No, I wouldn’t, because even if Sisk was actually guilty the treatment she’s received is absolutely unacceptable and her article was necessary publicity for why criminal justice reform is absolutely necessary. https://twitter.com/equivamp/status/1113214828015968256 …
Yeah, I don't believe that, I read over the entire website curated by her supporters that tells her side of the story and still don't believe it, and so i don't care that an easily-published-elsewhere story was removed froma furry news site.
-
-
Then you’re just a complete idiot and there’s nothing else left to be said.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So tell the class why you don't believe it. I'd love to hear why you're siding with Republican elected judges and Joe Arpaio over a trans woman.
-
Dms are open. ;)
- Tweet unavailable
-
So am I putting her in danger of being murdered by posting my doubt publicly, or am I for some reason required to post it publicly for the entertainment of bad-faith assholes who are unrelated to the case? And if it's about the rights of criminals, why does it matter if I think /
-
that she is guilty or not?
-
It's called a counter-signal. You are missing the point and defaming a victim. It doesn't matter if it's true, you are distracting from the point
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If that means that I will have to get talked down to by people on twitter...um...okay
-
have fun being the monster who destroys an innocent person's life her blood will be on your hands, as well as all of those involved in keeping her under suspicion of guilt with No. Evidence.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.