Every single person I've talked to engaged in this has been very clear that it's a roleplay element in a relationship between two consenting adults, not a sexual attraction to children.
-
to clarify: i couldn’t give less of a shit what two adults do if it’s between THEM and them ALONE. but putting that kind of thing out in public is dangerous
even something as small as a link to your f-list contributes to that sort of awful culture
-
-
"They’re still getting off from the thought of being a toddler in a sexual situation" isn't pedophilia, though. The difference literally is that both people are adults and capable of consent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no actual children are involved, either in the mental state or in actual reality, the focus is on becoming childlike. and even then, the vast majority of people are most likely non sexual "adult babies" anyway. or diaper lovers, which are fixated on the garments
-
just because it doesn’t involve the act of having sex doesn’t mean it’s not sexual
-
i don’t have very much actual argument material besides my own emotions so i think i’ll try and end this here
-
To be clear, I'd like to think we're not having an argument but a discussion.
-
i’m not entirely clear on the what the difference is, but i agree
-
Discussions are people talking about an issue. Arguments, at least to me, are people being adversarial about it and trying to "win."
-
ah I see.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but this is where you're wrong, because sexual infantilism isn't an attraction to children. it's an attraction to being childlike or being treated like a baby, which might SOUND similar but is completely different it's a shame that you're arguing about something you have no idea
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.