Speaking of the Tower of Babel.....

Why did God say "Let US go down there and confound their language"? He used the plural form of the word. Is God plural? Are there more than one of him? Does he function as a collective? Why use the term "US" instead of "ME" or "I"?

Also -- God interfered with human development by confounding our languages. He says that he gave us free will so we can make our own choices. But, then he messes with us and interferes in our development. In fact, He even said: "Nothing they imagine will be impossible for them". That sounds pretty good, right? Anything we can imagine, we can accomplish! Why would he want to stop that? Why would he circumvent our free will and prevent us from accomplishing anything we imagined doing?

Who's side is he on?

Bingo. Human consciousness is literally indestructible and is the source of everything. "I think, therefore I am"

15006089? wrote:

Think Truman Show.

Only on a larger scale.

Someone or something owns earth. They deceive you to think you live on an all natural planet spinning in a vast nothingness. They trick you into thinking you are moving instead of the sun moving ahead because otherwise you would realize the scale of everything is off.

When animals know they are caged they don't act natural.

Regarding the simulation theory that you are effectively describing above, see the following 4:45 min:sec video, which is part of a speech that science-fiction author and nonfiction essayist Philip K. Dick gave at the second Festival International de la Science-Fiction de Metz, France in September 1977. I couldn't find the full video of this speech.

• "Philip K Dick Speech Excerpts", Revlin ( archive.org/details/@revlin ), June 3, 2011, https://archive.org/details/PhilipKDickSpeechExcerpts . Mirror: "Philip K. Dick Discloses Real Matrix in 1977 ?!.flv", sammysmithazt, Apr. 10, 2012, youtube.com/watch?v=fTgxF2F9cIc . Mirror: "Philip K Dick exposes the matrix in 1977!", David Saoirse ( youtube.com/user/chaosismyonlyname ), Oct. 21, 2012, youtube.com/watch?v=owYMqhoZkn0 .

The full text of the speech was published as the nonfiction article "If You Find This World Bad, You Should See Some of the Others", pp. 147-165 of the following work:

• Philip K. Dick, edited and "Introduction" by Lawrence Sutin, The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick: Selected Literary and Philosophical Writings (New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1995), ISBN 0679426442, LCCN 94027812, bit.ly/2QGyiaI , https://webcitation.org/71hvTWRtL , http://www.freezepage.com/1534397720HOBKOBFKWE .

Some of what Dick writes about in the above is correct, such as the pantheism of God (more exactingly, panentheism); and the existence of parallel universes. As the world's leading quantum physicist and inventor of the quantum computer (being the first person to mathematically formulate how such a device operates) Prof. David Deutsch has pointed out, there has actually only ever been one interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, and that is the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI): all other supposed "interpretations" of Quantum Mechanics are simply failed attempts to avoid the MWI. The parallel universes of Quantum Mechanics really do exist.

And the below is an excellent lecture by neuroscientist Dr. Sam Harris, one of the main leaders of the New Atheist movement, at a June 2016 TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) conference.

• "Can we build AI without losing control over it? | Sam Harris", TED ( youtube.com/user/TEDtalksDirector ), Oct. 19, 2016, youtube.com/watch?v=8nt3edWLgIg , https://www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_can_we_build_ai_without_losing_control_over_it .

As Dr. Harris points out, unless there is something literally magical about the operations of our brains, then it is a purely physical process that can be replicated via advanced-enough technology. Harris further points out that given any rate of progress, it is inevitable that superintelligent godlike machines will one day be constructed. So Harris believes in the existence of gods, it's just that he knows--as do I--that they exist in the future; and the not-so-distant future, at that. Therefore we come to the ironic insight that materialistic atheism, consistently applied, unavoidably results in theism. Consistent atheism turns out to be theism.

⁂

Regarding the Dickian simulation theory, it could well be the case that we are in a computer simulation being run by a highly-advanced society. However, there would be no possible tests that we could perform that would reveal that to us unless said society wished to disclose their existence. This Dickian hypothesis is actually a variation on the Gnostic heresy.

However, I would think that a superhuman society would create a far more pleasant simulation. If they were malicious--and for various reasons that I've gone over elsewhere, I don't believe they could be--they would certainly be capable of creating a reality far more horrific than this one, bad as this world can be at various times and places.

Rather, the world appears to be more or less what I would expect it to be like if humans are naturally-evolved apes. In a certain very real sense, humans are trapped in a computer simulation: that of their mental programs operating on the wet-computer of the human brain. Humans are trapped in the matrix of bad ideas. Almost all of the main societal problems are due to false and destructive ideas.

For the evolutionary psychological details as to what the demons/aliens actually are, see my following article:

• James Redford, "Societal Sadomasochism", Daily Anarchist Forum, May 29, 2018, https://megalodon.jp/2018-0610-0734-14/dailyanarchist.com/forum/index.php?topic=3289.0 , https://archive.is/QalJT , https://web.archive.org/web/20180609221637/https://dailyanarchist.com/forum/index.php?topic=3289.0 .

⁂

Now here comes one of the strangest creations ever published, by one of the strangest people who ever lived. Edgar Allan Poe considered his following nonfiction book to be his magnum opus--and he was quite correct in considering it so.

• Edgar A. Poe, Eureka: A Prose Poem (New York: Geo. P. Putnam, 1848), https://archive.org/details/eurekaprosepoem00poeerich , https://archive.org/download/eurekaprosepoem00poeerich/eurekaprosepoem00poeerich.djvu , https://webcitation.org/6AdUPRmzN .

(The best format to get the above book is DJVU, although it is also available in PDF at the first link. DJVU files can be viewed with the free and open-source, cross-platform program DjView: http://djvu.sourceforge.net/djview4.html .)

In his above book, Poe gives an excellent description of essentially the entire Tiplerian Omega Point cosmology, from its Big Bang beginning to its Big Crunch end. Poe describes the universe starting at a "primordial Partictle" (i.e., an atom in the ancient Greek sense of indivisible unity), then expanding and evolving, and then collapsing into Godhead and unity in a state of infinite complexity. I wonder if Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was influenced by Poe, since Poe was very popular in France.

Throughout the book, Poe is at pains in attempting to describe the 3-sphere topology of the universe, but doesn't possess the technical mathematical terminology. On p. 29, he describes creation from nothing. On p. 100, he solves Olbers's Paradox. On pp. 102-103, he describes the parallel universes of Quantum Mechanics, i.e., the multiverse. On p. 117, he even gives an accurate summation of Special Relativity, that "Space and Duration are one." That is, space and time are actually different aspects of the same thing, i.e., spacetime. On pp. 84 and 122-123, he speaks of the existence of nonluminus stars--what are nowadays called neutron stars and black holes. Indeed, on pp. 122-123, he predicts the existence of a giant nonluminous star at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. And that is just a few of the surprising gems to be found throughout this work. Poe isn't completely correct in everything he presents here, though he gets far, far more correct than wrong, and all his major conclusions are correct.

Poe knew that he would be laughed-at and derided in presenting this information--that he would be thought of as quite mad. Yet Poe also had not the slightest doubt that he would get the last laugh in the end. And Poe was right. How did Poe know? In publishing this work, Poe presented to mankind a deep riddle, a preposterous enigma. The commonly-credited inventor of the detective genre wrote a real-life nonfiction mystery for mankind to unriddle.

For much more on physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:

• James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .

Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.

• James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com , July 30, 2013, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo , https://archive.is/a04w9 .

What are you worried about? You either have faith or you don't. Either way you ain't getting out of the earth "cage" alive. Change your perspective and live for God with faith or don't bother because without God it's all meaningless. There's definitely evil so why not believe in God? You just want to believe in evil?

Jesus... are you going to start going on about the "Flat Earth"? Facepalm

Truth is easily deciphered without any sources, we can think, therefore we can figure the truth out on our own. Problem is most people's minds have been thoroughly convoluted with useless information.

Well thank you for this one. Adding this to my repertoire

Welcome aboard fren. Glad to have you. YOU ARE the answer of how we start to unravel all this mess! One red pill at a time. I been at it since the early 90's, I've never seen so much progress as in the last few years! Even on 8chan many are resistant to some of the topics with tons of evidence, but still stuck with the conspiracy label. (aliens lol) The giggle factor is real, a natural reaction, and deeply programed into us ALL by "society". Once you get into any single topic though, you begin to find out it has many different angles to it, some are bunk, but often multiple view points have obvious evidence ("proof" is a myth IMO). Remember what Obi-won told Luke "What I told you is true,...from a certain point of view." From society's view point, we are all crazy here, we know different, but from their certain point of view, they are to some extent correct. However with each new red pilled mind it makes it that much easier for the next guy to "get it". Google "The 100th monkey effect" to see how it works. Even Q dropped us a hint about this very topic "hive mind". Carl Jung's material is a great resource about it. "No man is an island" indeed. Also I think Q means this same thing when he says "WWG1WGA". (Just a theory, lol)

Asking important questions is a start. For example: why do we use cash currency, and who benefits from this?