Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Tet Omeg]

Hello. I created the following post:

* Tet Omeg, "How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud", May 12, 2019, https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=28961.0 , https://archive.is/sZsf1 , https://webcitation.org/78KTpWWsM , http://www.freezepage.com/1557717145RXIFOGEJOT .

Of which was posted in the below subforum:

* "Miscellaneous", Free State Project Forum, https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?board=21.0 .

In said subforum I now see this post:

* JasonPSorens, "MOVED: How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud", May 15, 2019, https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=28962.0 .

The body of which states the following:

""
This topic has been moved to Moderated posts [ https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?board=28.0 ]. Not really appropriate for this forum.

https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=28961.0
""

The description for the "Miscellaneous" subforum states, "Discuss non-FSP topics: philosophy, news, music, movies, games, sports, etc.".

I was careful to look over the various subforums and their descriptions, and the "Miscellaneous" subforum would definitely be the appropriate subforum for my aforesaid post. Furthermore, when I click on the "Moderated posts" subforum ( https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?board=28.0 ), it is behind a login-page. When I login, it states the following:

""
An Error Has Occurred!

The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you.
""

So now I'm cut-off from replying to people on my own post.

May I be given on-limits to the above subforum?

* * * * *

Also, as I stated above, I was careful to look over the various subforums and their descriptions, and the "Miscellaneous" subforum would definitely be the appropriate subforum for my aforesaid post.

Is it merely because my post deals with sex, which for many people is an embarrassing topic, that my post was moved to an inaccessible location?

Yet in doing a forum-search on the word "sex", I see that there are many posts on the Free State Project Forum dealing with sex, particularly in the "Miscellaneous" subforum--including illicit sex. Whereas my post deals with licit sex.

It is very unfortunate that my post was moved in said manner, because issues of sexual inadequacy are often among the most emotionally-traumatizing issues that males frequently suffer with, and my article entitled "How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God Stud" (Internet Archive, May 12, 2019, 6 pp., ark:/13960/t0tr3j398, https://archive.org/download/InfiniLastSex/Redford-InfiniLast-Sex-Technique.pdf , http://www.freezepage.com/1557704775GXQCMMUNJE ) as cited in my above-said post offers the solution to many of these sexual problems. Only God and His archangels know how many males have committed suicide due to issues of sexual inadequacy, though undoubtably the number is large. (Here I define an "archangel" as a technologically-immortal superintelligence with access to enough computational resources to perform the multiversal resurrection of the dead up to our timeframe in universal history.)

Thus, my aforecited article has the power to literally save lives--as well, of course, to help make new lives via impregnation. And, surely, that is something we can all take joy in.

[JasonPSorens]

There was a complaint about your post. It does read as a bit "spammy," even though I realize it isn't spam, and also rather explicit for a forum that is easily accessible to teenagers. Perhaps there is a way to reword your post so that it looks less like something from the penile-enlargement Nigerian prince?

[Tet Omeg]

There was a complaint about your post. It does read as a bit "spammy," even though I realize it isn't spam, and also rather explicit for a forum that is easily accessible to teenagers. Perhaps there is a way to reword your post so that it looks less like something from the penile-enlargement Nigerian prince? ;)

Hi, JasonPSorens. I can remove the quotation of the article's abstract, which was the only explicit part of my aforesaid post (i.e., using the scientific terminology).

[JasonPSorens]

Cool. And maybe a differently worded subject?

[Tet Omeg]

Cool. And maybe a differently worded subject? ;)

Given the wink emoticon, I would guess that you're being facetious. If that's the case, then I assume it is permissible for me to repost the post in question but without the quotation of the abstract.

[Russell Kanning]

I just saw the post ..... it sure looked like spam that happens on forums .... so I flagged it and said "spam?".

[JasonPSorens]

Cool. And maybe a differently worded subject?

Given the wink emoticon, I would guess that you're being facetious. If that's the case, then I assume it is permissible for me to repost the post in question but without the quotation of the abstract.

Not facetious, just friendly.

[Tet Omeg]

Cool. And maybe a differently worded subject? ;)

Given the wink emoticon, I would guess that you're being facetious. If that's the case, then I assume it is permissible for me to repost the post in question but without the quotation of the abstract.

Not facetious, just friendly.

A friendly suggestion, or is a change of title a requirement? Because I'm quite satisfied with the title as it is. It's dubious any other title would be as good.

[Tet Omeg]

Cool. And maybe a differently worded subject? ;)

Given the wink emoticon, I would guess that you're being facetious. If that's the case, then I assume it is permissible for me to repost the post in question but without the quotation of the abstract.

Not facetious, just friendly.

A friendly suggestion, or is a change of title a requirement? Because I'm quite satisfied with the title as it is. It's dubious any other title would be as good.

I assume that it is permissible to repost the post in question but without the quotation of the relevant article's abstract, as per this thread's discussion.

Per this assumption, I will make said repost with the discussed modification in due time.