"I'm sure you have heard of grooming" Adults can't groom adults. If you have a problem with grooming, get loud and angry that FA allows 13 year olds onto a fucking fetish site. I want them to change it to 18, but apparently everyone else is perfectly fine letting 13 year olds ---
-
-
Replying to @PeterFunbun @Tanookicatoon
--- openly join the most popular furry porn site, because "lol they aren't allowed to view porn!" How about remove the fucking RL kids, instead of trying to terrorize the people who do innocuous things like block you.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @PeterFunbun
You're entire little rant here was kinda moot, since I pretty much answered every point in my response in the photo. Sorry I'm mean to pedos. They don't belong in this fandom, and should be shunned as much as the Nazifurs are.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
You've implied multiple times that people are pedos for blocking you, ridiculous. You haven't addressed half the things I pointed out. You are brushing it aside.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PeterFunbun
I actually have never done that. People have been spreading that lie around because it sounds nice as a thing against me. If you block me, It means you don't like me. hang on one minute or two while I go through the rest of your post.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
Well, thats a given. Sorry Im not nice to pedos. The lists I've made dont include people that have blocked me. The lists only include people that have openly created cub porn, openly support it, or openly support people who make said content. Blocking me has Nothing to do with.pic.twitter.com/LPA5I3qmDl
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
The only reason they should be afraid of being caught, is if they had something to be caught for. Which basically means they shouldn't be doing it in the first place. Admins literally told me, "we dont act, unless you report it" Here I am.pic.twitter.com/6pLKu7zIJ5
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
Again, Im ONLY reporting NSFW cubs. Vore has NOTHING to do with it. Its just a big coincidence that the loudest majority is in this big group of friends who are into vore. Again, I used to be part of said group, so I know what they're doing.pic.twitter.com/of1P5aKzFW
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
I've admitted the Shyguy9 incident was a mistake. Had they already not drawn cub porn before, and Eka's didn't have a public tagging system, that never would have happened. Continue...pic.twitter.com/rrIWwjh27L
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
As for the Fosho art. She literally titled the picture "Pedo vore" and is 100% into the whole "child predator" joke, While her friend Soto, has an inkbunny with faves filled with cub porn. Go figure why they blocked me. Sure it had nothing to do with vore or me being mean.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
Furaffinity is meant to be a furry site for everyone, not a fetish site. Eka's Portal is specifically a fetish site. They allow children on the site, so we cant have people sexualizing children out in the open like that. Simple as that.pic.twitter.com/bg6QGaM6T2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
Furry is a fetish. Ekas does NOT allow children on their site.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterFunbun
Furry is an interest. Not a fetish. Fetishes can be furry, but furry itself is not a fetish.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
So you are fine with actual children on FA? I'll keep that in mind. Furry is a fetish, and most would agree. It's disgusting we have kids snooping around that site, some even posting fetish shit like vore and straight up porn I've had to report. They shouldn't be allowed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterFunbun
Kelly Chamberline Retweeted Kelly Chamberline
Kelly Chamberline added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
Thats an opinion in response to my opinion. However, there is a fact. FA is fucking full of porn and fetishes, and we have kids on it. That should not be a thing. It even happened to me when I was 15 using fur places. lots of sexual roleplays from people that knew I was underage
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterFunbun
I've talked to them about measures on keeping the site more SFW or underaged users. I've had underaged users try to get art from me, and I reported them for it. Admins restricted access to adult content from them. Same person recently got suspended, likely for the same thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tanookicatoon
And you are fine with kids on this site full of porn. Okay. I for one, am not. It's part of why I don't heavily use FA.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterFunbun
There's measures that are meant to keep them on the SFW side of FA that have been in place for a long time now. If they choose to ignore that and fake their ages to view adult content, that should be blocked off, FA has no control over that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
FA has control over children being able to label themselves as available. You also think FA has a pedo problem. HMM? Maybe it's... bad for a place you think has pedos on it, to be able to easily access CHILDREN?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.