Tweets

You blocked @Charles_Lister

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @Charles_Lister

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Mar 18

    NEW -- " Says Is Defeated. Reality Says Otherwise" - My new article for takes a look at what remains of in & ... the news isn't good.

    Undo
  2. In a new article for , argues that recent developments in NW could in fact give an opportunity to re-enforce the arrangement:

    Undo
  3. A brief 4-part thread from me last week, arguing that through *inaction,* may have won its greatest strategic victory in in recent weeks.

    Undo
  4. Retweeted

    : BUT, yesterday's development was more complex than simply a strike against "Huras al-Din." In fact, most of the figures killed were recently expelled (& linked to those expelled) from the group for being 'too hardline' in refusing to assist in .

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. Retweeted

    : That a US strike targeted in NW for the first time in ~2yrs is a significant development (Why? See thread above). Bear in mind also that U.S. intelligence now considers "Huras al-Din" (not ) as 's affiliate - see:

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. In all honesty, this is a real shame, as ISW's philosophy has traditionally been to focus on granular analysis, rooted in deep research - something so rare these days. Their top-line conclusions are mostly credible, but all-too often, filled with simplistic black/white framing.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. This seems to have been the same issue with ISW's recent paper on in & . There's no doubt is already resurgent, but seeing every sign of violence & instability as -induced doesn't do anyone any favors. The section on is wildly off the mark.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. is a damn complicated place with ever-intricate dynamics. Attributing everything to (while giving sourcing that doesn't support your claims) is at best analytically useless & at worst analytically dangerous - it blurs details & vital nuance for policy considerations.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. ISW also says has conducted x4 "drone swarm attacks." BUT none of the attacks nor ISW's sources attribute anything to . 1/4 wasn't even confirmed to be drones. May 16 - "Grad rockets or drones," no attribution May 18 - no attribution June 1 - [same] June 26 - [same]

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. - has been behind 1 (not 3) attacks; a strike on June 6th (not 7th). - The June 19 incident involved an anti-aircraft gun, not . - The June 28 was claimed by al-Fatah al-Mubeen ops room, made up of 20+ groups (not just ). It was Faylaq al-Sham

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. The Fateh Dimashq Operations Room existed for a matter of days & has been replaced by multiple new iterations, depending on geography, factions involved etc. 's role in Ops Room creation has been negligible, if anything. In fact, MIT opposed entering it altogether.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. - To someone who's worked non-stop on for 8yrs, sentences like this are an immediate turn-off: " is leading the opposition defense of Greater Province." (not AQ) are certainly very strong, but it's a little more complex than such facile descriptions.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. I'm glad to see /NW getting some attention, but there are so many problems with this report. - First off, just stop calling "'s affiliate" - there's just no analytical logic that justifies such simplicity. All objective evidence points against.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. Rumors that cleared this -linked attack & provided protection for those conducting it are just that: rumors. It's at best irresponsible to share such gossip.

    Undo
  15. This is seriously alarming, to say the least. - Drone attacks that struck oil pipelines on May 14 2019 were launched from , not . Both the drone & explosives used differed from equipment.

    Undo
  16. "By claiming that every time we threaten to fire a missile we are getting another or another — please indicate that I’m stamping my fist on the table as I’m doing this — we are asking to go back to the 1930s." - Amb. Jim Jeffrey:

    Undo
  17. In an example of fateful coincidence, just held its annual meeting in... (why?!) At the event, covered by state media, NRC's regional head "lauded" NRC's support from 's Foreign Ministry & Asma al-Assad's Syria Trust for Development

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. According to the report, works with 's Interior Ministry, despite it being sanctioned by the EU & linked to human rights abuses, war crimes, repression of & more. The Interior Minister is also sanctioned - he's the former Political Intel chief.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. According to the report, works with multiple bodies linked to the , the -n Army, militias & sanctioned officials. Some OCHA work in was done through a "foundation" owned by the provincial chief of all militia operations.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. This is extraordinary work by & an utterly damning indictment of (1) the regime's co-optation of aid & (2) NGO's complicity in a corrupt, criminal system. Bravo :

    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. This is an interesting piece, but it over-defines "AQ": - Most "pragmatism" we see now from affiliates goes against new instruction from AQ's Af-Pak leadership - The best example of "pragmatism" is in , but AQ has effectively expelled it *for being pragmatic*

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.