comment is quite racist in itself, makes you a hypocrite, in my opinion. This article is very interesting and nobody has forced you to read it, I hope. So calm down and cut back on the hatred. Just because it’s an article on human races doesn’t mean you should turn it into a case of racism. Finally I didn’t read any part of this article that implied any race is “superior” to the others, leads me to think you didn’t understand the meaning of the article and read it the way your mind is used to pick up on things, racially motivated.
Fyi, I’m not white so don’t hate me, you racist.
OK, that’s predjudice.
Race one, tabula rasa – a white sheet, only the white race, other nations
Race 1 and 2 only of blood and other impure
Thank the Gods and Ancestors Ours!!!!
one race eventually due to immigration and mixed marriaiges
No, it could be lessened even to 0 but it will not die. The whole world could be the darkest skin color for 10 generations, the lightest skin color will not die, it’s in them the info.
soon to be one due to immigration and mixed marriages.
soon and eventually to be one.
Anthropologist reject the concept of race.
5. The American Anthropological Association recommends the elimination of the term “race” from OMB Directive 15 during the planning for the 2010 Census. During the past 50 years, “race” has been scientifically proven to not be a real, natural phenomenon. More specific, social categories such as “ethnicity” or “ethnic group” are more salient for scientific purposes and have fewer of the negative, racist connotations for which the concept of race was developed.
http://www.aaanet.org/gvt/ombdraft.htm
For the record, I am caucation, of scandinavian, and we have many mixed children in our family….. Some are black white mixed.. Some are white/ Native American mixed….and others are hispanic/white/with some native mixed… All of these children are beautiful and unique looking. One , who is caucation Scandinavian and Native looks like a perfect exotic mixture , is beautiful, and nicknamed herself ” CROWEGIAN.” ( Crow and Norwegian…) smile…Her Native parent also has some a Norwegian…The other two look more caucation…We have children who are black/ caucation mixed with caucation type hair and features , and some with curly dark hair… They too are all beautiful…then of course we have dozens of blue eyed and green eyed Scandinavian blondes too…We have children who are totally caucation with darker brown eyes, and dark brown hair, who are Norwegian, and children who are caucation and hispanic mixed….plus a few redheads , strawberry blonde who probably are Norwegian and Irish….All of this genetic variation began 6 to 10,000 years ago, when the gene oca2 changed, or mutated, to where forms this gene were no longer producing enough protein to create the amount of melanin to cause the brown eye coloring of the iris , and blue eyes began showing up in family groups more and more untill entire clans, who may have been close relatives, had blue , and green eyes …So now we have people on earth who carry copies of this gene which produce blue eyes , people who carry the original gene which produces not only brown eyes , but all eye colors , people who carry both, or all variations of this same gene, resulting in mixed children of all the people of the world, who look unique , and more rarely, people who carry the same gene, in a more seriously mutated form, which causes cells to not produce the protein that are needed to create melanin, which colors the eyes , skin and hair of these individuals..African people can carry this gene also…..People with this gene are albinos , and have very little pigment in their skin, hair and eyes…So from one human gene which changed , mutated, a few thousand years ago , we have , as a result, the beautiful human race….One people who all carry one form of this “SAME GENE”, in varying forms, which allow the people of the world to be unique individuals, look differently, but all beautiful….( There are a few other genes too , that can sometimes cancel out the genetic predictability we once believed existed in genetics of eye, hair and skin coloring..)while I am no expert on genetics, I have it right for the most part, and you can find this information online….
One of the most interesting cases of inherited traits from parent to child , is michael jackson and his four biological children. Because M.J. is closer to a 1/2, , and is not full black, his children can only be around a quarter black, or 1/4, or a little more . M.J.’s children , Prince 1 and Paris can only be around a quarter black because children inherit only half their genetic makeup from each parent. In order for Prince and Paris to be half black, michael Jackson would have to be full black. most people believe that m.J. was full black, and his children are half black…..Blanket has been said to be of middle eastern decent, Asian, Mexican, because of his long , thick, straight hair , however , M.J. carried the genetic makeup of around half black, the other half being white and Native American , from Katherine and Joe Jackson, his parents. because M.J. carries the genetic makeup of Native American, white and black, Blanket , was born with hair similiar to Native American and caucations…So all of the Jackson siblings are only around 1/3 to 1/2 or a little more black, with the genetic makeup of Native Americans, and caucations , the Jackson grandchildren can only be around a quarter black through the jackson side , and a quarter white and Native through the Jackson side… through their mothers, they either carry genetic makeup of latino, latino, and white , black , or mixed black and white , added to the quarter black genes the Jackson grandkids carry from their parents..All of the Jackson grandchildren look how they should look being more around a quarter black from their parents…. some look Latino, Hispanic, some look Latino/ black mix, some look mixed latino, black, white , some look nearly white , and some look mixed native , black and white as well as Prince1 and Paris who look around a quarter black… All of the Jackson grandchildren, and great grandchildren are beautiful, and unique looking…Because Debbie carried the alternate form of oca2 gene which was the mutation that accurred 6 to 10,000 years ago, which caused this gene to produce less of the protein which causes the cells to produce less melanin, and M.J. Jackson also carried copies of this mutated gene for blue eyes , and these two genes combined ,Paris was born with blue/ bluegreen eyes , passed down from debbie’s family and herself, as well as m.J. jackson’s father Joe, who has the blue to blue/ green eyes also .Since scientists now know there is no black, or white caucation gene , and there are only genes that cause cells to create the protein needed to produce melanin , in the eyes , skin, hair ect…, any person carrying the 0ca2 in the original form, as well as the altered form,(along with a few other) which occurred a few thousand years ago,who marries a person who also carries both forms of the gene, can have blue/ green eyed children…. A professor of biology said that an African American couple, both with the darkest complexions can have a totally caucation child with blonde hair and blue eyes , who looks totally white . All it takes is for both parents to carry both forms of the gene oca2 ,as well as around 6 other genes that determine, or influence the eye color, as well as skin, and hair color.Then, even if two parents contribute the form of gene that predicts brown eyes, other genes can cancel out these genes , and cause a child who should have had brown eyes ,to have blue, or green eyes…In this case two parents who both have brown eyes will have a blue eyed child. since the genes for different eye color , skin color and hair color may not be the same process A black child could be born with blue eyes, and black skin color, blue eyes and loose ringlets,brown eyes and blonde, even white/ blonde hair, or an evenly mixed look, or with blonde hair, blue eyes , and a caucation look..M.J.’s children Prince 1 and Paris look only around a quarter black……Blanket also is only around a quarter black , from Michael Jackson, but the Native American genes, as well as white, were expressed in him from M.J., Katherine and Joe and all their distant relatives…Blanket’s mother could be white……The surrogate who carried blanket in her womb was black tho, M.J. said. They transplant embryos into surrogate mothers…. usually… so the surrogate has no relation to the biological child of the real parents… Caucations may carry only recessive form of the oca2 gene,where not enough protein is produced to create the amount of melanin for hazel, or brown eyes, OR, a mixture of genes for both blue and brown eyes, light, or dark skin, complections, straight, or There are some caucations who have the same , or similiar texture of hair as long, loose afro style, with no black modern heritage…Since many of the Jackson grandchildren , third generation( from katherine and Joe) are, a quarter ,or a little more from the Jackson siblings, and Latino, or Latino/white mix , as well as Native and white from the jackson’s, the great grandchildren of katherine and Joe would probably have totally caucation looking children that looked similiar to Michael’s children if they marry caucation spouses, or children who look mixed Latino and white……. Then there could be children who also have the dark thick hair like blanket because of Native genes … so all the possibilities are there . M.J.’s oldest son looks just like Joe Jackson’s father ,and has the facial traits of the Jackson cousins, and relatives . Nearly all the Jackson male grandchildren share a genetic oral facial traits with Michael, that is they all pout their upper lips out like Michael did as a child, teen and adult.. If you look through the youtube videos , both past of m.J. and his siblings childhood , you will see many of them pouting theier upper lips out and jutting out their lips.. this is a strong , inherited oral facial genetic trait . then if you look through all of M.J.’s children as babies and children, you will see that they all share this inherited trait with Michael. Even Omer Bhatti pouted his upper lip out and jutted his lips out like M.J. did as a child( See Omer’s, Prince 1 and Prince 2 pictures, from baby, child , teen….These pictures are out there … Also pictures of jaafar, and other cousins like Tito’s sons also can be seen pouting their upper lips out, and jutting them out……. normally, a child pouts by pushing out their bottom lips, not their top lips. a genetic specialist made a youtube video showind m.J. and all four of his children , showing all three boys at different ages , as well as michael with their upper lips puffed out , and lips jutted out , which he said is a unique genetic set of oral facial traits m.J. shares with his kids as well as his siblings , nephews and nieces… the traits are unique enough for him ( the genetic specialist) to say that all of M.J.’s three boys are his biological children. And he showed that Paris also shared some oral facial traits with Michael Jackson .He showed how Paris looked like Latoya at different stages , infancy to teens….. and concluded that Paris was M.J.’s biological child also…In early pictures of Latoya as a baby, toddler, child and teen, side by side with Paris, at the same ages , one can see that Paris looks like a lighter version of latoya, with straighter hair.If one photoshopped Latoya with light, straighter hair, and blue eyes, Paris and Latoya would look like twins….. Or if one photo shopped Paris with brown eyes , and mixed hair , they would still look just alike…M.J’s children are not the only grandchildren who look caucation, with both blue and green eyes , according to what M.J.’s siblings have been quoted as saying….So this is a very interesting case where there are so many varients in the family….. however , people who come from the islands, and countries where nearly everyone is mixed with white and hispanic, as well as black, say that it is common there for children of black mixed people to look like michael jackson’s kids Prince1 and Prince 2 , Paris and Omer Bhatti with blue and green eyes as well as brown and hazel… When one understands how the genes interact to create babies , children with so many variations, it doesn’t seem so mysterious. Scientists now say there is no black, or white gene, and the dominant black gene doesn’t exist.What does exist is a gene , mainly oca2, which in it’s original form dictates how much of a protein that in turn ,causes the cells to create melanin which colors the eye iris, and the mutated , or changed variants of this same gene which causes the dna to create less of a protein, or enzyme that in turn produces less melanin in the cells which results in blue eyes…or green…these genes work along with a few other genes to create eye coloring.then the process is different for skin tone , and hair coloring….type in genetics of eye color, genetics of hair color , genetics of skintone, skin coloring, and also the genetics of afro type hair texture, and the genetics of hair texture.. type these all in separately. There are around 6 or 7 genes for skin coloring…Genetics is a very interesting subject…there are college and online college cources such as physical anthropology which explain how the genetics of eye, hair, and skin coloring work… already , in the last 10 years , scientists have done a total about face and no longer believe the same things that up untill the last decade , were taught in schools and college…scientists no longer believe that there is a biological basis for different races , black, white , asian, hispanic, and believe that race is only in the minds of people who look at the differences in hair color/ texture, skin color and tone , and eye color as race. They now say that what people see as different races is actually just different ethnic groups, cultures, or groups of people who share geographic bounderies … Now that they understand that there is no black, white, asian, or hispanic race genes , and that there are just a few genes that either produce the protein/enzyme that produce the melanin in varying amounts, and one of the main genes that cause brown eyes , also creates blue eyes , because of a mutation, or change in the gene , less than 10,000 years ago, it becomes clear that we are all one race … the human race…
ichael
Good Lord….
You said it… O_O
*starts the three claps as everyone else joins in*
scientists have found that the gene “oca2” , is responsible for all of eye color, blue, green , hazel, brown, and all varied colors.. in nearly 3/4 of people…. It is located on chromosone 15 ….There is no “dominant black gene”, this is a long believed myth….There are genes for eye color, skin color , and also hair color….Up untill 6 to 10,000 years ago, all humans had brown eyes. A mutation in the oca2 gene back around that time caused the gene to fail to create a protein which in turn produced the melanin in the eyes….. Most of the time this protein was still produced by the protein enzyme made by gene oca2, and so these persons were born with light , or blue eyes. In rare cases, there was a mutation on gene oca2 which caused the cells to produce , “NO” protein that causes the cells to create melanin to color the iris’s of the eye’s, and the people who were born with this rare mutation are called albinos…..So rather than a dominant black gene for black eye, skin, hair color, and hair texture, the oca2 gene on chromozone 15 produces brown eyes in all races… what’s interesting is that this same gene dictates whether the child will have blue, green, hazel , or any color between blue, gray, to dk. brown. Therefore there is no dominant black gene. The oca2 gene may , or not create the protein which causes the cells to produce melanin, for all shades of skin, or eye colors… so, Around 8 genes determine eye color , and some of the other genes play a part in what eye color a baby is born with..Blue eyes have the least melanin, green eyes have a little more , then hazel, then the brown shades have the most melanin.Almost 10 % of brown eyed individuals who had the oca2 for brown eyes , actually were born with blue eyes…. there are a few more genes which can cause a baby with the oca2 gene for brown eyes to develope blue , green, gray , blue/green, hazel shades to brown shades, This explains how two parents, both with blue eyes , can have children with green, hazel and brown eyes while neither parents had enough protien produced by the gene to create enough melanin for them to be born with any other color of eyes , together, they both had enough protein produced by the genes to have children with green, hazel and brown eyes.Scientists now say that it is a myth that two parents with blue eyes cannot produce children with hazel and brown shades of eyes.Scientists also now say that the belief that two parents with brown eyes cannot produce children with blue , or green eyes also is a myth.As long as the parents both carry the mutated gene for light eyes , which is the gene for brown eyes also, the child of two parents with brown eyes can have children with blue/ green eyes…Another believed myth is that if one parent has brown eyes , and the other parent has blue eyes , the children will all be born with brown eyes because of the brown dominant gene…This is a myth, that even scientists used to believe, but no longer do…. While the child may carry the 0ca2 gene for brown eyes , the combined genes that also influence eye color can cancel it out , and the child can be born with blue, or green eyes…Or if the parents both have the genes for brown eyes , but carry any recessive genes from relatives , or distant relatives on both of their sides , they can have a blue/ or green eyed child …So, it doesn’t matter what color of eyes the parents have all the time. what matters is whether they both carry the mutated form of the gene oca2 which cauces the cells not to produce enough of the proteins ( enzymes) for the cells to create the melanin neede to produced brown eyes … Again, there is no black gene for african American traits and features…..There is the oca2 gene on chromosone 15 which controls the color of the eyes , blue to dk. brown…and 6 or 7 other genes which can , in some cases influence the eye color. a child carrying a gene , or genes for brown eyes can be born with blue eyes because other genes canceled out the gene which was for brown eyes…so , in the end , children’s eye color , and hair , skin tones depend more on the genes their parents are carrying ,and the combined genes from both parents , than their parent’s eye coloring.Above taken from latest scientific reports, can be found on internet…( World-mysteries.com) also type in genetics of eye color … genetics of hair color… genetics of hair texture , genetics of skin color , or skin tone…Scientists now say there are no black genes , or white genes, most variation of eye , skin , and hair colors / tones stem from genes which control the amout of a protein/ enzyme that produces melanin ,which , in turn, colors the iris of the eye , the skin, and hair…
Stolen from the Sumerians!!!
Adam was red, like red clay. Presumably Eve was a similar color. From their genes, a complete rainbow of peoples were born. When Noah built the ark, he took his three sons and their three wives. These three wives were a random selection of the colors from Adam and Eve. One might have been blond and blue eyed, one yellow with straight dark hair and almond eyes and the third with rich dark skin, curly hair and deep brown eyes. All were undoubtedly beautiful.
I look like my mother and father and you look like yours. That is an indisputable fact of life, but it does not make me inferior or superior to you. That idea did not come from the Bible, (when Noah cursed Canaan, he did not curse all of the sons of Ham, only Canaan, who may have been the result of Ham raping his own mother while his father was drunk… and hence not even dark-skinned). The idea of superiority of some races came to us through Darwin. “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life” The dark secret of the original popularity of his ideas is “social Darwinism”, a “scientific” rationale for racism.
HAMITES AND SHEMITES were a black people, so were adam and eve,,,you cannot get a black dominant gene out of a recessive white gene,,,this is deception at it’s highest,,,agenda motivated lies,,,,anyone who took basic genetics in grammar school would know this science is bogus,,,let’s all get a grip hear and be desirous of truth and extinquish the deception that has been our food for centuries
I think the conclusion the article means to convey is that – although “we” (the lay people if you will) will continue to think and use “race” as a term to describe – usually – those who are different from one another in an obvious physical way (skin color being the most obvious and the feature almost always seized upon by those who wish to denigrate others by the actions of a few) *BUT* when it comes to actually trying to define Race as something with a factual, scientific (i.e. clearly defined) basis- that it simply doesn’t exist. In other words, ask someone white or black to explain what someone down the street is racially = no problem. Ask a genetic lab to list out the defined characteristics of what strictly makes up a “white” race person versus a “black” race person and it’s impossible – some “white” people will have characteristics that are “black” and vice/versa, still others may be mulatto/mixed to where there simply is no black or white but a creamy mocha color of skin. 🙂 I hope that makes sense – and that regardless of the prejudices people of many races have toward others, that really we are indeed all just members of the Human SPECIES. Or Human Race. Same difference, in that we are all different in some way, and alike in others. Too bad we don’t have the gene to be exclusively nice to one another all the time! 🙂 🙂
I strongly believe there are only two human species since the beginning, namely, negroid and mongoloid. The rest are a mixture of the two.
I believe there are 4 major races….The natives of the Americas, Negroid, Mongoloid, and Caucasian. It is as clear as day, people just refuse to believe because they get a little uncomfortable on the subject. I believe climate was a factor in all of this, the same way it is in different species of animals. I don’t mean to offend anyone with my comment, but I truly believe this.
If race is a social construct, why do forensic anthropologists go through so much trouble to identify the race of both victims and pepetrators of crimes particularly murder and rape?
To identify the victim and perpetrator?
That was the question I had.
I am baffled by all this ignorance… Who is asserting that the word “RAZZA” (Race) in Italian language is exclusively used for animals ???
Biblically speaking, it is hard to be clear who was of what race. The use of “race” as ethnicity or nationality is quite common in the Bible. However, I will say this. It is pretty much an accepted scientific fact that the first “people” on the face of the earth where African (Black, Negroid, whatever).
As time on earth progressed, skin and hair color got lighter. Noses got thinner. Hair got straighter. Light skin, hair & eyes are all recessive traits. Meaning that 2 people with these traits will NEVER produce offspring with the dominant trait (example: 2 people with blue eyes will never have a child with brown eyes). This is because in order to produce brown eyes, one or both parents MUST have brown eyes (The dominant trait). Hence all “races” MUST have descended from the “Black” race. This fact is also backed by fossil records.
Just another factor to plug into the Biblical discussion… And in case you are wondering, I am an African-American, Christian, with a degree in science.
Only because that is the oldest body they have dug up, so far. They have been wrong every time. They used to believe the world was flat too.
I think human beings are simply variations of the same symphony. We’re all the same species and whatever phenotype we possess doesn’t negate that fact.
I think people are simply variations of the same symphony. We’re all the same species and the differences
There is one more race to be considered The Jews Le me show you what the Bible
seas.
Why does God love the Jews.
Remember Noah and the flood and his three sons; Shem, Ham, Japheth.
Well Abraham came from the linage of Sham.
Abraham and God were no strangers,
Gen 12:1-3. Now the Lord had said unto Abram. Get thee out of thy country,
and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will
shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee and
make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that
bless thee, and curse him that cursed thee, and in thee shall all families
of the earth be blessed.
Abraham & Hagar had a son Ishmael,
Gen 16:16. And Abram was 86 years old, when Hagar bare Ishmael to Abram.
So it wasn’t Abraham’s seed that God was after.
So what was it that God wanted,
Sera was 90 years old and could not bear any children.
Gen 17:17 and shall Sara, that is ninety years old, bear?
Now stay with me here it comes
Gen 21:1-2 AND the Lord visited Serah as he had said, and the Lord did unto Sarah as he had spoken. For Serah Conceived,
and bare Abraham a son ( Isaac) in his
old age, at the set time of which God had spoken to him .
My Comment It is here, that the Lord Gave Serah an Egg, an egg of his own choosing.
Now you see why he has done everything for them that’s in the Bible and the
Bible (old testament) is about them.
Gen 25:17 Ishmael lived 127 years. Ishmael was 13 or 14 years older then Isaac.
Gen 23:1 Serah lived to be 127.
Isaac was about between 9 and 19 when the trial sacrifice took place.
So why did the Lord God say to Abraham “thy son, thy only son” Gen 22:12&16
From the above can you see hat the Lord God Started a new Race withe the Jews?
There are many races on earth Beside the Jews, But only the Jews have a rich
written history. And when Jesus cane along he sad LET ALL COME TO ME.
Unfortunately The Jews didn’t come. What’s even more unfortunate is that
they are all going to be Slaughtered except for a remnant, Rom 9:27.
“Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved :” ‘ Esaias =Isaiah.’
Romans 9:27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a rem
I didn’t say this the Bible did. Are you still withe me?
John,
jedinyjohn@aol.com
Sub: Why does God Love the Jews
you folks referring to Adam and Eve as if they were real must be the comic relief.
Sadly, the joke is so old it rarely incites laughter anymore.
And you my friend are the biggest joke of all
with you, I quite agree..
Most Anthropologists do not agree that race exists – it’s a social construction created uniquely within difference societies.
We are all desendents of Noah’s three sons and their wifes.
i have a rockin thingy
come visit my lame site!
I have the blood of many races running through my veins. I have known hundreds of individuals from all the races on Earth. I see no point in being occupied by race/s. All Blood Is Red! We are all One/Sixth cousins.
Great point Ron!
A very, very good point Cuz
It is my understanding that most anthropologists now accept that race is a social concept as well. The American Anthropological Association issue their statement about race in 1998 (http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm), so surely new anthropologists coming through the ranks will have been taught this.
If there is no difference, why do they ask it on all of our government forms? Why is there affirmative action?
Interesting article. I wonder how these differences came about? If the Bible is true and the original couple of Adam and Eve were white, then how did the humans of other colors come about?
Sorry but to my mind physical racial characteristics are definitely down to the human genome .Social aspects are learnt so eg there are many “Asian” looking people who speak with broad local accents !
So what if one of your parents is “black” and the other is “white”? What race are you?
Where exactly does the bible ever describe Adam and Eve as being White or of any color? We do know that Jesus is described as having feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace. We also know He was Jewish and therefore had features of someone from the Middle Eastern region and these are some of the oldest living societies on earth. So again I ask, how did you conclude Adam and Eve were White?
Since the jews are white, and they trace their lineage to Adam and Eve, it means Adam and Eve were white.
The “races” are explained in the bible in Genesis 11:5-8 where god pretty much scattered everyone across the earth, and changed their appearances and speech so that humankind could never be “one” again.
So are “blacks” not descended from Adam and Eve?
I believe enviromental circumstances are what changed our skin and features. Those exposed to direct sunlight over thousands of years had darker skin than those who lived in colder climates.
exactly what i believe, thanks very much. 🙂 besides, every single person is different thats what makes us all the same, thats what being human is about, differences should be celebrated.
how did you know adam and eve were white?
The Bible does not say that Adam and Eve were white, that is simply the way most European artists have chosen to depict them. It is actually believed that the first homo sapiens were “black” and from there lost use for dark skin pigments and protection from the sun as they moved north into colder climates.
Yea ur right