This movie has no objective evidence the airplane in the movie is so small and the scene of airplane is so short you should present objective evidence NOT Unilateral assertion
- New conversation
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
-
日本軍と交戦した・・・、ことになっちゃってるw
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"한국인은 숨을 내쉬처럼 거짓말을 토하는"고 일본에서는 알려져 있습니다. 한국은 아시아의 평화를 위협하는
-
어디 왜놈 쪽빠리 새끼가 감히 글을 싸지르노 손가락이 시벌 댕강댕강 짤려야 정신차릴라나 느그 아베 사진 더 퍼와줄까 씹새야 군대 찌질이 아베????????
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Shameless! You failed to excuse for using fire-control radar. The movie doesn't prove anything why ROK used the radar. What was ROK doing in Japan's EEZ without showing a national frag? ROK violated the international agreement to impose sanctions against North Korea, didn't it?
-
Speaking of fc radar,
@ROK_MND, how come ROK changed the story in regards to the use of fc radar in a span of two days? Quite a contradiction on your statement.pic.twitter.com/rlrxMTuiEi End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
よう韓国wお前ら本当に恥知らずのどうしようもない連中だな。ところでお前らの主張する「P-1が人道救助活動を妨害している」「韓国海軍艦の周りで危険な低空飛行を行ってる」シーンって、一体いつになったら出てくるんだ?wwww
-
無いもんは出せんわな〜笑笑
-
客観的な根拠もなく一方的な主張だけで何一つ証拠になってないという素人動画w韓国基準ではこれで拍手喝采かもしれないが、それが世界に通用すると思って真顔で反論動画と発表する韓国の程度の低さ。これで世界が納得出来るのかな?本当に惨めで哀れな連中。
-
本気で通用すると思ってるなら終わったてるでKさん
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.