🦖Incorgimus Rex 🦖

A lot of words, not even a smooth dodge, and zero acknowledgement of mining dogpatch for clout. Transparent and disappointing. Nailing the zoosadists (which I gave you credit for already) doesnt get you a free pass from scrutiny.

Please point out where I “mined” DogPatch for clout. I left a comment I was disappointed in him and talked to him in private. Stix commented too, Patch blocked him so Stix replied on his own profile. So again, how is Stix mining clout????? Just because he’s loud how cub is gross?

I never said you did. I said stixil is. And he is. And he blocked me for saying so and then admitted he is hungry for clicks and measured his self-worth against that metric. Re: dogpatch - publishing != endorsement.

So because people CHOOSE by FREE WILL to follow Stix, he’s at fault then? Is that what you’re saying? Cause nowhere have I seen him tweet “DogPatch sucks, please follow me”

IS that what i'm saying? Did I say that? Pretty sure I didn't. Bad strawman.

Also, in case it isn't already abundantly clear, I reject your puritanism but generally support your actions and political opinions. There's nothing to be gained in going nuclear over drawn pictures. UNLESS your goal is popularity, because villainizing people with a >>

Psychiatric diagnosis is ableist as fuck. These people have a problem, shitting all over them and telling them they're not welcome and threatening them constantly is a piss poor harm reduction strategy not rooted in fact.

I agree people with zoophilia and pedophilia should seek help but using cub porn as a “well people use it to cope with trauma” is where that line is crossed. Until they seek help, they shouldn’t be allowed around children or animals. How is that a problem?