sorry not sorry but I’m massively fucking suspicious of people who crank out half-baked callouts every other day, regardless of quality or depth of evidence, just because they want to catch the spotlight
Unfortunately they dont seem that extraordinary for people. And what she did show was pretty convincing for the things she said was convincing. The stuff that was mainly just associations was honestly salt from her. Someone "betrayed" her, and it had to be someone she contacted.
-
-
People ignoring or not talking about these things until accusations come out is rather suspect, but not condemning. The fact it took a callout to clear peoples names, rather than the call-ins she was performing is kind of dumb. But in the end, her credibility is hurt.
-
It was unwise to make the posts out of anger/frustration, something she even said herself when warned prior to releasing information. But it cleared more up in a day that weeks of contacting and gathering information so. Thats cool i guess?
-
....it’s your account, isn’t it
-
Seriously?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That she was "salty" doesn't excuse poor information vetting by someone who is ostensibly doing "investigation." Court cases have been won and lost because of "salt" from prosecutors.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not commenting on the problem at large here but on a grevious and unacceptable logical fallacy: "They don't seem that extraordinary for people" Otherwise known as "This person over here doesn't think it's far fetched, therefore it must not be" Is never acceptable proof.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.