Huh. Might as well try.

Well this is sure to be interesting.

Yes it will XD

I vote for the good boy Sammy!

I'm interested

Dude, you'd probably be a good candidate. Just hope it isn't a soul-crushing job.

If you happen to get selected by some chance and it is, don't be afraid to bail...

But seriously, best of luck, no doubt they need good conscientious people.

Gosh bless you for saying that!! <3 I hope it goes well! and I agree!

I wish you a lot of luck, this site needs good people like you :3

Gosh bless you!!

^^

You'd probably do well with it.

Thank you! <3

Yes. You would do well there, I think.

Epic broccoli

I'm not interested

I'm gay

Gross

O.o
That's hophobic

Hahaha

Don't be so hateful, Sonic fan.

We're all in the same spectrum honestly
sanic fans, furries, mlp , anime
we're all degenerates out in these streets! 👌👌👌👌👌

Is Sonic a furry?

well hes an animal and he talks and walks idk i'd say so
something like that

I think sonic is moar liek an anime thing, not a real furry

and thats your opinion
either way, anime is lumped up with degeneracy


w e r e a l l d e g e n e r a t e s h e r e

Sonic canon implies that in the far distant past the planet was occupied by humans. Then there was a great war of apocalyptic scale and due to fallout or experimentation or a mix of both the survivors mutated. The characters from the Sonic series are basically furries only for real (in a manner of speaking).

I mean, yeah, but, I mean, liek, furries are anthros and... they don't have anthro bodies they're just what people call, "chibis"

Sonic characters aren't really chibi's. They're more similar in style to Walt Disney or Looney Tune characters which was how they were meant to look. SEGA was deliberately copying western animation with their designs. Since there would be no furry without Disney or WB animation it only makes sense for them to be considered 'furry'. That and the whole point of the furry fandom in the first place was to celebrate anthropomorphic characters which is what they are. Anthropomorphic doesn't mean 'human shaped only with fox ears and a muzzle'. Anthropomorphic art means art of things non-human that have been given human qualities. Furry focuses on those that have animal features which Sonic characters do.

I would argue that Sonic is a chibi for the sole reason of proportions. I mean, you mentioned Disney/LooneyTunes. Look at the proportions of their bodies. Sonic has a typical chibi proportion and so does the rest of his pseudofurry team. Therefore I'd group Sonic with Pokemon and not as a real furry thing.

They are in no way chibi. That aside pokemon are a furry thing. There's no difference between Judy from Zootopia and Pikachu. They're both anthropomorphic cartoon animals. Sonic is an anthropomorphic hedgehog. They all exhibit the same level of sapience. You're being really nitpicky and also kinda gatekeepy.

I dunno, with those body proportions the sonic characters have the anatomy of a small child, and, in some adaptations, the one of a toddler.

I'm not. If I were a degenerate, I'm pretty sure I'd be a really shitty person. I'm trying to change that.

"There is no difference between Judy and Pikachu. Well, of course, if you ignore every single thing that's different.
Also, Pikachu doesn't have the same level of 'sapience' as Sonic or Judy. Judy is a fucking cop bunny midget bitch, and Sonic is a hedgehog who can go fast as the speed of sound and has to fight a morbidly obese man who wants to turn the world into a theme park or some shit. Pikachu can't do shit unless Ash tells him to 99% of the time. The other time he does shit himself is if he saves Ash from getting killed because he's always going on with his "LETS B FRIENDS" speeches in front of dimension-shifting monsters.

Also, not to burst your cum-filled bubble, but Pikachu is not anthropomorphic. I don't think you know what that means. He's pretty feral if anything.

P.S.: Sonic isn't a chibi, just an elongated chibi. Two different things. Look it up.

I'm joking. The point is furries, weebs , mlp and Sonic lovers are equal. That's about it.

Quoting your comment "is furries, weebs , mlp and Sonic lovers are equal." I'm absolutely sure you can piss off Sonic fans by comparing them to the furries.
Which is quite what makes them unique, I haven't seen a single weeaboo or brony complain or cry whenever they were compared to us, the furries. It kinda shows the Sonic fanboys are extremely narcissistic.

I've personally seen everyone lose their shit except for mlp fans, and I'm sure there are mlp fans who hate comparison too. As per usual it really depends on the person. I personally refuse to degrade or insult someone based on their fandom interest because I find it silly and trvial. I'ma just judge someone on their individual actions and avoid generalising a whole community.

-Peace

Pikachu being anthro why would someone believe that, hahaha

but yes, this comment makes a fair point or three.

A toddler is still human. As are chibis.

>weebs
ayo, hol' up

MerkavaMerkava Your post made me laugh so loud xD

Oh no dont make me get started with ponies. The fact that small colorful horses can talk, it doesnt make them furries.

If toddlers were humans they would be called humoddlers

..I'm sorry, what?
Toddlers are literally the offspring of humans, just because they're small doesn't mean they're not human :s

Pikachu exhibits plenty of intelligent qualities. While not all pokemon possess near-human intelligence there are plenty of times Pikachu displays conscious decision making on a human level. Plus there's the cat from team rocket. Explain him. Btw anthropomorphic just means giving something not human human qualities. it's not a style of drawing. The brave little toaster is anthropomorphic.

Oh there are plenty of bronies who lose their shit when they're compared to furries. You try being both furry and brony (as I am), note the similarities between the two fandoms then try pointing it out over on Derpibooru or EQD. Have fun with that. That said calling them all extremely narcissistic is pretty unfair. I know lots of Sonic fans who aren't assholes. In fact most of them are both furry and brony. People really need to stop judging entire fandoms based on a few dipshits.

Well toddlers aren't allowed to have sex, and you see quite a bit of sexual scenes between sonic and his sonic-like friends and ocs

Pikachu is not smarter than a trained dog, he can't be considered anthro for that reason. And, in order to not double post, you can't call ponies anthros because their basal state is to be quadrupeds, them talking don't make them real anthros. Is liek... liek...

Liek.

Well yeah sure but that's why people up-age the characters in their own interpretations to avoid guilt, usually by taking their canon age and adding on how ever many years they've existed (even though time logic doesn't work on fictional characters and they stay the same age forever unless stated otherwise by the original owners).
It's similar to the warped logic of some weebs who wanna fuck kids but don't wanna admit it so they cling to lolis who look like toddlers but are written as being 18+.

This OC looks 7 but is actually 56 years old

Having "human intelligence" doesn't mean he's anthropomorphic. Also, no he doesn't lol. Again, don't say shit you don't know and act like you know it.
You're being illiterate for no reason. However, Meowth is a different story. No shit he's anthropomorphic. He talks like a person, acts like a person, and moves around like a person,
And guess what, Pikachu doesn't do any of those things. Just because you think Pikachu has a 1000 IQ, that doesn't mean he's "anthropomorphic," or a better term, "humanoid."
Are you gonna say dolphins are anthropomorphic too? They're about as smart as humans and is smarter than Pikashits since you think smarts only mean something is anthropomorphic, my boy?

P.S. fam, i don't get where you got me saying "anthropomorphism is a style of drawing" because that's retarded

This child is 200 years old so it's ok if i can fuck it xdddd

Dolphins are smarter than 99% of poekmahns tho

Who said they wasn't?

Dunno pawbably i misread'dt

"Are you gonna say dolphins are anthropomorphic too? They're about as smart as humans and is smarter than Pikashits"

Lol yes apparently I misread, I was too busy stuffing myself with chocolate cookies and milk like a true alpha male

IN the study of art styles, the style of "sonic" is generally tied to looney tunes and to western cultures. While you personally tie it to other styles because of you own preferences/mind/definitions, but what Zidders has mentioned is still the objective truth XD. Sonic's intended style was always based on looney tunes despite the proportions being similar to what we now consider "chibi". That wasn't so much a widespread thing "then".

What is even going on with this post?

Ok do the following experiment. Grab a ruler. Grab a sonic image. Tell me how many times the head fits in the character's total height. Then do the same with Bugs Bunny, or Sylvester, or Lucas, or Elmer, etc. Now tell me if the proportions of the former are in concordance with those of the other one.

Besides, sonic doesn't even have any consistence. His arms ain't even blue.

Haha I like that one. Humans are an animal, they walk and talk... So, they are furry too. XD

heh, Furries are only fictional. Don't take it too literally

Furries may be fictional, but they are as real as a pancake if you think about it bro. Just, think about it bro.

Yeah. I would have to agree that technically Pikachu isn't anthro. To be anthro, you have to apply human characteristics and traits to something that is not human. Since Pikachu is a made up character, there technically isn't a version of him that doesn't already have these abilities.

You realize the furry community is supporting of LGBT rights, right?

whoosh

Maximum whoosh

Not everyone. Better and safer to keep that type of stuff to yourself anyway.

Well a lot of the time, the ones who don't support the LGBT community may actually be a part of it themselves, but just hiding in the closet. It's the same for furries in general. I used to be a closet furry because of the anti-furries.

Its also highly possible that someone who "may actually be a part of it" might not support the LGBT community due to how the LGBT community often treat individuals inside it. From trans men attempting to force lesbians to sleep with them, to parts of the trans community wanting to remove the " B " and everyone associated with it because "there are more than two genders and Bi is short for binary, meaning it perpetuates the claim that there are only two!".

Both of these are real instances by the way. In the UK they had a pride parade where the lesbian community got upset because the trans community was getting front stage and the reason they cited was that many trans members kept trying to get in bed with them, using such gross arguments as "I might look like a man but i'm a woman on the inside" because they had yet to go through with the surgeries. In the other case they wanted to turn it from "LGBT" to "LGT" I'd say the entire thing but honestly its hard to keep track of the multiple different ways the "entire" "LGBT" title means now.

I for one am Bisexual, but don't support LGBT because I've seen how they act, I didn't see others shouting about how they claimed they acted, I saw how they acted first hand and decided there is nothing healthy there.

Are you trying to tell us that there's an even more toxic community than our den??!!

So you're saying you dislike gays, lesbians, and trans people simply because of how a select few of them act? That doesn't seem fair.

amazing.. literally every one of those points and "facts" you brought up are blatantly wrong. quick question, how much crack do you smoke daily?

If I may throw in my two cents: You seem to be really focused on the only discrimination you faced by a few people of the LGBT community, or specifically the extremist part of the community that most of us actually oppose, and disagree with their tactics. You didn't mention any of the other discriminations within the community outside of what affected you. EVERY single person in the LGBT community has faced discrimination from another person in the community, ironically to your point, trans people face the worst of it. Which also may be the reason they are pushed to such extremism, with people so quick to not support them over ill actions from trans people they don't even know.

I am also someone who identifies as bisexual, I lean on one side and it often leads to me being treated differently. Trans people have gotten mad if my gender preference doesn't fall to them, gay people get mad that I'm not just "fully gay", straight people get mad because you "can't have both", lesbians get mad because sometime's there's a rivalry between gays/lesbians. People are just angry, all over the board, every group has the angries. Punishing all LGBT folks because of the actions of a few is very silly I think, imagine if we did that with any other kind of group. Watch out for white men in their 20-30s, a few of them were serial killers so I don't support them any more.

I did NOT say I dislike gays, lesbians and trans people, You are blatantly trying to twist my words. One of my statements is literally pointing out a situation in which LESBIANS WERE THE VICTIMS. If I hated lesbians why the fuck would I point it out!

These aren't isolated incidents. They USED to be isolated incidents. They're growing more frequent and incase hadn't noticed, there are people starting to turn against them. More each of these responses seem to have ignored the point I was making to attack me instead (gee I wonder if that might be my fucking POINT)

Not everyone is turning off the LGBT community train because of outside "anti-LGBT" individuals. It's literally shit that people are experiencing INSIDE THE FUCKING COMMUNITY that is turning people away. Jezus why the fuck do I need to spell that out. Oh. Right. because you tried to claim I hated gays, lesbians and trans people even though one of my points literally is trying to point out victimization OF LESIBANS.

I'm heterostraight and I feel sort of discriminated when people draw hot vore porn with male characters because I find it harder to get off to male vore than to... mnnnfff... *drools*.... girl vore.

The best way to get into a fetish is to mix it with fetish we already know.
If you can't masturbate on men, search for womens. There's Ziravore, FidchellVore, etc.

I'm reasonably happy

• Neutrality - Moderators respect the opinions of others and maintain a balanced perspective.

🤔

🤔

🤔

🤔

🤔

Baaa-baa... Oh, sorry, I thought we were being sheep :D

You obviously don't understand what's going on here.
Kabier, OP, was questioning the neutrality requirement, while the chain of thinking emoji was meant to be a jab at OP's hypocrisy. _{At least that's what I intended with my reply.}

You obviously cannot take a joke o3o

Kabier isn't allowed to comment on hypocrisy.

gr8 b8 m8

r/woooooosh

Kabier-logic: "Open discussion is good, toxicity is bad! *blocks people who call her out on acting toxic*"

Sorry I arrived too late on this but what did Kabier do?

No, let her do it at will. We need more material to laugh derisively and haughtily at in these dark times furrydom and the world are experiencing.

It's more a matter of her and her mate having extremely insufferable personalities in general and views on various things, rather than one of one or a few very major incidents. The summary is, she's a raging untreated BPD-type case who angrily attacks people and retaliates, and expresses bigoted/questionable sentiments on various matters, but instead of realizing she's inciting so many people with her outrageous behavior, she accuses furrydom of hating white cisgender females and basically called antifa furs pedophile enablers as she indignantly announces her withdrawal from furrydom. I've also heard people say she's deteriorated as an artist.

TL:DR- She's a raging BPD-type who many are rightfully disgusted and angered by, but doubles down on the indignant rage and calls us all bigots and liberals or whatever in response.

I wish I was that delusional too.

If only...

no

That's rich coming from you.

Heyo

Shit call 999 we got a serious burn here

No survivors

Get a load of this goy.

hi have I mentioned that I love you lately?

so i guess you're clearly not qualified

ITT: niggas goin' HAM

Hello, furry police? I’d like to report a murder.

Oof!!

ITS GETTING SPICY UP IN HERE

Lmao go away normie

Maybe if people didn't mention their political opinion there wouldn't be a problem. FA needs a "no politics" rule because we are in this shitstorm because some people decided it was a good idea to broadcast their political preferences on a site that isn't about politics to begin with

Agreed!

Some people outed themselves on their own volition and they get upset about others not being tolerant to them when politics and religion are very sensitive issues that can easily devolve into conflict which is why it's wise never to talk about them.

Generally a "no politics or religion" rule actually just means "no christians or conservatives"

If you are willing to believe that there's a problem because this policy isn't supposed to favor one side contrary to what you are assuming

No, but I wasn't born yesterday either lol

If you are willing to believe "no politics or religion" means "no conservatives or christians" doesn't that make you sound like a right wing version of an sjw who constantly believes they are being oppressed?

Well I suppose I'd have to be right wing and christian first wouldn't I? I've been on the internet since before you were born, I'm pretty well aware of what that rule means in places like this.

you sounded like that when you put up that comment but when I say "no politics or religion" that literally would mean all mention of politics (democrat, republican, etc) except fictional political parties which are not to be made would be forbidden on the site. The same with religion (every single one including atheism) but one thing I didn't mention is religion has ironically been the more civil of the two from what I saw.

So it would be a ban on all mentions of politics and religion except in cases that are fiction because some people are worldbuilders and I tend to fall in that category myself despite not posting much.

so while I wasn't specific on what I meant I literally mean what I am saying

Problem is the administration have already shown a bias, admitted to said bias, but still claims to be handling things neutrally, even though he defends a group labeled a terrorist organization. Sadly this means, if we're being completely honest and taking past actions by the administration into account? 'no politics or religion' policy will be cherry picked as to who it is enforced on. leaving people who say things like "Christians are complete scum" alone, while people saying "I don't wanna draw gay characters because it's a bit weird with my religious leanings" will be banned.


I will use the sonic rule as an example. Sonic characters (except for blatantly underage ones, like cream) are supposed to be fine on the site. except the site has a yearly "purge" where moderators start banning sonic artists for 'underage' content even though the characters have, repeatedly, been stated to be fair and allowed on the site.

You do have a point there. We do need more moderators though because not all trouble tickets are getting processed quickly

Thing is they constantly claim every time that it'll help with how quickly trouble tickets get answered. But it almost seems like it's just bait with how things go. Plus I've been saying for a while now that they need to show who the actual admins are again and not hide them under fake accounts.

I do agree with that sentiment regarding admins needing to be held accountable

Howzabout people being able to talk about whatever they want without being dicks?

Yeah, I know, that would be too much to ask...

That's impossible to enforce

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

It'd also be nice if there was a, "No posting everything you hate on your main page."
Always nice to see amazingly welcoming people ( sarcasm )

How to prove a point in one quote 🤔

Funny how YOU of all people point this out.

HA.
No room.

Let's just get some "anonymous sources" we can prove anything we want with that!

As if YOU of all people have a right to criticise them for how they act. Ahahahahaha. What a joke.

Oh look who crawled out of his depths to complain about something they have no right to complain about anymore.
I swear you take every single chance to make anything possible about you even if you're being an absolute hypocrite in the process.
I'm actually surprised anyone takes the two of you seriously anymore after the mountain of shit thats come from both your mouths.

Excuse my ignorance but... what happened?

Eh, besides being a talentless hack with an ego bigger than his girth, I believe he said the n-word on Twitter once?

Too be fair, it’s not hard to have an ego bigger than his girth, even when hard.

There's not enough time in the day to explain everything wrong with these two. Google is your friend.

I googled it all. Dark stuff. Disturbing stuff. I need to wash my eyes.

Coming from the guy who screams the n-word casually and brings up anti-trans propaganda? Hmmmm.

"How dare you insinuate FA isn't bipartisan, you Nazi Racist Transphobic Sexist piece of shit!"

Gee wiz I wonder why people have an issue with moderation. FA is 15 years behind because that is the kind of behavior that gets attention.

If you actually gave a damn about improving this platform, you wouldn't be trying to strawman every Popufur that dares challenge the status quo. Hunting for racist bigots? Look to yourself first before projecting on others.

deactivate iguana

deactivate iguana

That would make sense if we saw many popufurs being chasen for that same reason. But in this journal the only one is you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc917wPX1x8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCvC4_6zkrs

Careful where you spin that porn yo

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA no
Don't even try to think you have any sway on this site buddy

I sincerely believe you and Kabier have behavioral and political dispositions which are extremely compatible and congruent with AltFurry- specifically, Len + Blumiere's branch of it. I'm surprised you two haven't joined, yet. Furry Raiders are also an option. Foxler and Kabier could confer on the finer points of furry bestiality porn, and argue over why Kabier is morally superior to Foxler and other cubfurs despite sexualizing characters possessing the estimated human intelligence of a small toddler.

Being Classical Liberal is Altfurry now? There's good reason the sites in the state it's in. Same reason there's an hysteria over Nazis. Politics takes priority over common sense.

When you lack any competency or integrity, resort to calling everyone slightly less left than you a threat to your existence. Considering mods already use their questionable authority to 'identify ties to hate groups'. I myself have had imposters pose as me on Telegram trying to manipulate the new rules into false flags.

Complaints are completely warranted. FA decided that it's their obligation to enforce political bias when it's a task no other company has been able to control effectively. They either need to be consistent and ban those promoting Antifa, or ignore politics entirely and stick to cases of direct harassment by individuals.

Anyone smell something burning?

lol too bad you don't qualify at all for that! transphobe piece of shit

🤔

How’s your dog doing?

HEEEY-OOOO

Sure. Idk if I want to be an Mod, but Ill submit an application anyway

Ahahahah. Good luck, you think that people who like vore should get a bullet in the head, you're totally qualified.

Do I know you? Besides, Its likely I wont get the position and I dont care

• Have good and respectful communication.

Well darn...

Looks like that one's in the dumper...

Hard no.

sure why not im bored

_{Fix up the crew you already have though.}

This.

Well said~

I dunno, man. If you polish a turd, is still a turd. Better to flush it while you can.

is this a job or just volunteering?

This is the Fall 2018 application form for the volunteer role of Moderator on the Fur Affinity website.

How much time would a moderator need to dedicate to FA throughout the day to be considered active? Checking in once per hour? Maybe once in the morning and evening? I assume daily is a must but am unsure about the specifics.

Yeah, I'd like to know about this too. :o

Per the app: 10 hours a week is ideal.

never mind i dont care

Nope.

you really gotta focus on the neutral point this time

Despacito

Big mood

Honestly super interested, I'd love to help out on my most visited site

Nice to see commenting enabled again.

I want to daydream that when a journal gets posted on this account, the FA staff gathers across a round table and asks: "If we enable comments, is there anything here which the peasants may criticize and point our flaws out to us? Please let us assess the risks..."

Is this volunteer work or is it paid?

Volunteer

Things that won't happen.

I'm glad you pointed out that they have to remain neutral. I was worried somebody might disobey that rule and just go with the human instinct of partiality but there it is, in writing, protecting us all.

Some of the comments to this journal really make me rub my temples.

Unfortunately stupidity never goes out of style.

Definitely hoping to do some good! I'm interested!

Nice but I think you missed a crucial entry for "Best Moderator Traits":

• Have a detective's degree or investigative training, in order to skillfully research the ages of fictional characters across the internet, so that we may more effectively persecute artists when we're ideologically offended by the porn they draw.

If you're accusing someone of drawing loli/child porn, YOU'RE supposed to provide the proof, last I checked. XD

It would be easier for the artist to just not draw children in porn.

LMAO I mean you'd fuckin think, right? but that's just way too difficult for some people!

My brains have already been blown out thank you

• Neutrality - Moderators respect the opinions of others and maintain a balanced perspective.

I needed a good laugh thanks

I would like to apply for CEO

You'll be awesome at this

'An Excellent Application'

You're overqualified.

Oh, look. A CEO who will get shit done[/sarcasm]

It's a voluntary opportunity of donated hours to make this website better.

Not really: It's a position you can occupy if you think people on the site have too much freedom of expression and are allowed to draw too many things. Your payment is the bliss you feel when you know you've made a struggling artist's life harder for drawing something that offended you.

LOL, you're hilarious.

I would love to help but very busy between what is left of this year and next. Sorry. ':3

I would be interested, but i know for a fact that i´m far away from being qualified for such a roll.
simple for the fact that i see some rules stronger than they might are.....

It kind of cracks me up how you say remain neutral, when there is clearly favoritism when it comes to certain members. You have bigger name people who are actively scamming people out of money, been reported many times and do nothing, but a smaller time artist gets suspended or griped at for the dumbest shit, like not tagging images properly or posting too many reminders. Maybe actually look up what neutral means and apply it rather than make a joke out of your mods.

I accidentally clicked on this, but kinda glad I did because the comments section is fascinating

It is indeed. Some serious, some humorous. Overall it's an intriguing amalgamation of those who are genuinely interested and those who are critical in their own right on the subject. And then there are those who did not read when asked about it being a job or not

I literally don't have any idea what any of this drama is. I suppose I never got involved so this comments section is all new things 0wo

This would certainly be pretty interesting to do, but I doubt I'm qualified.

Just do it for the hell of it

I just submitted it a minute ago :dab:

:3

>putting up with one of the most toxic and drama-whoring community the internet has to offer
>FOR FREE

Sticking my dick in a hornet's nest would be a better use of my time.

>THEY DO IT FOR FREE

https://images.encyclopediadramatic.....ee_janitor.png

Now that's hot.

It’s hard to be neutral about crimes like bestiality and pedophilia.

It's also hard to be neutral about murder. Drawing a picture of someone getting shot, however, isn't the same as pulling the trigger. Drawing a picture is more akin to talking about it or imagining it. There are a lot of things I find distasteful, but I get uneasy when someone tells me that I'm not allowed even to think about them. Whom would you trust with that much control?

Of course, posting an image is more like making someone else think about these things. (Still not the same as doing them, however.) If FA had decent and specific filters, this wouldn't be a problem - just tell the site what not to show you, and you're all set. Maybe in the much-dreamed-of site recode - which I believe we are still allowed to think about.

being a site based in usa which has laws against pedophilia and dog-rape, it should be enforced. as it is country-wide.

Again, the laws apply to deeds much more clearly than to images. Prosecuting people for forcing actual children to participate in sex acts is entirely appropriate. Prosecuting people for photographing and selling images of those acts is appropriate, even if they merely watched and did not participate, because they are accessories to the crime. Prosecuting people who simply own child porn is problematic; I can understand it as a practical way to try to choke off the market, but I don't think most pedophiles do it for the money.

Prosecuting people for drawing an image, unless it is a life sketch of a real incident, is much too close to prosecuting thought, which is way too totalitarian for me. That being said, FA, as a private website, has the right to adopt and enforce any policies it wishes; and I am sure that the reason they ban overt child pornography, and sexual photographs of animals, is because of U.S. law. But an image of creatures which do not actually exist in the real world is very, very difficult to link to an actual crime - other than the "crime" of incorrect thought. If I have a painting of a knight slaying a dragon, why couldn't someone say that the image actually represents the real-life assassination of a bad government official, then ban it and imprison me for "suggesting" such a deed? In some countries, they can and they do. Those aren't places I would ever want to live.

The fact that the lines get blurry around the edges - the fact, for instance, that there are invented species which look distinctly child-like - is not a reason to draw an arbitrary line across people's imaginations. In the end (so to speak), the abuses of freedom generally work out better than the abuses of power.

Sorry (not really)but there is no grey area. There are sickos and sicko sympathizers.

Because banning the posting of imaginary characters engaged in sick acts doesn't automatically create grey areas, paradoxes and contradictions. (Not really.)

-That being said, I understand why they do, and it is their prerogative.

By this logic, drawing violence is a gateway to real violence.

So we better ban all fantasy representations. Video-games, Films, Music.

It's fallacy to claim humans cannot differentiate fantasy from reality, however FA can host any content they want. Just don't try to apply logic to it.

Why would you expect that when FA staff members have openly talked about abusing their dogs?

Catweasel: did they? where?

One of the staff raped their pet.

Important? Lol. Special snowflake gender names are what people think is “important” these days. The truth is there is nothing more important than this.
I don’t care what you say on the matter. Arguing FOR bestiality makes you just as sick. It makes you a bestiality sympathizer and a pedosympathizer. In other words, a huge part of the problem.

hey consider that you can be against pedophilia and zoophilia and.... get this.... not be a transphobe.
pretty wild idea huh!!!

Wow-not only are you a huge hypocrite (you draw furry porn-don't give me that 'all drawn bestiality is wrong...except for this bestiality I draw that makes me money, that's Ok' BS) you're also transphobic, too. Get over yourself.

LOL. im sorry where have i drawn bestiality?
because DRAGONS are not DOGS. you fuckin' 'tard.

Depends. Would you say that dragons are beasts? Would it be bestiality?

And, if you were at a concert and someone told you "yo dude the guy at the drums is a fucking beast". Would it count as bestiality too?

A feast of bees could be considered a bee-st, but would it make it bee-stiality?

Haha nice puns but no. If you aren’t arent familiar with bestiaity id suggest the power of www.google.com
Dragons while beasts are not real animals and thus it cannot be bestiality. If you were fucking a feral iguana obviously this is a different story.

And this is the point where reading FA literally gave me a headache

Are you Hated?

"Bestiality is a word describing sex between a human and an animal. There are few things stranger or more repulsive than bestiality. When you say bestiality, you can hear the word beast, which is a good clue to the meaning. People who are into bestiality like having sex with animals.""

Sorry, but you're wrong.
It's still bestiality or "beastiality." It means to have sex between a human or humanoid (in this case) and an animal, right? Dragons are still animals son. They just aren't real (no shit). Hell, you even refer to them as "fake animals." It's still bestiality whether you like it or not. I don't see anywhere that lets you have a pass on "bestiality" just because it's an animal- oh I'm sorry, "beast," that just so happens to not exist. What kind of levels of irony you have to be on to say something this retarded?

P.S.: A beast is still an animal you fucking moron.

HAHA LIBTARD GETS REKT
EPIK STYLE!!!!@11

Motherfucker, go back to reddit.

ah look another dogfucker trying to argue.

Oh look.
Another out-of-place, degenerate furfaggot, trying too hard to be edgy for no clear other than to be some "Internet Tough Guy."

I don't get to see those everyday.

EDIT: https://puu.sh/BJDC0/ce27734612.png

lmao so tough

How are you supposed to flex your tiny e-cock around if you're gonna block me, you fucker?

Merkava, dude, your comments make me keep reloading the journal over and over xD

That being said, what if dragons are actually humans? Lets consider those theories about ancestral races, think of how the chinese knew of dragons without them "existing", what if dinosaurs weren't dinosaurs but rather a civilization of dragons and we evolved from them?

Edit: after all, think of this vestigal bone we all have called, duh, tailbone. What if that used to be a dragon tail millions of years ago?

You opened my eyes.
I should've known.

Then human on human sex would be humanitiality

Fun fact time Adiago. :p Did you know?

Humans are species of anaimal. :D One of the facts of life, which many people completely forget.

yep. sentient, two walking animals.
i doubt you'd stick your dick in a beehive

Over 80 percent of tue world human population, forget they thrmselves are a mammal, which finally comes to being an animal. XD How people perceive logical or true explanations. They get angry and abusive.

Yes. The sentient part is what separates us from the other animals. :3

But hey, sometimes it doesn't look that way. O.o

See? Humanitality is real.

I'll take that away from you, because that's called "rape."

But as long as you're keeping this disgusting, degenerate shit in your mind/fantasies, who cares?
As long as you're not like Kero and His Zoo Crew, you should be fine.

Wait? You commented on me? XD I'm pretty sure that wasn't directed at me.

No.
I'm talking to you.
I know, isn't that amazing?

Also, I'd talk to the Adiago fucker as well (and I'm sure you thought what I said was supposed to be at his ass even though what I said was about what you said so idk what you talkin' 'bout), but he blocked me since I called him out on his shit like everyone else did, but no, what I said was at you, resoundingly.