Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.

@NikolovScience

A Ph.D. Physical Scientist with a broad range of interests in various fields of science, i.e. climate, cosmology, astrophysics, nutrition, archaeology etc.

Denver, CO
Joined July 2017
3,687 Photos and videos Photos and videos

You may also like

·

Tweets

You blocked @NikolovScience

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @NikolovScience

  1. Pinned Tweet
    15 Jul 2017

    New published challenges the current theory and all projections based on it:

    226 replies 1,419 retweets 1,544 likes
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    4 minutes ago
    Replying to and

    Joe, why do you think that the release of a trace gas, which totals just 0.04% of the atmospheric volume should have ANY effect on climate? Do you know how the Gas Law and the physics of the atmosphere work? This is the questions you need to answer for yourself first...🙂

    1 retweet 3 likes
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    7 minutes ago

    The notion that human diet "affects" is perhaps the most ABSURD consequence of the discombobulated "Greenhouse" theory. Also, the type of diet recommended (vegetarian & vegan) to "reduce" GHG emissions happens to be the most unhealthy one:

    7 retweets 10 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    18 minutes ago

    Here is a quick Quiz by NY Times claiming to assess the "impact" of your diet on : A low-fat high-carb (UNHEALTHY) diet is shown to have "low" impact, while a high-fat low-carb (HEALTHY) diet is shown to have "high" impact...😎 It's all BACKWARDS!

    1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. Retweeted
    8 hours ago
    Replying to and

    BTW, there is nothing "established" in the claimed effect on climate! The claim is only supported by computer models, and there is not a shred of evidence in the geological record backing it up. The projected warming effect of CO2 is just a violation of the 1st Law by models

    2 replies 12 retweets 28 likes
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    8 hours ago
    Replying to and

    😃 This is exactly what our empirical model does: it describes incredibly accurately the global temperatures of Venus, Earth, and Mars and a few other bodies in a continuum without ANY dependance on . Read our paper, Ken! I pointed this out 4 times:

    3 replies 6 retweets 15 likes
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    13 hours ago
    Replying to and

    People are reluctant to invest the time to understand the alternative, but I've been tracking electrical cosmology for about 14 years now, + what I would argue is that it offers a more coherent perspective than gravitational cosmology.

    2 replies 4 retweets 11 likes
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    9 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Ken, the interest in solar geo-research is NOT "acknowledgement of the seriousness of the problem", but a manifestation of massive scientific confusion & delusion that the is controlled by some trace gases. This is physically an ABSURD proposition!

    1 reply 9 retweets 13 likes
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    9 hours ago
    Replying to and

    What defines an act as terrorism is its potentially devastating impact on the World and humanity, not whether it's done in secrecy. The proposed climate manipulation via stratospheric aerosol injections is justified by a physically wrong theory (junk science). Hence, it's rogue!

    4 replies 6 retweets 14 likes
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    12 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Ken, I would be interested in your answer to Ned's question.

    1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    12 hours ago
    Replying to and

    David Keith, a PhD environmental scientist, has been proposing the terrorist idea of spraying ash and sulfuric acid in the stratosphere for over a decade now. Watch this 2007 presentation by him: People like Dr. Keith pose a potential threat to humanity.

    3 replies 8 retweets 8 likes
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    12 hours ago
    Replying to and

    The issue of SRM through stratospheric aerosol injections is already being seriously discussed as a "practical solution" to the imaginary problem. Watch this exert from a recent show, where David Keith PhD is proposing the spraying of SULFURIC ACID:

    1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes
    Undo
  13. Retweeted
    13 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Ken, I just saw this paper in Nature, where you are a co-author in along list of authors: After reading our paper (), do you still believe that the climate is controlled by non-condensible trace gases such as CO2?

    3 replies 2 retweets 12 likes
    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    13 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Ken, I see that you are a professional scientist. What do you think about our discovery regarding the nature of the Greenhouse effect described in these papers?

    This is a layman's summary of our new concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations from across the Solar System (including Earth) described in these papers:…
    2 replies 5 retweets 9 likes
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    13 hours ago
    Replying to and

    I'm far from calling a "crime" any crazy idea expressed in public! Criminal are only those ideas that are likely to harm humanity and/or are associated with a huge waste of money based on demonstrably junk science...

    1 reply 3 retweets 8 likes
    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    13 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Ken, advocating for deployment of a system for global SRM through polluting the stratosphere is definitely worse than advocating for research on the subject. The latter is only wasting of money, while the former is both waste of $ and a crime against humanity.

    1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    14 hours ago
    Replying to and

    This is simply a reincarnation of the same old idea that gravity holds the Universe together. Modern observations suggest that it ain't so:

    3 replies 3 retweets 9 likes
    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    16 hours ago
    Replying to and

    It's not ignorance! Gravity is a major force on the scale of the Solar System, but it's not sufficient to explain galactic rotations and the clustering of galaxies. That's why traditional cosmology based on gravity needed to invent unobservable entities like "dark matter".

    5 replies 3 retweets 12 likes
    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    16 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Watch this recent presentation reporting results from analysis of 20 million weather-balloon records from all over the World showing that the observed atmospheric temperature drop with altitude is explained by the Gas Law and caused by pressure:

    An interesting talk by Drs. Ronan & Michael Connolly providing new insights about Earth's vertical atmos. temperature profile based on balloon data: They show that the radiative "Greenhouse" effect does NOT exist, since…
    Show this thread
    6 replies 21 retweets 27 likes
    Undo

@NikolovScience hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.