want to join the discussion? or register in seconds.
sort by:
New Bottom Intensity Old

Sort: Top

[–] 19127012? 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

Yep. Putting another man's wiener inside your backside is NOT something to be "proud" of and not something that deserves "celebrating". John Hopkins study just came out that says there is not one piece of evidence to support the idea that homosexuality OR gender-confusion are genetic. It appears to be a mental issue or a "decision". NOT born that way.

[–] 19127198? 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I think the REAL issue is those that exhibit this abnormal behavior were themselves victims at one time. Most of them have a mental disorder brought on by some type of trauma. Happens almost every time! Some break the cycle, while most do not. I was one of the fortunate ones who was raised in a safe, loving home and now I am doing the same for my family. It's a cycle of abuse - the evil praying upon the vulnerable and weak. SICK!!!! Satan walks among us!!

[–] 19131032? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Don't fall into this broad assumption. My 26 year-old daughter just "came out" as some garbage called pan-romantic asexual. I am 100% certain she was never abused or traumatized by anything or anyone. She didn't become "confused" until she went to college & majored in psychology. That discipline REALLY pushes the gay agenda. I think many homosexuals are simply brainwashed into choosing it.

2 replies

[–] 19129037? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Saw a great documentary a few years ago, where the interviewer went around to gay bars and asked how many of the patrons were sexually abused or otherwise when they were children. 95% percent of them said they had been abused when little. Many (not all) then went on to be abusers in their life, thus perpetuating the problem. Like ripples in a pond.

Thought it was pretty interesting.

1 reply

[–] 19128138? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Interesting perspective. Complex ptsd as a thing is gaining acceptance and offers a workable model for understanding mental distress and dysfunction. Actual understanding of true psychology is likeky a well guarded secret or at least diluted by disinformation. We know at least there are are sime who suffer a form of OCD symptoms revolving aroynd the idea of being homosexual. HOCD. some of these people are told by therapists and others they are in denial though.

[–] 19132310? 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Being gay is a birth defect. The mental issues come from the realization that you, as a male human, like having cock stuffed up your ass. It's a progression that all started as a birth defect. Being gay is not a curable condition. Demanding to be recognized as 'normal' just isn't gonna happen.

[–] 19127837? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Can you post a link to that study if you have it? Thanks.

[–] 19129484? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=john+hopkins+homosexuality

1 reply

[–] 19132946? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Hi, 19127837?. You wrote:

Can you post a link to that study if you have it? Thanks.

19127012? mischaracterizes the article, of which did not just come out. The article referred to as authored by the two Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine academics is the following:

On p. 39 of the above article, Dr. Mayer and Prof. McHugh admit that prenatal hormone exposure can explain sexual orientation:

""
In summary, some forms of prenatal hormone exposure, particularly CAH [congenital adrenal hyperplasia] in females, are associated with differences in sexual orientation, while other factors are often important in determining the physical and psychological effects of those exposures. Hormonal conditions that contribute to disorders of sex development may contribute to the development of non-heterosexual orientations in some individuals, but this does not demonstrate that such factors explain the development of sexual attractions, desires, and behaviors in the majority of cases.
""

Notice the equivocatory language used above in the statement, "but this does not demonstrate that such factors explain the development of sexual attractions, desires, and behaviors in the majority of cases." In other words, Dr. Mayer and Prof. McHugh aren't claiming to have disproved that prenatal hormone exposure can explain the majority of such cases, i.e., they leave wide open the possibility that such could well be the case.

And indeed it is the case. It is already well-established that prenatal hormonal exposure has systemic lifelong effects on both anatomical and neurological development in humans and other animals. For some information on this, see my following article:

Among many studies pertaining to the hormonal effects of various chemicals in the environment, here is a choice one:

The below two items are a list of many references to peer-reviewed scientific journal papers establishing the influence of hormone exposure in sexual orientation and gender expression in humans and other animals, respectively:

[–] 19127225? 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Is that really something you need to cite John Hopkins for? Does a lack of evidence somehow become evidence of the contrary when it's pointed out by an authority?

[–] 19128161? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

No but when authority agrees with controversial (what was common sense ) viewpoints, you don't ignore that. At the same time akways remain open minded and sjeptical of scientific consensus.

[–] 19132899? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

19127012? wrote:

Yep. Putting another man's wiener inside your backside is NOT something to be "proud" of and not something that deserves "celebrating". John Hopkins study just came out that says there is not one piece of evidence to support the idea that homosexuality OR gender-confusion are genetic. It appears to be a mental issue or a "decision". NOT born that way.

You mischaracterize the article, of which did not just come out. The article referred to as authored by the two Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine academics is the following:

On p. 39 of the above article, Dr. Mayer and Prof. McHugh admit that prenatal hormone exposure can explain sexual orientation:

""
In summary, some forms of prenatal hormone exposure, particularly CAH [congenital adrenal hyperplasia] in females, are associated with differences in sexual orientation, while other factors are often important in determining the physical and psychological effects of those exposures. Hormonal conditions that contribute to disorders of sex development may contribute to the development of non-heterosexual orientations in some individuals, but this does not demonstrate that such factors explain the development of sexual attractions, desires, and behaviors in the majority of cases.
""

Notice the equivocatory language used above in the statement, "but this does not demonstrate that such factors explain the development of sexual attractions, desires, and behaviors in the majority of cases." In other words, Dr. Mayer and Prof. McHugh aren't claiming to have disproved that prenatal hormone exposure can explain the majority of such cases, i.e., they leave wide open the possibility that such could well be the case.

And indeed it is the case. It is already well-established that prenatal hormonal exposure has systemic lifelong effects on both anatomical and neurological development in humans and other animals. For some information on this, see my following article:

Among many studies pertaining to the hormonal effects of various chemicals in the environment, here is a choice one:

The below two items are a list of many references to peer-reviewed scientific journal papers establishing the influence of hormone exposure in sexual orientation and gender expression in humans and other animals, respectively:

[–] 19126972? 2 points 17 points (+19|-2) ago 

around 3% of the population is truly gay. God doesn't make mistakes.

The rest of them are acting like literal faggots to gain attention.

Facts over fiction.

[–] 19128179? 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Homosexuality is likely very much environmentally linked . You could cite epigenetics which would muddy the waters slightly.

[–] 19128224? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

They are ramming square pegs into round holes forcibly. Not just here, around the world the theme is the same.

Bow to the homos. Enough of this shit. (both of the puns were not intended, but i'll leave them there!)

2 replies

[–] 19131765? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

atrazine

1 reply

[–] 19130565? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I tend to believe the .03% figure more

[–] 19130593? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Truth be told...but what is the truth anymore.

That's why we require God's return.

[–] 19130591? 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Fuck you it's a choice. Stop using God's name as a weapon for your degenerate bullshit.

[–] 19130685? 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Stop being a division bot first.

I'm authorized to represent God.

You are not.

1 reply

[–] 19126809? 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

One of the biggest lessons to learn in life... KEEP YOUR SHIT PRIVATE... and this goes for ALL aspects... you have a really hot pretty girlfriend and you parade her around to show off, don't be surprised when she cheats on you... keep that shit private... you get some money or have a nice job... tell everyone you know you are always broke, no one asks the broke dude for a loan... KEEP YOUR SHIT PRIVATE...

Works in EVERY aspect of life.

[–] 19130860? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Thanks for the advice. I will do this.

[–] 19130578? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

old soul^^^^^^

lib-idiots take heed

[–] 19127113? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Dear Faggots, quit being all faggoty

[–] 19128346? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

its an abomination and a sin

[–] 19128049? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Another example of LGBT harassing and forcing their beliefs on people, since they don't start families like straight people, some of them have nothing better to do with their time than disrespecting other people's liberty's and beliefs:

Colorado Christian cakeshop sued a third time for discrimination

[–] 19129524? 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

some of them have nothing better to do with their time than disrespecting other people's liberty's and beliefs:

I can't tell if this is the most Ironic or Hypocritical thing I've seen this week.

[–] 19131829? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

that shit would probly stop if he just shot one or 2 for trying to assault him in the bakery..

[–] 19126969? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

This is so right on. Its a fucking sexual preference. Just like all of the other sexual preferences out there. No better, no less.

[–] 19127087? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This.

Every thing we do or don't do, including what gets your rocks off is a choice. Save for the individuals who suffered childhood trauma and their mental illness manifests through sexual behavior. Even then, call it what it is: Cause/effect or choice. Pick one queers and leave the rest of society out of it.

[–] 19129562? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No better, no less.

Considering how over-represented fags are among diseases, abuse, self-harming, pedophilia, and excessive drug use given their small population size I'd argue that some "sexual preferences" are better than others. Much much better.

[–] 19130626? 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Except normal heterosexual sexual preference is built by biology. Homosexuality is not.

[–] 19128209? 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

So all sexual preferences are valid?

[–] 19126695? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Why have a "pride month" if pride is a major sin?

[–] 19127081? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

And they are proud of their sin of sodomy too,.

[–] 19128201? 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It if course stems from the perception that there is something wrong with homosexuality .

load more comments ▼ (39 remaining)