“But its just cartoons!!” “its just drawings” “its not REAL children/animals” Youre right, but the damage that can be done with this “art” in the hands of an abuser is monumental. Sexual art showing characters of questionable age WILL be used by pedophiles to groom.
-
- Show this thread
-
They will take those images and make a child believe that these actions are normal. When you follow, retweet and support the artists who create these images you are only furthering that normality; by extension you are supporting abusive and highly destructive behavior.
Show this thread -
You tell potential victims that thousands of people who follow and support CP artists think these actions are okay and predators will take advantage of that. The same goes for beast/feral art.
Show this thread -
It doesn’t matter how popular the artist is, it doesnt matter how good their art is, when someone knowingly follows cp an beast artist they are supporting that behavior FULL STOP.
Show this thread -
SO i’d like to clarify something: What this all boils down to is AVAILABILITY. More activity on cp/zoo art = more availability of said art. More availability = the more people get desensitized (whether they realize it or not) and the more NORMAL it becomes to see/distribute
Show this thread -
When it becomes a normal, everyday thing more predators and abusers can get away with using that art as a tool. This is not some “woke take” or an opinion. This is a fact that a lot of CSA survivors can attest to. And i myself have experienced poke porn being used as a tool
Show this thread -
To convince me to participate in zoophilia!! This is not some hypothetical, this happens, this is real! So please, dont say “its just fantasy” That fantasy youre protecting will become real one way or another.
Show this thread End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Really? Pokemon? Can we chill with this puritanical bullshit, even I'm getting tired of a new kink being problematic every day of week.
-
If your kink involves characters from a show that is marketed towards children then theres a problem.
-
welp i guess all the people drawing bowser are problematic then because Mario is technically a kids franchise??
-
Forgive me for making a general statement then?? Also all of the characters in mario are canonically adults save for the koopalings...
-
it’s just not the same. like, a child franchise being sexualizrd doesn’t equal child abuse
-
I didnt say that art = abuse i said people who support artists who produce art of underage characters/characters from childrens shows and dont care about the repercussions of that media in the hands of abusers and predators are complicit in providing a platform of normalization
-
I think another part of the problem is making Nsfw art of kids shows puts all that stuff out there so kids looking for content of their favorite shows are met with porn. This definitely happened to me way too early.
-
YES!! THIS ABSOLUTELY!! I have two younger siblings (who both draw) and this stuff happens all the time to them as well, ive had to tell them which sites not to check when theyre looking for inspiration/references.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
First time I’ve seen someone sneak Pokémon into the *~problematic list~* shit. the fuck? Why not add dragons to the list?? They’re often feral bodied too.
-
I mean if the dragons in question are at the same level of intelligence and cognitive function as a human then theres no issue? You cant say that pokemon are as aware as a human?? In canon i would say they understand language in the same way a very clever dog would.
-
Oh i should also add these hypothetical dragons should also be of age (because i have definitely seen porn of young/baby dragons)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
how the fuck is Pokemon this
-
Not pokemon as a whole? Pokemon porn..
-
I meant that, like how
-
It’s out there
-
Ok that's not what I meant, I know it's out there. I meant in what ways does it go out of length to promote child porn related things. After reading I kinda have an argument to the points of why but I'm not sure if it'd be in interest to do it
-
Oh I think they said it somewhere but basically pokemon is a game primarily geared toward children, and it can be dangerous when sexualizing things meant for children
-
Yeah, but why not focus on ratting out the people who use that content in that viewpoint than everyone who likes it? I can say I've talked to many artists who draw of age "Pokemon" (not the humans) and never go in thinking "wow I wanna make a kid think like this"
-
It sounds like these kind of points should be used to make sure kids don't get any of that stuff. Hell places like Google already make it so easy to accidentally access porn in the first place through images. People who want to abuse their victims that way will use anything
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.