✨Soma ✨

I mean, that's not really the point

So the TL;DR version of why I said that is that @.DogpatchPress defended cub porn and then went on to post that. Also: I would suggest that you read over these two mini tweet chains to help clarify the issue: https://twitter.com/MxBatty/status/1083965075831033858?s=19 …https://twitter.com/WingnutXLV/status/1083891057371287552?s=19 …

Not all artists are-- some of them are predatory and actively reference child porn. Some consumers are abuse victims. The article also mentions that cub porn is should not be distributed due to grooming. You should actually read the article, it clarifies and explains all of this.

I'm defending the article more than anything. Maybe if you read closer instead of scoring Internet points because you think you're defending victims you'd understand why. You're a different kind of abuser as a result-- one who uses victims just to stroke their ego.

Everyone's outrage at Patch isn't coming from the article. It's that they condemned one pedo, but gave a total pass to and even defended one of their friends that bought cub porn, THEN posted that article, and THEN went about blocking people and burning bridges when called out

It shows that they're willing to support CP without listening to anyone or apologizing about it

ohhh gotcha yeah cub porn is gross and i don't support that i just have tons of people lining up to call me 'mommy' and asking me to hold them and tell them everything is okay and i have literally no reason to call them pedos