I have proposed that the Royal Statistical Society retract the honour. The award was for their own claim of a 'poverty' fall to 2018 - exaggerating even the World Bank claim. Clearly, income or spending alone cannot measure adequacy or economic gains. https://twitter.com/mattberkley/status/1078309220993376261 …
- This Tweet is unavailable.
- Replying to @mattberkley @sanjaygreddy and
Matt Berkley Retweeted Matt Berkley
Email to the Royal Statistical Society:https://twitter.com/mattberkley/status/1078678214988292096 …
Matt Berkley added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - Replying to @mattberkley @sanjaygreddy and
The Royal Statistical Society has responded to allegations that it made a claim on global poverty without evidence, by doing so again. At best gross professional negligence, undermining democracy, and abuse of charitable status?
#RoyalStatScandalpic.twitter.com/GMVhi0AlUI2 replies 14 retweets 17 likes - Replying to @mattberkley @sanjaygreddy and
The most insightful and robust poverty related figure? Aaaahhhh Try this: community leaders in 6 Asian nations elaborate on how they would define and measure poverty https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956247810379823 … Or this on nonsense poverty lines in Egypt by Sarah Sabry https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956247810379823 …
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes - Replying to @Dsatterthwaite @mattberkley and
I argue in my new book that all poverty measures are by their very nature arbitrary. For me, what is more important is how the practices of measurement and identification either disempower or empower political representation and contestation by the poor themselves.
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes - Replying to @AndrewM_Fischer @Dsatterthwaite and
My reply to Steven Pinker on global poverty, February 2018. The Wall Street Journal did not publish this, or a shorter version.pic.twitter.com/B00koBbjj4
3 replies 20 retweets 39 likes - Replying to @mattberkley @AndrewM_Fischer and
It is a triumph of Western culture to produce people who think their own economic situation depends on their "needs", assets, prices they face and so on, while other people's prosperity (and their own if they are making a point) can be judged by looking only at income.
4 replies 3 retweets 9 likes - Replying to @mattberkley @AndrewM_Fischer and
The central problem is not the World Bank "poverty" claims. It is the widespread use of "income" (often in fact spending) estimates to make unsupported claims about economic gains and losses to people. Claims on "income inequality" or "real income" can have similar problems.
4 replies 2 retweets 6 likes
I have written since 2003 on the key error of claiming economic gains and losses from "income" "data", ignoring costs, assets... http://www.mattberkley.com/socialscience.htm … Some influential policy conclusions fall apart when we consider real life. From 28 November 2003: https://web.archive.org/web/20070223160812/http:/www.addistribune.com/Archives/2003/11/28-11-03/Discoverer.htm …pic.twitter.com/wiMFDf4AxJ
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.