It's Pretty Clear the Bad Guys Are Losing, And Quite Poorly At That
Yes, I was pissed off yesterday when the cowards and shills who have infiltrated Reddit like a cancer and the satanists and cannibals who run Reddit conspired together to take down all the "Q"-related subs yesterday.
And yes, it was frustrating to see the influx of TuMOR-types to this sub yesterday, attacking GA and Q with the evil glee that fuels low-level demons and toadies.
But let's face it: If you know "The Art of War," this is all signs of a losing team.
At your weakest, appear strong--if they were strong, they wouldn't have to censor. If they were strong, they wouldn't have their team of MSM parrots attacking a subreddit in some of the nation's largest publications.
Control communications. The #1 thing an occupying force does when it takes over a nation is commandeer the media. The bad guys have controlled media for a loooong time, but they're losing their hold by the day. When you have to shut down a subreddit with less than 100K subscribers (though I bet it was more and the liars who run Reddit were throttling it, but whatever), you are showing your hand and it's a weak one.
Chessboard moves and countermoves--Does anybody actually think the Q team wasn't anticipating this? Of course they were. It will be fun to see what happens next and watch the cancers, shills and MSM parrots sputter and protest like the impotent limp dicks they are.
The ugly shadow monster is being forced to rear its many heads. The Deep State works best when it's just that: Deep. Operating below the public radar, in darkness. Between that treasonous NYT Op-Ed, the obviously controlled MSM talking points on pretty much everything, the social media clampdown and now Reddit's censorship roll, the Deep State is being forced to emerge from the shadows. They don't like it, which is why they're being so gross and pissy about it.
So take a step back. Look at all that's been accomplished in the past year--even the past week! Did you see all the key corporate resignations? Another half dozen--Leslie Moonves at CBS, but also "60 Minutes" top executive producer and sex freak Jeff Fagler; Jack Ma of Alibaba; Tim Armstrong of Oath/HuffPo/AOL (back in the day).
Bad guys are losing, and losing badly. Their fuse is running short. Their impotent anger, like a baby's temper tantrum, in their failure to achieve universal evil and sexual abuse, is what we need to be concerned about: They hate everything, including themselves, and will do whatever they can to ruin as much as they can before they are ultimately defeated.
But ultimately defeated they will be. Because they're already defeated. They are losers, inherently. Losers, losers, losers.
Have a great day! God loves you!
I agree. But as it goes: "I fully support you listening whatever shit your ears itch"
They have a God given right to do so, and Reddit as a massive social media institution should allow all discussion, whether it's womens rights, mlp, Q, LGBT, rule34, politics or anything.
I don't personally believe in Q, but for those who do then this certainly legitimised him in their eyes.
Well said man, excellent post.
They are 'resisting' change but they can't stop it. They're losing, afraid and desperate so they resort to lies, astroturf and censorship. As George Martin wrote, "When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say."
Also:
Sergey Brin - GOOG [Founder][BORN IN MOSCOW]
was married to…
Anne Wojcicki - 23andme [Founder]
was brother-in-law to…
Susan Wojcicki - CEO of YouTube
[DARPA]
^ ^ ^ Read between the lines.
I watched a documentary a few months back about a man who spent 20 years on death row for a crime he did not commit. Right before he was about to be released he said the guards took everything from his cell. He wanted to be mad and react but sat in his cell and realized it did not matter if he had nothing for a week because he was going home. I was with you yesterday in my anger at the pettiness of certain users of this site. Today I am happy that the truth is going to set us free,. I personally prefer the band aid to be ripped off sooner rather than later. But that is for my own selfish desires.
Knocking it out of the park, Ian! On point as usual.
Fuck yes!
If their arguments were based in truth then they wouldn't have to destroy the diversity of opinion on reddit.
Sad to see the "left" turn into the enemies of equality.
I think the charade is over. There was a time people believed that the democrats were the party of the working class, but the veil has been slowly lifted and everyone with half a brain can see the ugly visage lurking beneath. Neither party is the party of the people. Washing is full of nothing but sellouts, the extent of which increased exponential with the citizens united court case giving billionaires the ability to anonymously donate unlimited sums to as many campaigns as they please. Do he right thing and vote third party
Where did the Q subs threaten violence? I was a member, no regular member there ever did.
Same. Shit-posts galore, but never saw anything violent. Are any news outlets referring to anything specific? I’ve only seen short articles with nothing to reference.
Having been on the GA for months, I never saw a single bad thing posted. Even mild things like wanting a traitor to face the death penalty was removed for being "too violent..." this was censorship pure and simple. I must have missed the last few minutes of it when the fake posters possibly went in to shitpost just so reddit could say "see look! Racism! SHUT-EVERYTHING-DOWN"... pretty damn convenient 5+ subs all got banned at the exact same time.....
Sorry, this is incorrect. There were a few comments that were quickly deleted, but they were false flags that were immediately snap-shotted and sent to Reddit Admins.
Dormant Q subs were shuttered and shut down that had no comments at all. How do you explain that?
This was a coordinated effort, driven by fear and panic, and it will blow up in the face of the evil ones, just like pretty much everything else has in the past year or so.
Sorry, but it’s absolutely not. I read plenty of it. Read a lot of GA, kind of fascinated by the cult aspect of it.
Literally nothing has blown up in the face of the people you call evil because they disagree with you. Trump and his cronies are the ones actually being investigated, tried and convicted of blatant crimes.
Tell me, what hypothetical happening could occur that would make you legitimately conclude that Q is a hoax and his claims are garbage?
That last paragraph is gold.
So many people buy into some pretty questionable theories and stick to them like they’re in a cult. Like just because it’s not the MSM feeding you a narrative, that doesn’t mean you’re not susceptible to being played.
They brigaded the sub with trolls and used that as the excuse to ban the sub.
The ubiquitous downvoting in its final days. Targeting by other subs for elimination.
I mean mostly those guys were all crazy and all the people who were banned for saying how dumb the Q stuff is were always downvoting
You still didn't say how you know that they brigaded the sub with trolls, just that there a lot of downvoting
The mods commented on how their jobs were getting harder because of the trolls on the final few days. They said we were being brigaded.
The movement is non-violent.
"mostly those guys were all crazy." Smart people look like crazy people to dumb people.
"mostly those guys were all crazy." Smart people look like crazy people to dumb people.
I mean it's insanely easy to discredit the "Q movement" or whatever
All you have to do is ask for a single time where Q promised something and it happened. Like the BOOM. BOOM. BOOM. week where nothing happened
Or last friday where he said to "grab a bag of popcorn"
Or how monday was supposed to be the day everything finally went down
His first EVER post was saying that HRC would be imprisoned a week from that post. That was in Oct of 2017. What happened? Why do you keep letting him lie and string you along like an absentee parent promising he'll be there on christmas day?
Dude i just did
reread my comment, can you answer the question?
Wheres the proof they broke the rules? They banned 5 diffrent subs at once. And if there is a comment then how do GA comments stack up against those in politics which are continous and never adressed by mods?
The future is digital democracy. You might hate the left or the right, but we all hate the elites more.
Digital democracy or death.
This is the first thing I have read today, a nice start! Thank you.
Everyone is entitled to their own personal beliefs about spirituality.
This is why I stopped calling myself "atheist" a long time ago.
As science becomes dogma to some, atheists then feel the need to attack religion because it's like an Easter Bunny fairy tale in their worldview that just can't be *logical, rational or true*.
But they are really just attacking their own spirituality, of which their dogmas are rooted in. Is the Big Bang a noble lie? Lots of folks are lost in this weird battle of doing what Alan Watts puts simply as "playing hide and seek with God".
I can see it in Jordan Peterson, he's trying to convey this message as well, but he's having a really hard time doing it because he hasn't reached a point where it all crystallizes and becomes a clear concept that's easy to convey. He has a lot of stuff to work through before he gets there, because he has a lot of sources to draw from when formulating ideas, but I think he will gain the enlightenment through that journey, so even though I'm critical of Peterson and his rambling, I think the message he's trying to bring about is ultimately very important for a society that is losing touch with spirituality.
Much of western society has only experienced spirituality through strange constructs like drug addiction, religion, cults, tree hugging, and brand worship. These constructs harness people's innate and likely suppressed spirituality which wants to come to the surface because it is at least half of who/what we are. Not many people can recognize that and there is no current science or philosophy to back this up yet, so they are deep in the unknown.
The point of life is not physical, it is spiritual, or a good mix of both.
Of course they are. I was just curious - everyone has their reasons.
If you don't believe in a creator, then the universe cannot be a simulation as many claim it is likely to be. For a simulation REQUIRES a creator.
I don't think it's a simulation. I think it just 'is'. No creator is required.
In fact, a creator doesn't solve the problem either - one can always ask what created the creator. If the answer is "nothing, it's always been," then why cannot this be true of the cosmos?
Inside the universe is a realm of time and space. The creator exists outside this realm.
Consciousness is primary not matter.
I can still ask what created the creator. And what created the realm outside the realm of time and space.
If time, space, matter, gravity, are all constructs that we exist within, do you even have a capacity for understanding what something that lives outside of those boundaries looks like?
Something outside of time and matter?
Additionally, how do you figure life evolved from non-life, does that make very much sense?
If a creator doesn't require a creator, then why does the cosmos? You need to address that.And yes, I believe that life arose from a process of abiogenesis.
Something that lives outside of time and space would not "look" like anything because the way something "looks" is actually how that thing reflects light off of itself and how your brain processes it. If the creator lives outside of time and space, then again, he is nowhere and nowhen which just isnt. One cannot simply refer to a place that is defined by not being, having characteristics of, and not having the dimensions of a place. A creator would have to create some where and somewhen even if those when and where are "outside" our own. Its super meta.
Outside the realm of time and space there is no time, just one great big now. So the entire concept of beginning and ending do not exist.
Without a creator to create the realms of time and space there would be no realms of time and space.
But in order for the creator to create something, that thing would need to be somewhere and somewhen - or else it simply cannot exist as it would be nowhere and no-when which just arent.
Without a creator to create the creator, there can be no creator.
Every point within an infinite realm is it's center. We may literally be the center of creation.
Our observation collapses the wave function, which "affixes" our reality.
This is why moral relativism creates more chaos in the world; the observers refuse to measure the wave function, thus fail to collapse it. By instilling a society of moral relativism you are disempowering others from their co-creation.
Hi, Procgen. You asked, "Why do you believe in a god?" I believe in God because God has been proven to exist based upon the most reserved view of the known laws of physics. For much more on that, see my below article, which details physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all the forces in physics. The Omega Point cosmology demonstrates that the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) mathematically require that the universe end in the Omega Point: the final cosmological singularity and state of infinite informational capacity having all the unique properties (quiddities) traditionally claimed for God, and of which is a different aspect of the Big Bang initial singularity, i.e., the first cause.
Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals, such as Reports on Progress in Physics (the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional organization for physicists), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (one of the world's leading astrophysics journals), the International Journal of Theoretical Physics (a journal that Nobel Prize in Physics winner Richard Feynman also published in), and Physics Letters, among other journals.
For much more on Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:
James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .
Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.
James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com , July 30, 2013, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo , https://archive.is/a04w9 .
Why do I have to prove my belief to you?
Ambiguous evidence is what makes faith faith..
Do you know any religion based in unambiguous truth?
Do I really have to prove to you the earth exists?
You implied that I questioned whether the Earth exists. I do not.
I simply question whether it is a god. I'd like to hear your reasoning, because I am curious. I don't demand that you provide it.
It's pretty simple. The earth is a mystical being able to create and sustain life.
Can you explain how life originated on earth?
Via abiogenesis. It makes the most sense to me of all explanations I've encountered.
I rather like this quote from John von Neumann:
“Anybody who looks at living organisms knows perfectly well that they can produce other organisms like themselves. This is their normal function, they wouldn't exist if they didn't do this, and it's not plausible that this is the reason why they abound in the world. In other words, living organisms are very complicated aggregations of elementary parts, and by any reasonable theory of probability or thermodynamics highly improbable. That they should occur in the world at all is a miracle of the first magnitude; the only thing which removes, or mitigates, this miracle is that they reproduce themselves. Therefore, if by any peculiar accident there should ever be one of them, from there on the rules of probability do not apply, and there will be many of them, at least if the milieu is reasonable. But a reasonable milieu is already a thermodynamically much less improbable thing. So, the operations of probability somehow leave a loophole at this point, and it is by the process of self-reproduction that they are pierced.”
Yes, but that doesn't explain how the first life originated. It barely answers how, equating it with a miracle...
There are many explanations for how self-reproducing structures can emerge by chance (there are several described in detail here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis). This is still an active field of research, but conceptually it makes perfect sense to me that the earliest proto-organisms would be nothing more than conglomerations of self-reproducing proteins, that is proteins that catalyze their own formation in certain environments. And as von Neumann points out, it only takes one. Over billions of years, in a soup of incalculably many molecules constantly smashing into each other, joining, breaking apart - it really doesn't seem so miraculous.
Abiogenesis has never been observed by any scientist in all of human history. Isn't that interesting?
Adaptation over time exists, but abiogenesis is a hypothesis with no scientific observation behind it.
Do you really think life just popped up out of nowhere? If you believe in evolution, you recognize that every cell in existence is a copy of a previous cell. It does not answer the question where the first cells came from. Do you figure life somehow evolved from non-life?
It hasn't been observed because it takes billions of years and an enormous environment to occur. We can, in fact, simulate some of those early conditions and form what might have been the earliest self-replicating structures in a lab. I think that the first cells were created by chance, yes - from self-replicating proteins that arose from random chemical reactions.
If you believe in evolution, you recognize that every cell in existence is a copy of a previous cell. It does not answer the question where the first cells came from. Do you figure life somehow evolved from non-life?
How could change happen if every cell was a direct copy? Mutations absolutely occur within cells, even with asexual reproduction.
theyve become the old world order ... not sure when it happened but the script has flipped .. the false narrative they created has become real ..
q is not real also
not sure when it happened but the script has flipped
q is not real also
Gee, I wonder if the two have anything to do with each other.
The negative of having great awakening banned.. now they're all gonna come back here.
Youre getting your talking points mixed up, LOL.
I thought the narrative is that it’s just water vapor, not smoke?
There is no smoking smoke. smoking is to smoke that which can be smoked and then it is turned into smoke.
Smoke doesn't even look like a real word after typing that out... lol
What is wrong with moral relativism?
Straight from wiki: "moral relativists believe not only that people disagree about moral issues, but that terms such as "good", "bad", "right" and "wrong" do not stand subject to universal truth conditions at all; rather, they are relative to the traditions, convictions, or practices of an individual or a group of people."
Moral relativism is the ideology/belief that there is no "Truth" merely that what you believe is "true to you."
Hence since everything is just a belief (because there is no "Truth") no one belief is greater than another. Essentially that all belief is not only arbitrary but that it is not fixed to any underlying reality.
The social implications are a culture of self-centered, nihilistic egos worshipping death.
The opposite is that there is such a thing as Truth and it is our job to align ourselves with it.
The social implications of this are peace, prosperity and life.
Morals are relative, and subjective. But just because there isn't objective good doesn't mean much.
Your mom was still right about sharing your two cookies with a friend. Your church was still right to sends cards and flowers to a dying parishioner. Your grandfather was still right fighting against the Naziis.
That's what I think, and it's the general super majority consensus of western society. So the fact it's relativistic doesn't really mean much.
Relativism means that it is fine to murder, rape or abuse someone, steal their property, enslave them, eat them. Because there is no Truth only opinion.
Relativism means there is no objective reality we exist in, only a subjective reality.
Essentially anti-science, since science is about objective measurements of reality.
Reality is measurable. Morality isn't.
There is hard science, and soft science, but there's also philosophy.
All are valuable in different ways, but don't get them confused with one another.
But you're still back to subjectivity.
Batman jails, but refuses to kill The Joker. The Joker escapes and kills 1,000. Was Batman immoral because he didn't kill?
Batman was moral because he didn't murder The Joker. Killing The Joker would be fine.
(I have no clue about this scenario in the Batman fiction, so I'm just using your labels for the participants.)
You would find that question trivial were you to be at the mercy of an actual satanist.
Looks like you just needed a night to cool down. Great post brother.
A challenge confronting deep state is its need for secrecy prior to the job. This limits their getting adequate technical/expert advice from outside the occult clique.
Another weakness, the organization appears to source personnel based on nepotism / spiritual orientation instead of personal stability and technical proficiency.
Combined with “fog of battle” these ops are usually riddled with revealing errors, mishaps, forensics.
One day, a team of mechanics is going to get stuck in an elevator or accidentally locked inside a parking garage during a job and trying to get a cellphone signal to call for assistance.
Facial-recognition software will make the recurring use of govt employees and contractors dangerous. How many jobs can an actor or mechanic be recycled for without being captured on video ?
The enslavers tremble with fear, soon our stars align..... The forbidden gates begin to open by the power of our forceful sign.
Have a great day! God loves you!
...and you're a poor ambassador of His love.
Republican Christians trust in their guns, politicians and in their secret superior righteousness. Some will trust in chariots and some will trust in horses.
" ... satanists and cannibals who run Reddit"
literally unhinged crazy talk.
You must not know about Spez and r/cannibalism, I guess. Or maybe you do!
For the developing Cult of Q's sake, I hope it isn't a LARP.
Censorship is definitely ramping up. It does not necessarily mean the bad guys are losing. It could mean the opposite.
Who makes 2,170 rather complicated posts over a year's time for a laugh? If not for a laugh, what else could the motive be? Q mostly encourages us to learn and do independent research into Swamp topics. So the swamp isn't running Q. It just doesn't seem very likely that there is somebody doing this as a LARP. They would have to be enthused about draining the Swamp.
You're right. It's much more likely he's a deep state mole taking down satellite arrays and then shit-posting about it on 4/8chan.
I mean, a guy once reached max level in WoW without joining the Horde or Alliance by picking flowers for 8000 hours. He did it for way less attention than Q.
Who makes 2,170 rather complicated posts over a year's time for a laugh? If not for a laugh, what else could the motive be?
Government intelligence agencies running pacification and demoralization psy ops on their own population.
So the swamp isn't running Q. It just doesn't seem very likely that there is somebody doing this as a LARP. They would have to be enthused about draining the Swamp.
You refuse to even contemplate the idea that the Swamp might be running Q.
That is why I think Q is a psy op. It been very effective.
Q was designed to pacify, distract and discredit the MAGA movement.
It is clear they are losing. They seem to just call everything a shill instead of having a real conversation. Only one opinion is allowed.
They are losing big time.
That happened on GA all the time. Anything but enthusiastic support was called shilling.
The point of creating and shutting down Alex Jones and Q is to be able to create a nanny state. “See, look we got rid of the bad information. We will supply you with good information.” But ya the great awakening was a toxic cesspool of nationalists and baby boomers wielding some of the strongest confirmation bias I’ve ever seen to make everything fit into their special agenda. Shutting it down under the guise of it being violent/racist/violating Reddit’s terms of service is warranted (i don’t support this but no one is overstepping there). But that doesn’t mean Q is right. It just means the door is now open for the state to decide what media (and message boards now seem to be media) should be allowed to be digested by the populace. Arguing a victim complex and acting like their wasn’t disgusting and violent posts regularly in that sub is absolutely ridiculous though. While some were jokes (which is prevalent through all of internet culture, politics even aside), some seemed much more serious. This absolutely exists in leftist subs as well. That’s the point. Q isn’t special, but a group of fervent nationalists who think the entire Democratic Party eats babies and need to defeated by any means necessary is definitely the lowest hanging fruit to begin the censorship. The next banout will more than likely start banning leftist, foreign, fringe science, and new age subs as well as the right. There’s also been a lot of violent comments in this sub, so maybe cool it with that and the whole blaming entire groups of people for the actions of one person (and maybe start naming those people). The end game seems to be to make reddit just an upvote of a cute picture like fb and end the discourse. There’s no good guys and bad guys when everyone is playing different games to begin with.
I halfway agree with this, so I'll say no more.
Positive thinking is what's going to take down corrupt governments, shadow agencies, and globalist agendas? Seriously?
When we are in FEMA camps we will know the globalists have won. Are we in FEMA camps? No? Then there is still a fighting chance
Bad guys are losing, and losing badly. Their fuse is running short. Their impotent anger, like a baby's temper tantrum, in their failure to achieve universal evil and sexual abuse, is what we need to be concerned about
It's amazing how accurately this seems to be describing Trump
How, exactly, is Trump losing? He's not. It's the fact that he's not, in fact, that is causing this desperate panicked ramping up of censorship and the influx of hateful shills to multiple subreddits that dare to push back against the fascist social media companies.
Not to mention denuclearization of NK and bringing back POW remains. Nothing to see here folks! Move along!
You're wrong. They are lashing out at a perceived threat with these bans. They're afraid.
no they are not, the only people being persecuted are low tier pedos and rappist in Hollywood, most of then are free now and the fat jew will be too, sorry. i don't like it, but to pretend that they are losing is just ridiculous.
I think there's a lot happening that we don't see. Trump would already be out of office if we were losing. I don't fall for the MSM propaganda.
I think there's a lot happening that we don't see
who is falling for an unproven narrative?
that you don't know and can't know what is happening but still, you believe that "your side" is winning.
this was sold to you here
Well, my President is doing a great job of keeping his campaign promises so far, all the while calling out the Lügenpresse for us to mock for their blatant shilling.
It feels pretty good watching the world change as a result of the Greatest Awakening.
Did you see this hilarious article?
He's your president too, assuming you're a citizen of the United States.
well sis, find someone who is eating this collusion shit, cause i am not...
Nah, you sounded all hard lefty so I took a jab to see if it hurt your feelings like it always does with them but it didn't stick.
Whatever, carry on.
Thanks for weighing in from the delusional spectrum! Always good to hear one of those voices, LOL.
HHMMM...Lets see if AJ has anything to say about this...
An orchestrated event is in the cards, almost surely. Perhaps it will be stopped, as many have been already.
Spoken like a true sheep who has probably never visited GA.
It's all a troll, and people fell for it.
Didn't know being a Satanist was a bad thing. They do more good than any god fearing group imo.
You should read some Kerth Barker or Jay Parker.
Good god you Q followers are toxic. I hope you see how cult-like and hateful you sound.
Not very Christian, that's for sure
That's an extremely judgmental comment to make on numerous fronts! Toxic, in fact!
693k
Subscribers
4.3k
Online
**The conspiracy subreddit is a thinking ground. Above all else, we respect everyone's opinions and ALL religious beliefs and creeds. We hope to challenge issues which have captured the public’s imagination, from JFK and UFOs to 9/11. This is a forum for free thinking, not hate speech. Respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind.** **Our intentions are aimed towards a fairer, more transparent world and a better future for everyone.**