Tweets

You blocked @DanieleRaineri

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @DanieleRaineri

  1. Pinned Tweet
    8 Jun 2015
    Undo
  2. 3 minutes ago

    If you ask me where the safe houses are, well, Trump presented an interesting map (the grey one) by Defense Intelligence Agency a few days ago

    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. 6 minutes ago

    Probably some of those safe houses are “wild”, meaning placed in the most isolated areas, and some are “urban”, meaning in more populated areas – and their owners are 100% “clean” and bought them many years ago

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. 7 minutes ago

    This is confirmed by an Islamic State leader describing his meeting with Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in a recent article in the WSJ

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. 9 minutes ago

    They remember that a US drone filmed a tall person taking a walk inside a compound in Abbottabad and that was the end for Usama bin Laden

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. 10 minutes ago

    The guys are not improvising. They have, say, twenty (?) safe houses and they rotate from one to the others but probably slower than we think. I’d say those houses have a gate and a garage or high walls, to get off the car without exposing themselves

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. 11 minutes ago

    The three most important deputies of Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, Abu Mutaz al Qureshi and Abu Ali al Anbari and al Adnani, were all killed by Americans in their cars. Osama bin Laden, another most wanted, spent years hiding in the same villa and eluded his hunters just staying there

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. 12 minutes ago

    As for the part “he never stays in the same place for more than one day”: probably just a cliché, especially after losing all the ground. As a matter of fact, traveling from point A to point B is the dangerous part, it’s when the leaders are more exposed

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. 13 minutes ago

    So, why not a van full of gunmen five minutes behind just in case? They assume to be under surveillance and if too many vehicles/men move from point A to point B then you have a pattern. And they want to avoid patterns

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. 14 minutes ago

    Baghdadi travels with “a couple of loyalists”? I don’t think so. Three or four males in a car: not convincing, almost red flag. Women and children would be more natural. A family traveling in a car is the most common thing, you see thousands of them on the move in Iraq and Syria

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. 17 minutes ago

    Of course today they wouldn’t hold weapons on their laps and they wouldn’t follow such a predictable pattern five days in a row and they would have a plate. But again, different times and places.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. 18 minutes ago

    Here a rare witness speaking about Baghdadi and his deputy Haji Bakr together in a car (!) near Idlib, spring 2013. The golden years that won’t never come back (source: "Present at the creation", Foreign Policy August 2016)

    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. 19 minutes ago

    I guess today the three cars keep enough space between them that observing the road from above – for instance the camera of a drone – you don’t see a convoy, you don’t recognize a pattern, you just see a random sequence of traffic

    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. 21 minutes ago

    This ALLEGEDLY is the convoy of Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in Raqqa in February 2014 (can’t remember the source, kept this in an old folder), not so lonely – but again: if true, the city was under control, the drone campaign wasn’t active, conditions were completely different

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. 24 minutes ago

    Here we can see Abu Ali al Anbari traveling near the Iraqi/Syrian border in 2014, at least two vehicles in the picture. Just keep in mind that territory was under the control of the Islamic State, so circumstances were different. Today every place is supposed to be hostile

    Show this thread
    Undo
  16. 25 minutes ago

    It’s quite important, because the Islamic State chain of command is supposed to react quickly to the elimination/capture of Abu Bakr al Baghdadi. If an authorized vehicle is tailing the Lonely Car, they get reliable news in minutes

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. 27 minutes ago

    Another reason. Abu Bakr al Baghdadi and his associates in the "lonely car" don’t use phones or other devices. A drone strikes or special forces try to snatch him: the tailing crew arrives minutes later and sees what’s happening or what happened

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. 29 minutes ago

    Then, I’d say another car is tailing five minutes later the “lonely car”, just in case the latter has problems. You don’t want Abu Bakr al Baghdadi stranded on the roadside somewhere in Syria or Iraq

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. 30 minutes ago

    The scout crew arrives first at destination, checks everything is ok and greenlights the “lonely car”. We have to consider Abu Bakr al Baghdadi has internal enemies too and doesn’t trust at all his men

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. 31 minutes ago

    First of all, I think that the supposed “lonely car” of Abu Bakr al Baghdadi is – at least – preceded five minutes on the same road by another car, scouting for surprises and concentrations of security forces

    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. 32 minutes ago

    Another visual reference: Abu Muslim al Turkmani aka Abu Mutaz al Qureshi, deputy of Baghdadi for the whole Iraq, tracked and killed while traveling in a car near Mosul in August 2014 (pic found by Zaid Benjamin)

    Show this thread
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.