Conversation

Replying to

@KindKabsCorner

Woah there. Patch doesn't have a connection to Sangie. Also what is happening with Indigo sucks, but I don't think this is doxx. It appears to be proof of messages between the two that Patch paid Indigo for her article and iirc she claimed he refused to pay her.

5:07 PM · Feb 2, 2019Twitter for Android

Replying to

and

@KindKabsCorner

It just makes Indigo look like she was lying before about Patch refusing to pay his freelancers and now she's trying to pull some new grift? I don't know why. She kind of went ballistic like a week ago or something? imho just seems like an unstable person struggling & lashing out

1

2

Feb 2

Which sucks and I hope she gets the help she needs to find stability and happiness but whatever this Patch thing is just seems like a vendetta.

2

Feb 2

I'm especially skeptical of the Sangie thing since I know Patch and others worked to talk to manynof the big name furry publishing companies to no longer work with InkedFur or Sangie. A similarly false claim from the same people was that I along with Patch was protecting

2

3

Feb 2

pedophiles. Their "proof"? I replied to Sangie on twitter once long before the zoosadist bust happened. Not exactly reasonable since I talk to thousands of people and replying to a random comment on twitter is hardly affiliation or protection.

2

3

Harlan Rogers

@TheHarlanRogers

You were also happy to allow him admittance to a con you were supposedly regulating.

3

FoxFromTheWest, I've told you before I work as charity staff you paranoid stalker. I had no say over a completely different department, like the Dealers Den or what contracts they already had signed before the zoosadist leaks came out. I didn't "allow" anyone admittance and

1

I certainly have no power of "regulating" the world's largest furry con. I don't get oversight in who attends, I don't make any con decisions, and I don't really even have any contact with most of the other departments.

1

2