Kile Onasi

Nobody is saying people are entitled to be on his blog, they’re saying that the reasons he took the article down are petty, manipulative, stupid, and go against journalistic integrity.

But it’s really funny that you feel the need to ignore years of evidence and explanations from Sisk, efforts to be nothing but transparent and honest, all so you can shit on her while she can’t defend herself to appease your ass pal.

Most of Sisk's claims are related to being mistreated while in prison/on probation - and you can be against someone being treated thusly without believing her frankly ridiculous claims to innocence and defamation of a groomed teen and her father.

The 2008 police report found that there was at the time insufficient evidence to press charges. That is not the same thing as innocence and does not preclude charges being brought at a later time.

Innocent until proven guilty. She was never proven guilty. The court had nothing but hearsay and nude photos they couldn’t prove who they belonged to. The DA waited until Sisk’s family was broke and emotionally broken and then threatened her with 300 years of false charges to >

> get a guilty plea out of her because she wanted it all to end.

You can look at the evidence and reports yourself. They could not prove her guilty. There was no evidence to show that she committed any crime. Nothing. They had nothing.