SAA has nothing to win from bombing civilians. It simply makes no sense. In modern wars, you need to win heart and minds. The airforce always targets militants - remember there are ten of thousands of jihadists - and sometimes civilians get killed in the process.https://twitter.com/sakirkhader/status/1155166935497265157 …
-
-
And you understand that. You fully get it. And you're okay with it. You're good with he Syria regime killing as many civilians as it takes to end the rebellion. You just won't say it out loud, because that would be admitting what a wreteched waste of life you are.
-
It is their EXACT strategy to murder everyone beyond their control, to sap both the will to resist, and to deny the rebellion any source of support, food, healthcare, etc etc etc. It's a CONSCIOUS decision that says "it is worth killing our own people if it makes it harder for
-
the rebels to fight, forces more people to flee, or makes life unlivable in what area they have left. It has been the goal since the first time they pushed barrels of explosives lit by hand out the back of a helicopter. There was no targeting. There was no military goal there. It
-
is purely aimed at a strategy of depopulation, infrastructure destruction, and killing the very will to continue fighting, knowing that as long as you *exist* in an area beyond the control of the government, the Syrian air force, artillery, missile forces, and in some cases,
-
ground forces, will do everything in their power to kill you and your family. You aren't targeting military forces when you just blindly shell a village, fire 40 rocket barrages (from a system designed to obliterate everything inside a grid square because it can't independently
-
target), or fly a helicopter over a city and push unguided, homemade IEDs out the back with no means of aiming them whatsoever. No. Your goal is to kill and destroy EVERYTHING beyond your reach when you do that, and to make life unlivable. The Assad regime is ACTIVELY waging a
-
campaign of Genocide by Geography, whereby, your EXISTENCE beyond government control, is a capital crime, absolved only by death or fleeing. And you fucking it, Chris. You're just too much of a fucking coward to say you're okay with massacreing innocents if your side wins.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly. If Assad has ”nothing to win” then why does he do it? He kills civilians to “teach them a lesson”: this is what you deserve for trying to take me out of power. “Assad or we burn the country.” And he has. Every village, every town, markets, schools, hospitals, & people.pic.twitter.com/uiBLJj2VwM
-
So if you haven't picked up on it yet, Chris, fuck you, and everything you stand for, you pretentious monkeyfucker.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Chris literally shrugged off the detention, torture+murder of Leila Shewkhani bc of something something visa requirements.https://twitter.com/ImtiazGarcia/status/1134462916210626560?s=20 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well said. This was Obama's in deciding not to contest Russian intervention in Sept. '15...he thought Russia would end up in a quagmire. He fundamentally miscalculated that Russia doesn't play by int'l rules. Genocide to win a war is all just a fair day's work for them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s the logical unethical extension of fighting for the control of the population. Denying the population to your enemy is a “win”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right on. And love your expletives!
-
Assad won the war -> guys sitting in the U.S. cheering for "the rebels" (who are either al-Qaeda, or are allied to al-Qaeda) are sick in the head
-
How the hell is a child with her leg blown off "al Qaeda?"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You are so much braver than I. I can't even think about Syria without crying. Let alone debate. Does anyone else remember the Arab Women of History convention in Damascus in 2008? No? Just me? Ok well the whole city is rubble now. *defeated sigh. goes to sleep for a decade*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well said. This was Obama's in deciding not to contest Russian intervention in Sept. '15...he thought Russia would end up in a quagmire. He fundamentally miscalculated that Russia doesn't play by int'l rules. Genocide to win a war is all just a fair day's work for them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.