Those who doubt on Assad’ chemical weapons usage are commonly referred to as “assadists”, not to be taken seriously. Anyone with a common sense has to put a big ? on this attack because different players have a stake in US staying in Syria. This comparison is foul.
Much like when some cast doubt on Assad’s chemical weapon attacks because it made no sense that he’d do it (a week after Trump announced he’d leave Syria), some are questioning whether it was indeed ISIS that did the Manbij attack (a month after Trump announced withdrawal).
-
- Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ISIL wants the US to stay. It's part of their strategy to keep the US bogged down in the Middle East.
-
There are evidences the Turkish backed Jihadists want US stay as well. The difference is ISIS claimed the attack and Turkish backed Jihadists not
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.