[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / meta / news+ ] [ ][Options][ watchlist ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics and Current Events

Catalog

[Clear List] [Clear Ghosts]
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File+
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.

Expand all images

YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

File (hide): 1421218724517.png (327.42 KB, 720x436, 180:109, The current state of weste….png)

108d14 (2) No.920406>>920411 >>920431 >>920433 >>920450 >>920773 >>921141 >>921353 >>922672 >>922687 >>923000 [Watch Thread]

>This site not only exists
>It's currently making millions

Brb finding a way to cause a worldwide nuclear holocaust

20fac4 (1) No.920411>>922679

>>920406 (OP)
>you try to get laid.
>one of your dad's girlfriends sees you on there.
>makes a comment to your dad.
>"son we need to talk"
>"screwing married women isn't all it's cracked up to be…"
>proceeds with awkward conversation about how I need to find a nice girl and settle down and not fool around a bunch and stuff.
>proceeds to express some disappointment in me for being such a neet.

d07b4b (1) No.920431>>920461 >>920804 >>922993

>>920406 (OP)
>the free market is the best thing ever, HAHAHA U MAD LIBRULZ XDDDD
>OH SHIT, MUH FEELS ARE HURT! SHUT IT DOWN, SHUT IT DOWN!!!!

f69a2f (1) No.920433>>922875

>>920406 (OP)
>imblying any of the women will look that good
>imblying the extreme minority that look decent won't be batshit insane
would cause delicious drama

10daed (4) No.920450>>920488 >>920525 >>920530 >>920545 >>920911 >>922967 >>922983 >>923000 >>923294 >>923629 >>927460 >>927498

>>920406 (OP)
>Noel Biderman (born 1971)[1] is the CEO of Avid Life Media, who owns a dating web site named "Ashley Madison"
>Noel Biderman is a native of Toronto. Biderman is Jewish.

Well, what a surprise.

7235e3 (1) No.920461>>920493 >>920804

>>920431
>2015
>thinking /pol/ is libertarian
>being this much of a faggot

e9421c (2) No.920478

>Brb finding a way to cause a worldwide nuclear holocaust

That's some blue pill shit right there. Why do people always blame all of humanity every time somebody does some stupid shit? I know it's a joke, but it's really not, because the Jews programmed you to say it, even ironically.

9e8093 (4) No.920488>>920501

>>920450
FUCK! Why is /pol/ always right?

491e5d (3) No.920493>>920511 >>920523 >>920586 >>920804

>>920461
/pol/ was always majority libertarian but then the sub 120 IQ crowd thought the Nazi jokes weren't jokes.

10daed (4) No.920501>>920511 >>920965

File (hide): 1421220457367.jpg (106.78 KB, 900x900, 1:1, they-live-ds-1sh-movie-pos….jpg)

>>920488
In a world gone wrong, /pol/ is always right.

9e8093 (4) No.920511>>920517 >>923062

>>920493
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy#Guilt_by_association_as_an_ad_hominem_fallacy

>>920501
It is sad to think that the last way for young men to be edgy on the internet is to stand against degeneracy and support strong family values. It truly is a sign of the end times.

491e5d (3) No.920517>>920519 >>922646

>>920511
I don't see your point.

9e8093 (4) No.920519>>920547

>>920517
You're a funny goy anon.

d56d1c (1) No.920523>>920547

>>920493
/pol/ was always majority natsoc but then the sub-saharan crowd couldn't see past media stigmatization

1999e7 (2) No.920525>>920549

File (hide): 1421220805189.jpg (101.85 KB, 1020x782, 30:23, newmanaftermarathon.jpg)

>>920450

how dis always heppen

108d14 (2) No.920530>>920560

>>920450
Makes me wonder how the Jews raise their children

e6db90 (1) No.920545>>920805

>>920450
I don't even expect anything else anymore. In fact I'd be surprised if it wasn't. Why are blue pills so defiant in this when it's so blatant?

491e5d (3) No.920547>>920551 >>920567 >>922876

>>920523
>>920519
Look up stormfront, swarmfront, and bugs buddy. The only people who are unaware that the natsoc presence on /pol/ was trolls trolling trolls and think the whole thing was sincere is still a newfag and needs to lurk moar.

The people on this board who genuinely subscribe to that ideology because of shit they read here are aligning themselves with a fucking meme.

0c168f (1) No.920549

File (hide): 1421221244267.jpg (33.18 KB, 485x406, 485:406, struggle.jpg)

>>920525
Jews have no morals, what did you expect

1999e7 (2) No.920551>>920964

>>920547

I don't know, TGSNT probably has something to do with it.

10daed (4) No.920560

>>920530
Mostly with strong family values, I think. Charles Murray's latest book "Coming Apart" describes (without specifically mentioning the Jews) how the elite in America promote liberal sexual attitudes and single motherhood through the media, but they themselves wait until marriage to have children, and rarely divorce. It's a bizarre kind of reverse hypocrisy where you preach degeneracy to the masses, while not practising it yourself. Basically the upper middle class practices the same family values it did in the 60s (or close thereto) while reassuring the working class that a path of degeneracy is morally A-okay and has no negative consequences.

>In an interview with the "A Current Affair" program in Australia, [Biderman] admitted that if he found out that his own wife was accessing his cheater's site, that "I would be devastated."

9e8093 (4) No.920567

>>920547
>Anyone who isn't a libertarian must be either new or a stormfag

http://tgsnt.tv/

1c04c8 (7) No.920586>>921005 >>921158

File (hide): 1421221897634.jpg (76.71 KB, 600x786, 100:131, 1419923367529.jpg)

>>920493

No, there were always rightists balancing out the libertardians.

1c04c8 (7) No.920620

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men,_Women_%26_Children_%28film%29

I'm surprised /pol/ never talked about this shit film when it came out, it's basically an advertisement for that shit site.

>Don and Helen Truby are a sexually unsatisfied married couple. Helen seeks an extra-marital affair through the website Ashley Madison, while Don finds an escort service.


The guy the wife hooks up with is, of course, a nigger. And I'm sure you can guess what tribe the director is from.

8eb87a (1) No.920773>>920794

>>920406 (OP)
Is this is a website for cuckolds or did I understood incorrectly ?

1c04c8 (7) No.920794

>>920773

It's a website where married woman go to find guys to fuck. It's not cuckolding in the fetish sense, but more like cuckoldry in the more traditional usage of the term.

f42d64 (4) No.920804>>920858 >>920919 >>920920 >>920935 >>920954 >>922692 >>923683

>>920493
>>920461
>Nazi jokes weren't jokes
You're on the right track but missing something; /pol/ has been majority libertarian for quite some time now (I'm a relative newfag so can't really speak for before the stormfag invasion).

However, the stormfags started shilling and people who liked the casual racism of laughing at niggers latched onto it. Pretty soon the neckbeards with nothing left to live for arrived and styled and deluded themselves into believing NatSocs were ever close to being a majority on /pol/.

>>920431
I think you might be missing the point of OP's post. Still, he's said nothing to indicate he's even a libertarian.

8988ce (1) No.920805


917781 (1) No.920858>>920860

File (hide): 1421226157172.jpg (95.97 KB, 944x712, 118:89, kike detected.jpg)

>>920804
heebloving newfag gtfo

f42d64 (4) No.920860>>920881

>>920858
>heebloving
What does this mean?

8b5a69 (1) No.920881>>933883

>>920860
You're a jew lover.

And /pol/ was always racist, idiot, even when it was /new/, and prior to that, /n/

You're deluding yourself utterly if you think /pol/ or any of it's predecessors was a magical tolerant land before the 'stormfags' came.

969a34 (2) No.920911

>>920450
Go fuck his wife, anon.

969a34 (2) No.920919

File (hide): 1421226885948.png (16.71 KB, 475x375, 19:15, 1348890638373.png)

>>920804
>I'm a relative newfag
kill yourself.

962e37 (1) No.920920>>920990

>>920804
It is completely possible to be a Libertarian and desire the survival of the European races.

b98a8a (1) No.920935>>933889

File (hide): 1421227139386.gif (1.88 MB, 600x750, 4:5, 1418754857243.gif)

>>920804
>I'm a relative newfag
>Post extensive post instead of lurking

3a7c52 (1) No.920954>>922927

>>920804

>relative newfag


I've been on the chans since the beginning. I came from trolltalk on /. in the early 2000s where crackychan was continually spammed, thus introducing me to 4chan. Even back then, the right wing contingent was strong and made fun of the libertarian contingent. See: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Trolltalk

tl;dr go back to lurking you fucking reddit nerd faggot. I hope you killed and raped by marauding packs of blacks in your libertarian paradise.

e9421c (2) No.920964

>>920551
It did for me, but I've always had the suspicion that everybody was lying about Hitler.

Don't listen to the shills, they will say anything. They are scrambling and running scared on all fronts.

092f2b (1) No.920965>>921049

>>920501

this needs the merchant shooped on the glasses, with the text "the jews" under.

1c04c8 (7) No.920990>>922958

>>920920

>It is completely possible to be a Libertarian and desire the survival of the European races.


But desire is about all they can do, because to do anything to affect the survival of the European races would require authority and limitation on certain of the excesses of liberty.

867d02 (1) No.921005>>921051

>>920586
i was a libert, now i'm more in the thinking of the right.

i still support libertarians in the polls however, as a means to an end.

we need freedom to fight the left.
we need freedom to correct the lies they've spread.

10daed (4) No.921049>>922963

>>920965

There's a shooped version floating around somewhere, but strangely enough, Google images didn't seem to have it, so I went with the original.

1c04c8 (7) No.921051>>922646

File (hide): 1421229019719.png (556.35 KB, 615x613, 615:613, 1406232416784.png)

>>921005

I was a libertard until the first exodus and I came here, then I had a few revelations. That libertarian society can only work for a very narrow minority of people; liberty isn't necessarily a good thing; to ensure worthwhile liberty is allowed to flourish, a proper authority is needed; and, it's the duty of those narrow band of people who could make libertarianism (and even anarchism) work to take on the burdens of rulership and lead society to a proper course.

456883 (1) No.921141

>>920406 (OP)
Same.

18b3bb (2) No.921158>>921181

>>920586
Neoreactionary is a Libertarian movement.

1c04c8 (7) No.921181>>921206 >>923041

>>921158

Actually, I'm more of a classical reactionary, I just like the neoreactionary cat meme.

18b3bb (2) No.921206>>924182

>>921181
It's still a Libertarian movement. The result falls in line with many Libertarian principles of small government.

129363 (1) No.921353

>>920406 (OP)
And? What's wrong? Why should I care for any bluepill idiotic enough not only to be attracted to females but also marry them?

4b9e42 (1) No.921383

>Not profiting off of sluts

These guys are smart.

72fdcd (1) No.922646>>923772

>>921051
Smells like bait, but I bite.

While that sort of makes sense, as an ancap, I'd rather just leave everybody else the hell alone and enjoy my peace. That way I can focus on nurturing a society that actually has demonstrated a capacity for sanity, rather than being a violent criminal. If you ever really were a libertarian, you should know what I mean when I say that.

If the majority of people don't have the integrity to abide by liberty, then I'll just be free by myself until everybody else gets tired of dicking around and gets with the program.

>>920517
He's
>implying
that being a keyboard Nazi
>is to stand against degeneracy and support strong family values.

He's not technically wrong, relative to the alternative. (SJWs.)

de6277 (1) No.922672

>>920406 (OP)
>It's currently making millions

citation needed

7e836d (1) No.922679

File (hide): 1421252531487.jpg (23.24 KB, 400x386, 200:193, 1411669699017.jpg)

>>920411
>one of your dad's girlfriends sees you on there.

160800 (1) No.922687

>>920406 (OP)
>get people to believe nuclear bombs aren't real, like the moon landing
>wait
That's how you do it.

543cac (1) No.922692>>922784 >>922846

File (hide): 1421252715525.png (560.42 KB, 720x540, 4:3, 1420571224878-1.png)

>>920804
>(I'm a relative newfag so can't really speak for before the stormfag invasion).

Man, fuck off. Even all the way back to /n/, we were talking about the same shit. Hell, back in 2004, when I first started going on 4chan, I remember calling people niggers and kikes all the fucking time. Go back to fucking reddit.
>muh neckbeard meme
>muh stormfags

No, stormfags are obvious to point out, you're just fucking retarded.

0be0bc (1) No.922784>>922846

>>922692
> Hell, back in 2004, when I first started going on 4chan, I remember calling people niggers and kikes all the fucking time.

Nigger and faggot are totally chan vocabulary, although I think kike is much newer. Maybe it's because we weren't able to recognize the enemy back then.

40c54d (1) No.922846

>>922692
>Hell, back in 2004, when I first started going on 4chan, I remember calling people niggers and kikes all the fucking time.

everyone called everyone a nigger/faggot back in those days because of lolnousernames where you could as edgy as you wanted without fear of getting banned. in the endless sea of pro/vb boards only a few that tolerated that shit and they were either slow as fuck or suffered from the same attention whoring/mod faggotry that shitted up every other forum. also kike didn't start gaining traction until /n/ before it was on the same level as spic. as for the stormfags they were there but as you pointed out "easy to spot" and usually told to "fuck off back to stormfront" the only possible exception to any of this is nigger and that's because secretly no one actually likes niggers expect for niggers & the trash that breed with them. that includes the average white american liberal who are in reality the most racist people on the planet.

>>922784
>Nigger and faggot are totally chan vocabulary
exactly. its even common on 420chan which is basically reddit the imageboard.

aeeb08 (1) No.922875

>>920433
>Implying women are not insane drama incarnate.

983e59 (1) No.922876

>>920547

>The people on this board who genuinely subscribe to that ideology because of shit they read here are aligning themselves with a fucking meme.


Said the Libertarian.

1998bb (2) No.922927

>>920954

the ladies must love you

1998bb (2) No.922958

>>920990
i can act by marrying a white woman dipshit

2656d3 (1) No.922963

File (hide): 1421256517301.png (523.89 KB, 750x500, 3:2, xray specs.png)


eb8e79 (1) No.922967

File (hide): 1421256537767.gif (799.49 KB, 400x332, 100:83, 1403814900796.gif)

>>920450

Every fucking time.

3e339f (1) No.922983

File (hide): 1421256771632.jpg (45.38 KB, 241x313, 241:313, 39329092343.jpg)


cf7146 (2) No.922993>>924109

>>920431
>thinking you can't dislike something without wanting it to be illegal

More to the point, marriage is about as far from a free market contract as you can get. It's a government monopoly with a single set of terms, no deviation allowed. Imagine if employment worked like this. The government decides the one salary you're allowed to have, that everyone has to have, for all jobs. No deviation, no negotiation, just the same terms for everyone. Imagine how fucking insane that would be. That's how it is for marriage - with the added joy that, through feminist-inspired meddling, the One Acceptable Contract that the government currently allows isn't even any fucking good. It's worthless to most people, its terms simply aren't agreeable. What do you think would happen to marriage rates if people were able to marry following terms other than "in the event of divorce, the woman gets the house, kids, and half the man's salary, regardless of whoever is to blame"?

Maybe it's just that most people don't quite appreciate that that's what marriage is: a contract to negotiate the terms of divorce. Just like you can take voluntary employment with no contract and no terms where neither party is obliged to do anything, so too can you enter into a relationship in which there is no contract and no party is etc. etc. The only reason to get married is so that you get a payoff if the other party decides to end the relationship (either by fault e.g. adultery, abuse) or by leaving you without you having committed fault. You put yourself in a situation whereby you can't do X and Y in exchange for your partner not being able to do X or Y to you. The current terms of marriage don't facilitate any contractual agreement that has any real benefit, it's just a meaningless show with a one-sided payoff, which is why so many people are opting out these days.

Culture is endlessly malleable, whereas legal changes are made once and then remain fairly indefinitely. Fix the law and the culture will fix itself.

34b298 (2) No.923000

>>920406 (OP)
I remember freaking out about this in 2011, back when I was married.
>>920450
Holy shit…

cf7146 (2) No.923041

>>921181
The guy is right though, it's thick-wall libertarianism. Small but strong state, rather than a weak state that can easily be voted leftwards.

34b298 (2) No.923062

File (hide): 1421257648925.jpg (72.01 KB, 800x566, 400:283, 1418484256581.jpg)

>>920511
It's like my mom used to say… "Nothing is shocking anymore. The only thing that would surprise me is if people started acting decent."

ac6bb4 (1) No.923294

>>920450
And remember, kids, where there is degeneracy, a kike smiles in the corner.

a8d0b4 (1) No.923629

File (hide): 1421264298148.png (468.26 KB, 910x555, 182:111, EVERYTIME.png)

>>920450
Screenshotted.

c2fd97 (1) No.923683>>927922

>>920804
>/pol/ has been majority libertarian for a long time
>I'm a newfag

Then how would you fucking know?

I'm an oldfag, been around since /new/. /pol/ has always been 25% libertarian and 25% natsoc and 50% a million other smaller ideologies.

1c04c8 (7) No.923772

>>922646
>I'd rather just leave everybody else the hell alone and enjoy my peace.

Well, that's because of your values. As an ancap, if you're anything like the majority of ancaps, you're a strict individualist and a strict materialist. I've not met an ancap who had values beyond that which is materially and economically profitable and conducive to extreme individualism. The majority of ancaps I've discoursed with believe individuals have no duty to other people or society in general, the concept of duty to anything but the self seems foreign to them.

My main reasons for being libertarian were that all parties vying for authority in the current system are bad. But authority in and of itself is not bad, it's only bad when in the hands of bad people operating from bad principles. And, this is the big one, the only way we can assure that those who are mature and responsible enough to exercise liberty in worthwhile, non-destructive ways is to limit the liberties of those who practice freedom without concomitant responsibilities to point of self-destruction. Ancaps and many libertarians seem to think that self-destruction can be limited to those who engage in self-destruction while they themselves aren't affected unless government steps in to prop up the self-destructive; but the fallout of self-destructive and socially destructive behaviors has effects on everyone, even if government doesn't step in to make you pay for it.

be528b (1) No.924109

>>922993

>Laws can't be changed


eh?

91ccb4 (1) No.924182

>>921206
>>921206
What? You stupid lolberg. Neo-reactionary movements are traditional, not lolberg and not all of them are "small government" orientated. Many religious reactionaries want to see porn b& for example, and we all now how much the lolbergs on /pol/ shill for the porn industry.

Also, not a NatSoc but I'll gladly take NatSocs over lolbergs.

9b7a10 (1) No.927460

File (hide): 1421329003567.jpg (75.1 KB, 800x570, 80:57, noel-biderman.jpg)

>>920450
>this face
>anything but a kike

26d3ad (1) No.927498

File (hide): 1421329859078.jpg (152.12 KB, 751x555, 751:555, jidf.jpg)


e8de23 (1) No.927572>>928456

>finding a way to cause a worldwide nuclear holocaust
shoot a model rocket off near a nuclear missile radar station

b36ade (1) No.927594

how is /pol/ so blue pilled when it comes to women?

3a9501 (1) No.927922

>>923683
>>/pol/ has been majority libertarian for a long time
>>I'm a newfag
>Then how would you fucking know?

Fucking all of this. I am so sick of people posting that /pol/ has always been mostly libertardian.

f914fc (1) No.928187

I wouldn't lose any sleep OP. These kind of adult hookup sites, or specialty dating sites, stuff for Asians, Blacks, fatties etc, are 90% fake profiles.

They bait desperate guys with bot messages in an attempt to get them to pay a membership fee to message the bot profile back, thinking it's a gurrrrl.

You want to get laid? Use OKC or craigslist. No real woman uses these hookup sites, when she can literally ask any average Joe on the street for sex and get a yes everytime.

Source me: Used a hook up site got nothing, slept with 4 women from CL and OKC.

970893 (1) No.928456

>>927572

Kek, could you imagine? The problem is they can't return fire until they know where it's coming from, and a model rocket wouldn't have the information required (speed and trajectory) to get that. So they'd brace themselves, wait for impact, and when it doesn't come they'd find that it's a model rocket and go into an investigation to find out who did it.

f42d64 (4) No.933883

>>920881
I never said it was a place of magical tolerance. Only that the stormfags conducted psyops on it. This is common knowledge.

f42d64 (4) No.933889

>>920935
I've been here for 3 years. Most boards I browsed in the past treated anyone under 5 years as being a newfag.



80 replies | 17 images | 56 UIDs | Page ???
[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Update] ( Auto) 10
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / meta / news+ ] [ ][ watchlist ]
[Yotsuba B][Yotsuba][Tomorrow][Dark][Photon][Custom]