Nope he implied that Kurdish people were divided by imperial powers in order to use after a century. Divide & rule game turned out to be unite & rule game for Kurds.
Wait did @DailySabah just implicitly criticize Sykes-Picot for not creating an independent Kurdistan? https://www.dailysabah.com/columns/ataman-muhittin/2018/11/14/world-war-i-never-ended-in-the-middle-east …pic.twitter.com/gy9odRjvHu
-
-
-
And the alternative to the imperial powers dividing Kurdistan would have been?
-
Occupation under one single Turkish state I would venture to guess.
-
Yeah I guess that should have been obvious
-
Imperial division of Kurdistan = bad Imperial Turkish rule over all of Kurdistan (and as far beyond as possible) = good
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.