Furries: Working on Friday's Furry Friday post, would love to hear about experiences you've had with the law. Boozy@lawyersandliquor.com
-
-
Site you linked me to, supporting the furry, states
@tailpoof admitted to contact with the minor. -
She admitted to contact with the minor over the Internet as part of the plea bargain. We are required to state that now or the Arizona >
-
> probation department threatens to throw her back in jail for "publicly lying about her conviction." These people don't play nice.
-
Pleading guilty to any charge has that effect. I'd have to see the actual transcripts and file to form an opinion.
-
The sentencing hearing was recorded and as such the court won't provide transcripts. The recording was posted, but idk if it's still up.
-
The brash nature of the hearing and the judges attitude towards Sisk was enough to warrant the vast amount of support we received.
-
I can try to dig up the recording later. It looks like it was taken down after the fundraiser closed. I'll need to talk with the video owner
-
We appreciate the review but given the recent target attacks against Sisk, we are no longer hosting the hearing video publicly.
#SaveOurSisk - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
...child porn of herself and kept insisting that she was forced to do so by
@Tailpoof. A 5 year investigation formed and closed after... -
...no evidence of these claims was found. The investigation was only reopened after the 15-year-olds father claimed to have nude photos...
-
Looking at the website, it appears the girl was charged but not tried, and the DA produced nudes of Sisk that were sent to the girl?
-
Again, they weren't proven to be nudes of Sisk, but we're required to say that they are or Sisk gets in trouble with probation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.