Many people are talking about the chat logs when there are other proofs available. The top image in each section is from the leaks, bottom is from a video Kero himself has taken. Also before you tell me neither are his, take a look at the last picture.pic.twitter.com/DMmUbaafuA
-
-
Ive coverd my assets, and i doubt someone who sane would attempt-to assault someone with both governmental ties and is a strong believer in protecting the second amendment and constitution.
#oldfaithful#donttreadonme#istandwiththelaw -
Honestly, the way you are talking makes me believe you have something to hide. Especially since you've "covered your assets" whatever that means. The internet is forever, baby, archives of everything exists. I'll find it. Also lol, you can't shoot me through the screen.
-
Lol, ok buddy you do you, i can only represent myself,
-
We're doing us thanks. What are you doing to combat this?
-
Please don’t miss judge my aggressive nature, i lost a close family member to online harassment and suicide. So it is only in my intreats to see that things are delt with professionally. I have no quals of the outcome. I just ask for “fair play”
-
I understand completely. I'm just trying to make the fandom a better place and to make sure the animals that have been effected get the justice they deserve. I may argue people on the internet on this account, but I don't hate anyone. I just want to do my part.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can’t say i agree with not pursuing charges against certain individuals right now, nor do i agree that continuation of blasting opinions claimed “facts” with out a legal foot will go unnoticed...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is confusing to think why someone “if was guilty” wouldn’t immediately start playing the blame game and suing certain individuals . (Like they can, right now...) instead is stating they wants stay in this very toxic fandom? And regrow...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
list of things that the accused could do right now based on what was posted is quite long. Regardless of who’s to blame or whos guilty, I’m sure there a few blood sucking lawyers no offense intended who would would love to take on “any” Of these post for a very reasonable price.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4) this can happen anytime even if guilty , usually up to the 5-10 years after the fact depending on states: the accused files against the individuals involved both “directly and indirectly” for defaming, threats of violence, slander, false federal incrimination,...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3) a confirmed “statement” made by the accused that they have committed (any/or/&/all crime(s) “yes it must be a crime......”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2) it doesn’t reach court because claims made against the accused cannot be considered evidence or fact/ or the source list of the claims verified by an “original source” aka the person who started these post.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) it goes to court and the defense in court, must justify the claims only after the prosecution as verified any and all evidence they themselves are accountable for finding.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tweeting/ is a legal form of documentation that is binding if used in a court of law against individuals with malicious intent of slander/ liable wording. Also why “if” someone “stand up for the fandom and choose represent these claims” 1 of at least two things will happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, makeing a claim that “fact” but using other people’s information without du process is slander and liable” why i suggest the choice of word more formally......
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
... from my experience having to make a statement in court” sadly it does” if the statements of the accusations doesn’t match the person who cited it, “ who found it in the first place” it would br 9/10 be thrown out as not fact in court.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.