Apparently saying that involving kids in the fandom isnt ok. Go fuck yourself, @BoozyBadger.pic.twitter.com/O2lfIFCLk0
Boozy doesn't really see where emphasizing sexual preference to pre pubescent children is a problem. Pretty troubling.pic.twitter.com/KWliBowVRS
-
-
Contraty to what people think, kids understand in the most basic of terms, though if a kid saw the rainbow they would only think it's a rainbow and that may the the intent in the first place.
-
Kids need to be sheltered, and I don't see this con doing a very good job at doing this.
-
I don't fully agree, I feel kids need to be exposed to all kinds of experiences. Though I don't agree with say showing a five year old a dick. Some cons are better at keeping things under control than others.
-
That's the problem, isn't it? From what I'm reading from Boozy, this event looks like it was set up to "expose" kids to "experiences."
-
I doubt it actually is. From the title either isn't him actually reading bedtime stories for kids or it is an adult panel meant for adults. I think you all forget he is a father himself and I doubt he would expose other children to content he wouldn't be willing to show his kids.
-
I'm talking about the comments above and the con itself, not that "story time" in particular (and that's what the panel should have been named in the first place, btw).
-
It's that specific con's responsibility to keep security up enough to enforce rules and not be afraid to enforce them. If they don't then the con WILL fail because that is what ultimately killed Rainfurest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When i was kid a rainbow was just a rainbow, without meaning
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.