A convicted animal rapist has created a blocklist for those against zoophilia, not realizing that he will end up with 95% of Twitter blocked. Like/RT if you want to be on the blocklist! I'm proud to be the 3rd user blocked! https://blocktogether.org/show-blocks/CNtT8y7r07AnnOuAqtJKHQPcvvJq7gGwM7BpA3IX … Block away. Save us the time.
-
-
I'm not trying to change your mind or say you're wrong. You can believe what you want, but to label people with such a hateful attitude and view point is so backwards, and not what I would expect from the furry community or people in 2018.
-
My bud, that's not what the word "hate" means. Rejecting apologism for bad things is having a standard. Instead of white knighting for bad things for no reason, at least bring a real cause instead of empty rhetorical hairsplitting. Please also spare us mere whinging in reply too.
-
If you're idea of "zoophilia" involves showering a pet with gifts, pampering, and nonsexual affection, I might buy it. But if someone is getting off or touching a critter's no-no zone, that's no good. Seek professional help.
-
And please excuse me for that offensive grammatical error
-
If your getting off to touching then it's classed as bestiality. There's having a thought and acting on that thought, acting on the thought is wrong and is abuse but you cant police people's thoughts
-
Fake hairsplitting, no functional difference. If it was a mere "thought" it wouldn't be up for discussion because nobody is psychic. Abuse apologism is pretty bad my bud.
-
It's the same as MAPs in my mind.
-
I agree it's bad and wrong but without someone posing a counter statement the whole thing does not engage and and get people talking, I mean what would be the point in debating against an empty seat in a courtroom?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.