A Terrible Mistake: A Conversation With Collette in Exegesis & Why We As White Nationalist Men Should Forsake Our Friendship With Our White Sisters

Disclaimer: This essay is not intended to be addressed to any persons referenced in it. Rather it is addressed to the regular blogreaders of ‘The West’s Darkest Hour’, for the sake of our own moral and intellectual edification as a movement going forward.

Dear Stead,

For your information and in respect of Collette & Jon's ongoing campaign to estrange me from The Blot, please find attached my reply answering Jon's many complaints, together with copies of two of the contentious memes that I recall sending to Collette in private conversations through FB message chat, and also a link below to the blog post of my friend Cesar Tort that I most foolishly expected Collette to have sufficient intellectual rigour to both withstand and intelligently comment on.

The first meme was meant to convey my opinion of the Satanic '9 Angels' group Collette seems to support on grounds of its gynocentrism.

The second meme was meant to convey my disgust of the modern world in a conversation exactly about the modern world.

They were not "sent" in isolation and were a part and parcel of a flowing conversation in private messages. They are also what the courts would describe as "transformative", meaning that they have been transformed beyond the several purposes of the original materials in question and are therefore no longer technically "porn" in the legal sense.

Collette complained about the second meme and I therefore removed it. Collette did not complain about the first meme and simply typed "Eww". In addition I think I must have "sent" Collette hundreds of images, and I don't understand why references to these particular pictures are being dredged out of the mud now at this very late stage.

As I have already stated I sent these memes to many people in my circle of friends, obviously Collette was the only female to have received them. I broke my own rules by befriending a female and then allowed her into my comfort zone, where she should not have been in the first place. This was a mistake and I regret making it. I am prepared to take full responsibility for it, up to and including not attending anymore blots if deemed necessary.

Having said that, the fact is that Collette's 'hysteria' as you call it was most certainly not present when these exchanges took place. Indeed she kept insisting on referring to me as "Brother" Chris until very recently, and without the slightest prompting from myself.

This hysteria seems only to have materialised since Jon realised that we were having frequent private conversations, after I actually asked her to contact him to see if he would like to participate in my friend's completely legal paramilitary training course in America. I can therefore deduce that Collette has probably made herself hysterical in order to quash any notions on Jon's part that any infidelity (or thoughts of infidelity), have taken place relating to her. This therefore seems to me to be a domestic dispute into which I have unfortunately been unwittingly sucked into as the scapegoat.

As you probably know Stead, goths can get very uptight over the most trivial of suspicions, and from his previously long hair, effeminate dress and general demeanour, I'm sure that you would agree with me Stead that Jon is obviously from the goth subculture.

I've obviously made a terrible mistake in befriending a female into my inner circle against my better judgement. You can rest assured that I sincerely regret making this mistake and that it most certainly will not happen again.

Best wishes,

Chris

https://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/lycanthropy/


Dear Chris,

Thanks very much for taking the time to write to me at length. I appreciate that. I think both of us understand what has happened, as we discussed in the pub.

  My role as an acting goði is to try to bring about good relations between all our people around the flame of the Holy. So we can help one another to become better people. Amongst other things.

I want to do whatever I can to calm the waters between you and Collette and Jon. My suggestion is a two month cooling off period.  And then we can reassess.

My belief is that we must persevere in attempting to come together as a real people, comprising young and old, single men and married couples, otherwise, as individuals, we shall be displaced and scattered by those who are able to do this. This is not easy, because white people are very individualistic.  Few things worth achieving are.


Cordial regards,

Stead.

Hi Stead,

Unfortunately I don't have any means of seriously contacting either Jon or Collette anymore. They both permanently blocked me after Jon emailed me a final note, explaining that I was no longer a persona grata.

If needs be I can do without societal religious activity and simply concentrate on my political work. I'm sure that by now Jon's disassociation campaign against me has already created an atmosphere that would make it very awkward for me to be seen there again. (Especially by the females.)

On the other hand my not being there is probably not going to lend very much confidence to either [REDACTED] or [REDACTED], or perhaps even [REDACTED] and one or two others, in attending future services, so I see your predicament.

(One of the things Jon has accused me of is being an 'ISIS supporter'. I am not but [REDACTED] is apparently... If he finds out that there is huge hostility to IS supporters at the blot then he might just leave.)

Chris

Dear Chris,

Thanks for writing again.

Our common goal is to grow, to try to break the 25 attendees mark, to do what can we do to heal this misunderstanding between some of us and move forward. 

It was my suggestion, nothing stronger than that, that you sit out the next two blóts, until Collette and Jon have calmed down, because they seemed to be increasing their own worries to the point where they felt their safety was threatened, which seems to me without basis. I still regard you as a full member of the hearth. 

What you and they have said and exchanged stands outside the blóts and is a private matter, which I feel it is inappropriate for me to express any judgement on since the matter would be in the context of a relationship, which is made up of everything you and they have ever communicated to one another.

As long as people respect the liturgy and act with civility towards other attendees, there is freedom of thought and speech.

I can certainly pass on any message to either of them. It may be helpful to say something along the lines of what you said to me on Sunday.  Or it may be better just to let the dust settle for a while, I do not know. But it is your decision naturally. 

Cordial regards,


Stead


Dear Stead,

With respect to the idea of me somehow endangering a person's physical safety at the blot, I am indeed surprised and sickened that false allegations of this nature have been made against me.

If this were actually put to me in person (rather than me simply being abruptly blocked without any real explanation or mode of reply), then I would of course demand to see the evidence for such a claim. If there is any, then I do insist that it is sent along to me at the earliest opportunity, as I don't recall ever having stated anything that could even possibly amount to the effect of making promises to carry out an assault.

I have always operated under the assumption that the hypothetical discussion of violence (whether past, present or future), or groups that are or possibly have the potential to become violent, is not a criminal offence in itself, and I personally have never so much as acquired a parking ticket, despite my deep involvement with alternative politics since March 2009.

This type of allegation reminds me of our enemies The Far Left, who routinely cry for help and demand "safe spaces" from ideas. I stuck my lot in with Odinism to get away from all that, believing it to be a space of unrestrained intellectual freedom to tackle difficult issues outside of the narrow confines of Christian social ethics and morality.

The fact is that there is now a widespread Men's Rights movement sweeping The West. Some of the voices in that movement are calling for the withdrawal of male concern for women in certain spheres of life and/or in certain situations, or indeed altogether. Why should it be off limits to attempt to discuss such ideas (with those whom are apparently happy to do so), simply in order to preserve someone's ill defined, shallow and non-literal concept of 'personal safety' post facto?

To be honest I wouldn't mind attending some of the social functions either after the blots or associated with them, but as for the blots themselves I think it would be foolish of me to attend any of them where there are those present who think in SJW terms about free speech. Unless explicitly invited I won't attempt to attend anymore blots until January at the earliest.

One thing that particularly vexed me on Sunday was when another blot attendee told me that emails had been circulated by Jon & Collette (FAIP Jon), claiming that I had intentionally distributed obscene images - not as composited satire - but in order to attain some form of sexual gratification from doing so. This is obviously defamatory and outrageous, not to mention grossly hypocritical:

I don't ever recall making any public allegations of sexual harassment, after Collette screamed at people in the streets to quote "fucking breed" from a moving car window while repeatedly shouting out the word "niggers" in public, two blots ago. Nor have I even remotely considered doing so. The forces behind the British State are supposed to be our common enemy. Why exactly are we therefore adopting their own Orwellian Marxist philosophy by describing ideas expressed or argued for as vague 'threats to personal safety?'

Best wishes,

Chris


Dear Chris,

I can understand how you feel, I think, and I appreciate your frankness. Similar things have happened to me and it is not a pleasant experience.

When one is talking about emotive and sensitive subjects, especially not face to face, it is very easy for misunderstandings to occur.  It is the polar opposite of talking about the weather.  It is risky. 

Freedom of speech and freedom of thought are things we must indeed keep alive, even though misunderstandings like these may arise from time to time.

And we should also keep alive the desire to care for one another, those in our small community.  Half of the value of religion is a reason to come together regularly, I think. That is good for all of us.  And it is one of the particular issues that paganism has, that there are lots of people on their own, unconnected with the folk, and that is not healthy, nor a recipe for success.


Cordial regards,

Stead

THE FIRST BLOT

That was my exchange of emails to Stead Steadman from earlier this week. – If you wish to read the reply I refer to in the first exchange then scroll down to the end of this essay. *1

It represents my rather embarrassing and recent attempts to deal with a foolish error on my part, of attempting to make a brief religiously and politically sanctioned exception to my rule (our rule), of never befriending females.

Post 2014 when I basically became MGTOW I have only really made such exception with respect to Seana Fenner Oxford PhD – Odinist gythia from Hawaii. Seana Fenner still remains an exception, but she is not so much a “friend”, as a penpal who happens to share my particularly dark and facetious sense of humour as well as most of my political beliefs.

The fact is that I have never met Seana Fenner in person, that she is now beyond childbearing age and that like me she is a sanguine and stalwart extremist (even going so far as to agree with much of what I and Cesar Tort say and not minding the rest), goes someway to explaining why this remains so, albeit with its own ups and downs.

Last June I was invited to attend an Odinist blot in Rotherhithe by its minister Stead Steadman. Apprehensive at first, I decided to go simply in order to see if it would meet my expectations of something more than the remainder of the White Nationalist Movement’s staple spiritual diet of ‘Resistance’ Catholicism and CI.

Upon arriving at Rotherhithe Overground Station I was greeted with familiar surroundings as I had been here several times previously on business. However, the Swedish Mariners Church where the blot was being held was somewhere I wasn’t familiar with. I ended up taking a wrong turning for about 10 minutes before I realised that I had gone the wrong way, and then eventually found my way to the church.

It wasn’t much to look at. Not exactly hideously modern, but sufficiently distinctive to be recognisably a Victorian church. It was a hot day. I assumed that the door was locked and that I would have to use the communications panel on the side of the door, but upon leaning on the heavy oak door gently I found that it easily opened.

I went inside the shady hallway and saw a reception hall beyond two glass doors, but there was no one in it. Tentatively I pushed the glass doors open and found that there was a further main hall at the rear.

Entering I found various individuals, mostly men, standing around the hall, talking to one another, reading hymn sheets or just waiting in silence.

What did peak my interest was the presence of two or three females either of or close to childbearing years. One was about 25, short, brown hair, but pregnant. I spoke to her husband, he was wearing an England football shirt and seemed a pretty solid fellow although slightly delusional. However, his knowledge of The Occult and of Pagan religion did impress me. Then Stead Steadman arrived.

Soon we were all arrayed in a circle facing one another. The ceremony commenced with a strange dance around a maypole represented by the pregnant woman seated on a chair in the middle. I seem to remember that she was holding some sort of stick with a wreath of some plant attached to the end of it.

I looked around me, scanning the participants. Most of the participants as I previously mentioned were male, some were older and quite a few were younger, but the ratio of male to female was about seven or eight to one.

I noticed a short blonde woman, flabby but not fat, who obviously would have been much more attractive in her youth, and a brunet in a long flowing dress decorated with beads, who seemed just young enough to be deemed fertile. The brunet seemed to be the most emotional; grinning and basically dancing on the spot to the sing-a-long.

Then the blonde woman came up to each one of us and smeared some holy water on our foreheads as a sign of Pagan communion. I noticed a longhaired blonde hippy standing next to me with acne and a giant birthmark across his forehead, reminding me of Mikhail Gorbachev.

The next part in the ceremony involved the men taking it turns to skip around everyone else in the circle as the group sang a ritual song about a butter cake, while referring to the skipper’s name. For example ‘Chris needs a butter cake’, or something along those lines.

(After the blot I asked two Odinists what was meant by “butter cake”, but no one seemed to know.)

Then my turn came. I briefly considered signing that I wasn’t interested in that part of the ceremony, but instead opted to simply weave in and out of the people standing in the circle, - obviously without skipping. If not for this ritual’s religious licence I don’t think I would have countenanced making such a fool of myself in front of others.

When it came to the turn of the hippy standing next to me, he became so enthused that he not only skipped but as he did so leapt into the air with each skip. The beaded brunet was in stitches laughing.

At first I thought he was making a joke of it, but then after the ceremony said something similar to ‘it felt so good to skip and dance around in circles, because it felt like we were all doing it for the women’. – Sensing I was speaking to some kind of whiteknighting mangina my stomach turned slightly, and I felt a light sense of disgust and revulsion sweeping over me.

After the ceremony I wanted to test the water – or rather the fire of their convictions as Nationalists, explicit Racial Nationalism being at the centre of any religious tradition worthy of my time, – so I asked one or two of the Odinists present what they thought about Seana Fenner’s spat with Kosher Odinist minister Hilmar Hilmarsson, over Hilmarsson’s support for homosexual marriage within Odinism. The two rather young, middle class looking Odinist males I spoke too instantly seemed to become suspicious, and one of them actually reprimanded Seana for allegedly mixing politics with religion.

I explained that from Seana Fenner’s point of view politics and religion was combined, and was combined in a similar sense to how in Islam the mosque not only serves the function of a place of worship, but also as a court of law, a school, a public library, a university, a barracks, a building society and as a centre of administration. They didn’t really like that answer and simply responded by ignoring me.

Towards the end of the blot there was a social gathering with food. – Pork, beer and mead. During this small feast I learned that the beaded Brunet’s name was known to The Blot as Collette, whereas the hippy was known to The Blot as Jon.

I also met a few others at this first blot, some of whom I knew from other gatherings. Towards the end of the mini-feast alcohol had been cracked open and the conversation was being increasingly dominated by Collette.

By the end she had made us all vividly aware of the fact that she.

A. Hated Islam and Muslims with a passion.

B. Was disgusted by the Islamic practice of ‘thighing’ (whereby a Muslim male is permitted to copulate with a child of either sex in his custody under the age of six, provided that he uses the child’s thighs as a simulated vulva).

C. Hated blacks. – I had and still have no complaints about this.

D. Liked to consume alcohol.

Just looking back at this event two things strike me most about this particular experience.

1. As I write this I am currently accused by either Jon or Collette (probably Jon as Collette seems to have no independent rational thinking faculties of her own), of ‘sending’ at least two obscene images to Collette over a period of at least three months, and out of at least many dozens of other (basically benign), photos.

In reality the images in question were memes comparing our bizarre and unnatural modern age to a much saner past using images, and I will post them directly below, so that you the reader can decide whether merely sharing them in private message chats that are entirely political and not in any sense related to sex, actually justifies a religious excommunication on the grounds of the sender allegedly being a pervert for doing so.

In what sense would it be any different for me to decry Collette’s semi-public rantings against Muslims ejaculating between the legs of infants, to Collette & Jon’s total condemnation of my ironically ridiculing the modern age through simply memeing composited images intended to demonstrate historic contrasts?

The only fundamental difference I can think of is that whereas Collette graphically blurted out her opinions on such matters in front of other people at a semi-public meeting, I simply demonstrated my opinion using a meme in private messages.

So not only do “female friends” hold men at an entirely different standard than they do in respect to themselves, but whatever filth that women babble about is sacrosanct.

Whereas if you as a man comment, even in order to disparage or complain about the very thing it is that you’re commenting on, it somehow becomes an unforgivable intrusion – and not even at the moment, but later on down the line when a record of the incident is suddenly deemed useful for some ulterior purpose. And the male “friend?” – 100% expendable.

The memes in question are the sort of memes that I would send to the vast majority of my (all male) online friends, and I had already sent them to Joseph Walsh by the time they reached Collette. I obviously made a mistake, but when you’re dealing with a woman whom you are already used to seeing repeatedly rail against Islamic “thighing” in a crowded hall, it’s not always easy to predict the precise reaction.

2. As I write this, this couple are currently busily engaged in trying to have me excommunicated from this particular Odinist group (or at least this is what I am led to believe), on the grounds that my ideas (or rather ideas argued for by me), somehow constitute a physical safety issue in itself.

In what sense is this concept any different from The Left’s concept of decrying words as ‘physical attacks’ and demanding so called “safe spaces” from ideas?

Unfortunately we now see what opposition to Cultural Marxism and the extreme Left represents to most, if not practically all White Nationalist women:

They are happy to disparage blacks, labelling them “niggers” and “australopithecines” – these are direct quotes from Collette – when attempting to take refuge in White Nationalism, but at the same time are all too willing to readily utilise the linguistic and legal tools of The System for their own paranoid and selfish advantages against White Nationalist men they find they are unable to manipulate into making their views significantly conform to their own.

What does this say about White women in The Movement and what does this say about the reasons why White Nationalist men should in principle avoid White women – particularly White Nationalist women – at all costs?

The feast lasted for about just over an hour. Those who were left (Collette and Jon included), then made our way to the exit of the church. As we stood at the exit Collette approached me and almost touching my arm, said that she would like to know more about me. – Obviously a mistake on her part.

When women ask to ‘know more’ about you, that is obviously to be taken as a figure of speech from now on. Almost like saying ‘can I judge you?’

At the end of the blot I and Jon, Collette and one other Odinist departed from Rotherhithe Overground Station at almost the same time. Seeing Collette and Jon together on the opposing platform told me that they were in a relationship, so I commented to the rather tough looking bald Odinist standing next to me, asking “so are they together then?”

He confirmed that much, so I asked him what the appeal was – pointing out that Jon obviously looked like some kind of bum with girly hair. He said he didn’t know, that he was present when the couple got together, and made some deprecating comment on Collette’s judgement.

THE SECOND BLOT

The second blot I attended was on the following month in July. I had returned from Seattle only the previous week, where Harold Covington must have unexpectedly died only yards away from me. *2

I therefore honoured Covington’s memory during the remembrance ritual and then in conversations after the ceremony, and did my best to let the other male participants aware of The Base’s existence and how they could get involved with it. [See *2]

After the ceremony a similar small feast of bread, pork and alcohol commenced as last time. Between this blot and the first one I attended I had foolishly made the mistake of befriending Collette on Facebook and had engaged her in conversation.

She wanted to know if I was single and if I intended to start a family. Annoyed at her presumptions of parity I decided to embark on somewhat of a psychological experiment in female nature by befriending her to the point of total frankness on that issue.

I explained to her what it was like for most White males in this society to have to deal with White females, and without blaming her specifically impressed upon her the sense of widespread hostility and cynicism that Western Feminism had germinated within most of the Western male population.

The fact that men were resorting to promiscuity and prostitution simply in order to resist falling into the state of celibacy that Western culture had both raised them to despise, and at the same time forced them into, and so on.

This was part of an ongoing conversation on relationships which Collette has apparently recently used as an excuse to accuse me of sexual impropriety, on the basis that I used a chapter of George Orwell’s book 1984 merely to illustrate the poor state of relations between men and women that Feminism and female complacency have generally produced. – Again you use sincerity when engaging with “female friends” at your own peril, particularly when the subject turns to relationships, wherein non-existent sexual connotations can be simply attached later by the female party. When dealing with women it can often and WILL be twisted and used against you in some form of impromptu melodrama.

What I found was that instead of taking these frustrations on board she simply responded with crass and simplistic ‘let them eat cake’ responses, blithely insisting that after almost a quarter of a century of my trying I would one day almost certainly find the opportunity to get to have a wife and children.

This was literally the most sophisticated argument she could come up with as to why we as White Nationalist men she keep faith in our women, and personally I don’t think anyone is going to get a more representative answer than that from White women, whether so called ‘White Nationalist’ or otherwise.

This time instead of confining this post-blot social to the church five of us (including Collette & Jon), decided to have a meal in a pub in London Bridge.

On the way to this new venue Collette, already drunk as last time, proceeded to lean out of the front passenger window of the moving car we were travelling in and then scream at random White pedestrians in the streets to quote “breed” and quote “fuck each other”. I can only imagine how embarrassed Jon must have felt, but it didn’t end there. Once we were traversing the streets on foot to the pub in question Collette decided that she was going to jabber constantly about quote “niggers” and about quote “australopithecines”.

When we actually reached the pub and had ordered food I was then subjected to an interrogation by Jon and Collette on why I believed our Western women had failed us. I was gobsmacked that anyone in this day-and-age could ask such a naïve and stupid question. I felt like I was talking to two teenaged goths from the mid 1990’s.

I simply responded by describing my everyday experiences with Western women. That every time I ventured into an inner city core, such as Croydon, or Brixton, or Romford, or Tooting, or Lewisham, there were daily examples of White slags paired with blacks and/or pushing push chairs with brown bastards in them, looking like so many turds on a string.

Jon then brought up a chart of some kind that Collette had previously sent me through Facebook messages, citing unsourced statistics indicating that only a very small minority of White women actually race mixed.

I responded by making three points that they then didn’t answer. One; that in areas hit by ‘superdiversity’ – that is to say in those areas infested with muds, I could simply tell by walking through them that those statistics obviously do not bear out in these locations. Two; that even if true the statistics are all academic in a White population that largely refuses to reproduce in an appropriate fashion. And three; that the statistics in question were all unsourced.

As a consequence I was then subjected to a nauseating, crass, cheesy pep talk on how to pull women by Jon, who was moronically insisting that I go on pub crawls around bars and hotels only to randomly hit on large groups of seated females unannounced. Collette then jumped in claiming that my mass rejection by the women of my own race (but not of other races), was all my fault because my strong muscular physique meant that I simply hadn’t tried hard enough. - By this point Jon was beginning to remind me of pretentious failed YouTuber EvoGenVideos and Collette was beginning to annoy me. - Obviously I told Jon to get lost whereupon Collette then accused him of autism (which I can actually understand).

As I could see them becoming more and more frustrated with my not bowing down to White Women, I decided to change tack, and made it clear that I did not only hold White Women responsible for the shit-hole that The West is gradually becoming, but most White people in general, adding that I believed that ideally some form of purge should be in order to sweep away all the deadwood.

Whining at me Jon responded by trying to school me on the value of human beings with a lecture on how my proposed policy would end up eliminating many ‘valuable’ anti-racist doctors and nurses from the NHS, apparently blissfully unaware that the very circumstances that might enable my policies to be brought into power might dictate the end of the NHS, and of organised mass welfarism, altogether. I felt like I was speaking to some idiot from my college’s Socialist Society – the ones who used to meet in a union subsidised bar in Kingston-upon-Thames known as ‘The Hammer & Sickle’.

I was obviously just talking to some kind of blue pilled normie with a fetish for White people, who had simply stumbled into the identity politics of Odinism as some kind of naïve Walter Mitty whose brain had been fossilized in the mid 1990’s.

The night finished with Collette running into an unoccupied area of the bar patio and then proceeding to perform tai chi manoeuvres on her own in front of the venue’s entire clientele, like some form of LSD user having an hallucination about Bruce Lee. Needless to say it was at this point that I lost even the faintest interest in taking Collette from Jon.


THE GOTH

Recently I have discovered that it has been my mere mentioning of The Base at this second blot, and subsequently online, that has been used as a basis to charge me with the so called ‘threatening the personal safety’ allegation by Jon and Collette (Jon).

An obviously absurd claim that I am obviously unable to answer, and one which reminds me of being at primary school. – In case you the reader are not British, British schools have since about the mid 1970’s been run by Marxist and for the most part female social engineers who deem any display of interest in militarism or organised aggression on the part of boys as a pathology, that so called ‘threatens the physical safety of other children’.

With this in mind I thought of Jon on my way back home from a speaking engagement last Sunday very close to the pub where Collette had gone into full Bruce Lee mode, and an image of the children’s tv character Bob The Builder spontaneously cropped up in my mind’s eye. – It is my belief that the goth / grunge / emo / etc subculture among basically White middle class spoilt teenaged brats that Jon at the age of 30-something clearly represents, is one of the more serious stumbling blocks on the road to White Nationalist radicalisation.

'Goths'

'Grungers' (Columbine 1999)

'Emos'

Think of this subculture within the White Race as basically an overgrown male ballet dancer in a pink tutu armed with a Kalashnikov, but guarding the lifeboats on The Titanic as it sinks beneath the waves.

Although perhaps pro-White this subculture’s average constituent seems to be totally bent on confinement to passive resistance only; seems incapable of acting independently of the childish comfort zone he has been accustomed to since birth; still believes in maintaining the rigid Christian concept of almost feminine bossiness through obtuse civility and shaming; and still believes in male grovelling subservience to women as an adequate measure of life achievements.

The Goth (and I say “goth” through gritted teeth not wishing to tarnish the real goths of the 5th Century), although scruffy looking, a freak, often with long matted hair and a deliberate disregard for appropriate masculine dress, is nonetheless one of the rudest, bossiest and most dare a say “fascistic” (in the pejorative sense), cultural characters currently on offer to young White men in their teens.

Through believing himself to have a monopoly on ‘rebelliousness’, bad ‘music’ and on ‘non-conformity’ The Goth, somewhat hilariously, sees it as his role to insist on rigid almost Victorian standards of conformity in virtually everything but clothing. Thus in order to project his own neurotic, certainty / security obsessed, gender fluid worldview onto others he attempts to make others conform to a particular set of expectations that revolve around his own status.

This I think goes a long way in explaining how a supposedly ‘White Nationalist’ goth and his common law wife can have such a volatile – almost child-like – reaction to those who believe in something more than simply turning up to circlejerks and occasionally worshipping White women. – And how when partaking in White Nationalist circles we should not simply assume that every self-defined ‘White Nationalist’ present will necessarily see value in something that extends beyond their own selfish short term normative lives, communities and adolescent subcultures.

What we are essentially dealing with here – even in White Nationalist circles – is a great bulk of people who literally have no wider sense of themselves beyond their own immediate petty lives, to the point where any mention of great power politics or actions that could potentially lead to significant changes in the future of great power politics is hysterically stamped out, and labelled as ‘dangerous talk’ to the peace of the infantilised peasantry.

We, such as Cesar Tort, Joseph Walsh, Norman Spear, myself and many others whose identities shall remain concealed, are basically large fish in a small pond, whereas worms, whose only interest extends to mere reproduction and the creation of simple guards for one’s own domestic security, are small fish in a big pond.

As the internal and very much terminal contradictions contained within the Pseudomarxist ideology behind the Multiracial Nightmare continue to show themselves, - and more sporadically so as time endures, we shall find more and more such ‘small fish’ (virtually all women are ‘small fish’), enter into the pond with us. Let us therefore not climb into too many big ponds, let us instead stick to our small pond, venturing out only on occasion to survey the state of progress.

We don’t need to assume the risk of befriending what are in essence groups of smallminded genetic peasants only for these groups to muck up our higher plain of theory and politics, with their impish whinings concerned only with the personal comforts and security that they now increasingly seek out within Red Pilled circles.


THE FRIEND ZONE

After the second blot the communications between myself and Collette continued at a steady pace, and I must stress always with Collette’s distinct cooperation, even if she found some of the truths I had to point out about female nature somewhat objectionable.

There were indeed one or two moments when I got bored of talking to her and had decided to turn my attention to more worthy sources of interest, whereupon she would respond to my latest message about one or two days later. Contrary to what seems to be claimed by Jon & Collette now our conversations where varied and for the most part casual.

At one point I can vividly remember sending Collette (and at least two others), a block of photos from not one, but two stately homes in the West End that I happened to be visiting at the time as a tourist.

On another occasion I exchanged links on Stephan Molyneux. On another Collette told me about her sick grandfather and his demented ramblings believing she was going to marry her own deceased father. On another she told me about her former job as a nurse. On another she told me about Jon’s self-employment problems. On another I sent her some material on Revillo P Oliver. On another we had a discussion on Tommy Robinson and the EDL. ‘Etc, etc, etc.’

The idea that I “sent” Collette a one sided non-stop flow of inappropriate messages for  so called “three months” is outrageous, and I think says more about the source of such allegations than it does about me.

In the meantime ANTIFA had found out that Odinist blots were being held at the Swedish church and pledged to picket the venue in an edition of ‘Hope Not Hate’ magazine. We subsequently discovered that threats of violence had been made against the owners unless they broke their contract with Stead’s Odinist group. However, in any event it didn’t matter to me as I was called away on business and therefore couldn’t have attended even if the threat hadn’t been made.

The next blot was therefore held in a secluded public park in Central London, but obviously without me being present.

THE ELEPHANT MAN

Then September came. Unfortunately I had to close a business that I had set up earlier in the year and therefore found more time to give greater consideration to my political world.

Throughout my lifetime I have never had such a talkative relationship with a female of childbearing age whom I had already met in person, with possibly one exception in the form of a young South African woman I randomly hit on using Facebook back in 2007, and managed to get a few dates out of. – Although her Seventh Day Adventism and pretence at being open minded to Atheist perspectives caused the entire project to fall flat on its face.

Sensing that the window of opportunity could close (for whatever reason), I therefore took the opportunity to increase the experimental nature of the relationship between me and Collette.

I submitted various blogs and questions about Feminism (including Cesar Tort’s essay on Lycanthropy), and raised the issues of online Gynarchism in places like Facebook and FetLife, (as she had already made drunken reference to the BDSM networking site during a conversation after the second blot).

At this point I just wish to say for the record that although I maintain an account on FetLife, I am not nor have I ever been interested in BDSM.

If you the reader are unaware of what FetLife is, it’s basically a Facebook for people who are interested in BDSM. However, because it has around 7 to 8 million users it is (unlike other sex/dating based websites and apps), 100% free. There are fees for being able to view video material posted to the site, but other than this it is free and Tor friendly, which means that at least unlike on Tinder and other such apps I am not paying for the ‘privilege’ of being rejected by skanks and fat hoes who I myself have lowered my standards drastically simply in order to approach.

Would you really pay money for this?

Or this?...

The women who reject 98% of us on Tinder, Happn and Match as being 'beliow average'.

I have been on the site since 2015 and from what I have seen about 95% of its users are White people, although there are some coloured people who use it, as I see ‘black slave’ groups on the network as well as ‘white cuckold’ groups, and I myself have been randomly approached by black women in America and even one black woman in Brixton London, who wanted me to chain her up and abuse her as a transatlantic slave.

Needless to say I use it, just as I use Tinder, Match and other dating mediums, as a means of attempting to avoid the terrible fate of falling into either onanism or effective eunuchry. On extremely rare occasions I do get dates from using them, and ever so often a sexual encounter with a fat, ugly or old bint. However, in terms of dating app joining fees it is ironically much cheaper and less time consuming simply to fly out to a Thailand or to Eastern Europe, and to hire a girl for the night, many of whom are actually more attractive and cleaner than so called "dates" on Tinder.

I don't like this lifestyle, but obviously I have been left with no alternative option other than becoming totally celibate, thereby exposing myself to ridicule in this shit-hole society that measures individual worth and status in access to sexual intercourse and material goods.

If I were ‘King of The World’, I would of course outlaw basically all pornography and of course all perverse sites like ‘FetLife’, and make the seeding of any interracial pornography concerning Whites (and in particular White women), an automatic capital offence.

But then again a World in which I were King would also be a world in which females would be deprived of their civic rights, such that the mass hypergamy and cock carousel riding nature of Western women in general would be ended, with women being forced to choose between living in the gutter in a cardboard box, and serving the State of The Family, rather than being constantly pampered by the State of The Nation in the form of endless government welfare programs for women and employment and education discrimination in favour of women by perverted employers and Marxist university faculty workers.

Ultimately my being forced to rely upon such mediums in addition to the legal use of prostitution in countries where it is legal as the closest possible approximation of marriage and family that is available to myself, as well as many others, I think reflects more on how useless, dysfunctional and pathetic White women really are to us and how little they have to offer.

Not only would White women prefer to copulate with actual hominids and be publicly proud of doing so. But as I write this there is (literally), an ‘elephant man’ living not too far away from me who since his appearance on a Channel 4 documentary on freaks and freakshows (after which he was given a plush job as a BBC presenter), has himself attained the female affection that we men who are prepared to sacrifice our lives for the greatness of our nations, can only dream of.

Adam Pearson; what White girls want instead of us.

After almost a quarter-of-a-century since becoming men the closest we can even reach is only to be suckered into believing that it’s just around the corner (when it clearly isn’t), at the hands of these disingenuous, amoral, vile and mischievous bitches of our so called “race”.

Not only have White women failed, but they have failed miserably.


‘FORCED’ INTO PORN

When Collette insisted that the women who take part in pornography are all “innocent” and are simply “forced” into doing so, I simply couldn’t believe what I was reading.

It read like someone who had just arrived in 2018 from a 1960’s time warp. The last time I had seen her she had been raving against FetLife, saying that she didn’t know what it was until individuals within the Alt-Right crowd told her about it, so had she not also heard of PornHub? Of Xhamster? Of YouPorn? Of RedTube? – I knew of all of those pornographic websites despite never having actually used any of them by the time I was in my early 20’s at the latest, and indeed I can remember actually being at house parties in the early 2000’s, where what used to be called “hard core” pornography in the 1980’s and 90’s, was being played on 18 inch plasma tv screens as if it were just as much a part of the background ambience as the pop music.

I asked her if she wanted to see ‘proof’ that the women are not ‘faking it’, that most pornographic actresses are not somehow ‘oppressed’ into doing what they do, and that most porn in the 21st Century is actually produced by amateurs, so there’s not even much of a case of women being pressed into these activities by financial circumstances anymore.

Since she did I simply gave her all the necessary information to view it for herself. Although she said she clicked on one of the sites mentioned above, she then said that she got “scared” after only a few seconds of viewing it and quickly closed the page window. – This from an adult woman in her mid 30’s living in 21st Century England? Not exactly fresh out of a Victorian girl’s boarding school, is it?…

In retrospect, and for the record I don’t actually believe that Collette was ‘unaware’ of the prevalence of online pornography or the central and largely voluntary role of the women involved in it. I think she knew perfectly well that pornography in the 21st Century is no longer produced by sleezy directors dressed in 1970’s brown flares, afros and fake jewellery in sleezy apartments overlooking the San Francisco Bay Area.

And I also think that unless either retarded or born before 1975, one would have to be one of the world’s foremost hermits to have spent almost 20 years living in the 21st Century and never reached an epiphany on the fact that roughly one third to a half of the modern web is actually porn.

Almost certainly she was probably lying to me (as well as herself), in order to somehow persuade me that the modern female gender of the White Race is not completely beyond salvage unless subject to some enormous shock or reversal of discipline to snap them out of it. – Something that women obviously fear at an instinctive level.

Because deep down they know that they were born without the same capacity for moral thinking as men and are therefore for the very beginning innately corrupt.

“The speech of a maiden should no man trust, nor the words which a woman says; for their hearts were shaped on a whirling wheel, and falsehood fixed in their breasts.” ~ The Havamal, ‘On Women’, first verse.


THE GYNARCHIST

Contingent upon the subject of FetLife and modern Western pornography and the all to voluntary role of White women in it, the discussion then turned to Gynarchism.

If you the reader are not familiar with Gynarchism, let me then give you a brief introduction:

Gynarchism is superior and in a way more worthy of respect than Feminism. Feminism is broken down into several transitions or “waves”, First Wave Feminism or the campaign for equal political rights with men, Second Wave Feminism or the campaign for equal social and economic rights with men, Third Wave Feminism or the campaign to disable the means of men to exclude women, and Fourth Wave Feminism or the campaign to abolish men (or at least White men) as the centre of society. It is from this last wave known as Fourth Wave Feminism that so called ‘Gynarchism’ emerges.

Gynarchism is pure, unadulterated Female Supremacism (at least with respect to Western culture), is extremist calling for the creation of a society in which males and the need for male reproduction has been abolished and replaced by artificial procreation methods, requires mandatory lesbianism and the chemical inducement to transgenderism in men, and calls for the institutionalisation of physical, mental and sexual abuse against men and boys, the mutilation of the male sex organs and the introduction of a formal system of gender based slavery, therefore heavily connecting the Gynarchist political movement with the BDSM and Fetish communities.

Gynarchism does not pretend to only want parity or equality between men and women. It openly advocates the overthrow of men (or White men at the very least).

Through my research into it online 3 to 4 years ago, I actually penetrated a group of Gynarchists on Facebook who were embedded in the American Democratic Party, and who were attempting to commit to political activities designed to exclude all men from the Democratic Party nominations. – The ringleader (ironically named ‘Christina White’), looked Jewish. In my assessment Gynarchism is real, and represents perhaps the most extreme organised form of the subversive threat to the Western traditional political apparatus that is Feminism.

(If you happen to live in London and wish to meet some Gynarchists yourself, then you may wish to enrole in FetLife's winter season 'Cruel Huntress' event next February in Essex. However, be warned that you will be expected to participate.

From what I have been able to gather from email exchanges with former participants, 'The Cruel Huntress' is not really a 'game' but rather a type of religious ritual, wherein scores of mainly White men, but handfuls of sado-masochist lesbians and transgendered freaks also, are unleashed onto a private heath stark naked and then systematically hunted down, whipped, tormented and sodomized by women clad in leather bondage gear and PVCs. There are numerous marshals in florescent jackets present - women naturally, - who oversee the hunt to ensure that no rules are being broken, and photography and film are strictly prohibited. - Apparently this is what Emily Davidson died for.)

I recall that during our discussion on Gynachism Collette (being as sceptical as you might expect a female in denial to be), wanted ‘proof’ that such a misandrist movement actually existed.

In order to prove that it did exist I found a case example on FetLife (perhaps one of the most obvious places to look), in the form of a dark haired 28 year old woman from New York. On her FetLife profile she calls herself Katie Gabrielle, but from her listed photos we can clearly see that she is probably Jewish.

Gynarchist extremist, clitoris grower, and male-to-female mass transgenerist, 'Katie Gabrielle' of New York.

In addition to her portrait photos you will find numerous memes depicting women’s genitalia boasting gigantic clitoris’, and photos of enlarged breasts, bearing such titles as ‘ESTROGEN HORMONES: I AM GROWING GIGANTIC BREASTS’ and ‘KEEP SAYING IT: I AM GROWING GIGANTIC BREASTS’. There are also photos of packets of hormone pills where she offers to supply them to men without irony. You can easily verify what I say simply by setting up your own FetLife account and linking to her profile.

Or by linking to these numerous Gynarchist Facebook groups:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/646559482049996/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/673348469353140/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/288366864666410/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/391174934362397/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/802011133221434/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1488665441414572/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/480359528763417/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1478541795714484/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/562119357247311/

I have read through most of them, and if they are a ‘joke’ as most females (who are natural liars), would claim, then it’s obviously a quite extensive and elaborate joke, and without much visible irony…

In order to give you a more detailed flavour of what Gynarchism or Fourth Wave Feminism actually is in the intellectual sense, I have taken the trouble to cut and paste some of this Gynarchist’s insane writings. *3

Reading them was quite an eyeopener for me. I had always known that extreme misandry and the desire to sexually abuse boys with compulsory sex change chemicals played a role in the Feminist Movement. However, before I discovered this ‘Gynarchy’ movement I had always supposed that this craze was only present on the fringes of some of the more radical anti-male bigotry groups.

Instead what we find is that not only are Gynarchists already operating within the mainstream purview of conventional party politics, but that quite a substantial portion of their support base actually consists of men themselves on social media – both kinky and non-kinky.

It is frightening to realise that a significant say in how our institutions of state are directed are actually under the full sway of groups and movements whose sole aim it is, to abolish the entire male gender itself, (or at least certainly within the sphere of White Western culture and politics).

These facts remind us that no matter how strong the demands of women to equal political, social or economic rights may be, this in the end, is always what maximum female enfranchisement leads to:

A society controlled by women who are bent on the castration of 99.99% of male society, and whoring themselves to those sufficiently wealthy to remain in a stampede towards mass hypergamy.

Collette’s reaction to all this was correct but insufficient. She simply said “they’re so mentally ill”. An apt analysis, but the fact remains that it is female empowerment and so called “equality” that enables Jewesses like Katie Gabrielle and their ‘Gynarchism’ movement to thrive in the first place.

(Note that “they’re so mentally ill” clearly does not mean ‘stop showing me this’, as later implied post facto when it suited her appeasement of Jon’s paranoid nerd rage. Until last week I believed I had found at least one example of a decent and sensible White woman of my generation or younger. How mistaken I was. The facts are now well and truly out: Women. Are. Born. Genetically. Amoral.)


THE BALK-RIGHTER

Having exhausted the question of extreme Feminism (ie Fourth Wave Feminism aka ‘Gynarchism’), the conversation then moved to the questions surrounding the reaction of males to extreme Feminism and the Balk-Right, which is how I have personally decided to label my place on the political spectrum.

The term ‘Balk-Right’ was coined earlier this year by White Nationalist theorist Billy Roper. It essentially demarcates White Racial Nationalism from the rest of the Alt-Right, in that Balk-Righters by definition believe in the eventual balkanisation of the Western World – or at least part of it, - and the deliberate erosion of civil society to the point of universal breakdown in order to facilitate such ends.

I pointed out correctly, that with society incapable of gainfully employing many hundreds of thousands if not millions of young men in useful works; incapable of fulfilling the enormous sexual and pre-matrimonial promises made by popular Western culture and government institutions (eg ‘sex ed’); incapable of satisfying the basic need to feel pride in the nation and community of which one is apart; and incapable of providing meaning to civic life, the odds that a peaceful resolution will be arrived at and meaningfully sustained are almost nil. – Particularly in a society that is riven by ethnic and religious divides that are unwritten by inherently self-contradictive Marxist precepts. – The idea that distinct biological differences shaping divergence in average cognition and psychology between different general population groups, is somehow ‘made up’ or somehow ‘socially constructed’, is perhaps the most obvious but by no means only example of this.

I cited the emergence of Hypernationalist Nilhilist White youth based groups, such as National Action and Atomwaffen in America, as examples of this, and that James Mason’s Siege theory was helping to facilitate the emergence of such groups.

Perhaps to my detriment I then informed Collette of Norman Spears project, asking her if any males she knew of would like to participate in the course over in either America or Estonia, and particularly if it were something Jon would be interested in.

Far from being ‘afraid for her personal safety’ Collette not only said that she would ask Jon if he were interested in participating in it, but actually praised the concept with extreme enthusiasm, saying that she believed that ‘one day her own offspring would participate in a great war for liberation’, or something to the effect.

As the conversation evolved the issue of exactly how a civil war, or other similar conflict with apocalyptic or ‘paradigm shattering’ dimensions could unfold, taking the UK as an example.

I recall stating that should (hypothetically), a civil war break out in the UK the dividing lines geographically would probably look like something very similar to the Brexit Map.

In this map we see that middle class ‘Home Counties’, Oxbridge, those provincial areas where anti-English sentiment is usually strongest (Scotland, the costal fringe of North Wales and Roman Catholic Northern Ireland), and the White upper and middle class and Black minority quarters of Metropolitan Greater London, Leeds and Manchester are generally to strongly pro-EU, whereas the rest of England and Wales and Protestant Northern Ireland are generally to strongly anti-EU, with five mainly White working and lower middle class London boroughs voting against EU membership.

It is clear that were a civil war to break out in the UK along these lines the centre of Remoaner resistance would likely be Central London and the West End, or possibly Berkshire – a County just to the west of Greater London.

The likely centre of Brexit resistance would be in the east of England, - probably Bolton (a city heavily settled and transformed by Poles thanks to the EU), where the support for Brexit was highest throughout the whole of the UK, or if not Bolton then probably somewhere in one of the three costal East Anglian Counties of Suffolk, Norfolk and Essex, – possibly somewhere like Southend-on-Sea or Great Yarmouth.

Although not exact the Brexit Map appears to look somewhat eerily similar to the English civil war map of 1642-1645.

One could almost draw close parallels between the Parliamentarian positions in 1643 and the Remoaner positions today, with of course territories centred on Middlesex (now Greater London) a distinctive pro-establishment bastion in the heart of rural southern England. Ireland during the mid 17th Century was basically an independent province, whereas Scotland had been taken by the Covenanters opposed to Charles I.

We can therefore deduce that were a formal and conventional British civil conflict to break out at some point towards the end of this century, it is likely that the frontlines – initially at least – would then resemble something approaching the Brexit Map. Although I strongly suspect that unlike the conflict that arose in 1642 between the executive and legislative branches of the same government, a modern version of this conflict would probably be initiated by a standoff between the whole government apparatus itself and the public servants who underwrite it, with particular regard to the armed forces.

However, just as the English Civil War of 1642 was brought to boil as a sort of reaction to the 1641 Irish Uprising, (in which thousands of English and Scots Protestant settlers were massacred as heretics by Catholic Irish forces whom King Charles as Head of the Protestant Church was seen by England to be appeasing), I also strongly suspect that any possible future military confrontation between the Occupied Westminster State and its subjects would be as a result of perceived outrages by an alien population, – perceived to be effectively aided or abetted by government – would probably result from the now quite significant Islamic Problem in this country.

We already see this in the form of Popularism across The West, which in the UK, is essentially a response to the Westminster State’s continuing oppression of the British people through its police and civil service in an attempt to obfuscate and appease the presence of voting racial minorities, and their cultural expansion within traditionally indigenous institutions and territory.

When making reference to this, the mass rape / mass sexual enslavement scandals of White British female adolescents and older infants in what at first appeared to be a few Northern towns and cities, but then was soon revealed to be throughout every major urban centre in England, comes to mind.

Scandals that are so outrageous and so racially provocative, that had they occurred before about 1850 the reactions to them from the general populace would have made the antisemitic pogroms after the Jewish assassination of Tsar Alexander III look like a walk in the park.

Were such an event to take place in the UK I would imagine that the country – and therefore the White Race within it – would probably be carved up into two portions, thereby creating two separate nations out of one:

Both intractably opposed to one another, both politically polarised to the same extent as we saw in Spain during the civil war there in the 1930’s, or perhaps in Russia during the civil war there in the late 1910’s and early 1920’s. – Both examples were very hostile conflicts with either side being ideologically radicalised to the point where the usual modes of warfare traditionally reserved for conflicts between conventional nation states were thrown out of the window, and replace by the most intransigent ideological vitriol. First starting with the Marxists and then Nationalists, using either Fascism or religion to combat it.

I don’t believe for a moment that a modern conflict caused by the even more irritable, reprehensible and outrageous Cultural Marxism of the 21st Century, - as opposed to the Economic Marxism of the 20th Century, would be any less severe in terms of the raw hatred of the other it could potentially result in.

This is especially the case given that in the last century – in conflicts such as the Spanish Civil War, the Russian Civil War, the Bavarian Uprising and so on – the issues amounted to problems like poverty, unemployment, property ownership and social mobility, whereas the looming civil conflict represented by the clash of reactionary National Populism on the one hand and radical Racial & Sexual Marxism on the other in this decade, clearly indicates stakes that are for the most part far more permanent to the future of society than simply who profits most from material resources that are currently available.

If the post-war population replacement program continues to exist in the current EU/UK Area, then not only will the Western identity itself be erased from the chief regions of Western Europe, but the formulation of new identities systemically hostile to the amenities available to the original population will increase to ultimately critical proportions, and will arm the replacement peoples with the necessary tools to attempt to effect the political state in such a way as to not only deprive resources and means, but also fundamental liberties essential to the Classical Western experience.

We are already seeing this in the form of so called “hate speech” legislation, legislation that the Jewish lobby in Britain actually tried to have adopted by the House of Commons around 1945, only for their proposals to be roundly rejected on the grounds that it would effectively override the usual civil liberties of the public.

By the year 2010 the anti-White lobby in the UK had become so powerful that normal laws were being replaced by catch-all laws, that have since forbidden the citizen from merely causing offence to another. – Obviously I am offended every time I see government and commercial propaganda promoting interracial sex, and obviously everybody at some point during their lifetimes offends somebody. Therefore these Marxist laws are enforced selectively by the political police against anyone they just happen to see as a problem for their corrupt regime for whatever reason, thus making a mockery of the idea that we in England live under any sort of rule of law. *4

Given that this is so obviously the case from where we stand now at the end of the second decade of the 21st Century, we should I believe, as White Nationalists prepare for the challenging moral and ethical framework of a world in the future almost completely or even totally devoid of the general civic conditions that continue to endure here at the end of 2018.

For example, (and assuming that the necessary statecrafting powers and wherewithal traditionally associated with at least some form of organised civil society does indeed become significantly available to at least some close approximation of a pro-White government in response to such a conflagration as predicted above), how exactly would a newly established pro-White government seek to address the many challenges posed to it by an ethnically, and perhaps even religiously charged, civil conflict between globalist and populist/nationalist factions as previously mentioned?

How would such a government seek to secure its posterity in the midst of a sectarian civil defence vacuum, compromised by the forces of militated Left wing “progress” sporting rival systems of government?

How would such a government seek to establish a credible monopoly of armed force throughout the British Isles in the face of significant populations of ethnic, sexual, political and financial minorities, radicalised by the Marxist universities and incited by the Globalist mass media?

How would such a government respond to the challenges of having to possibly conduct a campaign of military and police engagements and occupations against forces whose known rule of warfare, (which we can already gather from the way in which many minority societies currently operate in our inner towns and cities), presupposes an armed conflict in which the mere presence of ethnic and religious factors serves as a point of contention in itself?

These are all questions that I put to Collette, with the suggestion that under such circumstances a reversion to previous forms available through natural law (ironically such as in the Dark Ages – the last time Odinism was widely practiced), was essentially inevitable under the hypothetical albeit perhaps predictable circumstances highlighted.


FRIENDS FROM THE FUTURE

Obviously, and due to the nature of the invidious Marxist ideology that currently infests the Occupied Westminster Regime, I am writing from a country that finds itself in a similar state of repression as Spain’s immediately prior to General Franco’s liberation of that country from Communism.

Therefore I am not able to offer the same meaningful answers to these questions here on an open blog that I would be able to offer in a closed message chat on Facebook, without running significant risk of arrest and detention by The Regime’s political officials.

I shall therefore frame a response to such questions by simply predicting how the White Nationalists in the future whom, having lawfully attained the necessary state power, would answer such questions were they in possession of a telephone line that could somehow send communications back in time to us here in their past.

I predict that they would answer such questions by confirming all our misgivings about the worst of worlds that awaits us in the future.

I predict that they would grimly let us know that once the non-White populations of the United Kingdom had effectively pushed the native British into being merely 20-30% of the overall UK population, they will use the electoral capital supported by international finance to irreversibly seal off even the remotest prospect of a native recovery of the national territory. – That just as in South Africa today laws will be passed preventing the White population from working, from accumulating wealth, from fairly competing for jobs and houses, and ultimately, from breeding.

I predict that they would indeed confirm that a violent conflagration did prove inevitable from their perspective, and that such upheaval – with so many millions of coloureds settled in the country – ultimately, as if by clockwork, simply gave rise to the obvious outcome: An ideologically charged sectarian armed conflict between Left and Right leading to the mutiny and defection of large bodies of troops, with serious interracial and Islamic dimensions.

I predict that if we were to ask them what the nature of this conflict was actually like, they I would probably answers us by letting us know beyond all reasonable doubt that such a conflict would be no less than brutal, grim, underhanded and above all total – involving the mobilisation and chastisement of whole populations on all sides of the conflict.

I predict that they would point out correctly that in a world in which civil society and human rights have themselves not only failed to be upheld, but actually contributed to the decline of decency in terms of universality. – That much like the inflation of a currency instead of elevating poverty simply creates more dollar bills to every pound of food thus triggering a famine, so too does the compulsion to love, (through taxes; through demands for one way respect for women and so called ‘minorities’; through compulsory adherence to draconian speech codes; and so on), actually generate more hatred of The Other than there was to begin with.

I predict that they would be describing a country that had disintegrated under the weight of the tax regime, the bureaucracy, the international commercial and financial lobbies for population replacements and global wealth transfer, deficit democracy, gender wars and general all round cultural degeneracy, to the point where those healthy elements remaining in society – that William Pierce tried to reach out to  through his life’s works – finally decided to act.

I predict that they would, in the words of Michael Rasczak, be describing how the veterans and the patriots “rose up and took control”.

How the international financial and political elites attempted to quell the rebellion by arming and further radicalising constituent ‘minority’ populations in order to putdown what they would inevitably call a “Fascist terrorist revolt”, and that many such ‘minorities’ fearing the consequences of decades of abuse of hospitality on an Odyssean scale would in time form their own militias, and in time their own statelets, their own British culture and eventually their own perverse rule over many pockets of what is currently the UK.

I predict that they would be telling us that in our future, we, the former White male residents of Francis Fukuyama’s Liberal brave new world of the late 1990’s, would find ourselves asking some pretty tough questions. Questions like:

What exactly is the value in continuing to respect the human rights of an enemy population whose government and culture treats and objectifies the de jure British population in exactly the same way as the Yazidis of northern Mesopotamia were treated and objectified under the Islamic State?

What is the actual purpose in continuing in attempting to maintain good relations between the sexes with at least one third of the male population involuntarily celibate, and at least another third having been made the victims of female hypergamy, Feminism and divorce?

How exactly is ethnic sovereignty in Britain to be restored without the widespread use of genocidal actions against whole enemy or hostile ‘settler’ populations, whose presence here is just as overwhelmingly supported by the spectre of international finance and Globalism as Stalin’s despotate seemed to be when the Germans tried to secure Europe during the 1940’s?

How exactly is a nation fighting for its very survival on its native soil to treat a barbarian hoard, suckled on the teats of their own internal tax and trade revenue for many decades, and yet bolstered by the arrival of yet more barbarians day-by-day? *5

How when faced with crazed and demented caligulan middle and ruling classes, bent on the nihilistic destruction of the natural order within the very edifice of principles from whence they originated, do those elements of a nation, - not yet infected with the ideological germ of The Frankfurt School - respond to such an existential threat, without resort to the exact same extreme ferocity and fanaticism seen in the White Counterterror of the late Bourbon Dynasty?

In other words, in the face of mass racial dispossession and displacement, and consequently the annihilation of a classical liberal and nationalist tradition representing the only possible context in which modernity and the rule of civility can survive in sufficient quantities, can we really afford a large middle class White population infected root and branch?

I answer to the last question, I suspect not. I suspect that if and when mainland Great Britain does fracture into the two emerging camps we now see in the United States with the rise of Trump, on the continent with the rise of nativist popular parties and in this realm with respect to Brexit and the reactions to widespread Islamic encroachments, we must simply decide how the other camp – beholden to Death itself – is to be dealt with.

In my humble opinion, and without wishing to ‘incite’ anyone to anything, I sincerely do not believe that any individuals, groups or statecraft as contrary to the self-evident national interest as the current Occupied Westminster State should, if exposed to the lights of justice, be tolerated in any conceivable sense.

My philosophy is one wouldn’t give a medical tumour a ‘fair trial’ before it is eternally cut off from the oxygenated blood that sustains it so why, if given the opportunity, would one permit a political tumour (which is what Common Purpose’s Multicultural Britain is), to continue unchallenged in its own obscene existence against our most essential existential interests as sovereign nations?

Our friends from the future would probably agree with me and say something such as, ‘you must understand; the enemy state that is to emerge out of the next half century or so, is not going to be a normal conventional enemy. It is like a virus, a progressive malignant cancer, that if not cut out will mean the death of you its host.’

I think that our friends from the future would direct us, to when the time comes, to be fanatically merciless to those towns and cities (particularly with high pro-treason White populations), where the Multicultural Regime – whether still in power within The State by this point or the coup givers against a recovery of our own 1707 British State, – still controls large urban centres or swathes of countryside.

That they would direct us to as they in their time have already done, to punish the Marxist Whites with utmost brutality and fanatical, almost obscene cruelty. To trained our revolutionaries to rejoice at the site the bayonetting of the Marxist womb and the spitting of their unborn children.

To massacre, rape, plunder, exterminate and enslave the infected parts of our own White Race, thus making use of their treasure and effects to fuel our own patriotic revolution for the total recovery of our national territories and resources from the foreign usurpation and alien subversion that they the traitors have deliberately grown and incubated over time, simply in order to feel smug and morally superior to one another at Live Aid concerts, or the post-1980’s equivalent.

To deliberately dehumanise our enemy as a people apart from our own, and no longer connected by any further bond of kinship or due acknowledgement as fellow souls in this world.

To hex their image and to spurn their humanity. To offer them just one amnesty, and then to condemn them collectively for all eternity in the full and certain knowledge that this section of our own people were intractably irredeemable, or as Mary Shelly put it “belong dead”.

I think that our friends would tell us that ‘The Race War’, that we on the radical fringes of Right wing politics have always predicted would be the outcome of the continued presence of the Frankfurt cult in the centre of Western intellectual and political discourse, would in a perverse sense not actually be a ‘race war’ as such, but rather a conflict between two polar opposites, with White Marxist traitors and their supporters on one side and the sane White population and their supporters on the other. - Thus setting the stage for a bloody conflict in which allegiance to ethnicity and by proxy culture, ie Libertarian vs Socialist, Christian vs Muslim, Nationalist vs Internationalist etc, would form the prime motivation for the conflagration and not ethnicity by itself.

That this would therefore mean that White Cultural Marxists would sadly and perhaps perversely, end up being treated more harshly than perhaps negroes who although with obviously no valid claim to Europe, might nonetheless be willing to kill and slaughter the enemies of the White Race just because doing so may actually suit their short term purposes.

In a manner of speaking, I put all this to Collette. Needless to say she didn’t agree, and somewhat amusingly started to send me memes containing images of mothers holding babies and children, or with bunnies and flowers in the background, as if in order to somehow try and slake my wilful psychopathic temperament with regards to the mass treason question. – A psychopathic temperament that after no fewer than six decades of declinism, sabotage and mass betrayal at the very top of Western Civilization should be the norm for every sane White Man, and which I am sure is already the normative perspective among those of you who are now reading this.

THE PSYCHOPATH

In my opinion were we ever faced with a situation like the one hypothetically mentioned above then I think we would all agree, that the delusional Marxist scum responsible for this social aids pandemic must be crushed, brutalized, have his loved one smashed and condemned to an oblivion, and must be deprived of all humanity, consciously and soberly with the maximum possible cruelty from spite. This is how our ancestors would have felt towards this freak – this insane clown creature plunging its dagger into the heart of the greatest social and political order ever known at the top of their technological game.

I feel as much hatred and vitriolic rage towards the Nutcase Left sabotaging our lives and civilization with their congenital insanity, as I would towards a cult of transsexual child molesters hijacking a passenger plane I was seated in and then attempting to nose dive it into a mountain in an attempt to save us all from our own bigotry of not also wanting to be child molesters; or poisoning London’s general water supply with VX nerve agent in order to remind us all about the plight of some black slaves 250 years ago in another country.

If that happened to me then it would feel completely natural to me to want to have their children’s skulls violently crushed on live television as they helplessly squeal in pain under the weight of a fully grown man’s boot. – However, obviously if we were talking about a small cult of nutters what would the political value be in doing that? Not much.

Therefore I would under those conditions I would obviously attempt to restrain those natural homicidal feelings, but if we were instead discussing a large area of territory occupied by a state made demented and ultimately controlled by such a cult, with scaled access to military and economic resources and sources of international finance, could we really say the same?

The Nutcase Left (and I count most of the Conservative Parliamentary Party as either part of or beholden to them), who have been crashing our country into nothingness since the 1940’s are not a normal enemy like the Germans of WW2 or the French of the Napoleonic Wars, or even the Red Army of the early 20th Century / ISIS in some respects. These enemies are special enemies. Irredeemable as human beings, they are the original ‘enemy within’ referred to by Marcus Cicero.

I am sure that you the reader would agree that once in power (and believe me we will be back in power), those of them who dare to remain loyal to their ideology of ethno-masochist self-annihilation (that they intend to carry out on all our behalves), cannot simply be allowed to continue their suicidal campaign of ethno-masochist Marxist filth.

They must be duly designated for destruction as an entire race. Yes I use the word ‘race’. – A race that will come into being once they have been duly separated from our own people, and made forever divorced and desolate from our identity, thus creating a bastard race of condemned souls who will and must by law be put to the sword before all men and before the face of God.

In light of these feelings of mine (of ours) against the disgusting group of parasites who now pervade and make rotten the national institutions that our ancestors created, you can probably imagine how I conveyed them to Collette. Although I cannot say for sure how she took them, I was later told by Stead that she had become and I quote “almost hysterical” after reading what I had to say. Which probably means that I must have been doing something right.

At the time Collette responded with predictable female attempts at surreptitious pacifism with predictable comments such as ‘yeah but you wouldn’t really do it though would you?’ And ‘if it came down to it most guys wouldn’t actually do what you’re describing.’ And ‘You think that raping women is easy, but in reality it’s not that easy. She’s screaming, biting, kicking you and trying to get you off her. Only someone who is absolutely incapable of empathy would be able to get aroused under those conditions’.

To her last point I pointed out correctly that the average rapist does indeed empathise his victim, and that that is where he gets his kicks from. She responded by correcting her statement to ‘only someone who is a psychopath’. Which is fair enough I suppose. Although I also reminded her that one should underestimate what human psychology can be like when part of a group, which is also true.

THE MORALIST

Just to clarify my position with regard to the appropriate permissibility of rape, I personally have taken the stance that rape should be viewed in context. For example marital rape in the United Kingdom was actually legal until 1989 when it entered into case law, and is still legal in parts of Switzerland.

Therefore rape – the forced vaginal copulation by a man against a woman, can be said to be an act that may either be legal or illegal depending on the jurisdiction, culture and period of history.

Although I of course do not advocate a society in which matrimonial relations are based on rape, even to the point of believing that in a civil society it should ideally be punished with the death penalty as a form of sacrilege, I do nonetheless believe that as a tool of war and as a weapon of conquest, it should necessarily be retained as inventory. Why?

That’s a good question. I know that here on WDH most of you already agree in principle with the idea of permitting mass rape to take place under certain circumstances – many of you even more so than I do. But let me just try and explore this question for the uninitiated.

Firstly you have to understand our English concept of Common Law, or at least some equivalent. Common Law says that unless explicitly prohibited by law, it is legal. Therefore were we to abolish the British State (or indeed any state), and set up a new Common Law regime in its place, then under that state anything would in theory be legal. In a Common Law system a code of laws are gradually accumulated over time by judicial precedent.  – Essentially it is a form of law by legal evolution.

So for example, say we managed to colonize Mars and set up an independent Town Council on the surface that then instituted a Common Law system. If in that Martian colony a person kills another person, then that person is apprehended and brought to trial.

If the court decides that he broke the natural law as it is understood within the community of the colony then he may well be found guilty of Murder and then sentenced. Thus the crime of Murder is created. There may not have been a crime of murder before, and hence technically the killing was legal up until his conviction made it illegal retrospectively.

Now imagine that in this Martian colony someone was brought to trial for rape. Because of the colony’s Common Law system there is no such crime as Rape as yet, but should the defendant be found guilty of such a crime then such a criminal category shall come into existence and his actions on trial shall be made illegal retrospectively.

Therefore the court would have to decide, what is rape? What if he raped his own wife and therefore simply took what was his due under marital contract? Is that rape?

What if he committed the act within territory not under the jurisdiction of the colony? Is that rape?

Since we are talking about the state of the natural law as it is understood within the community of the colony, why should that understanding be extended beyond that colony’s separate understanding and if so then under what circumstances?

I personally believe that unless excluded by the rules and regulations of treaties between nations or armies, the usual conditions associated with warfare in nature should apply.

We know what the usual conditions associated with warfare in nature are, because we can see the same patterns of war zone activity with respect to how prisoners and non-combatants are treated in war repeated throughout many countries and throughout many historical periods, often when the parties concerned have been completely separated by distance, time and culture.

We see that when left to revert to the normal conditions caused by nature, men, by and large, will take advantage of military victory by seizing not only the property of those directly impeded by the victory, but the persons of others themselves as property. Will generally speaking kill and destroy an enemy settlement and will seek to enlarge their own group by doing so.

These conditions are generally the dominant conditions in all cultures and in all societies throughout history where human interactions in war have been left uncircumscribed by political conventions or other avenues of discourse. Therefore we see that this is the natural and the relations observable within this natural order prescriptible as established examples of natural law.

I conclude this point by saying that it is not in the interests of the Aryan Race – or those who fight for it – to expend energy in restraining or undermining the natural state of a people in arms or an army itself without something of benefit to be gained thereby.

Clearly for us, there is very little to be gained by protecting Feminist thots who hold our manhoods cheap, or Gynarchists who deliberately organise politically with the conscious intent to denigrate and destroy national interests in a sexually humiliating and abominable social disaster.

Therefore without something in return rape stands, and should perhaps even be encouraged to take place at the hands of an army bent on using it as a way of breaking down the enemy’s dignity and morale. – If this excuse was good enough for the Pagan Roman Army then it is good enough for me.

Secondly, the fact is that after no less than six decades of institutionalised non-stop Racial Marxist misandry, we now have a huge population of very angry, very poorly employed White males – many of them under 25 who, – having been primed by the degenerate Western culture and by the schools and universities inciting them to sex acts (both heterosexual and now homosexual) since kindergarten – now see with what contempt modern society, and in particular the now ultra-radicalised misandrist White female gender, sees them in.

Why would we as Radical Nationalist philosopher-revolutionaries wish to disassociate ourselves from the destructive energetic potential of a disenfranchised, demoralised and in large part fatherless angry male White youth, rendered so directionless by the rotting holk that is the multicultural Marxist-Feminist toilet of “Great” Britain (also read every other Western country), that it is likely than no previous generation has ever been so receptive to the necessary level of nihilism required to spur them into significant revolutionary action?

I am sure that we can all agree that as the multiracial nightmare of the ‘New American Century’ continues to unfold, there will inevitably be huge potential in the probably very large numbers of young White males, - who having resisted the best efforts of the organised and well financed schemes of the homosexual and Gynarchist lobbies to ‘re-integrate’ White males into Western modernity as some sort of army of transgendered freaks on hormones, - will be most susceptible to the nihilistic relief on offer from complete System collapse, and the ensuing mayhem that would almost certainly follow.

Thirdly: So a few million thots might get raped. Thots who as we can see today actually had very little to offer our vision of the future anyway. So what? Who cares about them?

Isn’t it better to destroy The System and lay it to waste by unleashing the full destructive potential of Cultural Marxism’s dispossessed, than to sit on our seats whining about how ‘this’ is not possible, how ‘that’ is not possible, and all because a few silly women attempting to penetrate our Movement to take refuge from the consequences of their gender’s own long term voting patterns might object to it?

Ah! But ‘masculinity is all about showing control and restraint!’ I hear the women bleating. To which I say, what is the point in restraining a weapon that has yet to be forged?

Fourthly, and perhaps this is a more practical point. Why outlaw rape, pillaging and the enslavement of helots in the field in the middle of a demographic war?

Note I say demographic war not ‘demographic crisis’. If anything the UK’s White British population is, geographically speaking, actually too high. The ideal population for England & Wales should probably be no more than 5 million, and in the British Isles as a whole (including all of Ireland), no more than 8 million, or up to 10 million maximum. But the reality is that we are competing against many other populations, including as most of you will know the Pakicentric Islamic population, who are by this point well proven to possess a highly covertly organised religious and ideological culture that consciously aims to takeover the British Isles.

I myself have seen this culture at work, particularly at university where attempts were actually made by my Islamic Studies tutor (a White British race traitor married to an Asiatic), to invite me to convert and submit to the Muhammadan Umma.

Needless to say he gave up somewhat appalled, when he found out where my true allegiances lay. And refreshingly there was a slightly nervous and sombre tone in his voice and demeanour the last time I spoke to him, that I did not detect when we previously discussed my temporary and abortive affiliation with the Roman Catholic Church.

Obviously, while all those silly White bints who have chosen to use our movement as some kind of shield from Islam are whining, moaning and becoming ‘hysterical’ about our genocidal-rapist philosophy, our creed is the only one the prospective future usurpers of this country actually fear. I wonder why girls?...

THE BAIZUO

In addition to the Islamic demographic threat (which I believe will in time potentially absorb much of the coloured population of this country, thus subsuming the Coloured Problem into one overall Islamic or ‘ISIS’ Problem), there will of course be the demographic threat from what the Chinese, fascinated by the demise of The West, now call ‘Baizuo’ or ‘White Left’.

We don’t actually know under what circumstances an event such as an extra-constitutional break in the status quo, in say, the next eighty years could assume, and we don’t know what roles the counterforces of Populism on the one hand and Superdiversity on the other could play, but assuming that in Britain at least an effective pro-White government were to assume power (whether lawfully throughout, or lawfully only retrospectively), then there is in my opinion at least a half-decent possibility that the White Left or ‘Baizuo’ could not only cause problems for such a government, but actually attempt to constitute a rival state.

If we cannot persuade our misled brethren on the Nutcase Left (which has since at least the year 2000 assumed the place of the mainstream Left). Or if we cannot persuade a significant portion of what might remain of the White tax producing middle class to cooperate in overpowering the Nutcase Left or ‘Baizuo’, then we must simply accept that this is likely to happen.

If this does happen then this rival state, or rather ‘rival country’ would I think have to be treated as the first obstacle to get out of the way on the road to national liberation.

If this were to be the case then I imagine the political and military map of the British Isles would look something like this.

I think that the conflict would resemble something like the Spanish Civil War, but obviously with the Coloured / Islamic Problem thrown in, such that we might actually end up with a three front war, or else (very much like the British subjects of Fort Edward in 1777), confronted by an enemy ready and fully capable of deploying a true ‘multicultural’ so called “British Army” against us.

The fate of Jane McCrea and all those others who were naive enough to believe in the British State's empty promises of 'multicultural harmony'.

In such a conflict, in which not only would whole populations be possibly mobilised in the form of many hundreds of unorganised paramilitary armies (called ‘Popular Mobilisation Units’ in Iraq or ‘PMU’s’), but thousands of ideologically or religiously motivated foreign fighters entering the country.

It would therefore probably prove impossible to sufficiently discipline troops and militia on either side of the conflict, not to mention questionable as to whether it would be desirable to prevent counterterror methods against enemy civilians, and questionable as to whether the incentive of pillaging should be removed to very likely unpaid, undisciplined semi-controlled formations with an ideological or ethnic antagonism. – Particularly in those areas where the local populations are generally supportive of the opposing regime.

One defence against using rape as a weapon of war from a White Nationalist perspective is that doing so in a highly multiracialized Britain would inevitably compromise the racial purity of the population base that a Nationalist future would seek to invest in.

This is true however, this could be just as easily seen as an advanced argument for the intensive use of pillaging as a weapon of war against the White Left or ‘Baizuo’ cities and the enslavement of ‘Baizuo’ women by ‘Baiyou’ or ‘White Right’ men, in order to compensate for the wholesale cleansing and/or extermination on non-Baizuo enemy population centres on the British mainland.

Moreover, if such a government decided to revise their code of battle to something more akin to the 1929 Geneva Convention, that permitted a protagonist to execute up to ten civilians as hostages in reprisal against every regular soldier murdered by partisans (‘terrorists’ – and I regard any Baizuo force to be terrorist), instead of the 1948 version, and/or decided to reintroduce the penalty of Sippenhaft – or the execution of members of kin in retaliation for treason, then of course the Baizuo male population could eventually become so decimated that a brief period of ‘polygamy’ (mass enslavement and impregnation by the White Right), might be called for.


THE PRAGMATIST

During my time conversing with Collette on this issue, we briefly touched upon the practicalities of how a lawfully constituted future British Government could possibly address the Coloured / Islamic Problem. I speculated that such a government could seek to affect a restoration of Britain’s ethnic sovereignty using mass expulsions, or “population transfers” as the Allied Governments of World War Two described the ethnic cleansing of approximately 9.5 millionethnic Germans from eastern territories by Red Army and local Communist Party authorities.

However, I also pointed out that such a government could, in the face of a Kosovo Crisis (ie a heavy bombardment from international forces intended to stop or reverse an ethnic recovery program of a region), actually pass all the necessary legislation, orders in counsel and other directives required to trigger more radical measures, possibly including genocidal actions on the part of The State against undesirable concentrations of civilians, thus solving the Coloured Problem once and for all.

I added that I could think of many practical ways in which this could be achieved, from mobile summary action squads directed by special police units to mop up and liquidate the undesirable groups concerned to a ‘mass kill’ strategy, such as the construction of special facilities in order to effect mass drownings, (mass drowning is of course much more efficient than the use of poisonous gaseous chemicals that need to be industrially produced, stored and transported), to simply leading mass refugee columns into sealed cave complexes and abandoned mine shafts, and then simply dynamiting the entrances.

This was of course all hypothetical abstract talk about what a future lawfully constituted government may eventually decide to do if sufficiently influenced by Racial Nationalist ideology in the midst of a crisis, either exactly or very much like the Yugoslav Wars of the 1990’s, and did not in any way reflect my personal preferences either way. – Not that it is hard to guess what my personal preferences might be of course.

However, I’m guessing that because Collette is a female, she simply wasn’t able to grasp what an abstract and hypothetical discussion was, and went silent for a few hours before simply pelting me with memes, (which if my memory serves correctly, depicted shoalin monks), and peppering me with crass kung fu movie quotes, such as: “A student said to his master: "You teach me fighting, but you talk about peace. How do you reconcile the two?" The master replied: "It is better to be a warrior in a garden than to be a gardener in a war."” And so on.

With typical alexandrian phlegmaticism I responded by saying that the fighting aspect of an ideological war to end Cultural Marxism in my home country didn’t interest me so much as the mass execution part of it, and then posted two German massacre scenes as further illustrations of what I meant, one from Captain Correlli’s Mandolin and the other from the 1978 mini-series ‘War & Remembrance’.

I also added that from our Pagan ancestors' perspective what Odin wanted were not ‘peace loving’ shoalin warrior monks dancing about like fairies in a kung fu movie, but blood eagle sacrifices of enemy prisoners before an altar to The Gods. – A bit melodramatic perhaps, but I wanted to see how she reconciled Odinism with basing her alleged religion on ridiculous happy She-Ra kung fu movies like Kill Bill.

Needless to say she didn’t agree with this either, so I finished by reminding her about her ravings in the Seaman’s Church on Christianity.

About how pathetic and weak-willed she thought Christianity was, and how she mocked Christianity for quote “turning the other cheek” – obviously for her, just because she had a problem with Muslims treating White women like trash; some of whom I have to admit are at least superficially decent, but most of whom are indeed trash in at least some sense of the word. (Look at the nature of the Ariana Grande concert and then try telling me that those women and girls in attendance were of ‘high breeding’.)

I then said something to the effect of: “You wanted to meet people who don’t ‘turn the cheek’ well hear I am. So what is your problem?” To which she simply said nothing.

As soldiers of The Revolution and as patriots of the White Race before all other things, I strictly maintain that it is our duty to not only wish for, but to pray for the downfall of Western Civilization as presently constituted. Only in the cleansing fire of renewal can the honour which we abandoned in the second half of the last century be satisfactorily restored.


THE AUTIST

By the time my conversation with Collette on this topic came to a close, Jon had decided to contact me via Facebook, following up my invitations to help develop my friend’s training course in America.

Although I did indeed think that Jon looked and acted like a tosser to begin with (the effeminate goth demeanour, the bum-like appearance, the whiteknighting autism and so on), I had – as is my weakness – decided to give him the benefit of the doubt, and due to the fraternal religious nature pertaining to the circumstances of our meeting.

Immediately I was confronted by a paranoid fool asking patronising questions that he already knew the answers to, with me having already explained most of them in prior face-to-face conversations.

I told him that ‘The Base’ didn’t need to operate in the UK as it was an international training and survivalism non-membership association based in the United States, where tactical firearms training is protected by the Second Amendment. That it was a perfectly legal foreign network of self-defence enthusiasts and that it was popular amongst the Siege community.

Whining at me in typical mangina fashion, he then demanded to know what Siege was. I gave him a few links, over which he must have gone absolutely potty, as the next personal message I received was from Collette asking for permission to show Jon our entire conversation on Facebook.

Jon had obviously gone into an autistic arrest and was basically demanding an inquisition of some kind. I told her to reject his demands, to delete the entire conversation (as it was private), and to instead give him a “broad outline” of its contents.

The next private message I then received was from Jon requesting that I open an attached notepad file. (To my mind Jon most likely doesn’t have Microsoft Office or anything similar on account of his obvious inability to get a job, hence why he describes himself in the notepad file as a “ludologist” – professional video game player.) *1

The notepad file simply listed off an inventory of vague and imprecise accusations, among other things accusing me of being a Charles Manson cultist and of bombarding Collette with gay pornography, presumably as part of a wild conspiracy to woo her into leaving Jon no less...

Perhaps somewhat laughably, and in support of the obvious fact that goths are a most uptight, whiney, childish and dare I say ‘fascistic’ race, I was also accused of holding views that are not especially controversial.

Views such as the idea that pillaging in war (including rape), should not necessarily be restricted unless according to agreement between relatively civilized peoples.

Views such as that the age of consent should be lowered to what it used to be, and instead of perverted Marxist “sex education” classes, young Whites should be encouraged to marry at the earliest adolescent age possible.

And views such as that modern love and romance in this Feminist shit-hole is basically for a likely majority of men no different to the “filthy scuffles” with occasional strangers of the opposite sex, as described in George Orwell’s novel, 1984, which I seemed to be condemned for as a some sort of pervert simply for referencing.

I was then abruptly blocked by both of them, thus cutting me off from any sort of dialogue or reply to such accusations.

Yes, I know what you’re probably thinking. ‘What an uptight fairy!’ – But unfortunately that’s us. That’s who we are in the 21st Century. That is the standard of average White men and women these days: A sexually ambiguous longhaired unemployed bum who thinks that playing video games is something to put on his CV, and women who only ever make their bodies available to real men such as us through sordid BDSM websites and overseas brothels, all the while dating and having families with millions of hominids, congenital idiots and men with grotesque facial deformities.

Thus after just a matter of a few short weeks and a handful of frank online private exchanges with one individual I was left with a reputation in tatters, simply for engaging in conversation with a White Nationalist female and for reaching to conclusions, some of which she irrationally objected to.

Thankfully however, I only attended three blots in all (two of them when Collette and Jon were in attendance), and in any case Odinist religious activity is not exactly my primary crutch in life, nor my principle pursuit.

Nevertheless this experience or rather I should say ‘experiment’ of trying to be frank with women; treating a woman as your intellectual equal, even if she isn’t, I think tells us all we can expect from female Nature: ‘Agree with me. Conform to my expectations in a friend-zone and above all don’t threaten my emotional stability with abstract ideas, or else I will play you for a fool and then do my level best to try and screw your reputation among other men.’ – That’s about the size of it. So with that in mind let’s sum up:

Apparently as from last week I publicly stand accused of:

Vending porn just for memeing satire, twice, and – discussing an extreme Feminist and the ideas she promotes with an apparently completely willing participant.

Liking tranny porn just for attempting to mock the modern age by likening it to tranny porn in a private conversation.

Spamming people with ISIS execution videos just for saying that I had seen some ISIS execution videos some time ago in the past. *6

Paedophilia just for suggesting that it would perhaps be better if youngsters aged between 12 and 16 were able to marry each other (as in the past), rather than be subjected to all manner of corruption in so called “personal and social education” classes.

Worshipping Charles Manson as a god just for saying that I knew of groups who did worship Charles Manson.

Being an advocate for mass murder and of ‘planning a civil war’ just for speculating on what conditions and penalties there may be after an arguably inevitable future breakdown of law, order and civil society in The West.

And all this just from ONE WOMAN I was never interested in going out with to begin with after only a few weeks of email exchanges and one jealous autistic boyfriend with personal hygiene issues…

THIS my friends, is what happens when you try to befriend women. (And I am already a MGTOW!) My advice, and I am sure Cesar Tort’s advice as well, couldn’t be more obvious or plainer: DO NOT BE FRIENDS WITH WOMEN. – And in particular be suspicious of those women who claim to be on your side. – Who approach you after meetings, almost touching your arm or whatever, claiming that they wish to ‘get to know you’.

If they really mean it then it is always subject to the female small print.

When approached by women claiming to be ‘friends’ and ‘comrades’, our solution should be as simple and as it should be perpetual:

To look upon them and their words with cynicism.

To treat them with the silent contempt that they so richly deserve.

To disdain them and to disregard them, where and when it may behove us to view them as the mere commodities that their own innately delinquent actions inevitably reduce them to.


THE HIEROPHANT

The word religion comes from the Latin ‘religio’, which simply means ‘to bind’. In other words whatever the supernatural beliefs of a particular religious creed may be, the primary function of a religion is to bind its adherence to one another, to past adherence and to future adherence. It is therefore a peculiar institution that can both transcend The Nation (or ‘The Race’), as well as compliment The Nation.

Technically I am a Fundamentalist Agnostic. I don’t claim to know the mysteries of the universe or the reason why the particular atoms that apparently form all that I am, do form all that I am – albeit with the acknowledgement that the atoms that constitute my physical presence today, will not for the most part constitute my physical presence in a year from now.

Therefore for me the question remains ‘what are we?’ Do we have permanent or ‘everlasting’ souls that define who we are as spiritual beings, or are we simply codes of information that are simply copied from one set of molecules to another week by week and year by year, to the point that we are no more literally the same people as we were a decade ago as we are the person on the other side of the street?

Is there an integral part of our anatomies whose cells, molecules and atoms will always remain the same from the moment of our birth to the day we die, or are we, like Plutarch’s ‘Ship of Thesis’, literally just gradual shifting copies of our former selves from previous passages in our history?

If it IS true that we are simply clusters of atoms that merely get replaced every few years or so, then it would mean that we are nothing more than codes of information expressed through particles, and that we don’t really exist as such.

It would mean that the ‘death’ that we experience at the end of our lives is merely the end of a transfer of information from one group of atoms at the beginning, through several millions of groups of atoms that are literally the ham sandwiches we eat and the tea and coffee that we drink, as well as the urine we piss, the shit we excrete and the sweat we expire, through to the final link that simply fails to transfer the information that is ‘us’ any further.

In other words if that is true, then a man who dies at the age of 85, would if he lived to the age of 105 instead, simply gradually die anyway within in a few years. It’s just that he would simply be gradually replaced by another person with the same or similar thoughts, the same or similar memories and the same or similar desires, opinions and aspirations.

Could this really be true? Are we simply a non-existent code of information? A sound wave that simply travels through molecules?

Or is there more to it than that? Does the information that makes up ‘us’ find a more permanent expression elsewhere? Perhaps in a different dimension that directly corresponds to our own somehow?

What about the Double Slit Experiment? What about those coincidences in life that seem too improbable to have any basis in reality? What about miracles? What about the apparently uncanny accuracy of some of Nostradamus’ Quatrains? What about poltergeists and seances? What about apparent paranormal abilities, such as telepathy and so called ‘remote viewing?’ What about The Matrix? What about so called ‘quantum mechanics’ which I can only barely even begin to understand in some rudimentary fashion? What about astrology?

Is there something more to the information that we seem to be travelling through organic materials as, as we age and eventually face death?

Although I have been known to hazard a few wild guesses, I don’t know what the ultimate answers to any of these questions are. I suspect that the universe may actually be far simpler than we perceive it to be, in which case the answers aren’t looking too good for the supernaturalists. However, I’ve also noticed that when dealing with nature, nature has the nasty habit of scuppering your underlying basic assumptions in a way that you never expected.

Although I was never baptised a Christian I was raised by parents who were, and Christianity formed part of the fabric of my cultural wallpaper growing up. In my primary school for example, singing Christian assembly hymns and prayers were compulsory – something that I think turned me off of Christianity somewhat for the rest of my life, and more than that the hymns themselves were obviously effeminate in nature, sparing no room for an explicitly masculine role in the liturgy we were as children expected to follow.

I remember distinctly being about 7 or 8 years old and being made to sing assembly hymns where the chorus was, “I may never fight with the infantry, ride with the cavalry or shoot with the artillery, but I’m in the Lord’s Army! Yes Sir!”

The chorus was obviously intended to convey a message of submission and meekness in the pursuit of conformism and celebrity in the Christian Faith. However, the school (with the administrators mainly composed of women), actually got rid of the hymn after three goes since the boys would always scream out at the top of their lungs “YES SIR!” – And no amount of telling the boys to tone down that part of the hymn seemed to work.

What had happened was that the boys in the assembly (I went to mixed sex schools), had at some subconscious level computed a martial spirit in the hymn, such that they were therefore driven to express themselves in a collectively aggressive fashion. I can even remember at the age of 7 or 8 hearing boys in the assembly hall pledging that they wanted to join The Army when they grew up, only to be met by whines and cries from the girls deploring their determinations.

Needless to say Christianity (or at least Modern Anglicanism) is not a religion which I view as being particularly healthy, especially for the White male gender, and I very much suspect that its incorporation into the Roman Empire probably had much more to do with imposing the Feudalism that Rome had introduced during the 3^rd Century AD by means of inculcating a servile superstition in the general revenue paying populace. Ie “Render unto Caesar” everything, and concentrate on the hereafter.

As someone who has a degree in Religious Studies I personally believe that Jesus of Nazareth was simply the assistant of John The Baptist, as much as President Lindon Johnson was simply meant to be a mere mentor and adviser to President John F Kennedy. That although he probably did die on the cross as reported he was not resurrected literally, but instead allegedly resurrected in spirit through some form of séance. And that the reasons why he chose to break with the establish Faith of his state to support John The Baptist probably had more to do with his being rejected as a initiate priest on account of his illegitimacy, (despite his mother being of noble upbringing), than with any divine revelation from Jehovah.

Nevertheless Christianity (especially when considered in its transformative capacity), is indeed a part and parcel of our common European heritage and in a way sets the mould for the later constitution of a conscious ‘White Identity’ in the 11^th, 12^th, 13^th, 14^th, 15^th & 16^th Centuries with the Age of Discovery, and the large scale ‘coming into contact’ between Northern and Western Europeans and the rest of the World.

Inasmuch as that remains the case, it is difficult to completely separate oneself from ones Christian heritage, even in light of perceptions and probabilities that lend their weight to Atheism and Racial Nationalism, which on the face of it are in direct contradiction to Paul’s teachings. Therefore we as Radical Nationalists and White Nationalist philosophers are left with a love-hate relationship with Christianity.

Similarly to the Roman Catholic Church during the high middle ages, we cannot sanely permit the ideas of the New Testament to incite the populace to anarchy and dereliction, and yet at the same time we find ourselves shackled to the shell of the cultural tradition that surrounds it.

Thus in the vacuous and hyperindividualist reaches of secular Atheism many Whites, both Racial Nationalist as well as blue pilled, have sought to revive and transfer our spiritual belonging from Christian forms to previous forms such as Paganism.

There are however, a number of significant challenges in doing, at least some of which may never actually be solved.

Firstly, most non-Abrahamic religions fundamentally lack liturgical structure and cohesion, in that the liturgical sources supporting them are scant, are usually very modest or simple, and are not equipped to deal with the complex sociological and intellectual questions that arise in highly sophisticated urbanised societies. The Havamal for example (held up as an alternative to The Bible by the Odinists), is simply a short list of sayings on various topics, and the Odinists, because some of their mythology was written down, are by far the more hopeful Northern European Pagan religious tradition to have undergone any seriously attempted revival.

So far the only permanent Odinist structure in the UK consists of a small chapel in Newark and currently there is no uniform Odinist doctrine such as to compose a united religious creed. Having said that, Christian Identity – the Christian answer to Odinism in White Nationalism, seems to be faring no better, except in the United States.

The only non-Abrahamic religious traditions that seem to have a significant body of theological and liturgical theory assigned to them seem to be Hinduism and Buddhism. However, having said that these records are not so much analyses into the nature and meaning scripture as they are historical records and sources of clerical instruction. I distinctly remember at university being far more interested in the Islamic and Christian modules, whereas the Dharmic modules almost sent me to sleep just listening to what was said about them in the lecture theatres.

Secondly, and perhaps most significantly, the attitude of many of those who purport to follow Odinism is in many instances completely at odds with the factors which drive many White Nationalists toward it in the first place.

I’m afraid that ‘Jon The Ludologist’, effeminate weirdo Dan Rainer and the vain homoerotic bodybuilder calling himself ‘The Golden One’ in his lame, whiteknighting YouTube videos, are simply not the type of company that serious White men inclined towards Stoicism and Classical Pagan Tradition are looking for.

The ugly truth is that the sad and inept pampered middle class nature of so much of the Western millennial generation have effectively brought with them into Odinism the same attention seeking universalist principles that we see in such ‘new age’ cults as Wiccanism, and various other forms of ‘magick’ based impressions of Western Feminism.

When I stand in a circle watching grown men with long hair dancing and twerling around the place and becoming ratty and uptight when any serious politics is brought into the discussion, this makes me suspicious. It makes me question the motives of the people who are there and in makes me suspect that what they are actually attempting to manifest is in fact a form of Neopaganism as opposed to actual Paganism.

It is for this reason I have always been drawn to Roman Paganism over Nordic Paganism, in that a religious tradition centred on solid institutions, military and political hierarchies, distinct architectural styles and written and theologically understood liturgical forms appeals far more to me than sitting or standing in an open space, partaking in rituals which are calculated to be in tune with some woman’s monthly period.

There is a distinct feminine aspect to Northern European Neopaganism that reminds me of Camden Town Market, an aspect that frankly I don’t much care for.

Thirdly, with more and more archaeology and research being conducted each year, more and more evidence is emerging that myths contained in many different religious traditions, (and even in traditions that have no known pre-modern contact with one another), probably all if not most – are in fact from the same common origin.

This is fascinating to Atlantologists and people interested in Erich von Danikens theories surrounding an extraterrestrial explanation for civilized life on Earth. However, it also exposes the fact that biblical accounts of past events and Odinic accounts of past events probably do share the same origin.

For example ‘Yomonganda’ or ‘The Midgard Serpent’ in Nordic tradition is probably the same character as the Serpent Satan in The Book of Genesis. Given that this is the case this only makes it easier and more palatable to equivocate Aryan religious practice or ideas with the biblical liturgy that has underpinned much of Western Civilization throughout much of its most recent development.

Conclusion:

Although it might well be argued that Christian, or particularly the more traditional variants of Christianity, are ironically much closer to the spirit of most Aryan Paganisms during the 1^st Century BC than the modern and for the most part failed re-hashes of Aryan Paganism we see today, if I were to change from being an Odinist to worshipping Christ I would only be able to do so by pretending to believe as the Christians believe.

Ironically, one of the very things that currently makes Christianity so much stronger than Odinism (other than its numbers), is the same thing that allowed me to become at least ceremonially inculcated into Odinism in the first place. – Which is the fact that there is almost no way for most Christian congregations to knowingly accept anybody into their fold who had undertaken a fixed resolve to entrust their entire worldview to Reason, to the degree that they were actually prevented from forming a certain belief in the literal resurrection of Jesus Christ.

However, given its current condition and the fact that without firm leadership – perhaps only possible due to a great conflagration, - the Odinist community is for me unfortunately a half-hearted attempt at replacing Christianity, particularly in light of their inability to match Christianity’s vestigial masculine forms borrowed from Pagan Stoicism.

For example, when the feminised the schooling system in Britain I noticed that prior to doing so all the desks in my classrooms were vertically arrayed in neat rows. This is a very masculine way of learning, with the class focused in unison on the what’s going on on the altar. By about 1992 however, I noticed that the table arrangements had changed to reflect the feminine ideal of ‘teamwork’. I vividly remember my grandmother commenting on it at the time.

Although not “red pilled” as it would now be called today, she was nevertheless a lifelong Working Class Conservative, Thatcherite and High Anglican, and had instincts that told her that things were going wrong in the modern age. *7

So exactly what are we faced with here? A choice between:

Attempting to resurrecting a lost primitive unorganised shaymanic religion from Europe’s past, that either may or may not have existed, using people who are at least partly in it for the novelty of having emerged out of the goth / grunge / emo / bum subculture?

And.

Attempting to immerse ourselves in the established and organised middle eastern religious tradition we have inherited from the demise of the Classical Roman Empire, only to try and abolish its universality and re-orientate the inherently pacifist liturgy and theology within in it around ourselves and our own race?

Is that really what it comes down to?

I’d appreciate any thoughts on this in the comments section below.


FOOTNOTES:


*1

Hi Jon,

Thanks for the letter and thanks for blocking me before I had a chance to reply. Having found a number of errors and inaccuracies in it, I would just like to take the opportunity to both qualify and confirm some of the assertions you have made. I know you that are probably very “busy” as always, so I will simply respond to each point in order as follows.

Dear Chris W

....However, that aside, I've written this letter to follow up 'the base' that Collette informed me about as per your request.

As a result of looking at this information I became aware of other activity.

"Other activity?" lol

I asked collette to show me, but instead she had deleted it. So she gave me a summary.

She gave you a summary because I instructed her to delete the conversation (which was and should be none of your business), and to give you a "broad summary" instead. - Had I genuinely believed that I had done something wrong I would not have suggested to her that she do so.

So, without trying to be alarming, here is a rough summarization.

You've been:

- Messaging my fiancee for roughly 3 months.

We've been messaging each other for some weeks on and off, and Collette is of course by no means the only person, or even a primary person, who I have been in correspondence with throughout this time.

- Praising ISIS (an example to be emulated)

I can confirm that I have indeed spoken highly of the tactical skill of IS commanders and strategists (as have many non-IS supporters including many Western scholars who have written books on this subject), and that IS could be seen as being worthy of being emulated in certain respects and by certain parties. Your point is?

- Saying Manchester victims were 'thots'. Even the little children.

I don't recall calling the female individuals who attended that particular concert "thots". What I did call them were "sluts". That is my honest assessment of the type of people who would voluntarily attend such an event, and I seem to recall your fiancee actually agreeing with me with respect to the non-minors who were present.

It's a perfectly logical and valid assumption to make and one that does not necessarily detract from any desire on my part that the attack, should in principle, have been averted.

- Praising Rape as a weapon of war against enemies of the whites, and white 'thots'.

"Praising" is probably the wrong word. I recall that in a private discussion with Collette on Feminism and on ‘women's rights’ (that took place a little more than just a few days ago), I did argue that rape could be seen as a normative action of war in certain situations and/or by certain parties. That it was common throughout the medieval and Viking periods, and that it remains common in modern armies today.

I said this so as to give Collette as an outspoken opponent of that philosophy, a say in criticising it so that I could reflect on her criticisms and perhaps draw different conclusions. I still however, have to confess that I do find Cesar Tort's arguments a little more persuasive than Collette's. https://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/lycanthropy/

- Praising Charles Manson 'as a god'.

Although I recall discussing those who do or did indeed revere Charles Manson as some form of deified being, I don't ever recall calling Charles Manson a "god".

- Sending Collette Hardcore Gay and BDSM porn.

To my recollection the "porn" either refers to a specific woman we were discussing who is a "gynarchist" or 'extreme Feminist' - (obviously we can't have a conversation on what "gynarchism" is unless we can both see what we're talking about); a meme that was intended to take the piss out of the goth community, and in particular the '9 Angels' group; another meme in which I attempted to depict a sodomized tranny as being representative of the Aryan Race's future under Liberalism (crude but effective); and one or two photos of a potential date that I happened to stumble across online, as I believe that Collette was asking to see what she looked like. - Obviously she had no face pics.

With all due respect Collette is an adult, and this was indeed an adult conversation. Moreover, the idea that I would attempt to hit on somebody with lewd political memes or bizarre and obscene images is idiotic. This was banter. If you are indeed correct in deeming this banter to be completely beyond the pale then why was I not blocked then and there?

I must also say that I find it quite rich to be criticised for showing explicit illustrations in a personal message chat, on behalf of somebody who leans out of a moving car window and screams at passers by in the streets to quote "breed".

I "sent" or rather, I used many scores of FB images in the discussions I had with Collette, and frankly, I don't really understand why she has selectively highlighted those particular images for her supposedly "broad summary" of our multiple and for the most part benign conversations on a whole raft of different topics, ranging from great epochs of history to the weather.

As for the "gay" images, I honestly have no idea what you're talking about.

- A sex scene from geroge orwell?

I have absolutely no idea where this has come from. Please enlighten me if you know, because I certainly don't.

- stuff about lowering the age of consent? (16 isn't low enough?)

I took the liberty to remind Collette that prior to the 19th Century the age of consent in England and Wales was just 12. I was playing as Devil's Advocate for Islam - a religion that your fiancee seems to be very vocal about. I'm not a fan of Islam of course, but what's the point in having a one sided conversation?

I also suggested that lowering the age of consent to 13 or 14 might assist couples in marrying a lot younger, something which I don't perceive to be in any sense especially controversial. At least two of my ancestors married and bore children before reaching the age of 16 during the early 19th Century, so I don't really see that as being a bad thing at all. Again what is your point?

- Your plans for 'the civil war'?

I never mentioned any personal “plans for civil war”, so I don’t know where you got that from.

There is however, a widespread consensus among certain quarters that The West will at some point degenerate into a civil war like state. It's not an uncommon belief, many books have been written about it, I'm going to interview someone on it later and it is a belief that Collette left me in no doubt that she shares.

I even seem to recall Collette expressing to me that she felt as if her own future offspring were somehow 'destined' to participate in such an event in the future, without any prompting from me.

Your raising this as a source of concern strikes me as being particularly paranoid if I may say so.

- Mass executions of white 'traitors and their kids'. Goverment included?

In answer to Collette's questions on whether I "hate" White people (which while not wholly true, is indeed at least true in part), I answered her by discussing the potential for conflict in which whole civilian groups would become targets for ideological reasons. This is nothing new, and this type of scenario has happened many times throughout history.

I happen to agree that in certain situations the use of collective punishment can be justified as a means of conducting asymetrical military operations, and in that event would probably be unavoidable to a very large extent. What is your problem with merely discussing this as a topic for hypothetical debate? And what does it have to do with you exactly?

- Sending pics of Hardcore violence (blood eagle? Real guy? Special effects? ISIS executions?)

Obviously I don't agree with Collette that a typical Viking warrior resembled something out of KIll Bill, so I made my opinions known. What's wrong with doing that? Am I not allowed to respond to childish nonsense when I see it? Why engage me in such a conversation in the first place if you don't care for the likely answers?

I should also add that I have no recollection of ever sending any IS execution videos to Collette, although if you're referring to acted scenes from Captain Corelli's Mandolin, I find that frankly laughable. I also don't know what you mean by "real guy" and "special effects". What are they?

- Sending me stuff about AtomWaffen (group that's murdered some people?)

You asked me to explain what the book 'Siege' was. I sent you a couple of links to some online tabloid news articles on Atomwaffen, a modern group that has been arguably inspired into being by Siege - the book that you asked me to explain in the first place. So what is your point?

- Sending me info about paramilitary types who praise the IRA

I asked Collette if you would like to participate in some legal paramilitary training abroad, since I believe that this type of activity is of high value to White men at this particular time. She agreed with me that it was of high value, and she agreed to contact you on my behalf on that note.

You then contacted me and asked me for more information about the group I happened to be in contact with. I gave you the links to the sources of information that you requested, and the individual concerned just happens to be a fan of Irish Republicanism. So what is your issue with that?

- Sending me stuff to go abroad to some training camp?

Same as above.

- etc, etc, etc.

And yet after this supposedly horrifying catalogue of selective complaints that your fiancee has been allegedly made to endure over a period of so called "3 months", only now am I made aware of it? So much for a "broad outline" and so much for a woman who claims to be in an 'equal partnership'.

So, this lists reads badly, and most men would be angry.

I am calm.

Sorry to disappoint, but I don't consider myself to be on trial here, and frankly the conversations I have online with other consenting adults should be none of your business.

However, whether I agree with you or disagree with you on any of these topics is irrelevant due to a pressing concern of mine.

Collette seemed to tell me you're an unemployed startup hopeful living in a one bedroom rented apartment, so really, you can feel free to drop all the 'Mr Motivator' crap.

My mission is to have a white family that survives and thrives in the 21st century, despite the odds being stacked against us for various reasons. Since this is the focus of my activities anything that poses a potential threat to that objective is something I feel the need to deal with.

Or in otherwords, Collette is my beautiful fiancee and I don't want my woman to get dragged into any bullshit. She's there to sort out my dinner and have my kids. I worked my arse off to find and meet her, and then marry her. I'll be having a word with her not to be involved in politics.

I should probably tell you then that recently Collette appeared to me to "praise" the Satanic Nine Angels group (which is itself involved in the Atomwaffen Division that you complain so much about me merely informing you of), on the grounds of its gender equalitarianism. Obviously I don't agree with their stance, but neither do you it seems, which is interesting.

Although I confess to feeling rather chuffed to have been told by her ('Collette') that had she not been engaged to you she would quote "be interested" in me, the truth is I am not interested in Collette anymore so than I would be interested any other woman who obviously isn't single.

On more than one occasion I have urged her to hurry up and conceive on account of her obvious age problems, (presumably with you), and moreover, had she fallen silent some time ago I honestly don't think that I would have bothered to even attempt to stay in correspondence with her. One is therefore given to wonder why she did not fall silent, but instead continued to correspond with me when she didn't really have to in the first place.

Unfortunately my former perceptions of female nature - and in particular of White female nature - have only been reinforced.

And I prefer blondes anyway.

As I said, it's irrelevant if I agree or disagree with you on any of these topics. It's just a case that this kind of activity is not something that helps my plans personally. 'The base' and 'atomwaffen' fall under this category and I am also not personally interested.

So, as a result: I'll be telling Collette to block you and cut off contact with you over the internet, and I shall be doing the same. It really isn't anything personal, and I know you're the kind of man who isn't going to feel offended or slighted by this straight forward action.

Thanks for your time.

You're a good journalist.

Jon Knight the Ludologist.

o7

Uhh Jon. Just one more question,

Face bloted out lest some snowflake decides to make a privacy claim against Cesar Tort's very excellent and highly recommended wordpress site.

What's with the frilly nightie?...

 *2

The reason why I believe this to be true is because after Covington’s death was announced Andy Donner let me know that the last email communication they had received from him was late morning on the 17th. I had been corresponding with Covington the previous evening as late as midnight and my ferry from Seattle arrived in Bremerton at approximately 1pm. I sent an email to Covington at around 1:50pm and went for a walk to survey Bremerton.

By the time I returned a couple of hours later I found no reply. The following day when I met up with Norman Spear at around 6pm at a greasy dinner close to Bremerton docks I had still not received any reply and neither had Norman, despite having obtained a cell phone number purporting to be Covington’s personal line.

I have therefore deduced that Covington must have died between late morning and around 2pm on Tuesday July 17th Pacific Time.

Although I was keen to meet Harold Covington I was actually there to meet Norman Spear and to see The Homeland, (just one of the many regions of the Western World which the Balk-Right has designated as a likely venue for hosting a White Ethno-State post collapse).

During the meeting we discussed Norman’s project, ‘The Base’. A location in the United States which offers paramilitary, CQB (close quarter combat) and tactical firearms training, aimed specifically at young White Nationalist and National Socialist men.

If you the reader are interested to know more about this project then you can find The Base’s Twitter page.

Some snapshots which I managed to take on the evening of July 16th 2018 in Edmonds outside Seattle - the last evening of Harold Covington's life.

* A Subsequent Note To The Reader

No doubt many of you will be aware that recently the Anti-Islamic nativist political UK activist Stephen Yaxley aka ‘Tommy Robinson’ caused another cafuffle this week, after posing for some selfies with one or two squads of British Army recruits. The consequence has been that the unit concerned were placed under arrest and interrogated under the direction of the political police on charges of hate crime.

Their property, especially mobile phones, were confiscated by the authorities, and one recruit was dishonourably discharged on the orders of the Muslim Council of Britain, who direct politically motivated arrests and interrogations at the hands of the Occupied Westminster State.

"Far Right extremist" Tommy Robinson has succeeded in provoking The System into overreacting, thus creating an opening for extremists like us to step in and exploit the rift between The Establishment and the ordinary rank and file of the British Armed Forces that the MOD are themselves causing by their rigid imposition of Cultural Marxist ideology.

Just from looking at them, I can see that these recruits are basically kids, no older than 18 or 19, and they’re all obviously White, working class and probably therefore as straight as a ruler.

Being of that subset of the population in an army that constantly flies rainbow flags from its bases, treats disparaging remarks on shitstabbing as a form of blasphemy would have been treated during the high medieval period, treats silly little sluts fresh out of their high school miniskirts with earrings pierced through their tongues as if they are somehow worthy to be in the same army as Lord Kitchener, George Washington and Clive of India, and fast-tracks negroes through the ranks on the basis that they A, have black skin and B, hate Britain’s glorious military past of subjugating inferior stone age populations wallowing in savagery, is bad enough.

But to aggravate the Judeo-Marxist desecration of Britain’s armed forces with Orwellian police raids and arrests against regular British soldiers and their families based on their Racial Marxist direct discrimination policy against Whites, is I think a golden opportunity that we as patriotic Right wing extremists and professional radicalisers simply cannot ignore.

Wherever you see reference to this story, I want you all, whether in the comments sections, Tweets or in social media chats, to post links to information on The Base and how one can get involved in this American training program protected by the First and Second US Amendments.
Do it now and if a similar opportunity emerges, do it again.

When any prince, council, magnate, parliament or any other institution claiming state power pursues a long and demonstrable train of abuses to the ruinous detriment of the self-evident and national interests of a sovereign People, that they as new custodians purported to represent upon their coming into being, then that same People shall be well within their bounds to call upon natural law for the recovery and withdrawal of their innate sovereignty from the sovereign, and for this sovereignty’s subsequent reinvestment within the populace until such time as new guards for their future national security, prosperity and defence shall become available.

I have examined and studied British constitutionally as thoroughly as I have required in order to properly understand the subject, and I can confirm that there is indeed nothing legally preventing the Head of State from overriding the constitutional conventions that have enabled the Gramscian Marxists to assume and entrench power within the Westminster State: The Generals who are presently in command for the much culturally reduced British Armed Forces are Marxist freaks. Since Elizabeth II has not attempted to sack any of them, then she also is a Marxist freak and must face the due justice for Treason.


*3

From “Katie Gabrielle’s” own FetLife biography:


About me

THE AGE OF FEMALE DOMINANCE IS HERE!

This is the future, the age of feminine power. So powerful we can see it changing our society with each coming year, permanently leaving its mark. My job is to give women a portion of their sexual power back. That being growing her clitoris inches long to the size of a penis. My other job is to transform some men into women and getting them to fully commit to female estrogen hormones, so they can become the women they are and feel that addictive feminine rush.

I want people to give into their true nature. It is more exotic and grand than one might think to be. It is said those who hold the dominance in sex holds dominance in society. If you look backwards in time you will see that men have always held sexual dominance.

But in actuality it is women who hold sexual dominance and this is becoming more apparent. Women's sexuality have always been suppressed, shunned for expressing anything as so. This is now dissolving. A woman can almost have sex with any guy she wants, we can all agree on that. This is where it gets interesting. One might see this as madness but personally I don't care. I see truth in this madness, therefore I will speak.

The way one absorbs one sexual energy directly influences the psyche. Such as how women (yin)  absorb their sexual energy from men (yang). If women were to grow their clitoris (small penis) much much larger, they will then have the ability to penetrate males anally. Since they are absorbing yang differently, this will have a mayor influence on her psyche, thus then elevating her personality to new heights.

This will also have an influence on his psyche because he will be receiving his yin differently. In this inverse manner, orgasms are very powerful. Indeed, much more pleasurable. Since the clitoris is much bigger, orgasms will come faster and stronger. And since she is a woman she will be able to have multiple orgasms.

Since he is a male his prostate orgasm will be much stronger than a penile orgasm. With the moist clitoris pushing up and down his anus and her vaginal discharge breathing down his rectum, energetically  (magnetism, yin and yang) you will be activating his prostate to supreme pleasures. And your large clitoris will be subject to pure bliss. Your very large clitoris will be majestic, seen as exotic and sexy. Men and women will admire it.

Men will be willing to do this, they're always horny. Most of the time they just want a sexual encounter with a pretty girl. Above all, this will bring you into societal dominance, restoring gender order to a larger degree! Remember sex is a huge deal, you were created through sexual energy (magnetic polarities). Through sexual energy you can create immense change. I would also like to add woman are much more powerful than they perceive themselves to be. Claim back your power for it is righteously yours. Do not be afraid to give up your submissive nature.

JOIN MY FETLIFE GROUP: Feminine Sexual Revolution

https://fetlife.com/groups/175323


*4

It is precisely because of Marxist thoughtcrime legislation like this that Collette and Jon can accused me of ‘endangering the physical safety’ of individuals merely for expressing ideas, because they know that by doing so they gain a legal foothold in a system that on the other hand they condemn and despise. How miserable and pathetic. – The truth is that true Patriotism can only flourish in an environment where these Marxist ideas contained in the laws of the Occupied Westminster State have been cast aside and are not an issue.

This is of course one of the many primary reasons why we as White Nationalist men cannot allow ourselves become friends with supposed ‘White Nationalists’ who still haven’t gotten out of this mindset (particularly women), as they will feel inclined to adopt it in measures taken against should we say or argue anything their puny, infantilised minds cannot deal with on a level playing field.

*5

When I say “bolstered by the arrival yet more barbarians day-by-day”, I of course hark back to the Bosnian War of 1992 to 1995, when the mainly Aryan Muslims of Bosnia foolishly enlisted the aid of a veritable foreign legion of Arab and other brownskinned savages from the Middle East, who then proceeded to terrorize and butcher the Serb and Catholic countryside, desecrating places of worship and looting Christian property right in the heart of Europe.


*6

Not only have I viewed ISIS execution videos, but the viewing of terrorist gore such as this is by no means ‘uncommon’ in The Movement. Although for me it’s more a case of fascination than enjoyment. – Not only do these materials show us what it is to overthrow a globalist regime through direct armed struggle, but they also demonstrate what type of world we can expect what few descendants we are permitted to have, to live in, post-collapse, and as to what kind of dangers they can be expected to face in the next century.

Many is the time when I and my good friend, a retired university lecturer and stock market investor, who has done The Movement a very great favour by acquiring as many antisemitic and Neo-Nazi books as possible from Amazon and other websites for his Neo-Nazi library that he keeps in his basement, have sat down in my front living room, watching hours of some of the most gruesome and bloodcurdling Islamic State propaganda, over our Harrods bought cakes, sandwiches and luxury hot chocolates liquored with orange Baileys. Affectionately known as ‘Colossus’ due to his remarkable temperamental resemblance to EA Games’ parody of The Producer in ‘Wolfenstein: Colossus’. – You know who you are. 😉


*7

Although not exactly a defender of Western Civilization as Adolf Hitler was, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher did at least defend The Falklands in the last true Nationalist war that Britain fought, gave Apartheid South Africa and break, crushed the Marxist unions and passed Britain’s first explicitly anti-gay law since the Buggery Act in 1533, banning the teaching of homosexuality to children in schools. – A law that was later to be overturned by Tony Blair’s Government in the early 2000’s.


Biography:

Chris White counts himself as having been in The Movement since March 2009 when he first attended a meeting of the London New Right, England. From 2011 to 2014 he produced and ran a YouTube channel for the London New Right / London Forum called 'New Right Reloaded'. After a brief period of close contact with the founders of National Action (2013-2014), he rejected a role in the organisation on the grounds that the group lacked seriousness, and because of the suspected presence of active homosexuals within the organisation's leadership committee.

He currently runs a radio channel called 'Lone Wolf Radio', but has also contributed to such other publications as Renegade Broadcasting, Radio Free Northwest, The Brian Ruhe Show and Cucked Britain by Odinia Productions.

Chris White frequently travels between England and Eastern Europe on business and has worked closely on a redraft of the Northwest Constitution 2006.

Although not a self-described National Socialist Chris White works closely with National Socialists around the world, and takes a Racial Nationalist and Classical Liberal approach to politics, with similar if not identical goals to most National Socialist organisations.