And this is supposedly... zoosadism? Someone doing something with a male dog that, if that someone were a vet (or vet tech) would be recognized as entirely harmless (indeed, pleasurable) for the dog? That's it - really? Fuck's sake. Just... wow.
-
Evidence? Not doubting what you're saying... but still stuck on the "can anybody authenticate" issue.
Is there a route to technical verification of the logs? Not sure what that'd be, honestly, but asking nevertheless.
-
-
If there's real evil here, then it's vastly more important to focus on objective, verifiable evidence as that's what allows for actually empowers action.
- Tweet unavailable
-
Is there non-text evidence on the others, then?
- Tweet unavailable
-
Is that evidence available for public verification, or (for whatever reason) solely privately-held?
- Tweet unavailable
-
Reviewing - thanks.
-
For reference: # sha1sum Zoosadism\ Channel\ Export.rar 3a55772723e8ebfca090fb26cfb6a067b6c4f50a Zoosadism Channel Export.rar
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In some cases, it's possible to start with genuine logs - extensive/voluminous - and, for example, modify a few dozen entries here & there that change the entire tone of the archive. That's what the .ru troll-farms (IRA) did w/ 2016 DNC email dumps (& elsewhere). Very effective.
-
Which, unfortunately, the possibility of such pinpoint edits being done can negate the probative value of an *entire* unverifiable (via hash fingerprint, etc.) archive - frustrating, often, however in the nature of text-only materials.
-
Such edits can, technically, be done to photo & video materials, as well: video edits are still moderately complex/expensive; however, photo edits can & do happen fairly routinely. Forensic tools exist to identify such edits; however, masking techniques exist to fool those, &c.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed wrt active and ongoing chats - although someone could still say that it was all "just talk?"
- Tweet unavailable
-
Assuming the logs are non-altered (which seems justified, from what you say), then it is true that even "just talk" about such things is profoundly troubling: although it's not, in & of itself, evidence of action it *is* an enormous, screaming red flag - that's a very real fact.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Again, agreed - altering such materials would be significantly complex and expensive - highly unlikely in this context.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.