Huh. Might as well try.

Well this is sure to be interesting.

Yes it will XD

I vote for the good boy Sammy!

I'm interested

Dude, you'd probably be a good candidate. Just hope it isn't a soul-crushing job.

If you happen to get selected by some chance and it is, don't be afraid to bail...

But seriously, best of luck, no doubt they need good conscientious people.

Gosh bless you for saying that!! <3 I hope it goes well! and I agree!

I wish you a lot of luck, this site needs good people like you :3

Gosh bless you!!

^^

You'd probably do well with it.

Thank you! <3

Yes. You would do well there, I think.

Epic broccoli

I'm not interested

I'm gay

Gross

O.o
That's hophobic

Hahaha

Don't be so hateful, Sonic fan.

We're all in the same spectrum honestly
sanic fans, furries, mlp , anime
we're all degenerates out in these streets! 👌👌👌👌👌

Is Sonic a furry?

well hes an animal and he talks and walks idk i'd say so
something like that

I think sonic is moar liek an anime thing, not a real furry

and thats your opinion
either way, anime is lumped up with degeneracy


w e r e a l l d e g e n e r a t e s h e r e

I mean, yeah, but, I mean, liek, furries are anthros and... they don't have anthro bodies they're just what people call, "chibis"

I would argue that Sonic is a chibi for the sole reason of proportions. I mean, you mentioned Disney/LooneyTunes. Look at the proportions of their bodies. Sonic has a typical chibi proportion and so
does the rest of his pseudofurry team. Therefore I'd group Sonic with Pokemon and not as a real furry thing.

I dunno, with those body proportions the sonic characters have the anatomy of a small child, and, in some adaptations, the one of a toddler.

I'm not. If I were a degenerate, I'm pretty sure I'd be a really shitty person. I'm trying to change that.

"There is no difference between Judy and Pikachu. Well, of course, if you ignore every single thing that's different.
Also, Pikachu doesn't have the same level of 'sapience' as Sonic or Judy. Judy is a fucking cop bunny midget bitch, and Sonic is a hedgehog who can go fast as the speed of sound and has to fight a
morbidly obese man who wants to turn the world into a theme park or some shit. Pikachu can't do shit unless Ash tells him to 99% of the time. The other time he does shit himself is if he saves Ash
from getting killed because he's always going on with his "LETS B FRIENDS" speeches in front of dimension-shifting monsters.

Also, not to burst your cum-filled bubble, but Pikachu is not anthropomorphic. I don't think you know what that means. He's pretty feral if anything.

P.S.: Sonic isn't a chibi, just an elongated chibi. Two different things. Look it up.

I'm joking. The point is furries, weebs , mlp and Sonic lovers are equal. That's about it.

Quoting your comment "is furries, weebs , mlp and Sonic lovers are equal." I'm absolutely sure you can piss off Sonic fans by comparing them to the furries.
Which is quite what makes them unique, I haven't seen a single weeaboo or brony complain or cry whenever they were compared to us, the furries. It kinda shows the Sonic fanboys are extremely
narcissistic.

I've personally seen everyone lose their shit except for mlp fans, and I'm sure there are mlp fans who hate comparison too. As per usual it really depends on the person. I personally refuse to degrade
or insult someone based on their fandom interest because I find it silly and trvial. I'ma just judge someone on their individual actions and avoid generalising a whole community.

-Peace

Pikachu being anthro why would someone believe that, hahaha

but yes, this comment makes a fair point or three.

A toddler is still human. As are chibis.

>weebs
ayo, hol' up

MerkavaMerkava Your post made me laugh so loud xD

Oh no dont make me get started with ponies. The fact that small colorful horses can talk, it doesnt make them furries.

If toddlers were humans they would be called humoddlers

..I'm sorry, what?
Toddlers are literally the offspring of humans, just because they're small doesn't mean they're not human :s

Well toddlers aren't allowed to have sex, and you see quite a bit of sexual scenes between sonic and his sonic-like friends and ocs

Pikachu is not smarter than a trained dog, he can't be considered anthro for that reason. And, in order to not double post, you can't call ponies anthros because their basal state is to be quadrupeds,
them talking don't make them real anthros. Is liek... liek...

Liek.

Well yeah sure but that's why people up-age the characters in their own interpretations to avoid guilt, usually by taking their canon age and adding on how ever many years they've existed (even though
time logic doesn't work on fictional characters and they stay the same age forever unless stated otherwise by the original owners).
It's similar to the warped logic of some weebs who wanna fuck kids but don't wanna admit it so they cling to lolis who look like toddlers but are written as being 18+.

This OC looks 7 but is actually 56 years old

Having "human intelligence" doesn't mean he's anthropomorphic. Also, no he doesn't lol. Again, don't say shit you don't know and act like you know it.
You're being illiterate for no reason. However, Meowth is a different story. No shit he's anthropomorphic. He talks like a person, acts like a person, and moves around like a person,
And guess what, Pikachu doesn't do any of those things. Just because you think Pikachu has a 1000 IQ, that doesn't mean he's "anthropomorphic," or a better term, "humanoid."
Are you gonna say dolphins are anthropomorphic too? They're about as smart as humans and is smarter than Pikashits since you think smarts only mean something is anthropomorphic, my boy?

P.S. fam, i don't get where you got me saying "anthropomorphism is a style of drawing" because that's retarded

This child is 200 years old so it's ok if i can fuck it xdddd

Dolphins are smarter than 99% of poekmahns tho

Who said they wasn't?

Dunno pawbably i misread'dt

"Are you gonna say dolphins are anthropomorphic too? They're about as smart as humans and is smarter than Pikashits"

Lol yes apparently I misread, I was too busy stuffing myself with chocolate cookies and milk like a true alpha male

IN the study of art styles, the style of "sonic" is generally tied to looney tunes and to western cultures. While you personally tie it to other styles because of you own preferences/mind/definitions,
but what Zidders has mentioned is still the objective truth XD. Sonic's intended style was always based on looney tunes despite the proportions being similar to what we now consider "chibi". That
wasn't so much a widespread thing "then".

What is even going on with this post?

Ok do the following experiment. Grab a ruler. Grab a sonic image. Tell me how many times the head fits in the character's total height. Then do the same with Bugs Bunny, or Sylvester, or Lucas, or
Elmer, etc. Now tell me if the proportions of the former are in concordance with those of the other one.

Besides, sonic doesn't even have any consistence. His arms ain't even blue.

Haha I like that one. Humans are an animal, they walk and talk... So, they are furry too. XD

heh, Furries are only fictional. Don't take it too literally

Furries may be fictional, but they are as real as a pancake if you think about it bro. Just, think about it bro.

Yeah. I would have to agree that technically Pikachu isn't anthro. To be anthro, you have to apply human characteristics and traits to something that is not human. Since Pikachu is a made up
character, there technically isn't a version of him that doesn't already have these abilities.

Pikachu is barely sentient at all. He/she/it might as well be just an AI programmed to repeat its own name and follow instructions, with the same thing happening to every pokemon ever save for a few
exceptions like Mewto and Meowth.

Gosh... Such a large comment tree.

I know... right?

Weeding out those who don't have what it takes to be moderators, I guess. Xd

I'm not a furry, so I'm not included in that. Hooray!

You favorite furry porn.

I don't share many traits with most furries.

Sonic is a furry, it's just more chibi-style. Same as drawing a Chibi-fox furry. If it talks, it has human quality of speech. If it's smarter than an animal, it's a furry. Talking, walking on two
legs, and intelligence are common to classify something as a furry. Chibi is just a style and nothing more. I can draw chibi furries, or realistic furries, or toony furries. It doesn't make it not
furry.

You share ALL of the furry traits:

>having an account in a furry site
>having a furry icon
>getting off to furry stuff
>watch furry stuff at least once every 24 hours
>having a furry name

But his arms aren't blue.

Well, to be fair, in a way Pikachu is sort of anthro. An anthropomorphic character is something that has human characteristics/ qualities. Pikachu has demonstrated plenty of times that he has human
like qualities to him.
It's the same way a car can become anthropomorphic if you slap some eyes and a mouth on it.

But then fantasy creatures like dragons can't be anthro too right? Pikachu is a made up animal, just like dragons and unicorns are, yet we're all fine making dragons and unicorns and calling them
anthros.

I'm not trying to be a jerk. It all depends on how you define an anthropomorphic character. If a character or creation already has anthro characteristics, you cannot apply them. Is a monkey or a
chimpanzee anthropomorphic?
It all depends on the situation. Most people look beyond the previous creation and apply the characteristics post creation, thus making them anthro in their minds. Is a dragon a dragon, or an
anthropomorphic lizard? See what I mean? I guess I'm just splitting hairs here.

What? Exactly when and how did that ever happen?!

Quadruped dragons are not anthro because if you look at their skeleton, the hips are always drawn in the same way canine/feline hips are. Same happens to all of their limbs. Actually, most dragons
have the skeleton of a dog and the only different thing is the head. And well, wings.

I definitely wasn't trying to imply you were being a jerk, I was just genuinely joining in the discussion. Sorry if it came across that way.

I mean, monkey's and chimpanzees in real life aren't anthropomorphic, they're just monkey's and chimpanzees. But, creating a character based on one, making it do human-like things etc. would make it
anthro, right?

I know you're just giving an example but, the problem is, dragons aren't anthropomorphic lizards. In their "true form" or "animal form" most dragons aren't portrayed with human characteristics,
therefore not making them anthropomorphic. They're surely based off lizards, but in order to be anthropomorphic, it has to have something human about it. It's all to do with human traits, not animal
traits.

I'm talking about the anime and movies, just to be clear. He shows human emotion all the time, from embarrassment towards Ash doing something stupid, to slapping him in the face when he's being an
idiot. He apologises when he does things wrong, and will cry when sad things happen, if a pokemon is unhappy he'll try and cheer it up by pulling faces or consoling it. These are all human
characteristics, which show a genuine understanding of what's going on around him. Something doesn't have to have physical human qualities or even speak human language to be anthropomorphic.

I meant monkeys not monkey's, oof..

Well, there are a number of cats and dogs who can also do that irl. Check in youtube vids of cats facepalming. Besides Ash is such a sorry excuse for a human being that even pokemons think he's dumb.
So, I'd say pikachu is not quite anthro. On the other hand, Meowth, or the talking Reshiram from the movie, those sure are anthro in a way.

But cats aren't face palming for the sake of face palming, that is purely a human thing.

I'm curious, what do you think anthropomorphic means? Do you know the actual meaning of the word? Why do you think something has to speak English to be anthropomorphic? (Sorry if any of that comes
across as rude, I don't mean it to, I'm genuinely asking)

I understand what you mean and I have an interesting answer. If we were to technically define anthropomorphic, I would say, that the main characteristic required would be a bipedal skeleton
with an erected spine and some form of superior intellect. In other words, characters that walk on two legs, have skeletons resembling humans (namely, a hip bone that is sort of parallel to the
vertebral column and not perpendicular to like with most quadrupeds) and can have facial gesticulations and can talk, then are anthro.

To me, "talking animals" is not enough, they need the anatomical features I just mentioned for them to be considered anthropomorphic.

I understand why you feel that way, since most of the anthros on social media websites etc. have mostly human skeletons. But, the word itself does not mean that. Even a vehicle can be anthropomorphic
if it behaves in a human like way, like the cars in the movie "cars". Anthropomorphism is simple adding human like qualities/ emotions etc. to something that isn't human, that's just what it means.

Oh, I am aware of the strict meaning of the word but ya know, in the context of the furry world it has a special connotation. Ya know.

Liek.

Liek.

But then, if you knew the real meaning, and that I was talking about the literal meaning of the word; there was no reason to decline my original statement of Pikachu having human emotions, and
therefore being anthro, right? :P

That's just my name.

Gee. At least the discussion is civil. That's good. I do a lot with antiques and such. I have to split hairs sometimes in definitions about what something is. In the liberal definition of
anthropomorphism, yes, pikachu, dragons, etc. are anthropomorphic. I am just saying that by strict definition, this isn't always so. The English language is fluid and definitions change. This will
probably apply to this word, too.

Well the connotations of a word are dictated by context, and this context is the furry world, in where the most idealistic version of anthropomorphism is not the adequate pick from the list of
different meanings of that word

It's your FURRY name

No, it's just my name.

Name, but, furry.

How does that make any sense?

Because furry

I don't get it.

You don't need to get it to be furry

Indeed. They may be anthropomorphic, but that doesn't make them furries

You realize the furry community is supporting of LGBT rights, right?

whoosh

Maximum whoosh

Not everyone. Better and safer to keep that type of stuff to yourself anyway.

Well a lot of the time, the ones who don't support the LGBT community may actually be a part of it themselves, but just hiding in the closet. It's the same for furries in general. I used to be a
closet furry because of the anti-furries.

Its also highly possible that someone who "may actually be a part of it" might not support the LGBT community due to how the LGBT community often treat individuals inside it. From trans men attempting
to force lesbians to sleep with them, to parts of the trans community wanting to remove the " B " and everyone associated with it because "there are more than two genders and Bi is short for binary,
meaning it perpetuates the claim that there are only two!".

Both of these are real instances by the way. In the UK they had a pride parade where the lesbian community got upset because the trans community was getting front stage and the reason they cited was
that many trans members kept trying to get in bed with them, using such gross arguments as "I might look like a man but i'm a woman on the inside" because they had yet to go through with the
surgeries. In the other case they wanted to turn it from "LGBT" to "LGT" I'd say the entire thing but honestly its hard to keep track of the multiple different ways the "entire" "LGBT" title means
now.

I for one am Bisexual, but don't support LGBT because I've seen how they act, I didn't see others shouting about how they claimed they acted, I saw how they acted first hand and decided there is
nothing healthy there.

Are you trying to tell us that there's an even more toxic community than our den??!!

So you're saying you dislike gays, lesbians, and trans people simply because of how a select few of them act? That doesn't seem fair.

amazing.. literally every one of those points and "facts" you brought up are blatantly wrong. quick question, how much crack do you smoke daily?

If I may throw in my two cents: You seem to be really focused on the only discrimination you faced by a few people of the LGBT community, or specifically the extremist part of the community that most
of us actually oppose, and disagree with their tactics. You didn't mention any of the other discriminations within the community outside of what affected you. EVERY single person in the LGBT community
has faced discrimination from another person in the community, ironically to your point, trans people face the worst of it. Which also may be the reason they are pushed to such extremism, with people
so quick to not support them over ill actions from trans people they don't even know.

I am also someone who identifies as bisexual, I lean on one side and it often leads to me being treated differently. Trans people have gotten mad if my gender preference doesn't fall to them, gay
people get mad that I'm not just "fully gay", straight people get mad because you "can't have both", lesbians get mad because sometime's there's a rivalry between gays/lesbians. People are just angry,
all over the board, every group has the angries. Punishing all LGBT folks because of the actions of a few is very silly I think, imagine if we did that with any other kind of group. Watch out for
white men in their 20-30s, a few of them were serial killers so I don't support them any more.

I did NOT say I dislike gays, lesbians and trans people, You are blatantly trying to twist my words. One of my statements is literally pointing out a situation in which LESBIANS WERE THE VICTIMS. If I
hated lesbians why the fuck would I point it out!

These aren't isolated incidents. They USED to be isolated incidents. They're growing more frequent and incase hadn't noticed, there are people starting to turn against them. More each of these
responses seem to have ignored the point I was making to attack me instead (gee I wonder if that might be my fucking POINT)

Not everyone is turning off the LGBT community train because of outside "anti-LGBT" individuals. It's literally shit that people are experiencing INSIDE THE FUCKING COMMUNITY that is turning people
away. Jezus why the fuck do I need to spell that out. Oh. Right. because you tried to claim I hated gays, lesbians and trans people even though one of my points literally is trying to point out
victimization OF LESIBANS.

I'm heterostraight and I feel sort of discriminated when people draw hot vore porn with male characters because I find it harder to get off to male vore than to... mnnnfff... *drools*.... girl vore.

The best way to get into a fetish is to mix it with fetish we already know.
If you can't masturbate on men, search for womens. There's Ziravore, FidchellVore, etc.

Some male on male vore pics are just too hot, but when I look at those I can not avoid thinking "this would be 400$ better if at least one of those two characters was a gurl"

Then search for girl vore pics. They exists. Search the names I gave you.
(Or go on my profile huehue)

>goes into profile
>not bad not bad
>mnnf

I'm reasonably happy

• Neutrality - Moderators respect the opinions of others and maintain a balanced perspective.

🤔

🤔

🤔

🤔

🤔

Baaa-baa... Oh, sorry, I thought we were being sheep :D

You obviously don't understand what's going on here.
Kabier, OP, was questioning the neutrality requirement, while the chain of thinking emoji was meant to be a jab at OP's hypocrisy. _{At least that's what I intended with my reply.}

You obviously cannot take a joke o3o

Kabier isn't allowed to comment on hypocrisy.

gr8 b8 m8

r/woooooosh

Kabier-logic: "Open discussion is good, toxicity is bad! *blocks people who call her out on acting toxic*"

Sorry I arrived too late on this but what did Kabier do?

No, let her do it at will. We need more material to laugh derisively and haughtily at in these dark times furrydom and the world are experiencing.

It's more a matter of her and her mate having extremely insufferable personalities in general and views on various things, rather than one of one or a few very major incidents. The summary is, she's a
raging untreated BPD-type case who angrily attacks people and retaliates, and expresses bigoted/questionable sentiments on various matters, but instead of realizing she's inciting so many people with
her outrageous behavior, she accuses furrydom of hating white cisgender females and basically called antifa furs pedophile enablers as she indignantly announces her withdrawal from furrydom. I've also
heard people say she's deteriorated as an artist.

TL:DR- She's a raging BPD-type who many are rightfully disgusted and angered by, but doubles down on the indignant rage and calls us all bigots and liberals or whatever in response.

Woah, that's pretty hardcore. For what I have seen in this journal, many popufurs can be mean in public and still get away with it for the sole reason of being popular. Also shows that you don't get a
ban for being rude if you are popular enough like the person you talk about.

🤔

Last time I commented on a popufur in such a way, I've officially gotten a warning from the moderators. Find it funny that this conversation here is going so well when I could make just one small
comment before I got said warning the last time... X'D

I wish I was that delusional too.

Shit... I can't fave comments. Ah well.

I wish I could favorite them as well.
Alas, Furaffinity will never get out of the stone age.

If only...

no

That's rich coming from you.

Heyo

Shit call 999 we got a serious burn here

No survivors

Get a load of this goy.

hi have I mentioned that I love you lately?

so i guess you're clearly not qualified

ITT: niggas goin' HAM

Hello, furry police? I’d like to report a murder.

Oof!!

ITS GETTING SPICY UP IN HERE

Lmao go away normie

Maybe if people didn't mention their political opinion there wouldn't be a problem. FA needs a "no politics" rule because we are in this shitstorm because some people decided it was a good idea to
broadcast their political preferences on a site that isn't about politics to begin with

Agreed!

Some people outed themselves on their own volition and they get upset about others not being tolerant to them when politics and religion are very sensitive issues that can easily devolve into conflict
which is why it's wise never to talk about them.

Generally a "no politics or religion" rule actually just means "no christians or conservatives"

If you are willing to believe that there's a problem because this policy isn't supposed to favor one side contrary to what you are assuming

No, but I wasn't born yesterday either lol

If you are willing to believe "no politics or religion" means "no conservatives or christians" doesn't that make you sound like a right wing version of an sjw who constantly believes they are being
oppressed?

Well I suppose I'd have to be right wing and christian first wouldn't I? I've been on the internet since before you were born, I'm pretty well aware of what that rule means in places like this.

you sounded like that when you put up that comment but when I say "no politics or religion" that literally would mean all mention of politics (democrat, republican, etc) except fictional political
parties which are not to be made would be forbidden on the site. The same with religion (every single one including atheism) but one thing I didn't mention is religion has ironically been the more
civil of the two from what I saw.

So it would be a ban on all mentions of politics and religion except in cases that are fiction because some people are worldbuilders and I tend to fall in that category myself despite not posting
much.

so while I wasn't specific on what I meant I literally mean what I am saying

Problem is the administration have already shown a bias, admitted to said bias, but still claims to be handling things neutrally, even though he defends a group labeled a terrorist organization. Sadly
this means, if we're being completely honest and taking past actions by the administration into account? 'no politics or religion' policy will be cherry picked as to who it is enforced on. leaving
people who say things like "Christians are complete scum" alone, while people saying "I don't wanna draw gay characters because it's a bit weird with my religious leanings" will be banned.


I will use the sonic rule as an example. Sonic characters (except for blatantly underage ones, like cream) are supposed to be fine on the site. except the site has a yearly "purge" where moderators
start banning sonic artists for 'underage' content even though the characters have, repeatedly, been stated to be fair and allowed on the site.

You do have a point there. We do need more moderators though because not all trouble tickets are getting processed quickly

Thing is they constantly claim every time that it'll help with how quickly trouble tickets get answered. But it almost seems like it's just bait with how things go. Plus I've been saying for a while
now that they need to show who the actual admins are again and not hide them under fake accounts.

I do agree with that sentiment regarding admins needing to be held accountable

Howzabout people being able to talk about whatever they want without being dicks?

Yeah, I know, that would be too much to ask...

That's impossible to enforce

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

It'd also be nice if there was a, "No posting everything you hate on your main page."
Always nice to see amazingly welcoming people ( sarcasm )

How to prove a point in one quote 🤔

Funny how YOU of all people point this out.

HA.
No room.

Let's just get some "anonymous sources" we can prove anything we want with that!

As if YOU of all people have a right to criticise them for how they act. Ahahahahaha. What a joke.

Oh look who crawled out of his depths to complain about something they have no right to complain about anymore.
I swear you take every single chance to make anything possible about you even if you're being an absolute hypocrite in the process.
I'm actually surprised anyone takes the two of you seriously anymore after the mountain of shit thats come from both your mouths.

Excuse my ignorance but... what happened?

Eh, besides being a talentless hack with an ego bigger than his girth, I believe he said the n-word on Twitter once?

Too be fair, it’s not hard to have an ego bigger than his girth, even when hard.

There's not enough time in the day to explain everything wrong with these two. Google is your friend.

I googled it all. Dark stuff. Disturbing stuff. I need to wash my eyes.

Coming from the guy who screams the n-word casually and brings up anti-trans propaganda? Hmmmm.

"How dare you insinuate FA isn't bipartisan, you Nazi Racist Transphobic Sexist piece of shit!"

Gee wiz I wonder why people have an issue with moderation. FA is 15 years behind because that is the kind of behavior that gets attention.

If you actually gave a damn about improving this platform, you wouldn't be trying to strawman every Popufur that dares challenge the status quo. Hunting for racist bigots? Look to yourself first
before projecting on others.

deactivate iguana

deactivate iguana

deactivate iguana

deactivate iguana

deactivate iguana

What’s with the “deactivate iguana” comments?

That would make sense if we saw many popufurs being chasen for that same reason. But in this journal the only one is you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc917wPX1x8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCvC4_6zkrs

Careful where you spin that porn yo

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA no
Don't even try to think you have any sway on this site buddy

I sincerely believe you and Kabier have behavioral and political dispositions which are extremely compatible and congruent with AltFurry- specifically, Len + Blumiere's branch of it. I'm surprised you
two haven't joined, yet. Furry Raiders are also an option. Foxler and Kabier could confer on the finer points of furry bestiality porn, and argue over why Kabier is morally superior to Foxler and
other cubfurs despite sexualizing characters possessing the estimated human intelligence of a small toddler.

Being Classical Liberal is Altfurry now? There's good reason the sites in the state it's in. Same reason there's an hysteria over Nazis. Politics takes priority over common sense.

When you lack any competency or integrity, resort to calling everyone slightly less left than you a threat to your existence. Considering mods already use their questionable authority to 'identify
ties to hate groups'. I myself have had imposters pose as me on Telegram trying to manipulate the new rules into false flags.

Complaints are completely warranted. FA decided that it's their obligation to enforce political bias when it's a task no other company has been able to control effectively. They either need to be
consistent and ban those promoting Antifa, or ignore politics entirely and stick to cases of direct harassment by individuals.

Here we go again.

Dude, there is no "left" in the United States. The republican party is rightwing, a little more on the far rightwing spectrum. The democratic party is rightwing as well, with a very slight leaning
towards center. None of the two are even remotely close to the leftwing ideas. And those guys you're so scared from, the Antifa, they aren't leftists. On any truly left-y country, the american Antifa
guys would be perceived as what they truly are: rightwingers who only agree on TRIVIAL subjects with the left, while not in the crucial aspects that separate the left from the right.

Basically, you're scared of a ghost, a delusion, an inexistent thing. Please reconsider your life and stop watching Infowars/Fox News/the TV in general.

You have little to no comprehension of politics if you believe there is no such thing as progressive policy.

Do yourself a favor and complete this Test. Educate yourself in just how many variables are at play when determining someones affiliation.

Hahaha you're funny, because you have only proven to be completely oblivious of your country's political situation. The democratic and the republican party only pretend to have fights on rather
trivial subjects such as the bathroom thing for transgenders, while they largely agree on the crucial subjects such as the military budget, foreign policy, etc. The antifa, pawns of the democratic
party, are people with rightwing beliefs. Should the antifa really wanted to defend leftist ideas, they wouldn't protest for the ridiculous stuff they currently do and they would rather protest to
defend the rights of the workers. In the same manner, the dems would rather fight to eliminate lobbying so the big decisions could be back on the hands of the average people based on democracy and not
in the massive bribes of the rich people; if the democratic party truly had any leftist thing in their rightwing agenda, they would legislate to provide american people free medical care like in, you
know, any normal first world country. But no, they rather obey the commands of big companies. And a large etcetera.

So, kiddo, stop watching Infowars and actually try to read a book on basic politics.

> you have only proven to be completely oblivious of your country's political situation

You do realize I'm Australian/Canadian, right? Do you think the only people that call out the left are American?

You aren't offering any new revelation with your rhetoric. Both parties are mostly centrist and pander to their core demographics, what a surprise. Hillary lost favor pushing too hard towards
feminism, hoping the sexual assault allegations were something the majority of Americans care about.

Antifa are favored because to do otherwise would harm the image of the Democratic party. Ofcourse they are a bunch of militant thugs with zero self awareness. Fighting against 'Nazis' while promoting
National Socialist values. The 'Nazis' really being anyone associated with Capitalism or Liberty.

Intellectuals don't resort to straw-man tactics when attempting a rebuttal FYI. I have little faith you can even read comments, let alone a book if you think I'm right-wing/conservative.

Incorrectly labeling the Antifa as "left" is a mistake common to americans, but you have proven people from other countries can be wrong as well!



Dude, you watch too much TV. The real reason Hillary lost was because Trump promised the american army much more budget than they could have ever had with Hillary, and, to a lesser degree, from a wave
of angry voters who felt themselves betrayed by the administration of Obama. Feminism would be at the 100th or 200th reason as to why she didn't win, LOL.



Omg. The levels of ignorance in that sentence are colossal. Dude, where to begin with. Every single person in the Democratic party is a firm supporter not only of capitalism but also of american
imperialism as every single damn person in the Democratic party has supported fabricated wars in order to obtain the geopolitical control of oil in other countries; the dems have as well supported
financial wars and financial blockage against truly leftist countries such as Cuba, Venezuela and China. Not a single person in the Democratic party or the Antifa is against capitalism because they
are financed by the very companies and institutions that represent capitalism such as Amazon, Blackrock and Exxon Mobil. DUDE, STOP WATCHING TV LOL




It's ironic you say that because you resort to straw-man tactics all the time to attack your fellow Antifa brothers. Yes, I said your fellow Antifa brothers, because you both share the same rightwing
ideology with only slightly different and irrelevant opinions on trivial subjects. One day one lesson boy: being leftwing or rightwing has more to do with crucial economic politics and less about
your personal taste on irrelevant topics such as your views on transgender people.

Doubling-down isn't giving your credibility any favors there bud. You claim Antifa is pro-capitalism, despite walking around waving hammer and sickles. The same Antifa that anytime they are given an
opportunity to speak, praise the ideals of a communism Utopia.

Your military budget/war/oil rhetoric is dated, like Bush election dated. Clearly politics has moved on past you and you are lost and confused as to where you're meant to lay your allegiance.


I haven't watched TV in 8 years. Again, desperate straw-man to dismiss rebuttals you can't handle. The Democratic party has done all it can to pander to victims and socialists, to claim otherwise is
cognitive blindness. Want capitalistic values? Vote Trump.

Little more then a contrarian trying to buck all trends to appear relevant. If you are just going to invent your own personal truths, no reason to debate you.

Oh look, someone learned how to use the quote command. Too bad it took you days lol.



Surprise surprise, people lie about their actions all the time. Just like the american army lies about bringing "freedom" to Middle Easter countries when they actually only bring them bombs and
genocide, the antifa -along with the democratic party- wears "muh leftism" shirts while performing rightwing actions. Like I said before, do you even look at the kind of stuff the Democratic party
vote for during legislation sessions? Of course you don't, lol. You have no idea whatsoever about their agenda, you only look at TV and believe every word about what they say.




Hahahaha. You literally have not even the slightest idea of what is going on with the world right now. The current fight between Trump and Merkel is because of oil (namely, the Nord Stream 2
oleoduct), the fight between Iran and Israel is because of the natural gas and oil reserves of the sea that is in between, even the fight on NAFTA Trump had with Mexico was 100% about oil being
included in the treatise.

But your ignorance goes beyond that. You imply that the military budget is no longer relevant to politics. Oh you, its clear you are not even aware what is the economic sector that takes the largest
chunk of federal budget in the whole world.



It rather looks like you watch TV every 5 minutes dude



Like I said, you are not even aware of the kind of economic strategies that get voted in the american senate. The big economic and financial decisions, those get support from both parties. Want
capitalistic values? Just vote, because in that regard, dems and reps have the very same financial agenda.



This is not a debate, I'm merely talking to someone who is uncapable of logical reasoning.

Oh the hypocrisy...

Anyone smell something burning?

lol too bad you don't qualify at all for that! transphobe piece of shit

🤔

How’s your dog doing?

HEEEY-OOOO

Sure. Idk if I want to be an Mod, but Ill submit an application anyway

Ahahahah. Good luck, you think that people who like vore should get a bullet in the head, you're totally qualified.

Do I know you? Besides, Its likely I wont get the position and I dont care

• Have good and respectful communication.

Well darn...

Looks like that one's in the dumper...

Hard no.

sure why not im bored

_{Fix up the crew you already have though.}

This.

Well said~

I dunno, man. If you polish a turd, is still a turd. Better to flush it while you can.

is this a job or just volunteering?

This is the Fall 2018 application form for the volunteer role of Moderator on the Fur Affinity website.

How much time would a moderator need to dedicate to FA throughout the day to be considered active? Checking in once per hour? Maybe once in the morning and evening? I assume daily is a must but am
unsure about the specifics.

Yeah, I'd like to know about this too. :o

Per the app: 10 hours a week is ideal.

never mind i dont care

Nope.

you really gotta focus on the neutral point this time

Despacito

Big mood

Nice to see commenting enabled again.

I want to daydream that when a journal gets posted on this account, the FA staff gathers across a round table and asks: "If we enable comments, is there anything here which the peasants may criticize
and point our flaws out to us? Please let us assess the risks..."

Is this volunteer work or is it paid?

Volunteer

Things that won't happen.

I'm glad you pointed out that they have to remain neutral. I was worried somebody might disobey that rule and just go with the human instinct of partiality but there it is, in writing, protecting us
all.

Lol under-rated comment right here

Some of the comments to this journal really make me rub my temples.

Unfortunately stupidity never goes out of style.

Definitely hoping to do some good! I'm interested!

Nice but I think you missed a crucial entry for "Best Moderator Traits":

• Have a detective's degree or investigative training, in order to skillfully research the ages of fictional characters across the internet, so that we may more effectively persecute artists when
we're ideologically offended by the porn they draw.

If you're accusing someone of drawing loli/child porn, YOU'RE supposed to provide the proof, last I checked. XD

I had proof when I reported such porn. The character in the picture was an anime character that was 15 years old - pictured was a sexual interaction with another, adult, character. Hell, even the tags
showed that the artist didn't make said char older, nor did the description say that they did. Guess what? It's still up! :) Why? Because the person who checked the trouble ticket said it's cool. ^v^

The fictional 15-year-old was probably happy, though, so you should have left well enough alone and not bothered.

Yeah, let's just put that under a little blanket of "fiction" so the child porn can stay on here, great! :D /sarcasm

No wonder that people think furries are all pedophiles.

It would be easier for the artist to just not draw children in porn.

LMAO I mean you'd fuckin think, right? but that's just way too difficult for some people!