❤ 🌻 🐶 💣 🌻 ❤

It really isn't though? Patch made this threat in DM when I wouldn't speak up about the CP allegations he was facing, and he's delivering exactly as promised. He's using entrusted information to harm my loved one who's already in a delicate situation.

As someone fairly cool-headed who has been listening to the whole affair, this really seems to be wholly on Dogpatch. Why didn't you make this comment to him?

Carcin asked in public & I responded. As for Patch, I have been talking to him about this, but privately not publicly. I'm tired. Y'all know I got shit going down in my own life right? Nobody seems to care. I'm just caught in this crossfire getting dragged & cancelled for trying.

Ok, first, y'all stop beating up on Deo. This situation isn't exactly an easy thing for anyone. Second, yeah, I'm gonna be selfish for once and say it... This isn't fair. I know everyone is tired and everyone has their own life stuff to deal with, but this -IS- my life.

This is my life, and its once again under attack by people much bigger than me, and again I have to hear everyone tone police me about how I handle it. I guarantee you that for each bit of tired all of you are, I'm 200% more tired. This is all more work than there are hours.

But that's what it takes to stay in front of one of the most corrupt organization in the world. If I ever rest, Sisk dies. But I also have to constantly pander to holier-than-thou figures in the fandom, and constantly kiss their ass to keep SaveOurSisk in good standing.

None of this is rewarding. None of this is dignifying. It's all shit all the time. And now I have to deal with a tabloid writer's petty, immature bs that should have nothing to do with me or Sisk on top of it all. Do I get to be tired, tho? No. I get told "do better".

You were stressed out, Patch was stressed out, you hurt Patch's feelings going along with a group insisting he's into cub (he isn't) and part of why people said he supports pedos was he hosted Sisk's story. He defended Sisk and his other controversial guest writer who wrote about

their childhood abuse. People called Patch a pedo, called Sisk a pedo, demanded he disavow. He did as folks asked and removed those things from his website. Now you're unhappy, he's unhappy. You hurt each other with pigheadedness.

That doesn't add up. The link to Sisk's guest article was live up until just recently when he blocked me. And when asked why he took it down he doesn't respond "because of pedo-supporter claims", he instead tells people that Sisk was a liar. That's deadly misinformation.

I also know for a fact that Patch wasn't called a pedo-supporter for that article. Our SoS group set up feelers across twitter to monitor the response and squash misinformation. This is why we also use link-trackers. There was only one post who cried "pedo" for the entire >

> year that that article was live. And it was a nobody alt-account. Idk where this idea that Sisk article is somehow responsible for Patch's bad rep, but I find it hard to believe when I've been tracking metrics like this for years.

Deo, this seems to be pretty much entirely Patch's fault. You're both sidesing over someone's life.

Also if you thought that both of them were to blame you'd tell something similar to patch. But this seems mostly pointed towards blaming carcin. Honestly, if you were friends with both of them you should be able to see who's in the wrong here.