Local // Politics

California is first state to ban the sale of fur clothing, beginning in 2023

SACRAMENTO โ€” People in the market for mink coats or chinchilla vests will soon need to shop elsewhere, now that California will become the first state in the nation to ban new fur clothing.

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB44 on Saturday, outlawing the sale and manufacture of new fur clothing and accessories. The ban doesnโ€™t take effect until Jan. 1, 2023, giving retailers time to sell off their inventories.

โ€œCalifornia is a leader when it comes to animal welfare and today that leadership includes banning the sale of fur,โ€ Newsom said in a statement.

  • Unlimited Digital Access for 95ยข
  • Read more articles like this by subscribing to the San Francisco Chronicle
SUBSCRIBE

Supporters say the bill is necessary to end an inhumane fur trade that raises animals in filthy conditions and slaughters them solely for their coats, often using methods such as electrocution.

โ€œWeโ€™ve known from people whoโ€™ve gone undercover for years in the fur industry that it is impossible to be assured of humanely raised fur,โ€ said Assemblywoman Laura Friedman, D-Glendale (Los Angeles County), who carried the bill.

Retailers can still sell secondhand fur clothing or decor under the new law. The ban also wonโ€™t apply to faux fur, which is generally made from plastics. It also doesnโ€™t apply to leather, cowhides, stuffed animals and the full skin of deer, sheep and goats.

Opponents of the bill, including the Fur Information Council of America, call it government overreach and a step toward animal rights activists banning products like leather and meat.

โ€œThis issue is about much more than animal welfare in the fur industry,โ€ Keith Kaplan, a spokesman for the industry lobbying group, said in a statement. โ€œIt is about the end of animal use of any kind. Fur today, leather tomorrow, your wool blankets and silk sheets โ€” and meat after that.โ€

Violators could face a civil fine of $500 or up to $1,000 for repeat violations within one year. Each fur item sold could be treated as a separate violation.

Kitty Block, CEO and president of the Humane Society of the United States, cheered Californiaโ€™s move Saturday morning. She said other states are likely to pass similar bans, which could pressure more clothing brands to use synthetic materials.

โ€œThe signing of AB44 underscores the point that todayโ€™s consumers simply donโ€™t want wild animals to suffer extreme pain and fear for the sake of fashion,โ€ Block said in a statement.

San Francisco became the first major U.S. city to ban the sale of fur last year, a move that drove at least one retailer to leave the state. Berkeley, Los Angeles and West Hollywood have enacted similar bans.

Newsom signed several other animal rights bills Saturday, including SB313 by Sen. Ben Hueso, D-Logan Heights (San Diego County), which prohibits the use of wild animals such as bears, tigers, elephants and monkeys in a circus. Under the law, only domesticated cats, dogs and horses will be allowed in performances in California.

โ€œWe are making a statement to the world that beautiful wild animals like bears and tigers have no place on trapeze wires or jumping through flames,โ€ Newsom said. โ€œJust YouTube the videos showing the cruel way these animals โ€” often stripped from their mothers as babies โ€” are trained to do dangerous tricks. Itโ€™s deeply disturbing.โ€

Dustin Gardiner is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: dustin.gardiner@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @dustingardiner

You must be signed in to comment

Sign In

The sign in service is not functioning right now.

Please try again in a few minutes

If the issues continue, please contact our customer service at

Phone:

Email:

Worth every penny :
1ยข/day
DIGITAL ACCESS to in-depth local news