Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts
Welcome
Subscribe(0/5)
Vote(0/5)
Sign Up()

Welcome to Reddit

Try out Reddit, subscribe to communities and vote on posts

Subscribe to 5 communities

Customize your home feed by subscribing to your favorite communities. Browse r/popular to find more.

Vote on 5 posts

Votes help move posts up the page! Upvote posts you enjoy and more people will see them.

Don't lose your subscriptions! Become a Redditor to get updates from your favorite communities.

9
Archived

Not Just Earth: Expanding Hollow Stuff Theory (MegaPost)

Hi

i think i found some key concepts in understanding why the earth is in fact hollow (and expanding).

part1: if the pacific was closed, earth is growing.

The idea here, is general planets expansion.

take a look at this Ocean floor Pacific map, and notice:

_ red lines are complementary

_ between them are horizontal stretch marks

_ yellow lines are pieces of torn continent edges (islands), left while the stretching happened.

The earth ground expansion process is hard to analyse because streches, faults, openings appearing on top of each other.

But we can say that:

_ WEST america has been tearing at one point (the coast is detached), as well as EST asia (giving japan)

_ the expansion of the initial small earth has put lots of pressure on the crust top levels, giving mountain chains

_ and along them, weak lines where the Pacific then opened.

_ logically, before that, all the water was above continents (and there was less water as you will see lower in this article)

original map

recut to show the pacific


part2: the moon has marks of expansion

Modern scientists still find it amazing that our planet has a moon so big.

It's actually growing and shows marks of spherical expansion.

The moon has two types of terrain:

moon with notes

_Raw white terrain, with a lot of craters [3], many lacking remains of the impact in the middle but with round edges. You can also see many cracks on it showing the dark underground [2,4,5].

_Smooth black, big roundish areas with far less craters, but containing “ghost” craters [6], some with their edges missing parts, missing marks of impact at the center, or even missing everything, only recognizable by a dark disc on the ground. Add to this the presence of folds arranged circularly on the biggest zone [1].

The terrain here is mostly sand. On an expanding sphere, sand doesn't resist as much as earth's crust (until it cracks). Often, the lateral pull spreads it until there's no more left on the upper layer and the one under is slowly revealed. The new ground is (spherically) flat, with a very thin layer of craters history. Even on the white zones, deep craters (new ones) are rare. They have often lost their central remaining in the dirt and their interior is flattened [3].

original high res moon image


part3: iapetus, the key to expansion physics

_Iapetus, like earth's moon always presents the same face to the center of its orbit (the official term is "tidally locked").

_That heavily expanded brown side gives the white part an "opening shell" look (meaning it mostly only expands on one side)

_It has enormous craters, which are not deep into the planet, but follow the spherical shape of the planet (white arrow: a crater's profile view, purple arrow: continuous planet shadow line). Plus, all big craters have clear abrupt edges (there's a meaning to it)

_It has a moutain line right on its equator (13km high on brown background, multiple moutains on white background)

Here's my idea:

_what causes a crater to be bulgy: the planet is hollow, its crust is so thin that the wave caused by the meteor hit makes the abrupt edges: check the impact sequence theory

_what causes the equator rise: the fact that it is expanded on the "in" side of the orbit indicates that saturn's gravitational pull weakens iapetus's pull. so the effects we see (also expansion) must be due to a lack of gravity (explained lower).


part4: resurrecting aether as pre-matter

we need a serious explanation for planets expansion

imo most of what we know in physics is disinformation. every phenomenon has it's own official explanation when actually, everything is heavily linked to one concept: aether...

here's some stuff i came across:

_Electric discharges, violent reactions produce hydrogen in vacuum.There is something, some fluid filling space that is almost undetectable, that has the capacity to become hydrogen.

Aether is the name given to the all pervasive fluid, being responsible for the transmission of light. Light being a wave, it needs a medium to travel into (it makes absolutely no sense imo to say that a wave would become a particle or that a particle would become a wave, even if everybody accepts it). Thus we can theorize on the fact that aether particles are made up of the same constituents as hydrogen, both existing in two different but stable forms.

_The hydritic earth is a new scientific interest in the discovery of a lot of hydrogen coming out of the earth at lakes, shallow terrain depressions, wells and more unknown places. also, Hydrogen is known to react rapidly with other chemical components, so it shouldn't exist in the depths of the earth.

people from hydritic earth theory don't know about hydrogen materialization from aether. They think it is "primordial hydrogen" coming from the earth's iron core. they have a facebook page

_The discovery made in the Kola superdeep Borehole

At 12,262m deep in earth crust: "(...)the rock at that depth had been thoroughly fractured and was saturated with water, which was surprising.(...) Another unexpected discovery was a large quantity of hydrogen gas; the mud that flowed out of the hole was described as "boiling" with hydrogen."

No wonder "The project was closed down in late 2005 because of a lack of funding"

_Space anisotropy measurement: the existence of aether was commonly accepted as the light medium, until some scientists tried to measure the speed of earth inside it. The idea was that if earth travels at 30km/s around the sun, then, measuring the speed of light in different directions would show a similar variation (because sound speed varies when it goes with or against the wind). The 1887 Michelson and Morley experiment didn't give the awaited results, so the idea of aether was abandoned.

But: "Data from a new experiment measuring the anisotropy of the one-way speed of EM waves in a coaxial cable, gives the speed of light as 300,000+/-400+/-20km/s in a measured direction RA=5.5+/-2hrs, Dec=70+/-10deg S, is shown to be in excellent agreement with the results from seven previous anisotropy experiments, particularly those of Miller (1925/26), and even those of Michelson and Morley (1887)"

Please check this page for the document on anisotropy of space. the scientist and author of the document thinks he discovered gravity waves.

NOW. aether nature (theory).

i found the explanation for aether nature on Neal adams science site, even though i think he is a disinfo agent (his expanding earth is clearly false, there is dishonnest stuff mixed with real stuff on his site). But his aether theory is the only one taking into account hydrogen spontaneous appearence.

So, what is aether (in theory)

A hydrogen atom is made up of a proton “p” and an electron “e-”. In that form, it is electronic matter, meaning it can touch you, you can touch it. But although a proton weights 1836 times more than an electron, it's charge is exactly the opposite.

So if a particle of aether “ae” is neutral (as it doesn't interact electrically with matter, pretty much like rare gases but way lighter), it must be composed of e- and e+ (e+ would then be a positron, we suppose it has the same weight as an electron but opposite charge).

When an electric discharge occurs, or when aether is “disturbed”, it causes some of the aether particles “ae” to split in two, giving e+ and e-.

The electron's (e-) behavior is known. It is attracted by anything positive, like a lacking electron on some molecule around it. It won't disappear or transform by itself. Positrons don't exist in nature. You can't get them. The only stable positive particle available is the proton. So if you follow the charge leading to hydrogen fabrication, The positron becomes heavy, not by itself, but by gathering the only thing available around it: aether particles. It does so until it gets 1836/2 (because a proton is 1836 time an e- and ae=2e-=2e+=(e- plus e+)= 918 ae around it. If aether particles gather around a positron, then the ae, must be “surrounded” by its electron in a fluid way, shielding it from its environment.


part5: Persistent Polar Features: Gravitationally induced

  • Polar jets originate from the nort and south pole of galaxies's central stars (maybe black holes).

312034main_image_1276_946-710.jpg

amultiwavele.jpg

3C31_radio_optical_montage_Alan_Bridle.png

ngc4261.jpg

The NASA's weather viewing software too, "world wind", hides the poles. If you look closely, you can notice an invisible circle in each window used to duplicate clouds in a symmetric manner (between inside and outside the circle).

IDEA:

  • planets crusts expand, while their cores become stars.

  • The expansion's engine is the balance between centripetal and centrifugal force (let's call it BalCC, but this alone doesn't account for the spherical shape of a planet).

  • planet's core accumulates hydrogen (materialised from aether) and becomes a star. While doing that, it grows, expanding BalCC diameter.

  • While the crust gets further and further from the core, its poles open, revealing the interior of the planet (with a surface equivalent to the outer surface, lit by a mini sun)


part6: Iapetus is not the only one: Persistent Equatorial Features: Gravitationally induced

_uranus has retrograde wind at its equator

_the Sun has a low activity equatorial zone

_on earth, clouds go at the same speed as the ground (a little bit retrograde in imo)

_saturn's natural satellite iapetus has an equatorial level rise anomaly

_gas giant have rings and natural satellites on their equatorial plane

_the solar system and most galaxies are flat.

IDEA:

as light is aether waves, gravity is aether wind

4 types of gravity linked to aether nature:

_low gravity: any object disturbs aether. if the object is dense and big enough, the materializing aether inside of it causes an in-draft of the surrounding (pressurized) aether.

_normal gravity: the inner sun's growing rotation inertia causes an aether vortex. this is the basis for the centripetal-centrifugal force equilibrium causing planets expansion.

_impact gravity: the growing (positron based) proton accumulates aether particles while travelling at the speed of the aether wind. Until it is to big to pass through physical matter. the impact of the newly formed particle inside of the object is the stars engine, making the core accelerate much more than the exterior.

_The tentacle effect:like in a wirhlpool, there are spiraling pressure lines around the gravitational core. they push matter laterally and concentrate it. this effect is visible on galaxies, and in the solar system. look at these asteroid's organisation GIFs in the images section.

Low gravity gives birth to the aether vortex, which, augmented by impact gravity produces normal gravity (feeding the aether vortex) and the tentacle effect (turbulences of the aether vortex)

the vortex:

_in the sun, the aether vortex is in two inequal parts (the one below is greater)

_the aether flow inside of the star should look like this, because it is not able to gradually concentrate while speeding up at the equator. Also, above and below the active bands, the aether vortices would be too narrow i guess.


part7: Theoretical Timeline

DRAWING

  1. a mass of matter in orbit / rotates (around itself) at a slow speed (tidally locked, same rotation as it had in the rings) / disturbs aether / consequence: centripetal (slightly shifted off center) aether wind (blue arrows) / at the center, impact gravity accelerates rotation.

  2. the aether vortex (purple profile cut) causes separation between fast rotating core and crust / crust outside of vortex follows the expansion of the middle part / fluid-geometric properties of the aether vortex imply empty center and weak equator

  3. with expansion and centrifugal force, there is not enough low gravity to maintain polar ground: opening of the poles / the poles don't open at the same time.

  4. with expansion and centrifugal force, there is not enough normal gravity (purple) to maintain the equator / starts a slow process of fluids loss, crust collapsing at the equator.

  5. Theoretical step of advanced disintegration of the crust / blue arrows: aether wind vortex profile cut / white arrow: equatorial centrifugal force / red arrows: crust goes along the lack of gravity / important diminution of the shielding effect (the crust slowed down aether from reaching the inner sun)

  6. no more shielding effect / fast growth of the core: Gas Giant step(GG) / unbalanced up-down aether vortex specific of GG where only one band is present, the other is in formation. characterized by spots / screen effect of the hydrogen-helium: shining core not visible unless from poles (at the unactive zone at the center of the aether vortex).

  7. important growth, near completion of the two parts based aether vortex.

  8. centripetal aether wind keeps planets and rings in orbit / the tentacle effect organizes orbiting matter (like after the asteroid belt or in GG rings) / this process makes new orbiting masses of matter rotating slowly around themselves...so back to 1).


Part 8.1: Details of the Expanding Hollow Stuff Theory

thunder phenomenon

it is explained officially, that the electrical tension between the ground and the athmosphere is the result of water evaporation, when water molecules going in the air take more negative electrical charges than positive (?)...but if it was so, and taking into account water autoprotolysis (which produces the same amount of + and - water ions), the evaporation process should be neutral, with the same amount of positive and negative ions going up the air.

this is actually a follow up to part 7 of the expanding hollow stuff serie.

the idea here is that gravitation is an aether wind (composed of neutral electron-positron pairs) moving in a vortex fashion towards the inner sun at the middle of our hollow earth.

taking that into account, those aether particles split randomly depending on how much the are disturbed. This and the fact that thunder's electrons go from the athmosphere to the ground

2 thing happen when the aether particle splits:

  • up in the athmopshere, an electron is released, immediately harnessed by any molecule passing by (i think it would end up in humidity water micro droplet inside or oustide clouds).

  • deep in the ground, when the aether coated prositron (from the same particle split) suddenly "appears" as matter, it's a proton, bringing a supplementary positive charge to the soil. this process systematically builds up negative charges up and positive charges down. Until thunder nullifies the tension

volcanism

here's the worldwide eruptions world map.

volcanism occurs where the plates (different parts of the crust) are torn apart. Logically those zones would be the thinnest parts of the crust, where aether wind would go faster, and thus impact gravity would hit harder, making the rocks melt. This would also happen in the central zone of elongated plates. i guess water heating is at least in part responsible for the eruptions, and the acide lakes you find on top of some volcanoes show that the concentration of protons (H+) is very high. The positive charges concentration would seem to be the cause of thunder while eruptions goes up in the air.


part 8.2: Details of the Expanding Hollow Stuff Theory

  1. Abiotic oil and rock hydrogenation

the official theory states that oil is a fossil ressource...

there's a problem with the depth at which oil is found. if you can find it deeper than 10km (furthermore sometimes under salt domes...not even mixed with it) then it has no relationship with life. add to this that chemical elements concentration is not the same.

this, and peak oil (scarcity) is good for business.

the abiotic oil theory (here's an example) tries to explain oil natural (mineral) production...but can't really because of hydrogen which cannot exist deep underground (because it goes against any planetary formation simple logic of "lightest stuff goes up"), so they need to invent "primordial hydrogen".

This primordial hydrogen concept alone makes any scientific paper ridicule, because it hold everything without anything backing it up.

2) Oil source

As presented in part4, there are great amounts of materialized aether building up in the ground. Some of its protons (H+) capture (are captured by?) in-rock oxygen to make water, while some of its hydrogen is released at ground level.

Well guess what ?

some of the hydrogen must appear in carbon rich rocks (as aether wind travels through the whole crust) where it produces all sorts of hydrocarbonated compounds (starting from methane).

This concept can easily be connected with the fact that:

  • hydrogen chemical bonds are easily broken. carbon stolen from any given carbon-rich rock (by hydrogen) will be cooked into coal when heat extracts hydrogen from it in the form of natural gas (methane, CH4, so it takes some carbon with it).

  • there are coal mines everywhere on the planet, and sometimes coal is bituminous, meaning it didn't get enough heat (and/or pressure) to loose all its hydrogen.

So, maybe you can now see that there is oil everywhere on earth, in any given country, you just have to digg deep enough to find it.

Also, the geopolitics of oil (wars, racket) are thus just a front for the real operations of dissolving every country into the new world order (imo).


Part 8.3: Applying the theory while going backwards in time

Backwards in time, we can see that many things happened (at the planetary scale):

  • The earth gets smaller, as the moon, and they get closer, until, they separate (logically the earth and moon were to satellites (of the sun) with close orbits, so earth and moon must have gotten closer slowly because they had very close revolution periods and this also explains why some satellites have retrograde rotation)

  • All the gas giants get smaller until each one of them re-becomes an inner sun with rings which soon englobes them so that they return to a telluric state.

  • meanwhile close planets (to the sun) desintegrate into rings.

  • When all the rocky matter around the sun is in ring form, the sun is very small and is, in fact, a gas giant getting smaller and smaller. Until it's shining again, as the inner sun of the initial Planet responsible for the whole solar system.

  • But again, maybe the Planetsun had Jupiter as its moon (maybe not, maybe it was all of the gas giant which were small satellites at the time). Maybe the is planet X (nibiru) which was Planetsun 's harvested moon (in the last star system generation...)

Any way, rocky matter, in all these planetary transformation processes, stays the same (when it finds itself in the crust). This means that life, bacterial life i guess, may come from way before what we think (even though i don't can't believe that the earth is 4.5 billion years old). It may have been transported from that Planetsun all the way to earth, mars, venus...europa...

Also, in the Hollow Earth sub, i have found interresting stuff about the past:

  • First, the Lazeria Map Collection where you can see old maps made in the 16th, 17th century and before. They have separating pieces of land (north of america), drowning islands (frietzland), and mapping of the continent around the north pole. But one of the best things must be that in about 1600 Australia was still stuck to antartica, forming the "australis" continent. (lol note: the word antartica was muted in the video!)

  • Second. Apparently, in some old cultures, Planet saturn was a star. it means that not long ago (about 3000y minimum), after having been a telluric planet, it expanded until losing all it"s crust to ring, revealing it's central sun (which after some time got bloated with hydrogen until it became the gas giant that we know)

addition: This new article about a star that has been dimming for over a century "baffles scientists" and their best guess is...wait for it...alien megastructure!

Actually, it's an inner star which crust part have been turned into rings, while the new star is rapidly gathering hydrogen and being coeated with it, until it becomes a gas giant.

22 comments
85% Upvoted
This thread is archived
New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast
level 1
[deleted]
3 points · 2 years ago

Great post! A very well described hollow earth theory. What is your opinion on a possible toroidal shaped earth? This would be a perfect explanation for the polar openings. The magnetosphere is a toroidal shape, even mainstream science admitted that.

level 2
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago

when you move a spoon in a cup of coffe, the smal vortices it makes on the sides don't look like the spoon itself.

your comment tells me "i didn't read your post and i don't want to understand what you saying, i only came here to find a torus"...you guys are like flies, you don't hurt, you just annoy.

it's like if i'm in the matrix, and everybody i meet is a smith agent with a torus t-shirt logo.

level 3
[deleted]
3 points · 2 years ago · edited 2 years ago

Your response literally makes no sense, no one else here has mentioned a torus. I came here to read about hollow earth which I do believe in. A torus fits with everything in your post, which I did read and understand. The outside of the torus would be a hollow sphere while the inner spiral element would be the core star emitting its plasma and magnetic energy. This would fully explain both polar openings and the Aurora Borealis, not to mention the clearly torus shaped magnetosphere. I don't get why you are being such a dick I am just trying to discuss your post if you don't agree that is fine.

level 4
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago

because it is clearly not a torus and everybody tries to pull me towards torusses/hollow fractal

level 3

Dicks out for the hollow earth

level 1

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / ^Contact)

level 1
1 point · 2 years ago · edited 2 years ago

What is the cycle you are proposing? There must exist some method for the split aether to once again become the undetectable positron electron pair or else it would mean that the age of the universe is finite as all aether is slowly converted to matter.

level 2
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago · edited 2 years ago

i can't see in all the pictures i know of this phenomenon, although it could be possible to shoot a proton with electrons with so much energy, that it would shower off the aether particles from it until it becomes an aether particle (but that process would make even more disturbance in the aether, making more collateral matter). or another way would be to be able to inject protons with electrons (one electron per proton) so that they become neutrons (but free neutrons decay into protons + electrons, so the injection should get deep next to the internal positron)

BUT

the world should even end sooner than this: in the aether point of view, red shift (stars that we see red when they are in fact white or blue or else) means that they are moving away from us at amazing speeds, meaning they are near the "edge" of the pocket of aether constituting the universe (pocket which is expanding in the void at the speed of light because that's the speed of the aether particles).

for example blue light wavelength is about 475nm and red wavelength is 650nm.

if we see blue as red, it means that like in the doppler effect (a police car's horn coming at you will sound higher frequencywise, while if it goes away it will sound lower):

  • 475/650=0.73 which means a difference of 27% of the wavelength (so the distant galaxies are travelling away from us at 0.27*300000km/s=80770km/s)

soon, we won't even see them because there won't be enough aether between us and them.

EDIT: but i personnaly have a theory (i could send it to you, but it's just a theory, not like everything i posted which i actually think is fact) which assumes that electrons don't exist as a particle, but as a sub aetheric rigid grid system, and if a proton reaches the end of the grid, there's a possibility for the posittron inside to touch that grid and become an aether particle again. I have never thought about this before, but when you asked that question, i imagined that this is the most credible thing to happen to protons at the end.

Now, what's the size ratio between the pocket of aether and the grid ? if there's already red shift, it means that the pocket expansion is accelerating, and nothing has bounced back yet.

level 3
2 points · 2 years ago · edited 2 years ago

Personally i don't believe in the expansion of the universe. If light was affected by doppler this should be observed in laboratories, and AFAIK it has not.

Your proposed explanation don't seem to have a mechanism for the quantization of redshift that we observe.

Edit: i would gladly read through your theory.

level 4
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago · edited 2 years ago

ok, maybe my idea is wrong for this red shift, but i don't believe in photons, light is a wave in a medium, so doppler must exist even if we can't measure it now (i guess).

also this pushed me towards thinking about doppler for light:

but what do you think about planets expansion, becoming gas giants, becoming stars, and all this caused by aether2matter vortices ?

level 5

I think planet and moon expansion seems to be the most reasonable explanation for many observations we have throughout the solar system. The method how this expansion happens i have no opinion on yet.

On one hand it would seem too radical to think the earth is hollow with an inner star. On the other hand the moon ringing like a bell almost necessitates it to be hollow.

level 6
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago

ok

and what about the observations about iapetus in my post ? what about the equatorial ridge and the bulgy craters ? it's hollow, expanding and with a tendency of the crust to become rings. what you think about that ?

level 7

I know too little about it to have any real opinion.

Isn't that crater diagram from conventional theory? So not really an argument for crater shape resulting from hollowness if it is used also for solid planets.

level 8
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago

a normal crater on a (not hollow and not expanding) planet with no atmosphere would be a hole in the ground, like if you threw a nut in flour.

what i'm talking about in the iapetus case, is that it seems to be a flour plane hit by a nut.

level 7
[deleted]
1 point · 2 years ago

I agree. Most planets are hollow and expanding. Earth is definitely hollow and expanding. As for Iapetus. Think about Saturn. When the torus forms it funnels material ejected up from the core star it flows around the "spherical" "crust" where it collapses and flattens, expanding outward at the equator. This is also how many galaxies are formed. When the core star starts running out of material/fuel the planet cools and a "crust" forms. Iapetus is an interesting one. I agree it's hollow just like the earth. It's very small core star had long since died. The rings are formed as the crust buckled during the cooling period. This could also explain the apparent cylindrical area of the equator.

level 8
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago

Think about Saturn. When the torus forms...

So it is actually about torusses.

it funnels material ejected up from the core star it flows around the "spherical" "crust"

I think i have to take a lot of time to do a real video about my theory. Nobody actually reads my posts. You don't understand how it works. And you're really applying your toroidal way of looking at things, which makes you understand everything backwards.

also, there is matter genesis in all planets (gravity=vortex with inward flow of aether=core aether conversion into hydrogen) Iapetus is not dying, is just starting slow. No planet will ever run out of fuel if there's aether around.

level 1

This is the best, most well thought out explanation of Hollow earth theory I've came across, so excellent job.

If we look at the works of Walter Russell, his theory of Electric Universe also proposes this idea.

Electric Universe theory (the current one) and plasma cosmology haven't made it far enough to come across this idea yet--and if they have they're keeping it a secret for obvious reasons (it's hard enough pushing a new idea against the status quo, and throwing this bombshell in there would cause the theory to not be taken seriously.

However, Electric Universe considers Space to be a liquid like medium, superfluid if you will, and postulates that what we think is gravitational lensing, is in fact refraction and diffraction of light through different density mediums, hence why the lensing effects we see in space are always blue, and never different colors, because of how the color gradient changes when refracted/diffracted.

Here's a link for that:

http://youtu.be/fePQdJNVF9g

Here's another video that gives a concept of space as a superfluid medium:

http://youtu.be/eawL3WxzkUk

Hope this can contribute some insight or trigger new thoughts. I like the direction this is going...

level 2
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago

Electric Universe theory (...) haven't made it far enough to come across this idea yet--and if they have they're keeping it a secret for obvious reasons

i can't believe this. wether they have good intentions and disclose everything they have for the good of humanity, or they are agents (conscious or unconscious) for the system. there is no middle (except making mistakes in the theory).

gravitational lensing, is in fact refraction and diffraction of light through different density mediums

honestly, the aether vortex makes everything fit together so well, and with gravity being the inward aether flow justifying the lensing, that any compromise with any other parallel theory only shows that my theory is either not understood, or not accepted.

but thank you for your interest, i really hope you got my view point :)

level 3
1 point · 2 years ago · edited 2 years ago

I didnt intend to come off condescending like EU or PC have this in the bag (in terms of what theory is right)--what i meant was that after enough research into EU, and some of the works of even Tesla, and Walter Russell, and other scientists of the pre-einsteinian era, that this is truly not actually far fetched at all.

The biggest problem with proposing this idea coupled with any existing theory (no matter how well the pieces fit together--and believe me, in terms of Electricity...i mean Electricity is literally ALL there is, there is nothing else in the Universe) hollow earth theories are seen in the same light as flat earth theories, or illuminati conspiricies (very...VERY sad, i know)--but its the truth.

So what i meant all around, is that if you've actually done extensive research on nature from an electrical standpoint, you could actually arrive at the conclusion that gravitational creation is complete bullshit, and that there is some other process we have not yet witnessed (such as what you are proposing), which in-fact, lends credence to the expanding, hollow earth model, as well as linking our galaxy, solar system, and home planet all together in a seamless process, that is quite logical if you understand alternative viewpoints of the universe (anything outside standard cosmology).

Again, you did an excellent job putting this together, and after reading through this, and looking at the pictures, i can actually picture a toroidal ball oblating into a disc, revealing a ball of energy that continues to repeat the process infinitely.

When you think of two wave-forms coalescing and creating constructive interference, it looks like a set of rings flashing in and out of existence. Apparently matter appears solid, due to how quickly these waveforms oscillate in this way. Everything is an oscillation. I would even say that our Earth is oscillating, going off of what you are proposing...we just can't tell because of how huge it is compared to what our mind is able to percieve (trapped on our spectrum of the time-scale). If we could shrink down, and perceive time at the scale of a quantum oscillation, things wouldnt appear to move so strangely i dont think. Things very, very tiny tend to move at extremely high speeds when viewed closely, and things very, very huge, tend to look like they dont move at all when viewed from very far away. I think this obstacle is what is keeping us from understanding space the way we should.

Edit: I mentioned the whole liquid space medium thing because you had mentioned the aether vortex--which essentially is what ''space'' is, the Aether--Im not sure if you watched that video i posted about the lensing phenomenon, but it basically is explaining that mainstream science has redshift completely wrong, and that it has nothing to do with expansion, but instead explains that the bending of light can be calculated just as accurately, and account for certain phenomenon that gravitational lensing cannot, by using the Aether as a medium in which light travels. Different density in the Aether would cause light to act differently, or trap certain parts of the gradient more so than others, giving the appearance of light being red/blue shifted--which may not mean how fast away from us its moving.

level 4

If you check into Cymatics, you'll find some very interesting things--such as we can create patterns here on earth, using sound, or frequency--some of which form sacred geometries.

After looking up the cymatics, then look up the orbital patterns of the planets in our solar system and prepare to be shocked. Those same cymatical patterns that we can find at the quantum level, and recreate at our scale with sound/frequency--the planets create the same sacred geometries if their orbital patterns are traced over a certain amount of time. I think Venus over an 8 year span creates one full oscillation pattern...

level 1

Check this out:

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-p-swave.asp

and then: https://www.google.com/search?q=oscillating+ball&espv=2&biw=1126&bih=702&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwid0N272d3NAhWjzIMKHRFHApcQ_AUIBygC#tbm=isch&q=standing+wave+gif&imgdii=pFLW8mp2fJRlQM%3A%3BpFLW8mp2fJRlQM%3A%3BoxEF5z5gDDSVoM%3A&imgrc=pFLW8mp2fJRlQM%3A

Since you believe light is a wave (as do I), then you have to have some opinion on what the holofractal community has came across with geometry. Do you feel there is underlying geometry to this universe?

level 2
Original Poster1 point · 2 years ago

standing waves require to be reflected on something at the right distance from the source (distance equal to a multiple of the wave length). This means that saying "an atom is composed of a standing wave" while everything around it is moving and distances vary...doesn't mean anything (even even more if everything is only composed of standing waves or just waves around it).

Also, i think that the holofractal concept of viewing things, is like a cult made by agents, because they choose what shape they're looking for: the torus in this case, and then they try to see it everywhere. Geometry is everywhere, OK, but many many different types of it. also the basis for geometry is often some rule applied to great numbers of particles...so...it tends to be vortices and flows (that's why i think magnetism is caused by some sub aetheric particles flow)