Kirolos Kelada GCPT Chem 1P- Blake Final Review Packet UCI GENERAL CHEMISTRY DEPARTMENT PEER TUTORING REVIEW SESSION FEEDBACK EVALUATION Quarter Fall2015 Date Class Circle One Midterm Review Final Review Tutors’ Names Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree or Disagree Agree Strongly Agree This review was interactive and engaging Comments Audience participation was encouraged. Comments The presentation volume was acceptable. Comments The presentation was visually clear and logically organized. Comments The review increased your confidence in taking your exam. Comments The quality of the review packet was excellent. Comments ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS What worked best? What would you like to see next time? What could be improved? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Tutor #1: Tutor #2: Tutor#3: Final Review Packet
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
Kirolos Kelada GCPT Chem 1P- Blake Final Review Packet 1- The formula for sodium tungstate is Na 2 WO 4 . Knowing that what would you expect the formula for calcium tungstate to be? Briefly explain how you can figure it out. CaWO 4 . From the given formula, we learn that tungstate is WO 4 2 - , since Na ions are (predictably) 1+. Ca ions are 2+, so it takes only one of them to balance the tungstate ion. 2- Balance the following equation: B 2 O 3 (s) + 6 HF (l) 2 BF 3 (g) + 3 H 2 O (l) 3- Consider the element with electron configuration 1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 3s 2 3p 5 .
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
- Fall '01
- Tobias
- Chemistry, Ion, Final Review Packet, Chem 1P- Blake, Kirolos Kelada, GCPT Chem 1P
