Mulvaney seeks to correct quid pro quo remarks in withering interview with Fox's Chris Wallace

Mulvaney says withheld Ukraine aide tied in part to 2016 election concerns involving Democrats
Volume 90%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
Keyboard Shortcuts
Play/PauseSPACE
Increase Volume
Decrease Volume
Seek Forward
Seek Backward
Captions On/Offc
Fullscreen/Exit Fullscreenf
Mute/Unmutem
Seek %0-9
Next Up
Poll: Most voters say White House should cooperate with impeachment inquiry
01:42
00:00
01:11
01:11
 
White House acting chief of staff Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyTrump says his Doral resort will no longer host G-7 after backlash CNN's Anderson Cooper mocks WH press secretary over Fox News interview Trump accuses media, Democrats of going 'crazy' over G-7 at his Miami resort MORE insisted he never said the Trump administration expected a quid pro quo between U.S. aid to Ukraine and that Kiev launching investigations into former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenCNN's Anderson Cooper mocks WH press secretary over Fox News interview Yang cautions Democrats: Impeachment might not be 'successful' Ocasio-Cortez: Sanders' heart attack was a 'gut check' moment MORE during a withering interview on "Fox News Sunday" with Chris WallaceChristopher (Chris) WallaceBaier, Bream, Hemmer, Hume, Wallace among interim anchors to fill Shep Smith's 3 PM slot Trump hits Fox News's Chris Wallace over Ukraine coverage White House officials stand by Syria withdrawal, sanctions delay amid bipartisan pushback MORE.
 
Mulvaney repeatedly insisted his remarks at a Thursday press conference were taken out of context, saying he never used the "reporters" language of "quid pro quo."
 
"That’s not what I said. That’s what people said that I said," he told a skeptical Wallace early on in the interview.
 
“Can I say that people took that the wrong way? Absolutely," Mulvaney later said in the interview. "But I never said there was a  quid pro quo because there isn’t.”
 
 
Mulvaney said the withheld aid to Ukraine was kept back because Trump wanted to make sure that European allies were also delivering aid to Ukraine, and because Trump wanted answers about corruption in Ukraine.
 
Wallace challenged Mulvaney on that point, saying that he believed "that anyone listening to what you said in that briefing could only come to one conclusion."
 
Fox then replayed video of Mulvaney's Thursday press conference, during which Wallace pointed out that Mulvaney listed three reasons, not the two he listed on Sunday, for why the aid had been withheld.
 
"You were asked specifically by Jonathan Karl was investigating Democrats one of the conditions for holding up the aid, was part of the quid pro quo, and you said 'it happens all the time,'" Wallace said, referring to the ABC reporter who had questioned Mulvaney on Thursday.
 
Mulvaney said Trump mentioned the investigations in passing, but the chief of staff then stuck to his position that corruption and ensuring that aid was provided by other countries were the reasons for the delayed aid. 
 
Wallace then pressed Mulvaney again. 
 
"You know, I hate to go through this, but you said what you said, and the fact is after that exchange with Jonathan Karl, you were asked another time why the aid was held up, what was the condition for the aid, and you didn't mention two conditions, you mentioned three conditions," Wallace said. 
 
Wallace then showed video of Mulvaney saying "three issues for that" while holding up three countries during the Thursday press conference. The third issue cited by Mulvaney on Thursday was whether Ukraine was cooperating with an ongoing investigation by the Justice of Department.  
 
The Justice Department has said the linking of Ukraine aid to its investigation was "news to us," according to a senior Justice official cited by Fox.
 
Mulvaney conceded that he could see how people took his comments "the wrong way" but again insisted he never used the words "quid pro quo." 
 
He also said that the fact that the aid to Ukraine was eventually sent should "put the matter to bed."
 
Asked later if he'd offered to resign over the matter, Mulvaney said he did not.
 
"Absolutely positively not. I’m very happy working there. Did I have the perfect press conference, no," Mulvaney said. 
 
Democrats pressing for Trump's impeachment have pounced on Mulvaney's remarks, and GOP allies of the White House have also been critical of the Thursday remarks.
 
Load Comments (1,796)