If I could be anything, I’d be a jaguar. And not just any jaguar. One with a dark coat, blue spots, but my general humanoid shape intact along with the feline features. That’s because I’m a furry.
It took me a long time to admit that to anyone. More than 15 years. That’s because I had always heard the word “furry” as a pejorative, a term practically synonymous with fetish. At best, being open about it would open me to ridicule and at worst, well, I didn’t even want to think about the reactions of friends and family. Despite the proliferation of nerdy pop culture – from anime to cosplay – furries have always been pushed out to the fringes.
Even when I decided to tell my wife about my interest in the fandom, I couldn’t hold back the anxiety. I was in a knot for days leading up to purchasing a ticket to my first furry convention at the relatively late age of 33. It was unexpected enough that my wife called me as soon as she saw the charge on our bank account. She thought some pervert had hijacked it. No, I said, I was the one going to Rocky Mountain Fur Con.
Even then, she asked me “You’re not a secret furry, are you?” To her, the term conjured the implication of people dressed up in mascot-like costumes who set about deviantly despoiling convention centre hotel rooms. All I could say was: “Not secret, but not how you think.”
Furry is not a fetish. I know that runs counter to the atrocious CSI episode about the fandom and a long-form 2001 Vanity Fair hatchet job, but furries are not bound together by some predilection for anonymous yiffing. It’s more like someone asking what superhero you’d want to be and saying no, thanks, you’d rather be a hyena or fox or deer. It’s about identity, picking a fursona – like a persona, naturally – that’s a projection of who you are or wish you could be. Instead of going to comic cons dressed up as Captain America or Black Widow, furries define an identity all their own.
Of course there’s a sexuality to the fandom. There is for almost any you can name. But that doesn’t define what brings furries together, and it would be a mistake to let the sneers and jeers of critics define the conversation. If you want to be surprised by who furries are and what they do, there’s an entire scientific profile on the matter for you to peruse. Stigma shouldn’t drive the way furries present themselves, especially during an era where a little escapism feels sorely needed.
Furries are hardly the only fandom to be misunderstood. But during a time when comic book movies are big box office and cosplaying is normal, I don’t understand why furry hate hangs on. If anything, it’s always been on the edges of our experience.
Anthropomorphic animals completely permeate our culture, from the earliest cave drawings to the Oscar-winning Zootopia (Zootropolis in the UK). People dress as animals for Halloween, identify with certain species as personal favourites, and, hell, a popular trashy novel and movie series had duelling fans debate the merits of whether the female lead should marry a blood-sucking corpse or werewolf. Whether you’re rooting for an animal-themed sports team or listening to Top 40 songs about being “hungry like the wolf”, we’re practically obsessed by crossover between the human and animal.
Furries have a culture all their own, formed through internet forums and conventions over decades. But the basic fascination has always been with us. Furries are simply drawing from our animalistic interests and curiosities to create characters for ourselves instead of trying to co-opt something already pre-packed and sold. It just so happens to be animal-shaped, and so much the better. At the heart of it, everyone’s a little bit furry.
Since you're here…
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading and supporting our independent, investigative reporting than ever before. And unlike many news organisations, we have chosen an approach that allows us to keep our journalism accessible to all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford.
Readers’ support powers our work, giving our reporting impact and safeguarding our essential editorial independence. This means the responsibility of protecting independent journalism is shared, enabling us all to feel empowered to bring about real change in the world. Your support gives Guardian journalists the time, space and freedom to report with tenacity and rigor, to shed light where others won’t. It emboldens us to challenge authority and question the status quo. And by keeping all of our journalism free and open to all, we can foster inclusivity, diversity, make space for debate, inspire conversation – so more people, across the world, have access to accurate information with integrity at its heart.
The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important as it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.
Every contribution we receive from readers like you, big or small, goes directly into funding our journalism. This support enables us to keep working as we do – but we must maintain and build on it for every year to come. Support The Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
View all comments >
comments (403)
Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
"I don’t understand why furry hate hangs on."
It doesn't. Its ridicule.
Why belittle someone who's doing you no harm?
I think the point is that it isn't 'hate'. A much overused word.
Yes don't make the fur fly.
Is this fur real?
I'll get my (fur) coat.
Is this a light-hearted satire of ID politics - or an actual thing?
It's an actual thing amazingly enough.
It's not that dumb considering people also dress up as soldiers and wander around the countryside for the weekend. It's just another form of adult (not adult) play.
It's nice to have a release and certainly healthier than sitting in the pub for hours on end.
It patently is not 'just another form of adult play'.
Brings a whole new meaning to 'I'm a cat person'!
Just when I was figuring out the 53 alternative genders, now I have to add animals to the list as well!
Not gonna work mate, too many people here have been on the Internet longer than two weeks.
As far as I know it isn't a fetish per se, but the subculture is host to some weirdos who use it to get their kicks. They use the innocent touching and rubbing of furry for less innocent ends.
That one got me. I know this article is driving for more tolerance of furry-culture, but come on- You have to be honest about its fetish origins.
Sorry that's not up to you. The internet has spoken. You guys are barely a step above the ultra creepy loli stuff that creeps out of the darknet from time to time. I say this not in judgement but because you need to get your head around the fact that it's how your community is perceived and that you choose to associate with them. Even if the majority aren't part of the yiffing or trolling problems that can ruin cons it's still the most well known part of that subculture. I commend you for trying to shed light on the fact that it's not a requirement but until you own that part and the community makes an effort to try and change it you will still all get tarred with the same brush. Even then, the unfortunate connotations of being a Furry are never, ever going away.
This reads like a coded post about Islamic extremists...
You guys are barely a step above the ultra creepy loli stuff that creeps out of the darknet from time to time.
To be fair I think dressing up as a cartoon animal is hardly the same thing as getting off to images of prepubescent girls.
I agree that it's not as bad but beastiality fetishes aren't much better, that's what the sexual side of furrism is. Not being as bad as borderline paedophilia is not a high bar to cross.
Look, I don't understand this, but that's not a reason to hate or ridicule it. If it makes someone happy, who cares?
Hate, definitely not. But requesting nothing is ridiculed is asking too much.
I'd agree with you, but when he writes...
...I can't help but laugh.
I will try to be kind and just say that I find it indicative of an unsettled mind.
It is not necessarily dressing up like animals that is the problem, but cartoon versions of animals which are generally found in kids or kid friendly media.
When you throw in a sexual element it just makes it super weird and dangerously close to very unpleasant perversions.
You're quite the little prude, aren't you?
Which are the pleasant perversions?
pleasant perversions = mine
unpleasant perversions = other peoples
Practically might be a rather strong word there, given the two examples.
Otherwise, the argument was well reasoned and well explained.
But furries have to remember that people also giggle at 40 year olds dressing as superheroes or civil war soldiers. It's just human nature to do so, I think.
Thanks for taking the flak off us trainspotters at least.
This makes me wonder if there's a minority of trainspotters that are sexually attracted to trains. (I didn't ask for my brain, it just chose me.)
(I didn't ask for my brain, it just chose me.)
What a great get-out-of-jail card!
Bit like "I'm just as God made me."
All that pumping, hot steamy action? Burly men stripped to the waist, gleaming with sweat, shovelling coal into the raging furnace? The thrum and vibration as a 30 foot long* iron phallic symbol penetrates a tunnel? Nah. Nothing in it.
*someone's going to be along in a minute to rumble me as a fake trainspotter. I don't know, it's a guess.
Now this is interesting, in that it opens up a whole can of identity politics worms. If you aren't defined by your biology and if you are what you identify as, is being a 'furry' as valid and worthy of respect as being transgender? And what about race? That Rachel whatever her name was in America, the white woman who identified as black?
Dolezal
Yep, all the real animals are going to be kicking off soon.
I've long since given up linking to the very famous article by esteemed Marxist literary theorist Adolph Reed because it is almost instantly liquidated in the Guardian's BTL memory hole, but if you look he wrote about Rachel Dolezal and Caitlyn Jenner, and the implications of various hypocrisies their respective treatments exposed. It is excellent.
Lol.
At least football and brand mascots get paid for wearing what one can only assume is an uncomfortable, heavy outfit; unless that is part of the attraction.
It's probably easier to hide a raging boner in a mascot outfit as well if that's your fetish.
I'll never look at Lucas the Kop Cat in the same way again...
There are policeman who are into this and many of them feature in my photography book "The Filth and the Furry"*
*available from all good pet shops in hipster areas
Is that a companion piece to your work on Furry street-racing drivers, "Fast and Furrious"?
"Whether you’re rooting for an animal-themed sports team or listening to Top 40 songs about being “hungry like the wolf”,
Well neither of those apply to me but I have eaten Lion bars.
That's a gateway chocolate bar. It's a slippery slope.
Can't wait for the comments to really rev up to speed!
May I suggest an article on "otherkin" to really get the old blood flowing?
May I suggest an article on "otherkin" to really get the old blood flowing?
At which point I'm afraid I shall be obliged to raze The Guardian's offices to the ground, sow the ground with salt, and sell the editorial staff into bondage. While I may not agree with Mr. Switek's predilection for dressing up like a (whatever he dresses up as) on his own time, but people who "identify" as something else (and it's always some bollocks like effing dragons, unicorns, and the like) really need to be taken outside and given a good talking to.
Sorry for taking a hard line here - I'm a tolerant person most of the time, but there are a couple of things that make my blood curdle, "Otherkin" for one.
Where do you stand on the Barmy Army? I'm sure there's usually a dragon or two amongst them. Usually a Pink panther too.
There's a difference between dressing up like something (a dragon, a meerkat, or a functioning productive member of society) and actually believing that you are, in fact, a dragon, a meerkat, or a functioning productive member of society. And since cricket fans are clearly not functioning productive members of society they can dress up as anything they like, they're still gits. I blame private education.
I think all furries are deviant but I will applaud your courage in opening comments.
Grown ups into computer games were considered pretty deviant until very recently.
Not by me. I like your Hylian Crest avatar.
How recently?
There have been 18 rated video games for years now
Well until studies proved otherwise, politicians and religious leaders kept pushing the narritive that video games turned kids in sociopathic mass murderers
Thing is it very much is seen as a sexual thing and then you have the issue that cartoon anthropomorphized animals are pretty much exclusively featured in media aimed at children, whether it be actual cartoons or people in animal suits at fairs dressed up like disney characters etc etc. it's all aimed at kids, when you add a sexual element to that subject you're skirting some seriously unsavory territory, hence furry has become a pejorative for implied impropriety.
Great party, isn't it!
Fursona! Ha that's good.
C'mon face it, you're a bit weird. I did dress up as a furry elephant for a party once though and it was good fun. People stroked me and and pulled my great big elephant's trunk. Obviously there was nothing sexual about it! Pull the other one if you've got one.
I suppose it's harmless, safaris it goes.
Oh, fur heaven's sake..
Just my opinion, but people dress up as their favorite super hero because its fun. They don't do it because they identify themselves as an actual Super man. For me, the moment you start to say things like "I should be born a panther" or picking a "fursona" is the moment it turns from past time to fetish.
But hey, as long as they are not mauling people then they can do what they want.
That, and picking up their own crap from the pavement.
Won't be long now until the Guardian employs columnists to write serious articles about "furminism" and how the "sapiemarchy" enforces a discriminatory and oppressive "zoogender" upon those in the minority furry community....
I'm just surprised there's no Guardian outrage at the cultural appropriation these human beings are committing against the animal world...
And they'll still be saying trans women don't exist at the same time.
Isn't that a bit furr-ophobic ?
Nope, "furry" certainly isn't a fetish - not grown-up enough for that. Lord Sebastian Flyte's teddy bear in Waugh is at least literature, but "furry", well, good grief... Pitiful stuff.
So many images I didn't want in these comments, so many. I don't think Sebastian felt that way about that poor bear, you know.
No need to pity Aloysius, he lead a charmed life. Apt user name btw.
Sign in or create your Guardian account to recommend a comment