[–] 18269175? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Those who scream the loudest...

[–] 18268931? 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Notice the bold and underlined letters in the article making "we are Q"

Interesting.

[–] 18269024? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Me too. TheWashingtonPundit is Q? Kek

[–] 18270309? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I thought I was Q lol

[–] 18268608? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

This is reposted every month again. It's ok for newbies, but no new info...

[–] 18272277? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yeah this has been out for a year now.

[–] 18269577? 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Is this real? I don’t know which links are good or not really, if it’s not an MSM link I recognize I usually don’t know wether to trust or not. And by trust I mean like if this was an MSM slink then I would know “ok this is being reported by MSM not just alt news sites.”

I think Q should make a list of good operative news organizations, like the people that made that “fake news” list a while back of sites that should be black listed.

I remember after suggesting this one time not too long after Q started posting some alternative news articles as sources such as breitbart and another one.

For me it was big because of all the infighting I never know which sites are wonky or legit.

[–] 18272425? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Here's the original article cited by the Washington Pundit:

The Washington Pundit could use editing by someone who knows how to properly form paragraphs.

And for those who are asking whether or not a news item is trustworthy: pay attention to the sources cited in an article, and then find the original sources. Pay attention to names, particularly names of reporters/authors cited. When direct quotations are given, do phrase-searches in web-search engines, i.e., by surrounding the quoted text in quotation marks like so: "...".

--TetrahedronOmega

[–] 18271567? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's why they ALL hate him.

[–] 18271328? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Here's a question I keep asking. WHY does Robert de Niro carry a flip phone? Is he incapable of using smartphone technology? Is he restricted in some way? Surely it's not because he is too poor to afford a state-of the art phone.

[–] 18271289? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Number of arrests? STILL ZERO.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)