California is first state to ban the sale of fur clothing, beginning in 2023
![](https://s.hdnux.com/photos/01/04/12/71/17870462/13/640x0.jpg)
SACRAMENTO โ People in the market for mink coats or chinchilla vests will soon need to shop elsewhere, now that California will become the first state in the nation to ban new fur clothing.
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB44 on Saturday, outlawing the sale and manufacture of new fur clothing and accessories. The ban doesnโt take effect until Jan. 1, 2023, giving retailers time to sell off their inventories.
โCalifornia is a leader when it comes to animal welfare and today that leadership includes banning the sale of fur,โ Newsom said in a statement.
- Unlimited Digital Access for 95ยข
- Read more articles like this by subscribing to the San Francisco Chronicle
Supporters say the bill is necessary to end an inhumane fur trade that raises animals in filthy conditions and slaughters them solely for their coats, often using methods such as electrocution.
โWeโve known from people whoโve gone undercover for years in the fur industry that it is impossible to be assured of humanely raised fur,โ said Assemblywoman Laura Friedman, D-Glendale (Los Angeles County), who carried the bill.
Retailers can still sell secondhand fur clothing or decor under the new law. The ban also wonโt apply to faux fur, which is generally made from plastics. It also doesnโt apply to leather, cowhides, stuffed animals and the full skin of deer, sheep and goats.
Opponents of the bill, including the Fur Information Council of America, call it government overreach and a step toward animal rights activists banning products like leather and meat.
โThis issue is about much more than animal welfare in the fur industry,โ Keith Kaplan, a spokesman for the industry lobbying group, said in a statement. โIt is about the end of animal use of any kind. Fur today, leather tomorrow, your wool blankets and silk sheets โ and meat after that.โ
Violators could face a civil fine of $500 or up to $1,000 for repeat violations within one year. Each fur item sold could be treated as a separate violation.
Kitty Block, CEO and president of the Humane Society of the United States, cheered Californiaโs move Saturday morning. She said other states are likely to pass similar bans, which could pressure more clothing brands to use synthetic materials.
โThe signing of AB44 underscores the point that todayโs consumers simply donโt want wild animals to suffer extreme pain and fear for the sake of fashion,โ Block said in a statement.
San Francisco became the first major U.S. city to ban the sale of fur last year, a move that drove at least one retailer to leave the state. Berkeley, Los Angeles and West Hollywood have enacted similar bans.
Newsom signed several other animal rights bills Saturday, including SB313 by Sen. Ben Hueso, D-Logan Heights (San Diego County), which prohibits the use of wild animals such as bears, tigers, elephants and monkeys in a circus. Under the law, only domesticated cats, dogs and horses will be allowed in performances in California.
โWe are making a statement to the world that beautiful wild animals like bears and tigers have no place on trapeze wires or jumping through flames,โ Newsom said. โJust YouTube the videos showing the cruel way these animals โ often stripped from their mothers as babies โ are trained to do dangerous tricks. Itโs deeply disturbing.โ
Dustin Gardiner is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: dustin.gardiner@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @dustingardiner
You must be signed in to comment
is currently signed in
Sign In