e27241 (12) No.924064>>924074 >>924089 >>924097 >>924128 >>924283 >>924355 >>924371 >>924377 >>924605 >>924635 >>924645 >>924840 >>924898 >>924899 >>925027 >>925509 >>935810 [Watch Thread]
Some solutions to an aging demographic that doesn't involve importing millions of shitskins that will destroy society.
>outlaw abortion
>limit access to contraceptives so they're not easily available OTC
>additional financial incentives to have a child whether they're tax breaks, lump sum payments or monthly stipends
There you go now you don't have to turn your country into Rhodesia.
65f93a (1) No.924074
>>924064 (OP)How about some marriage law that doesn't assrape men financially for the rest of their lives when their wives become cheating whores and divorce them?
Plus banning all pro-whore jewish propaganda in mass media.
d335c4 (1) No.924087
>implying it's a problem that needs to be solved
909fef (1) No.924089
>>924064 (OP)create an incentive for stay at home parents in order to reduce the need for dual income as the minimum necessary to start a family
a2ca49 (1) No.924097
>>924064 (OP)Some post-industrial areas, like NW Europe and Japan could benefitted from a declining population, if handled properly:
>incentives for the elderly to contribute to local cottage-industries>encourage elderly to move in with their children like the olden days, let them either help raise their grandchildren, or be nursed by their children >new generations don't have to contribute to retirement pyramid schemes; the shrinking pie goes to the ones that did have to contribute, until it dries up 44cdf7 (1) No.924100>>924113 >>924420
Holy shit OP is a legendary dumbass.
If you want to fix the birth rate collapse, going around removing the tools which the lowest common denominator are using to kill themselves is only going to increase the amount of poorly raised mistake babies.
If you want the birth rate to go back up god forbid you…
>fix marriage laws so they're not toxic to men
>promote older men getting with younger ergo providing a more stable income for the family
>pay workers fairly so they can afford children
>don't flood the country with debt, making our hard to have children
You fucktard. You completely missed the reasons children are so rare now.
e27241 (12) No.924113>>924167 >>924551
>>924100Poorly raised mistake baby > immigrant baby
0e854b (1) No.924125
forbid all forms of contraception and provocative clothing
it worked for Romania
e533d8 (1) No.924128
>>924064 (OP)Legalize polygamy. Polygamous marriages produce more children and they can be provided for with extra income and extra parents to competently raise them. Also 4 ways every night fuck yeah.
774ec7 (1) No.924166>>924171
>more laws
>solution
Really?
341a64 (1) No.924167
>>924113"Poorly raised mistake baby" is code for "black and hispanic babies"
Blacks and Hispanic get a disproportionately high number of abortions.
e27241 (12) No.924171
51543c (1) No.924283
>>924064 (OP)
>not blaming the welfare state system c72fb4 (9) No.924322>>924342 >>924369
These are all unnecessarily heavy handed and pointlessly inadequate at addressing the fundamental issues.
It's like slapping a bandage on a cancer patient. He may FEEL better but the tumours continue to kill him as if you had done nothing.
The reasons for the declining birth rate are simple. Humans are less likely to seek to start families when they have economic and household insecurity. When the bird can not build a nest that will last longer then a few days then they will not lay any eggs.
We must therefore ensure that everyone can obtain economic security. That a man or woman can bring home a sufficient amount of money from their work in order to raise a family. A living wage.
Second we must ensure a steady and constant supply of affordable housing that is of proper size, layout and location for the raising of families. People do not want to raise children in crowded inner city apartments. We must deurbanise and radically rethink how we build. Above all else we must ensure that people are able to OWN their home. So that they feel safe and secure in it. So that they will be able to have children of their own with a good peace of mind.
That's it.
Address those underlying issues and the problem is solved at its root.
95dbd3 (1) No.924333>>924337
No, that's dumb. Mo' liberty, the better. What would be more ideal would be some kind of newlywed loan program like in Hitler's Germany. For example, every (purely x national) newlywed couple gets the equivalent of $20,000 in governmental loans that they don't have to start paying back for say, five years. But, if they have a child at any time, then they get to keep a portion (one-fourth would probably be ideal) of the loan, and an extension of a couple years to pay it back. Couples get to keep another one fourth for every child they have, such that if they have four children they get to keep all of the money lent to then when they got married. Gives economic incentives to having kids and helps keep them afloat.
c72fb4 (9) No.924337
>>924333Again this is unnecessarily heavy handed AND expensive. All without solving the underlying issues.
e27241 (12) No.924342>>924346 >>924364
>>924322Here's birth rates by income so you're full of shit
Under $10,000 98.3
$10,000 to $19,999 74.7
$20,000 to $24,999 62.1
$25,000 to $29,999 66.4
$30,000 to $34,999 67.9
$35,000 to $49,999 55
$50,000 to $74,999 55.5
$75,000 and over 54.8
f2abef (2) No.924346>>924356
>>924342Control for niggers and shitskins, I want to see what it looks like when it's just whites.
44d111 (4) No.924355>>924401
>>924064 (OP)>outlaw abortion>stop the number one cause of dead niggers that saves us billions in welfare>and as we all know coathangers and black market abortions never existed
>limit access to contraceptives so they're not easily available OTC>let's make STDs, bastards and unwanted, maladjusted children the norm because God knows teenagers are pros at raising children
>>additional financial incentives to have a child whether they're tax breaks, lump sum payments or monthly stipendsThe one smart thing you said.
In other words, anon is a mouth breathing cretin that is just repeating shitty propaganda and stating the plainly obvious.
e27241 (12) No.924356>>924367
>>924346I don't know but blacks have a lower birth rate than white in the US. Hispanics have a higher birth rate than whites.
c72fb4 (9) No.924364>>924412
>>924342That is more a matter of social class than income amount.
The upper class have always had less children. From the modern era to the times of antiquity. They also invest more resources in every child.
There are multiple reasons for this.
You also have to control for the other mode of human reproductive behaviour which occurs in times of deprivation and famine. Mass breeding. Essentially the same tactic used by herd animals, relying on the fact that there are too many of them for a predator or natural problem to kill all of them.
We also have to consider that many in the middle class do not feel secure in their homes. They bought homes they can barely afford or live in inner city rental properties.
All too often when someone has greater income they end up committing more of it in loan repayments trying to live a lifestyle they can not afford because that is what our current capitalist society tells them to do.
This is a seperate problem that must be addressed for its own reasons. But it will have a helpful knock on effect.
f2abef (2) No.924367
>>924356>but blacks have a lower birth rate than white in the US>Hispanics have a higher birth rate than whites.Source it please.
44d111 (4) No.924369>>924384
>>924322>The reasons for the declining birth rate are simple. Humans are less likely to seek to start families when they have economic and household insecurity. When the bird can not build a nest that will last longer then a few days then they will not lay any eggs. Pretty much.
Japan has insane housing prices and taxation to support all the old people. Add to that a culture of overworking for the men and you can see why marriage is not attractive to young men that have witnessed what it did to their fathers.
>We must therefore ensure that everyone can obtain economic security. That a man or woman can bring home a sufficient amount of money from their work in order to raise a family. A living wage.I hope you're only applying this to whites and Asians.
Shtiskins and niggers need to die, then we'll have more resources for everyone.
eccbaa (1) No.924371
>>924064 (OP)>an aging demographicNot if Calico and SENS get their way.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924377
>>924064 (OP)No, just no.
Ireland has the most newborns in Yurop, simply because two third of the families are traditional ones: they are formed by the first marriage of young couples.
It's because traditions are still stronger there than most places, while the economy is not fucking shitty.
That's all you need. Traditionalism, not socialism. Their birth rates actually decreased in the 90s, when they started to hand out more welfare.
4fc83b (1) No.924378>>924423
I'll fix this demographic issue. Most of it is because degenerate women are becoming single mothers or getting divorced early on.
What we need to do is majorly fix divorce laws and make it so that the woman doesn't get shit from the husband if she files for divorce. Then, fix the welfare system so that divorced women can't just suck on the government's tit once they're out of a job.
Do these things and marriage will be a lasting thing again.
c72fb4 (9) No.924384
>>924369The native rights and immigration issues are seperate issues that must be addressed on their own and require considerable efforts on their own.
e27241 (12) No.924401>>924409 >>924427
>>924355>and as we all know coathangers and black market abortions never existedIllegal abortions aren't common enough to have much of an impact.
>let's make STDs, bastards and unwanted, maladjusted children the norm because God knows teenagers are pros at raising childrenTeenagers have been raising children for 99% of human history.
44d111 (4) No.924409
>>924401>Illegal abortions aren't common enough to have much of an impact.Citation needed.
>Teenagers have been raising children for 99% of human history.Yeah, and what well adjusted societies those were!
e27241 (12) No.924412>>924427
>>924364It won't have an effect. There's absolutely zero correlation that a higher income leads to higher birth rates. It's the opposite effect in reality.
9c36a4 (12) No.924420>>924428 >>924442 >>924745 >>924757
>>924100>promote older men getting with younger ergo providing a more stable income for the familyI'm a young woman, I don't think any government initiative could ever, ever make me date a man over 30. Be realistic.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924423
>>924378I think a contract would be better: both of them states what their spouses can't do. If A breaks the contract, then B can fill a divorce, and get some shit, because it was clearly A's fault.
But if A doesn't break anything, and B still wants to divorce, because of reasons, then it's B's fault, and A gets some shit.
In practice it's the same thing, and we all know who is A and who is B, but now you can sell it to the masses.
c72fb4 (9) No.924427
>>924401The problem is cost and impact.
Policing your anti-abortion law alone will cost a considerable sum with little to show for it. It will also be extremely unpopular and lead to an increased strain on the child welfare system due to abandoned children.
>>924412Wrong.
The income bands you posts were of a limited scope and clearly from the USA. Where pretty much everything is screwed up due to the hypercapitalist debt fuelled nature of its society.
Those in the higher bands are typically left wing professionals anyways who are less likely to have children to begin with due to what modern left wing ideology teaches.
Your suggestions WILL NOT work. In the slightest.
You may have more children but those children will be of poor quality and the product of a collapsing child welfare system which will be unable to cope with the numbers on the limited budget available due to how much you are paying people to have children. Before we even factor in enforcement costs of the abortion ban.
You must think wider. In terms of the entirety of society. What will be the knock on effects of each action? How will it effect the treasury? Will it cost or make money? How will the public react? What will it push them to do?
44d111 (4) No.924428
>>924420>Be realistic.You're talking to a pedophile on /pol/, you're asking for the impossible.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924442>>924454
>>924420Would you a 30 year old man?
9c36a4 (12) No.924454>>924472
>>924442Maybe. I probably wouldn't be wanted though, being 19.
e27241 (12) No.924461>>924483
>Policing your anti-abortion law alone will cost a considerable sum with little to show for it. It will also be extremely unpopular and lead to an increased strain on the child welfare system due to abandoned children.
People would have to deal with it and the increased costs on the child welfare system would be a fraction of the costs of immigration.
>Wrong.
You show some proof that a higher income leads to higher birth rates. Until you do then it's not worth discussing this idea.
Besides limiting immigration increases wages without an influx of immigrates to depress them. So you control immigration and people will have a higher income.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924472>>924490
>>924454And a 30 years 10 month year old man?
What kind of male do you want?
80f577 (2) No.924477>>924526
You are going about this the wrong way OP, we don't need more government, we need less. People used to have children so that they could support them in old age, but now they are a burden on the taxpayer so the incentive is lost. Cut the bloated welfare system and maybe people will have a little more money to start families. Socialism and materialism are what's killing us, petty laws and tax breaks won't save us.
c72fb4 (9) No.924483>>924532
>>924461So you would increase taxes to finance it? Thus effectively negating the bonuses from the childbirth payouts.
As for higher income leading to higher birth rates.
You are a fool who takes the idea of economic security to mean vast wealth.
It is economic SECURITY. That people will be in a position where they will have enough to raise a family on and feel comfortable in their economic situation. It doesn't need to be a huge sum. Just enough to be comfortable.
9c36a4 (12) No.924490>>924513
>>924472Attractive, willing to take care of me, and can relate to me and like the things I generally like. Idk, it's hard to think about everything I want.
291864 (4) No.924511
>outlaw abortion
I don't know about your country, but here in Murrica - nearly all abortions are niggers. Most whites aren't degenerate enough for abortion; and the ones that do are often coal-burning whores.
We just need to create Aryan eugenics camps, where white women and men are tested for superior genes (and lacking genetic diseases); then basically paid large sums to breed like rabbits. The children will be raised by a team of professionals - turning them into athletic geniuses indoctrinated in white nationalism.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924513>>924519
>>924490All you know that he couldn't be 31 years old?
9c36a4 (12) No.924519>>924542
>>924513I mean he could, age isn't a hard limit, but I doubt I could find a guy like that who would want me who is that much older than me.
80f577 (2) No.924526
>>924477The first part of my post was lost.
>outlaw abortion64% of abortions are for non-white women in America. The largest percentage of abortions are for black women.
>limit access to contraceptivesYes, that way Jamal, Tyrone, and Juan will breed even more.
>additional financial incentivesTyrone sure won't be around to bring up his child, so we better give mo of dat gubmint money.
e27241 (12) No.924532>>924579
>>924483>You are a fool who takes the idea of economic security to mean vast wealth.It is economic SECURITY. That people will be in a position where they will have enough to raise a family on and feel comfortable in their economic situation. It doesn't need to be a huge sum. Just enough to be comfortable.
There's no point to discussing this. It's too subjective. I want real solutions to work I'm not here to discuss philosophy.
>So you would increase taxes to finance it? Thus effectively negating the bonuses from the childbirth payouts.When you factor in the costs of immigration taxes would be less than they are now.
291864 (4) No.924541
Aren't there usually more women than men in a given population?
You could be on to something; but I don't know about 4 women to one man, unless a lot of men in the area are infertile or have shit genes.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924542>>924552
>>924519>I don't think any government initiative could ever, ever make me date a man over 30>age isn't a hard limit> I doubt I could find a guy like that who would want me who is that much older than meThat doublespeak and insecurity… you must be an actual female.
c73195 (1) No.924551
>>924113not even fucking close you braindead moron.
9c36a4 (12) No.924552>>924571
>>924542I mean that's a bit rude, but at least you don't think I'm lying.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924571>>924602
>>924552Well, I do believe that most of the fairer sex experiences reality in a fundamentally different way, so it's not too hard to spot you.
c72fb4 (9) No.924579>>924598
>>924532It's really not hard to figure out. A fair wage is all that's needed.
I understand that for someone incapable of seeing beyond the first layer of any problem it is difficult if not impossible to understand.
But do try.
As for it costing less than immigration I suspect not.
Raising children in state institutions is expensive. Not just in the basic childcare costs but also facility costs, staffing costs and so on.
And you will be raising MANY children in state run institutions. More so than are now and the system in place is already collapsing due to underfinancing and an inability to attract staff.
Couple that with the high incidences of abuse in state run institutions today and you have some serious problems that will only create more problems.
e27241 (12) No.924598>>924631
>>924579>It's really not hard to figure out. A fair wage is all that's needed.
I understand that for someone incapable of seeing beyond the first layer of any problem it is difficult if not impossible to understand.
But do try.
I'm not going to discuss something as subjective as comfortability
>As for it costing less than immigration I suspect not.
Raising children in state institutions is expensive. Not just in the basic childcare costs but also facility costs, staffing costs and so on.
And you will be raising MANY children in state run institutions. More so than are now and the system in place is already collapsing due to underfinancing and an inability to attract staff.
Couple that with the high incidences of abuse in state run institutions today and you have some serious problems that will only create more problems.
It's a necessary cost.
And abortion is wrong. What a woman wants isn't a justifiable reason to take the life of a child. She shouldn't be able to take the life of a child just because it would put her in an uncomfortable situation.
9c36a4 (12) No.924602>>924640
>>924571>the fairer sex experiences reality in a fundamentally different wayI doubt it's really so different. Being a bit more emotional and insecure is different from experiencing reality in a fundamentally different way. Also how does that explain femmy men?
57b85f (2) No.924605
>>924064 (OP)
>There you go now you don't have to turn your country into Rhodesia.Doing this would seriously flood us with niggers.
c72fb4 (9) No.924631>>924653
>>924598When dealing with humans you HAVE to deal with subjectivity.
That's life.
As for abortion being wrong it's an unavoidable fact of life that women will seek to abort children. Either by inducing a stillbirth or by other means.
They have done it since time immemorial as much as men have tried to avoid getting them pregnant in the first place.
Deal with the humanity that is. Not an idealised version you cannot create.
eaec0e (5) No.924635>>924657
>>924064 (OP)Its quite inevitable.
when life quality increase, the amount of baby always decrease, but the life expendency increase largly as with the child mortality rate who decrease until being irrelevant to statistic.
But,…sometimes…some country are able to stabilize at 2 child per family with a high HDI…whitout the need of immigration. I'm talking to you iceland.
if you want the answer look at iceland. their population never changes and they ahve one of the highest HDI. I really need to study their country.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924640>>924664
>>924602You successfully have me cognitive dissonance with only a few sentences in an anonymous image board. Don't tell me that's not a sign of something significant. I mean, you've considered everything and wrote that the government couldn't pressure you to date a man over 30, then you claimed that it's not a problem for you if a man is over 30, you just feel that you wouldn't be good enough for him.
On the other hand, if I was 30, I'd rather marry a 19 years old girl than a 25, simply because I find that a lot more logical.
Can you see what I mean?
>Also how does that explain femmy men?We are yet to explain all mental illnesses, but it must be hormonal, or maybe their brains are wired badly.
da7372 (1) No.924645>>924666
>>924064 (OP)I'll never understand half of /pol/'s obsession with having children.
>implying having white children magically solves all world problems e27241 (12) No.924653>>924684 >>925014
>>924631>As for abortion being wrong it's an unavoidable fact of life that women will seek to abort children.That's no reason that it can't be made as difficult as possible. If it's discovered a woman intentionally gave herself an abortion she should be charged with murder.
A high mortality rate factored with the possibility of getting charged with murder would make illegal abortions very uncommon.
eaec0e (5) No.924657
>>924635forgot to add picture
9c36a4 (12) No.924664>>924700 >>924763
>>924640>Don't tell me that's not a sign of something significantI don't think I should represent all women. Seems a bit unfair.
> I'd rather marry a 19 years old girl than a 25, simply because I find that a lot more logical.>Can you see what I mean?What makes it more logical? I don't see what you mean.
3fd8e3 (1) No.924666
>>924645Most people do want children. Also, nationalists tend to want to make sure their nation does not die out.
c72fb4 (9) No.924684>>924698
>>924653Women have knowingly ingested poisons to induce a stillbirth before.
Trust me it ain't going anywhere.
This isn't about raising the birth rate for you. That is an excuse.
This is about you simply not liking abortion. A valid opinion on its own but don't hide behind false justification. It just makes you look like a fool as your half baked ideas easily fall apart.
e27241 (12) No.924698
>>924684When have I ever claimed abortion would be non existent? Murder isn't nonexistent and neither would abortions be.
I'm telling you that if abortion were illegal then abortion rates would dramatically drop. That's a fact.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924700>>924713
>>924664>I don't think I should represent all women. But I yet to find a well-adjusted, healthy man who can do the same to me, while it's no problem for the average woman. This is why I now firmly believe that you are a female, to begin with.
>What makes it more logical? I don't see what you mean.Fertility. That's all.
Of course, there are things like beauty and cuteness, or whatever, but I like those things because they are signs of fertility and my brain is programmed to like them.
It's all about facts.You are undecided about age, because your unconsciousness wants you to find a male with a high status. But status is relative to the other members of a group, so you can't rely only on age.
It's all about feelings. 9c36a4 (12) No.924713>>924734
>>924700>But I yet to find a well-adjusted, healthy man who can do the same to meThat's cherry picking, tons of males are full of cognitive dissonance.
>It's all about facts.>It's all about feelings.Except we are the same. You want a "high value" woman, and I want a "high value" man. The things that make people high value to us is different, but it's the same exact thing.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924734
>>924713>That's cherry picking, tons of males are full of cognitive dissonance. Yeah, even I have it now (thanks to you) but only a few of them
cause cognitive dissonance for me. And most of them are kikes or communists.
> The things that make people high value to us is different, but it's the same exact thing.Yes, and we evolved to pick up different things from reality. I mostly have to watch your skin and boobs, you mostly have to watch how I interact with other members of the group.
cb1aaa (2) No.924745>>924752
>>924420Your generation doesn't want to have children so good luck reproducing.
9c36a4 (12) No.924752>>924754
>>924745Most guys I talk about that sort of thing with, plus /pol/, makes me think that finding a guy who would want a child isn't the task you think it is.
eaec0e (5) No.924754>>924781 >>924790
>>924752what she say is quite true. Ive seen more women willing to have child than guys by a large numbers.
4e10f2 (1) No.924757
>>924420>I'm a young woman, I don't think any government initiative could ever, ever make me date a man over 30.What? Getting younger women as an older guy is already way too easy. If anything we should be promoting young married couples with children (emphasis on children.)
291864 (4) No.924763>>924781 >>924792 >>924814
>>924664
>preferring 19 to 25Some of us like Christmas cakes, you know.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924781>>924794 >>924866
>>924754Males don't really want to breed if they don't feel that they are successful, in my opinion at least.
And in the age of NEETs you'll find a lot of unsuccessful men. I too want to breed, but not before I has a job, maybe they too would change their mind if they had jobs.
>>924763Harem-kun, is that you?
>>>/tg/48599 cb1aaa (2) No.924790
>>924754I think most women want to have children but public education has them all screwed up. So men end up spending looking for a woman that isn't "crazy".
9c36a4 (12) No.924792>>924823
>>924763Christmas cakes are pretty amazing… I might even have one if she were aggressive enough.
291864 (4) No.924794
>>924781Nah, just a passer-by cake fan.
0d01b0 (1) No.924814
>>924763Thanks for the fap material.
f5e1e9 (15) No.924823>>924833
>>924792So, you are of
homosex bisex?
158bc8 (1) No.924840
>>924064 (OP)Stop giving a fuck about MUH GDP and let the population shrink.
>B-BUT THEN IT MIGHT BE AN EMPLOYEE'S MARKET, GOY! f5e1e9 (15) No.924852>>924888
>>924833Hm, now I just want to ask you a bunch of questions.
Are you a virgin?
Have you ever done anything sexual with an other female, or just masturbate to the idea?
Are you fat?
Do you have a
tumblrblog?
Where are you from (approximately)?
Are you religious?
eaec0e (5) No.924866>>924881
>>924781there was a song where I live, that I know almost by heart. here it is, basically say what you were saying but clearer.
I, in my case would like to have childrens(about 3 or 4) and shit, but after my studies. So masically when Im 22 - 25. But even tough there more women who are mostlikely to be willing to ahve kids, its still hard to find. Maybe later on there would be even more. Well Im gonna hope.
9c36a4 (12) No.924888>>924939
>>924852>Are you a virgin?No.
>Have you ever done anything sexual with an other female, or just masturbate to the idea?I did something with another girl when I was younger. It didn't really work because what we wanted didn't really mix (we both wanted each other to be "the guy"). I might try it again though.
>Are you fat?No. Pretty average.
>Do you have a tumblrblog?Yes, but it's not leftist really. I used to be an SJW, but now I'm not and I use it to get under the skin of my old followers.
>Where are you from (approximately)?New Jersey, USA
>Are you religious?Deist, I guess. I think there's a god but I don't really know enough to say much more. I guess my militant atheist father contributed to that.
8108f3 (1) No.924898
>>924064 (OP)>limit access to contraceptivesThis would cause a nation-wide chimpout to rival LA riots and Ferguson as if they had never happened.
3e3551 (1) No.924899
>>924064 (OP)>guys let's try and make people have kids>that's the best way to ensure personal freedom, right guys? f5e1e9 (15) No.924939
>>924888Nice trips, but now I'm sure as hell that you can't beat pic related.>>924888
f5e1e9 (15) No.924956>>935711
>>924881This music is fucking based. Surprising from the French.
57b85f (2) No.925014
>>924653Doesn't work. Look at Poland, abortion is outright criminalized there. Lowest birthrates, and complete negative population growth (few new kids, massive emigration).
41b0bd (1) No.925027
>>924064 (OP)Have government incentives for American citizens to birth children in America. Additionally, federally run "boarding schools" can accept unwanted children and employ American citizens as day care employees. These "boarding schools" can be complete with training in nationalism, basic K-12 education, and due to the nature of the broad acceptance criteria, would be an excellent method to build cultural marxism!!!
d74932 (1) No.925034
>>291864
19 year olds become 25 year olds
f1d355 (1) No.925133>>936169
We'd need to change marriage and birthing laws. Right now if you divorce after marriage, she gets half, gets the kid except every other weekend, and gets money for 18 years. And if she became a housewife, she'll get spousal support on top of that. With the rate of failure for marriage it is a huge leap of faith or a total accident to actually get married and raise a child.
02b207 (1) No.925509
>>924064 (OP)make genetically superior babies through test tubes would be the best way.
8140e5 (1) No.935711
>>924956from the quebecer* you meant
28a552 (1) No.935810
>>924064 (OP)>outlaw abortion>limit access to contraceptives so they're not easily available OTC>additional financial incentives to have a child whether they're tax breaks, lump sum payments or monthly stipendsThe goal is not simply more babies but more high-quality (i.e. white or asinal, high IQ + good health) babies. If you outlaw abortion and give financial incentives you will get shitskin and nigger babies i.e. adding to, not solving the population problem.
If government want more high-quality babies it has to support hight-quality parents. The biggest problem is probably the education and career of potential mother - and here state can help by arranging proper daycare and school options. But it has to keep the target in mind - it should be only for educated middle class parents, not niggers.
a86754 (1) No.936169
>>925133This is what I'm afraid of. I want kids, I want a family and a wife but after being burned by so many females already who I thought were good ones, I don't know that I will ever find one that I can trust to a situation like that. I was with a girl for 2 years and she was the sweetest person I had ever met, it took 1 night out with her friends to make a series of horrible decisions and ruin our relationship. You can never tell when they will do that sort of thing, but you can bet your ass that they will.