Breaking News:According to Reuters,US Commanders are recommending allowing SDF to keep US weaponry that the US has delivered to SDF ever since 2014
-
-
Not anti-tank missiles. They were never given TOWs and Javelins were used by US forces not SDF.
-
-
They have AT4s. Which is an unguided anti tank rocket. No ATGMs.
-
ahh,thanks for specifying
-
And I'd be willing to bet this means: small arms and ammunition. *Maybe* mortars. But armored vehicles would drive right back out the way they came in.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How able would the US be in taking it back?
-
US commanders are recommending to let SDF keep the weapons
-
Understood the recommendations. Just hypothetically pondering if the US wanted weapons back, how able they be to reclaim them.
-
i agree,hard to get back
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Give them Stinger missiles too in order to neutralize Turkish airpower.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
they didn't get anti-tank missiles AFAIK
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the Kurds are smart it will all become part of the SAA arsenal
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if they decide to want take back the weapon, How though ? It will be very easy to trick away or conceal the weapons that delivered. Example: they can say, it get captured by ISIS or blown away.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they would keep the Javelin missile that would be very dangerous for Turkish army tanks, apcs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Before tanks air forces will be send. They will have good " hunting " ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.