Next

Boost Policy

The boost policy has a few terms that need to be better defined or taken out of the policy

Is a Help & Support request;

It doesn't actually seem this is what you are looking to achieve and not being able to publicly promote your view on issues to the network, asking for help with the network, or "requests" to the network is a direct conflict with the building blocks of Minds and freedom of speech and expression. Did you accept this boost??

Enrollment

I agree every user should be able to vote on content I also agree they should be able not to vote or get notifications for this if they wish not to participate in the process. An opt-out / opt-in option would reduce times for users to wait for judgment as well as keep the annoyance down for users that do not want to participate.

NSFW

Allow users to opt in to becoming a NSFW channel to avoid forgetfulness of marking posts and receiving a strike.

Notification

If "strikes" are taken away when the appeal is approved as they should be then a separate appeal notification is needed as channels with large amount of notifications everyday could easy miss this notification and be taken down in less than a week if they miss three notifications or are attacked.

Time Limits

An amount of time is needed for accounts to appeal as to accept a report if no action is taken and not pile false "strikes" where they may just have not been active to appeal the report.

Full review and blog

https://www.minds.com/MindsGaming/blog/community-moderation-the-high-road-review-part-one-mindsgami-978402084378607616

changed the description 2 times within 2 minutes

@jotto141

1. Boost Policy - not really tied to keeping that in there, reasonable point.

2. Enrollment - users do have the option to participate or opt-out forever as it currently stands.

3. NSFW - agree that we should allow channels to self-tag good catch @benhayward.ben

4. Notifications - we send an in-app notification as well as an email when a user has content actioned on. they receive an in-app notification when their content is restored by jury, should also send an email (think we need to add that)

5. Time limits - i do not understand what you are saying. i believe users are given 7 days to appeal a strike. they are notified both via email and in the app, so they should not miss it. open to extending this but not sure exactly what you are suggesting...the strike needs to be enforced as soon as the admin makes a decision because the content has been deemed to require an NSFW tag in most cases.

3. is here already minds#486

marked this issue as related to minds#486