Conversation

  • "Co-invest in Damascus to diversify its base of support and reduce its reliance on Iran, strengthening an independent Syria" how could something like this happen when the regime is under direct Iranian authority? what side inside the regime can guarantee any non-Iranian rule?
    Quote Tweet
    Sam Heller
    @AbuJamajem
    For countries aiming to check Iran’s influence, there’s more than one approach to Syria: • Write off Damascus as hopelessly Iran-owned and oppose it, or • Co-invest in Damascus to diversify its base of support and reduce its reliance on Iran, strengthening an independent Syria. twitter.com/Charles_Lister…
    Show this thread
    5:27 PM · Nov 8, 2018 · Twitter Web Client
    Replying to
    @putintintin1
    this is an absurd approach; no one now has a direct influence on "Syrian government" except Russia&Iran,Russia can't un-root Iran from inside the Syrian state now IF it want to,UAE influence in the past on SF groups who reconciled with regime is finished now,UAE has no leverage
    1
    6
    13
    Replying to
    @putintintin1
    Agree, a little leverage could be find on few minor issues and dossiers, but Syria is & till Assad is in charge will be an Iranian puppet. Do not expect Bashar endorsing the US peace plan, tell Iranians to withdraw, jumping off the Resistance trains or receiving Israelis.
    1
    1
    yes won't leave Iran who backed him to a deal with some Gulf country who could turn against him after a year, look at 2008 Summit with France,Turkey and Iran and how 2 years later the 3countries turned against Assad
    1

    New to Twitter?

    Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!
    Sign up

    Trending now

    Trends for you

    Trending
    Sergio
    Trending with: Kuchar, sergio garcia, Kuch
    Trending
    #UFCPhiladelphia
    Trending with: Ray Borg, Kevin Holland, Kenney
    Trending
    Chennedy Carter
    Trending
    #Batman80
    Trending with: #LongLiveTheBat
    Show more